Home Alternative Method to Simulate a Sub-idle Engine Operation in Order to Synthesize Its Control System
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Alternative Method to Simulate a Sub-idle Engine Operation in Order to Synthesize Its Control System

  • Sergii I. Sukhovii , Feliks F. Sirenko , Sergiy V. Yepifanov and Igor Loboda EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 14, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The steady-state and transient engine performances in control systems are usually evaluated by applying thermodynamic engine models. Most models operate between the idle and maximum power points, only recently, they sometimes address a sub-idle operating range. The lack of information about the component maps at the sub-idle modes presents a challenging problem. A common method to cope with the problem is to extrapolate the component performances to the sub-idle range. Precise extrapolation is also a challenge. As a rule, many scientists concern only particular aspects of the problem such as the lighting combustion chamber or the turbine operation under the turned-off conditions of the combustion chamber. However, there are no reports about a model that considers all of these aspects and simulates the engine starting. The proposed paper addresses a new method to simulate the starting. The method substitutes the non-linear thermodynamic model with a linear dynamic model, which is supplemented with a simplified static model. The latter model is the set of direct relations between parameters that are used in the control algorithms instead of commonly used component performances. Specifically, this model consists of simplified relations between the gas path parameters and the corrected rotational speed.

Funding statement: Funding: The work has been performed with the support of the National Polytechnic Institute of Mexico (research project 20131509).

Acknowledgments

Our acknowledgments to ASME for a kind permission to publish this paper.

Nomenclature

b

coefficient of LDM

cp

heat capacity

d

coefficient of LDM

G

mass flow through a component (engine)

HPR

high pressure rotor

Hu

lower caloric value

J

moment of inertia

L

work of component

LDM

linear dynamic model

LPR

low pressure rotor

M

torque

N

power of component

n

rotational speed

p

pressure

T

temperature, time constant

TC

thermocouple

t

time

η

efficiency

υ

time constant of thermocouple

ω

angular velocity

Subscripts
a

air

br

breakaway

C

compressor, compressor discharge station

calc

calculated parameter

cons

consumer

cor

corrected parameter

f

fuel

FT

free turbine

in

engine inlet

inert

inertia

HP

parameter of the high pressure rotor

res

resistance

sp

specific parameter

st

static parameter

starter

starter

T

turbine, turbine discharge station

TC

thermocouple

torq

torque

univ

parameter calculated from the universal performance

wind

windmilling

*

stagnation parameter

References

1. Gaudet SR, Donald Gauthier JE. A simple sub-idle component map extrapolation method. ASME Paper No. GT2007–27193, 2007.10.1115/GT2007-27193Search in Google Scholar

2. Sexton WR. A method to control turbofan engine starting by varying compressor surge valve bleed. Master of Science Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

3. Kurzke J. Correlations hidden in compressor maps. ASME Paper No. GT2011–45519, 2011.10.1115/GT2011-45519Search in Google Scholar

4. Walsh PP, Fletcher P. Gas turbine performance. Oxford: UK, Blackwell Science Ltd., 1998.Search in Google Scholar

5. Benzer WA, Johnsen IA, Bullock RO. Compressor operation with one or more blade rows stalled. NASA Aerodynamic Design of Axial-Flow Compressors SP-36, 1965:341–6.Search in Google Scholar

6. Kim S, Ellis S, Challener M. Real-time engine modeling of a three shafts turbofan engine: from sub-idle to max power rate. ASME Paper No. GT2006–90656, 2006.10.1115/GT2006-90656Search in Google Scholar

7. Agrawal RK, Yunis M. A generalized mathematical model to estimate gas turbine starting characteristics. J Propuls Power 1982;104:194–201.10.1115/81-GT-202Search in Google Scholar

8. Kong C, Ki J, Kang M. A new scaling method for component maps of gas turbine using system identification. J Eng Gas Turb Power 2003;125:979–85.10.1115/GT2002-30150Search in Google Scholar

9. Jones G, Pilidis P, Curnock B. Compressor characteristics in gas turbine performance modeling. ASME Paper No. GT2001–0384, 2001.10.1115/2001-GT-0384Search in Google Scholar

10. Pourfarzaneh H, Hajilouy-Benisi A, Farshchi M. An analytical model of a gas turbine components performance and its experimental validation. ASME Paper No. GT2010-23369, 2010.10.1115/GT2010-23369Search in Google Scholar

11. Sukhovii SI, Yepifanov SV, Pavluk EV, Kulik TV. экспериментально-расчетная методика построения линейной динамической математической модели процесса запуска гтд (Design-experiment method of GTE starting process linear dynamic simulator forming). Авиационно-Космическая Техника И Технология 2008;9/56:147–51.Search in Google Scholar

12. Lyubomudrov YV. применение теории подобия при проектировании систем автоматического управления газотурбинных двигателей (Similarity theory in automatic control systems of gas turbine engines). Moscow: Машиностроение, 1971.Search in Google Scholar

13. Yepifanov SV, Kuznetzov BI, Bogayenko IN, et al. Синтез систем управления и диагностирования газотурбинных двигателей (Synthesis of Control and Diagnostic Systems of Gas-Turbine Engines)– Техника, Kyiv, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-6-11
Accepted: 2015-7-1
Published Online: 2015-7-14
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 25.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjj-2015-0027/html
Scroll to top button