Startseite The Legitimacy Deficits of the Human Rights Judiciary: Elements and Implications of a Normative Theory
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Legitimacy Deficits of the Human Rights Judiciary: Elements and Implications of a Normative Theory

  • Andreas Follesdal
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 6. November 2013
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The Article addresses some of the disagreement concerning the legitimacy of the international human rights judiciary. It lays out some aspects of a theory of legitimacy for the international human rights judiciary that seem relevant to addressing two challenges: First, it is difficult to justify the human rights judiciary by appeal to standard accounts of why states agree to subject themselves to treaties. What is the problem the international human rights judiciary is meant to help solve? Second, the human rights judiciary seems undemocratic and even antidemocratic when it overrules domestic, accountable legislatures. Such international judicial review is therefore sometimes thought to be normatively illegitimate, at least regarding democracies.

Published Online: 2013-11-06
Published in Print: 2013-11

© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.

Heruntergeladen am 6.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/til-2013-018/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen