Home Technology Numerical Investigation of a Model Scramjet Combustor Using DDES
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Numerical Investigation of a Model Scramjet Combustor Using DDES

  • Junsu Shin and Hong-Gye Sung EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 30, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Non-reactive flows moving through a model scramjet were investigated using a delayed detached eddy simulation (DDES), which is a hybrid scheme combining Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes scheme and a large eddy simulation. The three dimensional Navier-Stokes equations were solved numerically on a structural grid using finite volume methods. An in-house was developed. This code used a monotonic upstream-centered scheme for conservation laws (MUSCL) with an advection upstream splitting method by pressure weight function (AUSMPW+) for space. In addition, a 4th order Runge-Kutta scheme was used with preconditioning for time integration. The geometries and boundary conditions of a scramjet combustor operated by DLR, a German aerospace center, were considered. The profiles of the lower wall pressure and axial velocity obtained from a time-averaged solution were compared with experimental results. Also, the mixing efficiency and total pressure recovery factor were provided in order to inspect the performance of the combustor.

Acknowledgements

This study was written based on a presentation paper given at APCATS 2015.

Nomenclature

Dk

turbulent kinetic energy destruction term

E

specific total energy

h

specific enthalpy

k

turbulent kinetic energy

l

length scale

Mt

turbulent Mach number

p

static pressure

pt

total pressure

qj

specific heat flux

t

time

T

temperature

u

velocity

x

spatial coordinate

Y

species mass fraction

δij

kronecker delta

μ

molecular viscosity

μt

turbulent viscosity

ρ

density

τij

viscous stress tensor

φ

equivalence ratio

ω

turbulent frequency

References

1. Gieseking DA, Choi JI, Edwards JR, Hassan HA. Compressible-flow simulation using a new large-eddy simulation/reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes model. AIAA J 2011;49:2194–209.10.2514/1.J051001Search in Google Scholar

2. Spalart PR, Jou WH, Strelets MK, Allmaras SR. “Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach”, 1st AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, 4–8 August 1997, Ruston, LA.Search in Google Scholar

3. Spalart PR, Deck S, Shur ML, Squires KD, Strelets MK, Travin AK. A new version of detached-eddy simulation, resistant to ambiguous grid densities. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn 2006;20:181–95.10.1007/s00162-006-0015-0Search in Google Scholar

4. Shur ML, Spalart PR, Strelets MK, Travin AK. A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modeled LES capabilities. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 2008;29:1638–49.10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2008.07.001Search in Google Scholar

5. Guerra R, Waidmann W, Laible C. “An Experimental Investigation of the Combustion of a Hydrogen Jet Injected Parallel in a Supersonic Air Stream”, AIAA–91–5102.Search in Google Scholar

6. Oevermann M. Numerical investigation of turbulent hydrogen combustion in a SCRAMJET using flamelet modeling. Aerosp Sci Technol 2000;5:463–80.10.1016/S1270-9638(00)01070-1Search in Google Scholar

7. Gao Z, Wang J, Jiang C, Lee C. Application and theoretical analysis of the flamelet model for supersonic turbulent combustion flows in the scramjet engine. Combust Theor Model 2014;18:652–91.10.1080/13647830.2014.962617Search in Google Scholar

8. Niu D, Hou L. Comparison study on different compressibility modifications of turbulence model in supersonic combustion simulation. Adv Mech Eng 2014;6, Article ID:238250:9 pages.10.1155/2014/238250Search in Google Scholar

9. Fureby C, Fedina E, TegnerJ. A computational study of supersonic combustion behind a wedge-shaped flameholder. Shock Waves 2014;24:41–50.10.1007/s00193-013-0459-2Search in Google Scholar

10. Genin F, Menon S. Simulation of turbulent mixing behind a strut injector in supersonic flow. AIAA J 2010;48:526–39.10.2514/6.2009-132Search in Google Scholar

11. Potturi AS, Edwards JR. Hybrid large-Eddy/Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of flow through a model Scramjet. AIAA J 2014;52:1417–29.10.2514/1.J052595Search in Google Scholar

12. Yeom HW, Seo BG, Sung HG. Numerical analysis of a Scramjet engine with intake sidewalls and cavity flameholder. AIAA J 2013;51:1566–75.10.2514/1.J051677Search in Google Scholar

13. Yeom HW, Sung HG, Yang V. A numerical analysis of supersonic intake buzz in an axisymmetric ramjet engine. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 2015;16:165–76.10.5139/IJASS.2015.16.2.165Search in Google Scholar

14. Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 1994;32:1598–605.10.2514/3.12149Search in Google Scholar

15. Sarkar S, Erlebacher G, Hussaini MY, Kreiss HO. Analysis and Modeling of Dilatational Terms in Compressible Turbulence. J Fluid Mech 1991;227:473–93.10.1017/S0022112091000204Search in Google Scholar

16. Sung HG, Kim SJ, Yeom HW, Heo JY. On the assessment of compressibility effects of wo-Equation turbulence models for supersonic transition flow with flow separation. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 2013;14:387–97.10.5139/IJASS.2013.14.4.387Search in Google Scholar

17. Kim KH, Kim CA, Rho OH. Methods for the accurate computations of hypersonic flows I. AUSMPW+ Scheme. J Comput Phys 2001;174:38–80.10.1006/jcph.2001.6873Search in Google Scholar

18. Peterson DM, Tylczaky EB, Candler GV. “Hybrid Reynolds-Averaged and Large-Eddy Simulation of Scramjet Fuel Injection”, AIAA–2011–2344.10.2514/6.2011-2344Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-10-29
Accepted: 2015-11-24
Published Online: 2016-1-30
Published in Print: 2017-4-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2015-0056/html
Scroll to top button