Abstract
It has been observed that the geometry of a brush seal has a significant effect on the sealing performance. However, the relationship between rotordynamic coefficients and geometry factors of the brush seal itself are rarely considered. In this article, the rotordynamic coefficients of a typical single-stage brush seal for different geometries and operating conditions were numerically analyzed using CFD RANS solutions coupled with a non-Darcian porous medium model. The reaction force which plays an essential role in rotordynamic coefficients was obtained by integrating the dynamic pressure distribution. The influence of the bristle pack thickness, fence height, clearance size and other working condition parameters on aerodynamic force, stiffness coefficients, and damping coefficients of brush seal were presented and compared. In addition, the effects of various geometric configurations on pressure and flow features were also discussed.
Funding statement: Funding: The research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11272100).
Nomenclature
- ω
rotational speed, r/min
- Ω
whirl velocity, r/min
- e
eccentricity, mm
- hfh
frence height, mm
- hbf
free bristle height, mm
- tb
thickness of bristle pack, mm
- cr
clearance, mm
- d
bristle diameter, mm
- Ai
viscous resistance tensors, m–2
- Bi
inertial resistance tensors, m–1
- ε
porosity of bristle pack
- n
bristle pack density, bristles/m
- p
pressure, Pa
- ΔP
pressure differential
- Rp
pressure ratio = pu / pd
- ui
velocity, m/s
- xi
coordinate direction, m
- μ
molecular viscosity, Pa.s
- ρ
density of fluid, Kg/m3
- K
direct stiffness, N/m
- k
cross-coupled stiffness, N/m
- C
direct damping, N·s/m
- c
cross-coupled damping, N·s/m
References
1. Short JF, Basu P, Datta A, Loewenthal RG, Prior RJ. Advanced brush seal development, Proceedings of the 32nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE/Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Lake Buena Vista, USA, Paper No. AIAA 96-2907, July 1–3, 1996.10.2514/6.1996-2907Search in Google Scholar
2. Chupp RE, Hendricks RC, Lattime SB, Steinetz BM. Sealing in turbomachinery. J Propul Power 2006;22:313–49.10.2514/1.17778Search in Google Scholar
3. Flitney R. Seals and sealing handbook, 5th ed. Oxford: Elsevier, 2007.Search in Google Scholar
4. Aksit MF, Tichy JA. Wear of brush seals: background and new modeling approach. Tribol Trans 1998;41:368–74.10.1080/10402009808983760Search in Google Scholar
5. Crudgington PF, Bowsher A. Brush seal pack hysteresis, Proceedings of the 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Indianapolis, USA, Paper No. AIAA 2002-3794, July 7–10, 2002.10.2514/6.2002-3794Search in Google Scholar
6. Basu P, Datta A, Loewenthal R, Short J, Johnson R. Hysteresis and bristle stiffening effects in brush seals. J Propul Power 1994;10:569–75.10.2514/6.1993-1996Search in Google Scholar
7. Franceschini G, Jones TV. Improved understanding of blow-down in filament seals. J Turbomach 2010;132:041004-1–10.10.1115/GT2008-51197Search in Google Scholar
8. Braun MJ, Yang Y, Hendricks RC. Effects of brush seal morphology on leakage and pressure drops, Proceedings of the 27th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Sacramento, CA, Paper No. 91-2106, June 24–26, 1991.10.2514/6.1991-2106Search in Google Scholar
9. Dogu Y, Aksit MF. Effects of geometry on brush seal pressure and flow fields-I: front plate configurations. J Turbomach 2006;128:367–78.10.1115/1.2101857Search in Google Scholar
10. Dogu Y, Aksit MF. Effects of geometry on brush seal pressure and flow fields II: backing plate configurations. J Turbomach 2006;128:379–89.10.1115/1.2101858Search in Google Scholar
11. Dogu Y, Akist MF, Demiroglu M, Dinc OS. Evaluation of flow behavior for clearance brush seals. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2008;130:012507-1–9.10.1115/1.2770479Search in Google Scholar
12. Dowell EH. Aeroelasticity of plates and shells. Groningen, Netherlands: Noordhoff International Publishing, 1975.Search in Google Scholar
13. Dowell EH. A modern course in aeroelastisity, 5th ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-09453-3Search in Google Scholar
14. Conner KJ, Childs DW. Rotordynamic coefficient test results for a four-stage brush seal. J Propul Power 1993;9:462–65.10.2514/3.23644Search in Google Scholar
15. Delgado A, Andrés LS. Identification of structural stiffness and damping coefficients of a shoed-brush. J Vib Acoust 2007;129:648–55.10.1115/DETC2005-84159Search in Google Scholar
16. Andrés LS, Baker J, Delgado A. Rotordynamic force coefficients of a hybrid brush seal: measurements and predictions. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2010;132:042503-1–7.10.1115/1.3159377Search in Google Scholar
17. Pugachev AO, Deckner M. CFD prediction and test results of stiffness and damping coefficients for brush-labyrinth gas seals, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2010: Power for Land, Sea and Air, Glasgow, UK, Paper No. GT2010-22667, June 14–18, 2010.10.1115/GT2010-22667Search in Google Scholar
18. Pugachev AO, Deckner M. Experimental and theoretical rotordynamic stiffness coefficients for a three-stage brush seal. Mech Syst Sig Process 2012;31:143–54.10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.03.015Search in Google Scholar
19. Gaszner M, Pugachev AO, Georgakis C, Cooper P. Leakage and rotordynamic coefficients of brush seals with zero cold clearance used in an arrangement with labyrinth fins. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 2013;135:122506-1–11.10.1115/GT2013-94342Search in Google Scholar
20. Athavale M, Przekwas A, Hendricks R. A finite volume numerical method to calculate fluid forces and rotordynamic coefficients in seals, Proceedings of the 28th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Nashville, USA, Paper No. 92-3712, July 6–8, 1992.10.2514/6.1992-3712Search in Google Scholar
21. Rao JS, Saravanokumar M. Numerical simulation of seal flow and determination of stiffness and damping coefficient, Proceedings of the 7th IFToMM International Conference on Rotor Dynamics, Vienna, Austria, pp. 25–28, September 25–28, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
22. Holle GF, Chupp RE, Dowler CA. Brush seal leakage correlations based on effective thickness, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery (ISROMAC-4), Honolulu, USA, pp. 296–304, April 5–8, 1992.Search in Google Scholar
23. Bayley FJ, Long CA. A combined experimental and theoretical study of flow and pressure distribution in a brush seal. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 1993;115:404–10.10.1115/92-GT-355Search in Google Scholar
24. Chew JW, Lapworth BL, Millener PJ. Mathematical modeling of brush seals. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 1995;16:493–500.10.1016/0142-727X(95)00061-TSearch in Google Scholar
25. Li J, Obi S, Feng Z. The effects of clearance sizes on labyrinth brush seal leakage performance using a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solver and non-Darcian porous medium model. Proc IMechE, Part A J Power Energy 2009;223:953–64.10.1243/09576509JPE772Search in Google Scholar
26. Celik I, Karatekin O. Numerical experiments on application of Richardson extrapolation with nonuniform grids. J Fluids Eng 1997;119:584–90.10.1115/1.2819284Search in Google Scholar
27. Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng 2008;130:078001-1–4.10.1115/1.2960953Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Study of Decay Characteristics of Hexagonal and Square Supersonic Jet
- Investigation on the Film Cooling Performance of Diffuser Shaped Holes with Different Inclination Angles
- Model-based Acceleration Control of Turbofan Engines with a Hammerstein-Wiener Representation
- Fatigue Life Prediction of Low Pressure Turbine Shaft of Turbojet Engine
- Influence of Geometry on Rotordynamic Coefficients of Brush Seal
- Numerical Investigation of Transient Flow in a Prototype Centrifugal Pump during Startup Period
- Thrust Performance Evaluation of a Turbofan Engine Based on Exergetic Approach and Thrust Management in Aircraft
- Real-time Simulation of Turboprop Engine Control System
- Ignition Study on a Rotary-valved Air-breathing Pulse Detonation Engine
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Study of Decay Characteristics of Hexagonal and Square Supersonic Jet
- Investigation on the Film Cooling Performance of Diffuser Shaped Holes with Different Inclination Angles
- Model-based Acceleration Control of Turbofan Engines with a Hammerstein-Wiener Representation
- Fatigue Life Prediction of Low Pressure Turbine Shaft of Turbojet Engine
- Influence of Geometry on Rotordynamic Coefficients of Brush Seal
- Numerical Investigation of Transient Flow in a Prototype Centrifugal Pump during Startup Period
- Thrust Performance Evaluation of a Turbofan Engine Based on Exergetic Approach and Thrust Management in Aircraft
- Real-time Simulation of Turboprop Engine Control System
- Ignition Study on a Rotary-valved Air-breathing Pulse Detonation Engine