Home Association between systemic immune inflammation index and newly diagnosed adult celiac disease
Article Open Access

Association between systemic immune inflammation index and newly diagnosed adult celiac disease

  • Isil Cakir ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Serkan Dogan ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: September 14, 2021

Abstract

Objectives

The systemic immune inflammation index (SII) is a novel biomarker based on platelet, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts. SII serum levels have diagnostic, prognostic degrees and correlations with various immune, inflammatory diseases. Celiac disease (CD) is an immune-mediated chronic enteropathy with inflammatory situations. Here we aimed to evaluate clinical significance of SII and to compare SII with other inflammatory markers in CD.

Methods

161 pathologically confirmed CD and 75 dyspeptic patients were enrolled. Hemogram, biochemical markers, SII, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean platelet volume-to-platelet ratio (MPR) and monocyte-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) were evaluated.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference between groups for SII (p<0.001). SII was statistically correlated with and superior to inflammatory markers in relation with CD. There were also statistically significant differences between groups for hsCRP, PLR, NLR, MPR, haemoglobin, platelet count, platelet volume distribution width, plateletcrit, ferritin, total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol (p=0.034; 0.015; 0.032; <0.001; <0.001; <0.001; 0.030; 0.001; <0.001; <0.001; 0.048, respectively). Correlations between SII and NLR, PLR, MHR, hsCRP were statistically significant (p≤0.001; <0.001; 0.033; 0.030, respectively). ROC analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value for CD by SII. A baseline SII level >560.0 was associated with CD with 64% specificity, 78% sensitivity (p<0.001).

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study analyzed the diagnostic value of SII in CD. SII may serve as a beneficial marker for the diagnosis of inflammatory state superior to that of hsCRP, PLR, NLR, MHR, MPR and WBC.

Öz

Amaç

Sistemik immün enflamasyon indeksi (SII) platelet, nötrofil ve lenfosit sayılarına dayanan yeni bir biyobelirteçtir. SII serum düzeylerinin çeşitli immün, enflamatuvar hastalıklar ile diyagnostik, prognostik dereceleri ve korelasyonları mevcuttur. Çölyak hastalığı (CD) enflamatuvar durumlar ile birlikte olan immün-aracılı kronik bir enteropatidir. Burada CD’de SII’nin klinik önemini değerlendirmeyi ve SII ile diğer enflamatuvar belirteçleri karşılaştırmayı amaçladık.

Gereç ve Yöntem

Patolojik olarak teyid edilmiş 161 CD ve 75 dispeptik hasta dahil edildi. Hemogram, biyokimyasal belirteçler, SII, platelet-lenfosit oranı (PLR), nötrofil-lenfosit oranı (NLR), ortalama platelet hacmi-platelet oranı (MPR) ve monosit-yüksek dansiteli lipoprotein kolesterol oranı (MHR) değerlendirildi.

Bulgular

Gruplar arasında SII açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark mevcuttu (p<0.001). SII istatistiksel olarak CD ile korele idi ve CD ile ilişki açısından enflamatuvar belirteçlerden daha üstündü. Ayrıca gruplar arasında hsCRP, PLR, NLR, MPR, hemoglobin, platelet sayısı, platelet hacmi dağılım genişliği, plateletkrit, ferritin, total kolesterol ve HDL kolesterol için istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklar mevcuttu (p=0.034; 0.015; 0.032; <0.001; <0.001; <0.001; 0.030; 0.001; <0.001; <0.001; 0.048, sırasıyla). SII ve NLR, PLR, MHR, hsCRP arasındaki korelasyonlar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı idi (p≤0.001; <0.001; 0.033; 0.030, sırasıyla). SII ile optimal kesim değerini belirlemek için ROC analizi kıllanıldı. SII için >502.0 düzeyi CD ile %64 spesifisite, %72 sensitivite ile ilişkili idi (p<0.001).

Sonuç

Bildiğimiz kadarıyla, bu çalışma CD’de SII’nin diyagnostik değerini analiz eden ilk çalışmadır.SII enflamatuvar durumun teşhisi için hsCRP, PLR, NLR, MHR, MPR ve WBC’ninkinden daha üstün bir faydalı belirteç olarak hizmet edebilir.

Introduction

Celiac disease (CD) is a frequently seen immune mediated genetic disease. Until the last decades the most believed opinion was that CD was a disease of children, but today lots of studies demonstrate a remarkable increase of CD prevalance in adults [1]. The precise and the gold standard diagnosis of CD is the biopsy of small bowel and CD can be presented by demonstrating villous atrophies in intestinal biopsies [2, 3]. Chronic inflammation caused by dietary gluten peptides of wheat or rye and barley reveals the disease in susceptible people [4]. These peptides are responsible for small intestinal epithelial inflammation, villous atrophy and mucosal damage so symptoms of malabsorption occur [5]. CD treatment is a lifelong strict gluten-free diet [6]. Patients with CD have some complications such as bone fractures, lung infections, hyposplenism, intestinal ulcers, collagenous enteritis and intestinal carcinoma [7].

There is a complicated CD pathogenesis that hasn’t been explained fully. But especially the immune-mediated theory plays an important role [7]. Latest studies have represented that newly diagnosed serum inflammatory markers are related with immune-mediated diseases like CD [8, 9].

The systemic immune inflammation index (SII) is a novel inflammatory biomarker based on platelet, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts. SII is an integrated marker that might be able to indicate immune and inflammatory status better than these markers alone [10]. This index was used to reflect inflammation status and as a prognostic marker of various diseases [11], [12], [13]. However, the relation between SII and patients with celiac disease remains unclear. Herein, in our study we aimed to investigate clinical significance of SII and other inflammation based biomarkers, their diagnostic abilities, and their relations and correlations in adult patients with CD before treatment.

Materials and methods

Study groups

Our study included a total of 236 patients who were admitted to gastroenterology outpatient clinic between January 2016 and January 2018. 161 patients with biopsy proven adult celiac disease (112 females and 49 males) included in patients group and 75 (54 females and 21 males) dyspeptic participants, with serological levels in reference interval or normal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or normal histological structures without CD, performed control group. We retrospectively examined their medical and laboratory records. The biochemical tests were studied at diagnosis before a gluten-free diet. We excluded patients with chronic liver disease, viral hepatitis, obstructive biliary diseases, cancer, Cushing Syndrome and pregnant women from the study. CD patients’ mucosal damage degrees were evaluated by using the Marsh classification [14, 15].

This study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and The Ethical Committee of … University Medical Faculty approved the study protocol (2019/807).

Biochemical analyses

We retrospectively examined and recorded participants’ biochemical test results. Complete blood count parameters: haemoglobin (Hb), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), white blood cells (WBC), platelet (PLT) count, platelet volume distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), plateletcrit (PCT) were measured using Sysmex XN-1000 (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan) autoanalyser; ferritin, folate, free thyroxine (fT4), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels were studied using chemiluminescent immunoassay by UniCel DxI 800 autoanalyser (Beckman Coulter Diagnostics, Miami, FL, USA); lipid parameters: triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and other biochemical analyses of high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), fasting serum glucose (FSG) were done photometrically using AU680 autoanalyser (Beckman Coulter Diagnostics, Miami, FL, USA) using their original commercial kits. Novel inflammation parameters as platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean platelet volume-to-platelet ratio (MPR) and monocyte-to HDL-c (MHR) and SII (using the PLT × N/L formula) were calculated.

Statistical analyses

We analysed data using SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software program. We used Student’s t-test to compare variables with normal distribution. We compared non-normally distributed variables with Mann–Whitney U test. We presented normally distributed, continuous variables by mean ± standard deviation (SD), and non-normally distributed, continuous variables by median and interquartile range (25–75%). We performed correlation analysis using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic ability of SII and other inflammatory markers. p-Value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Clinical and demographic features and intestinal mucosal damage degrees of patients were presented in Table 1. In literature the incidence of CD is highest in females [16]. In accordance with the literature our study population mostly composed of female celiac patients. The mean age of CD and control groups were 38 ± 13.11 and 39 ± 11.94 years, respectively. There was no significant difference between mean levels of ages of both groups (p>0.05).

Table 1:

Clinical and demographic features and intestinal mucosal damage degrees of CD patients.

Variables Female CD patients (n=112) Male CD patients (n=49)
Age, year 37 ± 12.4 34 ± 12.8
Anemia 78 26
Autoimmune thyroid disease 41 0
Vitiligo 12 0
Osteoporosis 13 0
Anxiety or depression 20 0
Polyneuropathy 0 3
Headache syndromes 6 4
Myalgia 3 0
Diabetes 12 2
Sjogren’s syndrome 2 0
Arthritis 10 0
Asthma 13 0
Obstructive pulmonary disease 0 3
Marsh classification
Marsh I 62 12
Marsh II 14 5
Marsh III 49 19

Celiac patients had some manifestations different from extraintestinal ones, as: 104 patients had anemia, 41 patients had autoimmune thyroid disease, 12 patients had vitiligo, 13 patients had osteoporosis, 20 patients had anxiety or depression, 3 patients had polyneuropathy, 10 patients had headache syndromes, 3 patients had myalgia, 14 patients had diabetes, 2 patients had Sjogren’s Syndrome, 10 patients had arthritis, 13 patients had asthma and 3 patients had obstructive pulmonary disease. According to Marsh classification, intestinal mucosal damage degrees of CD patients were shown in Table 1. Biochemical test results were presented in Table 2. Celiac patients had numerically higher WBC, MPV, TG, LDL-c and total protein, fasting serum glucose, NLR and MHR levels than controls’. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were found between two study groups for Hb, PLT, PDW, PCT, ferritin, TC, HDL-c, SII, hsCRP, PLR and MPR levels (Table 2).

Table 2:

Biochemical test results of study groups.

Variables CD patients (n=161) Controls (n=77) p-Value
Hb, g/dL 10.82 ± 1.90 13.86 ± 1.48 <0.001a
MCV, fL 82.26 ± 10.70 84.50 ± 5.44 0.065
WBC, 109/L 7.41 ± 1.65 7.12 ± 1.41 0.191
Neutrophil, mg/dL 4.06 ± 1.15 4.35 ± 1.22 0.118
Lymphocyte, mg/dL 2.34 ± 0.72 2.35 ± 0.74 0.886
PLT, 109/L 321.98 ± 93.04 275.22 ± 74.81 <0.001a
PDW, % 13.39 ± 2.23 12.66 ± 2.22 0.030a
MPV, fL 10.32 ± 0.94 10.09 ± 1.02 0.125
PCT, % 0.32 ± 0.08 0.29 ± 0.06 0.001a
Ferritin, ng/mL 7.80 (5.0–20.40)b 23.85 (10.75–85.85)b <0.001a
Folate, ng/mL 6.94 ± 2.06 7.08 ± 2.65 0.803
fT4, ng/dL 0.85 (0.77–1.10)b 0.79 (0.65–1.53)b 0.414
TSH, µU/mL 2.06 (2.13–4.11)b 1.88 (0.94–10.92)b 0.455
Triglycerides, mg/dL 136.58 ± 70.39 119.42 ± 54.11 0.129
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 174.57 ± 49.02 84.50 ± 5.44 <0.001a
HDL cholesterol, mg/dL 44.60 ± 13.65 48.96 ± 10.81 0.048a
LDL cholesterol, mg/dL 110.85 ± 39.66 106.16 ± 35.92 0.478
Total protein, g/dL 7.45 ± 0.50 7.34 ± 0.62 0.314
Albümin, g/dL 4.37 ± 0.52 4.38 ± 0.36 0.862
Fasting serum glucose, mg/dL 95.13 ± 15.59 94.29 ± 16.20 0.733
SII 698.61 ± 219.4 517.84 ± 183.69 <0.001a
hsCRP, mg/L 4.15 ± 1.49 3.77 ± 1.01 0.034a
NLR 2.04 ± 0.83 1.82 ± 0.53 0.032a
PLR 148.54 ± 48.22 128.30 ± 39.40 0.015a
MPR 0.038 (0.032–0.045)b 0.032 (0.025–0.041)b <0.001a
MHR 0.0128 ± 0.0023 0.0113 ± 0.0011 0.114
  1. SII, systemic immune inflammation index; hsCRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio; MPR, mean platelet volume to platelet ratio; MHR, monocyte to high density lipoprotein ratio. Student’s t-test was used, data were summarized as mean ± SD. aStatistically significant, p<0.05. bMann–Whitney U test was used; data were summarized as median and interquartile range (25–75%).

Spearman’s correlation analyses were performed and statistically significant but not very strong correlations were found between celiac patients’ SII levels and other inflammation markers as NLR, PLR, MHR and hsCRP levels (Table 3).

Table 3:

Spearman’s correlation analyses of systemic immune inflammation index with other inflammatory markers of patients with celiac disease.

SII Correlation coefficient p-Value
NLR 0.553 <0.001a
PLR 0.457 <0.001a
MHR 0.261 0.033a
hsCRP 0.208 0.030a
MPR −0.186 0.057
WBC 0.174 0.076
  1. SII, systemic immune inflammation index; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio; MHR, monocyte to high density lipoprotein ratio; hsCRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; MPR, mean platelet volume to platelet ratio; WBC, white blood cell. aStatistically significant, p<0.05.

We performed the ROC curve analysis of SII and other inflammatory parameters and decided optimal cut-off point for SII using the maximum value of Youden’s index (sensitivity + specificity − 1). We presented a baseline serum SII level >560.0 associated with adult CD with 64% specificity and 78% sensitivity (area under the curve [AUC], 0.732; 95% CI 0.630–0.834; p<0.001) (Figure 1).

Figure 1: 
Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis for SII, NLR, PLR, MPR, MHR, hsCRP and WBC levels of patients with celiac disease.
Figure 1:

Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis for SII, NLR, PLR, MPR, MHR, hsCRP and WBC levels of patients with celiac disease.

Discussion

The whole immune system is known to be projected by venous markers. In inflammatory processes neutrophils are rapidly recruited from the blood stream into inflamed tissues. In order to attract to other inflammatory cells they release cytokines and proinflammatory chemokines. So, neutrophil recruitment is clearly critical for innate immunity. But excessive neutrophil recruitment can lead to tissue destruction and inflammatory disorders. Studies have shown that platelets are required for neutrophil recruitment in many acute and chronic inflammatory diseases [17, 18]. Neutrophils also need platelets for their important effector functions as phagocytosis, reactive oxygen species formation, and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation [19]. There is an important adhesion molecule called P-selectin on the platelet surface for neutrophil-platelet interactions. This molecule binds to another molecule called P-Selectin Glycoprotein Ligand 1 (PSGL-1) on the neutrophil surface [20].

Studies have shown increased neutrophils in active CD [21, 22]. A 20-fold increase calculated neutrophils have been observed, so these cells may play a role in the early phase of gluten challenge [21, 22]. Their cytotoxic properties to enterocytes were also shown [23]. CD and the relation with systemic inflammation have been demonstrated in previous studies [24]. Studies have shown the abnormal increases in inflammatory parameters of blood cells including PLR and NLR as simple markers of inflammation in CD [8, 9]. However these biomarkers involve only two types of inflammatory and immune cells and do not precisely reflect the inflammation status in CD. SII was appointed based on three types of circulating inflammatory and immune cells: platelets, neutrophils and lymphocytes [10]. The SII level serves as an easily detectable biomarker reflecting the inflammatory state and systemic inflammatory activity [10]. We evaluated clinical significance of SII in CD patients and compared the diagnostic abilities of SII, PLR, NLR, MPR, MHR, WBC and hsCRP. We represented that, compared to other inflammatory markers SII had statistically significant higher AUC by ROC curve analysis. According to our results we indicated that high SII is significantly associated with CD.

We approved some limitations of our study. Firstly, it is a retrospective single center study. Secondly, our patients were newly diagnosed without gluten free diet therapy, so evaluating SII levels before and after their therapy may be more informative.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study elaborately analyzed the diagnostic value of SII in adult CD patients. Our study also compared the relative diagnostic efficiency of SII, PLR, NLR, MHR, MPR, hsCRP and WBC. Our findings suggest that SII is significantly associated with adult CD and is superior to PLR, NLR, MHR, MPR, hsCRP and WBC. Therefore SII is worthy of further studies investigating prospectively as a hematologic parameter for adult CD patients.


Corresponding author: Isil Cakir, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Public Health Laboratory, 38010 Kayseri, Turkey, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: This is a retrospective study.Informed consent was not obtained from individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: This study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and The Ethical Committee of Erciyes University Medical Faculty approved the study protocol (2019/807).

References

1. Domsa, EM, Berindan-Neagoe, I, Para, I, Munteanu, L, Matei, D, Andreica, V. Celiac disease: a multi-faceted medical condition. J Physiol Pharmacol 2020;71:3–14. https://doi.org/10.26402/jpp.2020.1.01.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Adriaanse, M, Leffler, DA. Serum markers in the clinical management of celiac disease. Dig Dis 2015;33:236–43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000371405.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Nadhem, ON, Azeez, G, Smalligan, RD, Urban, S. Review and practice guidelines for celiac disease in 2014. Postgrad Med 2015;127:259–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2015.1015926.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Ferretti, G, Bacchetti, T, Masciangelo, S, Saturni, L. Celiac disease, inflammation and oxidative damage: a nutrigenetic approach. Nutrients 2012;4:243–57. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4040243.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Martín-Masot, R, Teresa Nestares, M, Diaz-Castro, J, López-Aliaga, I, Muñoz Alférez, MJ, Moreno-Fernandez, J, et al.. Multifactorial etiology of anemia in celiac disease and effect of gluten-free diet: a comprehensive review. Nutrients 2019;11:2557. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112557.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Makovicky, P, Makovicky, P, Caja, F, Rimarova, K, Samasca, G, Vannucci, L. Celiac disease and gluten-free diet: past, present, and future. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2020;13:1–7.Search in Google Scholar

7. Piątek-Guziewicz, A, Zagrodzki, P, Paśko, P, Krośniak, M, Ptak-Belowska, A, Przybylska-Feluś, M, et al.. Alterations in serum levels of selected markers of oxidative imbalance in adult celiac patients with extraintestinal manifestations: a pilot study. Pol Arch Intern Med 2017;127:532–9. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.4020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Sarikaya, M, Dogan, Z, Ergul, B, Filik, L. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a sensitive marker in diagnosis of celiac disease. Ann Gastroenterol 2014;27:431–2.Search in Google Scholar

9. Sarikaya, M, Dogan, Z, Ergul, B, Filik, L. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for early diagnosis of celiac disease. Indian J Gastroenterol 2015;34:182–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-014-0493-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Hu, B, Yang, XR, Xu, Y, Sun, YF, Sun, C, Guo, W, et al.. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts prognosis of patients after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Canc Res 2014;20:6212–22. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0442.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Hong, X, Cui, B, Wang, M, Yang, Z, Wang, L, Xu, Q. Systemic immune-inflammation index, based on platelet counts and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, is useful for predicting prognosis in small cell lung cancer. Tohoku J Exp Med 2015;236:297–304. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.236.297.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Wang, L, Wang, C, Wang, J, Huang, X, Cheng, Y. A novel systemic immune-inflammation index predicts survival and quality of life of patients after curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Canc Res Clin Oncol 2017;143:2077–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-017-2451-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Agus, HZ, Kahraman, S, Arslan, C, Yildirim, C, Erturk, M, Kalkan, AK, et al.. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts mortality in infective endocarditis. J Saudi Heart Assoc 2020;32:58–64. https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1010.Search in Google Scholar

14. Mulder, C, Rostami, K, Marsh, MN. When is a coeliac a coeliac. Gut 1998;42:594. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.42.4.594.Search in Google Scholar

15. Marsh, MN. Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’). Gastroenterology 1992;102:330–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(92)91819-p.Search in Google Scholar

16. Stefanelli, G, Viscido, A, Longo, S, Magistroni, M, Latella, G. Persistent iron deficiency anemia in patients with celiac disease despite a gluten-free diet. Nutrients 2020;12:2176. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12082176.Search in Google Scholar

17. Wetterholm, E, Linders, J, Merza, M, Regner, S, Thorlacius, H. Platelet-derived CXCL4 regulates neutrophil infiltration and tissue damage in severe acute pancreatitis. Transl Res 2016;176:105–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2016.04.006.Search in Google Scholar

18. Pan, D, Amison, RT, Vasquez, YR, Spina, D, Cleary, SJ, Wakelam, MJ, et al.. P-Rex and Vav Rac-GEFs in platelets control leukocyte recruitment to sites of inflammation. Blood 2015;125:1146–58. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-07-591040.Search in Google Scholar

19. Kral, JB, Schrottmaier, WC, Salzmann, M, Assinger, A. Platelet interaction with innate immune cells. Transfus Med Hemotherapy 2016;43:78–88. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444807.Search in Google Scholar

20. Pitchford, S, Pan, D, Welch, HC. Platelets in neutrophil recruitment to sites of inflammation. Curr Opin Hematol 2017;24:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/moh.0000000000000297.Search in Google Scholar

21. Marsh, MN, Crowe, PT. Morphology of the mucosal lesion in gluten sensitivity. Bailliere Clin Gastroenterol 1995;9:273–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3528(95)90032-2.Search in Google Scholar

22. Dhesi, I, Marsh, MN, Kelly, C, Crowe, P. Morphometric analysis of small intestinal mucosa. II. Determination of lamina propria volumes; plasma cell and neutrophil populations within control and coeliac disease mucosae. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1984;403:173–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00695233.Search in Google Scholar

23. Dunne, MR, Byrne, G, Chirdo, FG, Feighery, C. Coeliac disease pathogenesis: the uncertainties of a well-known immune mediated disorder. Front Immunol 2020;11:1374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01374.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Palmacci, F, Toti, E, Raguzzini, A, Catasta, G, Aiello, P, Peluso, I, et al.. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte ratio, Mediterranean diet, and bone health in coeliac disease patients: a pilot study. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2019;2019:7384193. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7384193.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2021-03-08
Accepted: 2021-08-11
Published Online: 2021-09-14

© 2021 Isil Cakir and Serkan Dogan, published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review Article
  3. Is carnosine effective to alleviate lung injury: a systematic review
  4. Research Article
  5. Neutralizing antibody response and associated factors in Coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) up to one month
  6. Technical Note
  7. Comparison of enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and electrochemiluminescence immune assay in procalcitonin measurement
  8. Research Articles
  9. Pretreatment of diabetic aged rats with combination of ginsenoside-Mc1 and silibinin protects liver from ischemia-reperfusion injury through an AMPK-dependent mechanism
  10. Effects of exercise and quercetin on muscle energy charge in metabolic syndrome model of rats
  11. Effects of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonist on fasting model applied neuron cultures
  12. Combined effect of midostaurin and sphingosine kinase-1 inhibitor on FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) wild type acute myeloid leukemia cells
  13. Association between systemic immune inflammation index and newly diagnosed adult celiac disease
  14. Total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio and monocyte/HDL cholesterol ratio are related with subclinical hypothyroidism in polycystic ovary syndrome
  15. Effects of different exercise loads on serum betatrophin (ANGPTL-8/lipasin) and cartonectin (CTRP-3) levels in metabolic syndrome
  16. Impact of serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D deficiency on lipid biomarkers in established coronary artery disease
  17. The effect of temozolomide on Hsp60 and Hsp70 expression in extracellular vesicles derived from U87MG glioma cells
  18. Investigation of RASSF4 gene in head and neck cancers
  19. The role of A268V exon-7 polymorphism of PPARA in development of axial spondyloarthritis
  20. Analysis of beta globin gene mutations in Diyarbakir
  21. Education Section
  22. Mobile learning in a flipped classroom: findings from a “5-lecture-5” blended learning design for large classes
  23. Flipped learning in faculty development programs: opportunities for greater faculty engagement, self-learning, collaboration and discussion
  24. Medical interns’ attitudes towards One Health approach
  25. Coexisting of interprofessional education and organizational culture
  26. A snapshot of the coaching practices in undergraduate nursing education: evaluation of stakeholders’ perceptions and program costs
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/tjb-2021-0053/html
Scroll to top button