Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Embodied movement as a stratified semiotic mode: how movement, gaze and speech mean together in the classroom
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Embodied movement as a stratified semiotic mode: how movement, gaze and speech mean together in the classroom

  • Xiaoqin Wu

    Xiaoqin Wu received her PhD in linguistics and communication at University of New South Wales, Sydney and is currently Lecturer at Southwest University and Advisory Editor for Visual Communication. Her research interests include spatial semiotics, digital communication and museum communication. Her most recent publications include a monograph A Multimodal Framework of Pedagogic Practices in Space with Routledge (2025), and several journal articles in Journalism (2024), New Media & Society (2023), Journal of Pragmatics (2023), Visual Communication (2023), Multimodality & Society (2022), etc.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. September 2024

Abstract

This paper develops a model to map out embodied movement as a stratified semiotic mode, that is, a conventionalized set of resources for meaning making. The model describes movement structure as a system that realizes specific meanings activated by contexts of situation. The model establishes an explicit link between contextual meanings and textual patterning by theorizing connections between genre, metafunction, and structure. Drawing upon an empirical study of one teacher’s embodied movement in the classroom, this paper maps out movement structure as distinct choices and reveals how movement, gaze and speech function rhythmically to construe information prominence and information boundaries at different levels of discourse organization, which further contributes to coherence and periodicity for the information flow and semantic flow in the lesson. Additionally, the paper reveals that the synthesis of different modes can enact semantic convergence and divergence to aggregate knowledge in pedagogic contexts. The analysis contributes to a systematic understanding of the types of meaning that embodied movement can realize and of the ways in which they are realized together with speech and gaze. The intertwined nature of movement structures, meanings and contexts also indicates that pedagogy is an embodied and situated construction.


Corresponding author: Xiaoqin Wu, College of International Studies, Southwest University, No. 2 Tiansheng Road, Beibei District, 400715, Chongqing, China, E-mail:

Funding source: Southwest University

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2023JY081

Award Identifier / Grant number: SWU2309714

Funding source: Guangdong Provincial Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Project

Award Identifier / Grant number: GD24YWY05

About the author

Xiaoqin Wu

Xiaoqin Wu received her PhD in linguistics and communication at University of New South Wales, Sydney and is currently Lecturer at Southwest University and Advisory Editor for Visual Communication. Her research interests include spatial semiotics, digital communication and museum communication. Her most recent publications include a monograph A Multimodal Framework of Pedagogic Practices in Space with Routledge (2025), and several journal articles in Journalism (2024), New Media & Society (2023), Journal of Pragmatics (2023), Visual Communication (2023), Multimodality & Society (2022), etc.

Acknowledgments

I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to Professor Louise Ravelli, Associate Professor Susan Hood, Associate Professor Helen Caple for their insightful comments on an early draft of this manuscript. I am also grateful to the three anonymous reviewers and the editor-in-chief, Professor Srikant Sarangi, whose constructive feedback tightens the discussion in this paper.

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China, under Grant [24XJC740007]; Southwest University Educational Reform Project, under Grant [2023JY081]; Central Universities Social Science Project, under Grant [SWU2309714].

  2. Competing interests: The author reports there is no competing interest to declare.

Appendix

List of transcription notations

2

stasis and the duration of stasis

3

motion and the duration of motion

teacher gaze

student gaze

teacher motion

teacher posture

References

Amundrud, Thomas. 2018. Applying multimodal research to the tertiary foreign language classroom: Looking at gaze. In Helen de Silva Joyce & Susan Feez (eds.), Multimodality across classrooms, 160–177. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203701072-11Suche in Google Scholar

Amundrud, Thomas. 2022. Multimodal knowledge building in a Japanese secondary English as a foreign language class. Multimodality & Society 2(1). 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795221081300.Suche in Google Scholar

Bannerman, Henrietta. 2014. Is dance a language? Movement, meaning and communication. The Journal of the Society for Dance Research 32(1). 65–80. https://doi.org/10.3366/drs.2014.0087.Suche in Google Scholar

Bartlett, Tom & Gerard O’Grady (eds.). 2017. The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315413891Suche in Google Scholar

Bitgood, Stephen & Donald Patterson. 1993. The effects of gallery changes on visitor reading and object viewing time. Environment and Behavior 25(6). 761–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593256006.Suche in Google Scholar

Blacking, John. 1983. Movement and meaning: Dance in social anthropological perspective. The Journal of the Society for Dance Research 1(1). 89–99. https://doi.org/10.2307/1290805.Suche in Google Scholar

Burrows, David. 1990. Sound, speech and music. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Christie, Frances. 2002. Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Gregory, Michael. 2002. Phasal analysis within communication linguistics: Two contrastive discourses. In Peter Fries, Michael Cummings, David Lockwood & William Spruiell (eds.), Relations and functions within and across languages, 316–346. New York: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, Edward. 1966. The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael. 2002. How do you mean? In Johnathan Webster (ed.), On grammar, 352–368. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael. 2009. Methods-techniques-problems. In Micheal Halliday & Johnson Webster (eds.), Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics, 59–86. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael & Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Hao, Jing & Susan Hood. 2019. Valuing science: The role of language and body language in a health science lecture. Journal of Pragmatics 139. 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Hood, Susan. 2011. Body language in face-to-face teaching: A focus on textual and interpersonal meaning. In Shoshana Dreyfus, Susan Hood & Maree Stenglin (eds.), Semiotic margins: Meaning in multimodalities, 31–52. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible actions as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo Van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203619728Suche in Google Scholar

Levy, Elena & David McNeill. 1992. Speech, gesture and discourse. Discourse Processes 15. 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544813.Suche in Google Scholar

Lim, Victor. 2011. A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis approach to pedagogic discourse. Singapore: National University of Singapore PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Lim, Victor, Kay O’Halloran & Alexey Podlasov. 2012. Spatial pedagogy: Mapping meanings in the use of classroom space. Cambridge Journal of Education 42(2). 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2012.676629.Suche in Google Scholar

Maiorani, Arianna. 2020. Kinesemiotics: Modelling how choreographed movement means in space. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429297946Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.59Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James & David Rose. 2007. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Martinec, Radan. 2000. Rhythm in multimodal texts. Leonardo 33(4). 289–297.10.1162/002409400552676Suche in Google Scholar

McDonald, Edward. 2013. Embodiment and meaning: Moving beyond linguistic imperialism in social semiotics. Social Semiotics 23(3). 318–334.10.1080/10350330.2012.719730Suche in Google Scholar

McMurtrie, Robert. 2010. Bobbing for power: An exploration of into the modality of hair. Visual Communication 9(4). 399–424.10.1177/1470357210382182Suche in Google Scholar

McMurtrie, Robert. 2011. The meaning of [exiting]: Toward a grammaticalization of architecture. Text & Talk 31(6). 705–731.10.1515/text.2011.034Suche in Google Scholar

McMurtrie, Robert. 2013. Spatiogrammatics: A social semiotic perspective on moving bodies transforming the meaning potential of space. Sydney: University of New South Wales PhD Thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

McMurtrie, Robert. 2017. The semiotics of movement in space. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315640273Suche in Google Scholar

McMurtrie, Robert & Aurora Murphy. 2016. Penetrating spaces: A social semiotic multimodal analysis of performance as rape prevention. Social Semiotics 26(4). 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2016.1189728.Suche in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2012. The dynamics of embodied participation and language choice in multilingual meetings. Language in Society 41(2). 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004740451200005x.Suche in Google Scholar

Ngo, Thu, Susan Hood, James Martin, Claire Painter, Bradley Smith & Michelle Zappavigna. 2022. Modelling paralanguage from the perspective of systemic functional semiotics: Theory and application. London: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Ravelli, Louise. 1995. Intersemiosis: The constraints and potential of verbal-visual interaction. Paper presented at The International Systemic Functional Congress, Peking University, 1st–5th, July.Suche in Google Scholar

Ravelli, Louise & Robert McMurtrie. 2016. Multimodality in the built environment: Spatial discourse analysis. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315880037Suche in Google Scholar

Rose, David. 2018. Pedagogic register analysis: Mapping choices in teaching and learning. Functional Linguistics 5(1). 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0053-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Ruthrof, Horst. 1997. Semantics and the body: Meaning from Frege to the postmodern. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442679757Suche in Google Scholar

Ruthrof, Horst. 2000. The body in language. London: Cassell.Suche in Google Scholar

Thibault, Paul. 2004. Brain, mind and the signifying body: An ecosocial semiotic theory. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing social semiotics: An introductory textbook. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203647028Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Xiaoqin. 2022. Space and practice: A multifaceted understanding of the designs and uses of active learning classrooms. Sydney: University of New South Wales PhD thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Xiaoqin. 2025. A multimodal framework of pedagogic practices in space. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-08-28
Accepted: 2024-09-11
Published Online: 2024-09-30
Published in Print: 2025-07-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 18.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2023-0164/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen