Home Metaphorical language in the discourse of Yasser Arafat
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Metaphorical language in the discourse of Yasser Arafat

  • Aadel Shakkour

    Aadel Shakkour received his PhD in Hebrew and Semitic Languages from Bar-Ilan University and is currently a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Hebrew Language and Literature at Al-Qasemi Academy, Israel. His research interests include rhetoric, discourse analysis, and contact linguistics, with articles published in international journals such as Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, Language Problems & Language Planning, and Hebrew Studies.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 31, 2025

Abstract

This paper examines how Yasser Arafat, President of Palestinian National Authority from 1994 to 2004, relied on metaphor as a rhetorical device to promote his opposition to the Israeli government’s discrimination and brutality against Palestinians and settlement-building policies in Palestinian Territories. The metaphors analyzed here are drawn from more than 90 web documents, Arabic-language newspapers, interviews, and speeches. They are analyzed using the framework of conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) to explore the source and target domains on which Arafat draws to characterize both Israelis and Palestinians. The metaphorical constructs are analyzed in three stages: first, they are associated with source domains; then, the metaphors are analyzed for how these source domains conceptualize Israelis and Palestinians, and finally, the source domains that merit particular attention are identified. The findings show that Arafat particularly draws on nature metaphors as well as biblical and historical metaphors related to Jewish suffering and ultimate triumph over adversity to convey the message that the Palestinian people will ultimately be victorious against the Israeli occupation.


Corresponding author: Aadel Shakkour, Department of Hebrew and Literature, Al-Qasemi Academy, Baqa El Gharbiyya 30100, P.O. Box 124, Israel, E-mail:

About the author

Aadel Shakkour

Aadel Shakkour received his PhD in Hebrew and Semitic Languages from Bar-Ilan University and is currently a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Hebrew Language and Literature at Al-Qasemi Academy, Israel. His research interests include rhetoric, discourse analysis, and contact linguistics, with articles published in international journals such as Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, Language Problems & Language Planning, and Hebrew Studies.

References

Baider, Fabienne & Monika Kopytowska. 2017. Conceptualising the other: Online discourses on the current refugee crisis in Cyprus and in Poland. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13(2). 203–233. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2017-0011.Search in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230501706Search in Google Scholar

Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia. 2009. Friendly fire: War-normalizing metaphors in the Israeli political discourse. Journal of Peace Education 6(2). 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400200903090252.Search in Google Scholar

Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia. 2011. War metaphors as women’s business. Panim 56. 93 [Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical discourse and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230299009Search in Google Scholar

Ifeanyichukwu, Agbo, Kadiri Goodluck & Ijem Blessing. 2018. Critical metaphor analysis of political discourse in Nigeria. English Language Teaching 11(5). 95–103. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n5p95.Search in Google Scholar

Koller, Veronika. 2012. How to analyse collective identity in discourse: Textual and contextual parameters. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 5(2). 19–38.Search in Google Scholar

Kopytowska, Monika. 2010. Television news and the “meta war”. In Iwona Witczak Plisiecka (ed.), Pragmatic perspectives on language and linguistics, 301–362. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Kupferberg, Irit. 2016. Touching the sky: Text and discourse-oriented figurative language analysis. Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute [Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Kupferberg, Irit & David Green. 2005. Troubled talk: Metaphorical negotiation in problem discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110897630Search in Google Scholar

Kupferberg, Irit & David Green. 2008. Narrators defend their side of the story metaphorically at troubled narrative junctions. Narrative Inquiry 18. 258–273.10.1075/ni.18.1.05kupSearch in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1991. Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research 23. 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2012.4.2.5.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 202-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Livnat, Zohar. 2014. Introduction to the theory of meaning: Semantics and pragmatics, vol. II. Raanana: Open University of Israel [Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Michael. 2001. Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 14–31. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857028020.n2Search in Google Scholar

Mio, Jeffrey Scott. 1997. Metaphor and politics. Metaphor and Symbol 12(2). 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1202_2.Search in Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Qumsiyeh, Mazin B. & Mohammed A. Abusarhan. 2020. An environmental Nakba: The Palestinian environment under Israeli Colonization. Science Under Occupation 23(1).Search in Google Scholar

Rouhi, Mehri & Mohammad Mahand. 2001. Animal metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Psychology Research 1(4). 251–254.10.17265/2159-5542/2011.04.005Search in Google Scholar

Scott, Heidi. 2023, April 6. Critical discourse analysis: What is it? Available at: https://www.sesync.org/resources/critical-discourse-analysis-what-it.Search in Google Scholar

Shakkour, Aadel. 2024. Operations Iron Sword and Al-Aqsa Flood: Metaphors as rhetorical tools in channel 12 and Al-Jazeera Broadcasts. Israel Studies in Language and Society 17. 94–113 [Hebrew].Search in Google Scholar

Shakkour, Aadel & Abd Al-Rahman Marʾi. 2020. The formulation of metaphors in the political discourse of Arab politicians in the State of Israel. Hebrew Studies 61. 299–331 [Hebrew]. https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2020.0021.Search in Google Scholar

Shakkour, Aadel & Nader Qasem. 2021. Metaphor in the written discourse of Arab students at a College of Education in Israel. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 17(1–2). 111–126.10.1515/lpp-2021-0006Search in Google Scholar

Silberstein, Sandra. 2002. War of words: Language, politics, and 9/11. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. 2001. Critical discourse analysis. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth. 2001a. What is CDA about: Summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 1–13. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857028020.n1Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth. 2001b. The discourse–historical approach. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse, 63–94. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857028020.n4Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-08-14
Accepted: 2025-03-11
Published Online: 2025-03-31
Published in Print: 2025-07-28

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2023-0157/html
Scroll to top button