Home Investigation of HP Turbine Blade Failure in a Military Turbofan Engine
Article Publicly Available

Investigation of HP Turbine Blade Failure in a Military Turbofan Engine

  • R. K. Mishra EMAIL logo , Johny Thomas , K. Srinivasan , Vaishakhi Nandi and R. Raghavendra Bhatt
Published/Copyright: September 15, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Failure of a high pressure (HP) turbine blade in a military turbofan engine is investigated to determine the root cause of failure. Forensic and metallurgical investigations are carried out on the affected blades. The loss of coating and the presence of heavily oxidized intergranular fracture features including substrate material aging and airfoil curling in the trailing edge of a representative blade indicate that the coating is not providing adequate oxidation protection and the blade material substrate is not suitable for the application at hand. Coating spallation followed by substrate oxidation and aging leading to intergranular cracking and localized trailing edge curling is the root cause of the blade failure. The remaining portion of the blade fracture surface showed ductile overload features in the final failure. The damage observed in downstream components is due to secondary effects.

PACS: 62.20.mq

Introduction

Low bypass turbofan engines are used worldwide for fighter aircraft. The nature of their application leads them to operate at extreme conditions and often unscheduled during training and combat modes. Rapid throttle excursions under arduous environmental conditions and “g” load variations during different manoeuvres cause high cyclic stresses on engine components and unusual demands on engine accessories [1]. Also, the engines often operate at maximum stress conditions for considerable time to meet the mission requirements. As a result, premature failure of engine components and turbine blades in particular can take place. This causes non-availability of aircrafts and affects the flight management. Therefore an in-depth understanding the engine component failures is required for ensuring the airworthiness of the engines.

In jet engines nearly 50% of the failures are caused by damage to turbine blades and discs. Turbine blades generally fail because of creep, oxidation, low-cycle fatigue (LCF) and high-cycle fatigue (HCF). Fatigue failures account for about 50% of all component damage in jet engines [2, 3]. The HCF is responsible for nearly half of all these failures while LCF and all other modes of fatigue lead to the remainder of fatigue failures in almost equal proportions. Contributing factors for HCF failure include environmental conditions, corrosion and cyclic loads and delayed starting cycle [47]. Mechanical vibration arising from rotor imbalance and rubbing on casings, aerodynamic excitation due to nozzle guide vanes, and the presence of downstream struts and blades of other stages that can contribute to HCF in engines. Aeromechanical instability in blades in association with flutter and acoustic fatigue of engine sheet metal components can also contribute to HCF in gas turbine engines [8].

Foreign object damage (FOD) due to entry of outside debris or impact by any internal object debris leading to domestic object damage (DOD) inside the engine may be caused by defects in the raw material, improper material selection, inappropriate design, incorrect processing and improper maintenance etc. that can also result in engine blade failures or blade failures [9]. The engine spools often operate at high pressures and high rotational speeds and failure of turbine blades may become catastrophic and may rupture the engine casing and sometimes even the aircraft fuselage.

This paper presents the details of a study carried out to investigate the root cause of failure of a high pressure (HP) turbine blade in a military turbofan engine during service. The paper presents the details of fracture analysis and metallurgical assessment of the failed to arrive at some concrete conclusions.

Engine configuration

The subject engine is a low bypass turbofan engine with afterburner. It is a twin spool engine possessing 40 kN thrust with multi-stage axial fan and compressor, each driven separately by a turbine stage. The engine possesses an annular type combustion system with air-blast atomizers. A schematic layout of the engine is shown in Figure 1. The high pressure (HP) compressor comprises of machined discs that are welded together to form a drum assembly into which rotor blades are keyed and locked in position by retaining plates. The HP compressor drum is bolted to the HP turbine rotor shaft by a curvic coupling which locates the drum and the shaft and transmits the turbine drive. The compressor stator assembly consists of a series of vanes that are welded onto the outer platform to form a ring behind each row of rotor blades in each stage. At the rear of the combustor, the high pressure nozzle guide vanes (NGV) are positioned which is air cooled with air bleed from the compressor exit. The HP turbine rotor assembly comprises a disc, blades, rotor shaft and a stub shaft. The HP turbine blades are forged and air-cooled that are keyed to the disc using the fir-tree root configuration. The HP turbine blade also possesses an aluminide coating. The other modules of the engine include low pressure (LP) nozzle guide vanes, LP turbine rotor disc and shaft coupled to the fan, rotor support system, exhaust mixer and cone, afterburner system, gear box and accessories.

Figure 1: Configuration of the Military Turbofan Engine under study.
Figure 1:

Configuration of the Military Turbofan Engine under study.

Investigation of the failure

Damage was noticed in the HP turbine blades during post-flight inspection of the engine. The engine was withdrawn from the aircraft for detail investigation. The rotor spool rotation was not smooth. This suggested that the rotor had either suffered distortion or other damage during service such as the rubbing of the blades on the casing, entanglement of objects in the rotor blades or a bearing failure. To find out the root cause of the problem, the engine was subjected to teardown examination without any ground run or a confirmation test.

Teardown examination

The conditions of the HP and LP compressor assemblies were checked and no abnormalities were found except for carbon deposits. Parts were found to be intact and balanced. Combustion chamber liner and casings were found to possess no cracks. The liner front end revealed the presence of carbon deposits around the atomizers. The HP nozzle guide vane platforms were found to be chipped-off at the tips. The vanes were eroded and contained cracks. One HP turbine rotor blade was found broken approximately at mid- airfoil height as shown in Figure 2. The broken piece of the blade airfoil could not be located. Whitish discoloration, indicative of blade erosion, was noticed on the aerofoil sections of other blades of the HP turbine an example of which is also shown in Figure 2. Impact damage was noticed on LP turbine nozzle guide vanes where trailing edge airfoil chipping had occurred in one of the LP turbine rotor blades as shown in Figure 3.The condition of fuel and oil systems were found to be satisfactory. Magnetic Chip Detectors (MCD) were also checked and found to be satisfactory. Oil sample from the engine was sent for laboratory examination.

Figure 2: The failed HP Turbine blade (left) and whitish discoloration of the blades (right).
Figure 2:

The failed HP Turbine blade (left) and whitish discoloration of the blades (right).

Figure 3: Impact damage suffered by the NGV (left) and a damaged rotor blade (right) in the LP turbine.
Figure 3:

Impact damage suffered by the NGV (left) and a damaged rotor blade (right) in the LP turbine.

Forensic examination

A systematic approach was followed to establish the root cause of the blade failure. The following checks were carried out to collate information about the engine history and the incident [10].

  1. The history of the components and life consumed, maintenance and operational records etc. for the said engine were reviewed. These revealed no abnormalities.

  2. The engine had logged nearly 90% of its time between overhaul (TBO) life.

  3. Study of the engine sorties prior to this failure and analysis of the flight data recorder failed to reveal any engine operating parameter beyond the prescribed operating limits.

Forensic examination failed to reveal any abnormality that might be responsible to the HP blade failure.

Visual observations

A photograph of the broken HP turbine blade is shown in Figure 4. The close-up view of the fracture surface is shown in Figure 5. The blade had broken in the mid-aerofoil section. Two different views of the fractured blade are shown in Figure 6. Noticeable trailing edge deformation in the vicinity of the fracture surface is quite evident. This fractured blade is identified as “HPTB-1”.

Figure 4: Fractured HP turbine blade HPTB-1.
Figure 4:

Fractured HP turbine blade HPTB-1.

Figure 5: Close view of the fracture surface of HPTB-1.
Figure 5:

Close view of the fracture surface of HPTB-1.

Figure 6: Two different views of the fractured blade HPTB-1. Deformation noticed in the trailing edge in the vicinity of the fracture surface.
Figure 6:

Two different views of the fractured blade HPTB-1. Deformation noticed in the trailing edge in the vicinity of the fracture surface.

Two different views of another HP Turbine blade, identified as “HPTB-2”, are shown in Figure 7. The HPTB-2 blade reveals the presence of a major trailing edge crack in addition to the trailing edge deformation similar to that observed in the case of HPTR-1 blade. Other smaller cracks were also observed in the deformed trailing edge region of this blade. Another HP turbine blade, identified as “HPTB-3” is shown in Figure 8. Cracks were observed in the leading edge region of this blade along with some coating erosion marks in the trailing edge region. Physical damage was also noticed on the surface of the blade HPTB-3 as shown in Figure 8. Photographs showing different views of a fourth HP turbine blade, identified as “HPTB-4” are presented in Figure 9. This blade appears to be in a better condition without significant damage such as cracking or severe coating erosion marks.

Figure 7: Two different views of another HP Turbine blade identified as “HPTB-2”. Deformation in the blade material the trailing edge region and the presence of cracks in blade trailing edge.
Figure 7:

Two different views of another HP Turbine blade identified as “HPTB-2”. Deformation in the blade material the trailing edge region and the presence of cracks in blade trailing edge.

Figure 8: Cracks along the leading edge of the blade HPTB-3 (left) and physical damage in trailing edge region of HPTB-3 (right).
Figure 8:

Cracks along the leading edge of the blade HPTB-3 (left) and physical damage in trailing edge region of HPTB-3 (right).

Figure 9: Macrograph showing relatively undamaged blade HPTB-4 considered as the reference blade in the study.
Figure 9:

Macrograph showing relatively undamaged blade HPTB-4 considered as the reference blade in the study.

Chemical analysis

The chemistry of the HP and LP turbine blades was carried out using spectrometric techniques. The chemistry of the samples conformed to the specifications of Nimonic 108 and Nimonic 115 respectively for the HP and LP turbine blades. The turbine vanes and platforms were also found to conform to their original material specifications.

Fractographic analysis

Severe discoloration of the fracture surface of blade HPTB-1 was observed. At the macroscopic level, the failure mode of the blade could not be identified. Hence, the fracture surface of the blade HPTB-1 was examined using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Thick high temperature oxides were present on the fracture surface of the blade and this was obscuring the view of the majority of the fracture features lying underneath. The fracture surface of the blade was cleaned repeatedly using a replica stripping technique followed by ultrasonic cleaning in an attempt to remove the oxide products. After repeated steps of stripping and cleaning, the fracture surface was again examined under the SEM. The SEM images of the fracture surface in the trailing edge region of the blade are shown in Figure 10(a) and 10(b) whereas an image in the leading edge of the blade is shown Figure 10(c) for comparison. The high magnification SEM analysis revealed the presence of a heavily oxidized intergranular fracture including extensive intergranular cracking in the trailing edge region of the blade as shown in Figures 11 and 12.

Figure 10: (a) SEM images of fracture surface of the blade HPTB-1 captured towards its trailing edge region showing intergranular fracture features. Portion of the blade surface showing intergranular features is encircled. (b) SEM image of the fracture surface of the blade HPTB-1 captured towards its trailing edge. (c) SEM image of the fracture surface of the blade HPTB-1 captured towards its leading edge.
Figure 10:

(a) SEM images of fracture surface of the blade HPTB-1 captured towards its trailing edge region showing intergranular fracture features. Portion of the blade surface showing intergranular features is encircled. (b) SEM image of the fracture surface of the blade HPTB-1 captured towards its trailing edge. (c) SEM image of the fracture surface of the blade HPTB-1 captured towards its leading edge.

Figure 11: High magnification SEM image showing the presence of intergranular fracture features on the fracture surface in HPTB-1 blade towards its trailing edge (Magnification = 1,500X).
Figure 11:

High magnification SEM image showing the presence of intergranular fracture features on the fracture surface in HPTB-1 blade towards its trailing edge (Magnification = 1,500X).

Figure 12: High magnification SEM image showing the presence of intergranular fracture features on the fracture surface of HPTB-1 blade in its trailing edge region (Magnification = 3,150X).
Figure 12:

High magnification SEM image showing the presence of intergranular fracture features on the fracture surface of HPTB-1 blade in its trailing edge region (Magnification = 3,150X).

The intergranular fracture features were limited to the trailing edge region of the blade and this region is encircled in Figure 10(a). At locations beyond this encircled area, the fracture surface of the blade predominantly showed the presence of ductile dimples that are typical of an overload failure, Figure 13. The presence of ductile overload features indicates that the region corresponds to the final or high strain rate failure zone. These observations clearly indicate that the cracking in the HPTB-1 blade originated in the trailing edge region of the blade.

Figure 13: High magnification SEM image showing ductile overload fracture features (dimples) in the final failure zone of the fracture surface of the blade “HPTB-1”.
Figure 13:

High magnification SEM image showing ductile overload fracture features (dimples) in the final failure zone of the fracture surface of the blade “HPTB-1”.

Microstructural examination

Considering that the HPTB-2 blade also exhibited surface trailing edge erosion, cracking and deformation, similar to that observed in the case of the HPTB-1 blade fracture region (Figure 7), metallographic specimens from the deformed and cracked trailing edge regions of the HPTB-2 blade were thus prepared. Metallographic specimens from the HPTB-4 blade from the same airfoil location were also included for microscopic studies for comparison since this blade revealed the least amount of damage from a macroscopic perspective. All sample sections were mounted, polished and etched for microscopic examination [11].

The etched microstructures from the trailing edge regions of the blades HPTB-2 and HPTB-4 are presented in Figures 14 and 15, respectively. The metallographic analysis was carried out as per ASM Handbook [12]. In both cases, the aluminide coating in some regions of the trailing edge regions has completely eroded away or suffered spallation and the remnants of coating in other regions of the trailing edge contain heavily transformed coating diffusion zone. This is indicative of the inability of the coating to withstand the engine operating environment. In the case of HPTB-2 blade, intergranular oxide networks including significant intergranular cracks are also observed close to the trailing edge region where coating has suffered severe degradation, Figure 14. The etched microstructures of both HPTB-4 and HPTB-2 specimens also reveal severe gamma prime coarsening in the form of intragranular mottling, Figures 15 and 16, respectively. The gamma prime coarsening of this magnitude is indicative of severe aging of the substrate and its inability of the blade substrate material to withstand the operating temperatures that the HP turbine section is exposed to during service [13, 14].

Figure 14: Microstructural features in the trailing edge region of HPTB-2 blade in etched condition at different magnifications.
Figure 14:

Microstructural features in the trailing edge region of HPTB-2 blade in etched condition at different magnifications.

Figure 15: Microstructural features in the trailing edge region of the HPTB-4 blade in the etched condition at different magnifications.
Figure 15:

Microstructural features in the trailing edge region of the HPTB-4 blade in the etched condition at different magnifications.

Figure 16: Microstructural features slightly inside the HPTB-2 blade trailing edge region showing coating degradation and intense transgranular mottling.
Figure 16:

Microstructural features slightly inside the HPTB-2 blade trailing edge region showing coating degradation and intense transgranular mottling.

A low magnification montage of the microstructure of the HPTB-2 blade including its cooling cavity is shown in Figure 17. Signs of coating degradation and heavy internal cooling passage oxidation are clearly visible in this micrograph. More importantly, however, the presence of very large and wide intergranular cracks close to the blade external surface and internal cooling passage is indicative of oxidation damage playing a major role in the crack nucleation in this blade. In addition, the curling of the blade aerofoil in the trailing edge region, Figure 7, indicates that the blade substrate is not strong enough from a creep strength perspective to withstand the magnitude of temperatures and stresses that the HP blade is subjected to during service. This coupled with coating spallation and a heavily transformed coating-substrate diffusion zone clearly indicates that the chosen coating system for the blade is not adequate enough to provide the oxidation protection it is supposed to deliver.

Figure 17: A low magnification montages of micrographs of the HPTB-2 blade material at 50X magnification showing wide intergranular cracks.
Figure 17:

A low magnification montages of micrographs of the HPTB-2 blade material at 50X magnification showing wide intergranular cracks.

Conclusions

Based on the analysis carried out on failed blades of the high pressure turbine, the following conclusions can be drawn.

  1. The chemistry of the HP turbine blades conformed to the specifications and failure due to improper material was ruled out [15, 16].

  2. There was no evidence of foreign body ingression or dislocation of any internal parts from any other upstream module, the case of FOD or DOD was also ruled out [9].

  3. The flight data did not show any symptoms of engine surge [15, 17].

  4. The HPTB-1 blade fracture nucleated in the mid-aerofoil trailing edge region. The trailing edge of the fractured surface of this blade revealed the presence of coating spallation, airfoil distortion, heavily oxidized intergranular fracture features including severe intergranular cracking. It exhibited typical symptoms of coating failure followed by extensive oxidation damage including cracking and severe blade material aging during service. The HPTB-2 blade also showed similar degradation features [18, 19].

  5. The coating is not providing adequate oxidation protection and blade substrate material suffers significant over-aging during service. The coating-substrate system used to manufacture the HPT blade is not considered suitable for the engine operating environment [14].

  6. Advanced prognosis and health monitoring systems need to be adopted for forecasting the residual life of turbine blades and discs to improve the reliability of turbines focusing on fracture critical locations to avoid catastrophic failures [20].

References

1. Cowles BA. High cycle fatigue in aircraft gas turbines – an industry perspective. Int J Fract Apr 1996;80:147–63.10.1007/BF00012667Search in Google Scholar

2. Gan L, Huang H-Z, Zhu S-P, Li Y-F, Yang Y. Fatigue reliability analysis of turbine disk alloy using saddle point approximation. Int J Turbo Jet Eng 2013;30:217–29. ISSN (Online) 2191–0332, ISSN (Print) 0334–0082. DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2013-0020, July 2013.Search in Google Scholar

3. Huang H-Z, Gong J, Zuo MJ, Zhu S-P, Liao Q. Fatigue life estimation of an aircraft engine under different load spectrums. Int J Turbo Jet Eng 2012;29:259–67. ISSN (Online) 2191–0332, ISSN (Print) 0334–0082. DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2012-0017, Dec 2012.Search in Google Scholar

4. Poursaeidi E, Aieneravaie M, Mohammadi MR. Failure analysis of a second stage blade in a gas turbine engine. J Eng Fail Anal Dec 2008;15:1111–29.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.11.020Search in Google Scholar

5. Hour J, Wicks BJ, Antoniou RA. An investigation of fatigue failures of turbine blades in a gas turbine engine by mechanical analysis. J Eng Fail Anal Apr 2002;9:201–11.10.1016/S1350-6307(01)00005-XSearch in Google Scholar

6. Suresh S. Fatigue of materials.2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, UK, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

7. Mishra RK, Johney T, Srinivasan K, Vaisakhi N, Raghavendra B. Failure analysis of HP turbine blades in a low bypass turbofan engine. J Fail Anal Prev 2013;13:274–81. DOI: 10.1007/s11668-013-9674-5.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ozaltun H, Seidt J, Herman Shen M-H, George T, Cross C. An Energy-Based Method for Uni-Axial Fatigue Life Calculation, GT2009-59512. Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2009, June 2009, Orlando, Florida, USA.10.1115/GT2009-59512Search in Google Scholar

9. Mishra RK, Srinivasan K, Srivastava DK, Vaisakhi N, Raghavendra B. Impact of foreign object damage on an aero gas turbine engine. J Fail Anal Prev 2015;15:25–32. DOI: 10.1007/s11668-014-9914-3, Dec 2014.Search in Google Scholar

10. Kazempour-Liacy H, Abouali S, Akbari-Garakani M. Failure analysis of a first stage gas turbine blade. J Eng Fail Anal Jan 2011;18:517–22.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.09.040Search in Google Scholar

11. Bannantine JA, Comer JJ, Handrock JL. Fundamental of metal fatigue analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., 1990:40–87.Search in Google Scholar

12. ASM Handbook, 9: Metallography and Microstructure, edited by G F Vander Voort, Dec 2004, ASM International, Ohio, USASearch in Google Scholar

13. Kibsey M, Huang X, Koul A, Hildebrand M. Life Prediction and Metallographical Examination of SAGBO Cracking in RB211 High Pressure Turbine Blades, ASME Turbo Expo 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 11–15, 2012, Paper No. GT2012-68366, pp. 99–105; doi:10.1115/GT2012–68366Search in Google Scholar

14. Bose S. High temperature coatings. Chicago, IL: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

15. Meher-Homji CB, Gabriles G. Gas Turbine Blade failures-Causes, Avoidance and Troubleshooting, Proceedings of 27th Turbomachinery Symposium, Texas A & M University, USA, 1998, 129–179.Search in Google Scholar

16. Mehdi TN, et al. Failure Analysis of Gas Turbine blades, Proceedings of the 2008 IAJC-IJME International Conference, 17–18 Nov 2008, Nashville, TN, USA, ISBN 978-1-60643-379–9.Search in Google Scholar

17. Cohen H, Rogers GFC, Saravanamuttoo HIH. Gas turbine theory. 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons. Dorling Kinderslay (India) Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, licensees of Pearson Education in South Asia.Search in Google Scholar

18. Eliaz N, Shemesh G, Latanision RM. Hot corrosion in gas turbine components. J Eng Fail Anal Feb 2002;9:31–43.10.1016/S1350-6307(00)00035-2Search in Google Scholar

19. Ejaz N, Qureshi IN, Rizvi SA. Creep failure of low pressure turbine blade of an aircraft engine. J Eng Fail Anal Sep 2011;18:1407–14.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.03.010Search in Google Scholar

20. Koul AK, Bhanot S, Tiku A, Junkin B. Importance of Physics-Based Prognosis for Improving Turbine Reliability: RRA 501KB Gas Turbine Blade Case Study, ASME 2007 Power Conference, San Antonio, Texas, USA, July 17–19, 2007, Paper No. POWER2007-22064, pp. 185–190; DOI: 10.1115/POWER2007-22064.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-8-19
Accepted: 2015-9-6
Published Online: 2015-9-15
Published in Print: 2017-4-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2015-0049/html
Scroll to top button