Note-taking/making as a resource for substantiating advice at a second language speaking center

References

Blom, Robin. 2016. Guided note taking and student achievement in a media law course. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 72(4). 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695816653857.Suche in Google Scholar

Boon, Richard T., Cecil III Fore & Saleem Rasheed. 2007. Students’ attitudes and perceptions toward technology-based applications and guided notes instruction in high school world history classrooms. Reading Improvement 44. 23–31.Suche in Google Scholar

Glenn, Phillip & Curtis LeBaron. 2011. Epistemic authority in employment interviews: Glancing, pointing, touching. Discourse & Communication 5(1). 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481310390161.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1994. Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96. 606–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, Joan K. & Emily R. Butler. 2017. The shifting role of a document in managing conflict and shaping the outcome of a small group meeting. Text & Talk 37(5). 615–638. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2017-0021.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, Joan K. & Steven D. Looney. 2019. The embodied work of teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/HALL5495Suche in Google Scholar

Hazel, Spencer. 2020. Doing notes – a practice for coordinating ideas development in theatre settings. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 14(2). 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.33659.Suche in Google Scholar

Hazel, Spencer & Kristian Mortensen. 2014. Embodying the institution: Object manipulation in developing interaction in study counselling meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 65. 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.016.Suche in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Maxwell J. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299–345. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020Suche in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSuche in Google Scholar

Kääntä, Leila, Gabriele Kasper & Arja Piirainen-Marsh. 2018. Explaining Hooke’s law: Definitional practices in a CLIL physics classroom. Applied Linguistics 39. 694–717.Suche in Google Scholar

Komter, Martha L. 2006. From talk to text: The interactional construction of a police record. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39. 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_2.Suche in Google Scholar

Kunitz, Silvia. 2015. Scriptlines as emergent artifacts in collaborative group planning. Journal of Pragmatics 76. 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Majlesi, Ali R. 2018. Instructed vision: Navigating grammatical rules by using landmarks for linguistic structures in corrective feedback sequences. The Modern Language Journal 102. 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12452.Suche in Google Scholar

Mikkola, Piia & Esa Lehtinen. 2014. Initiating activity shifts through use of appraisal forms as material objects during performance appraisal interviews. In Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann & Mirka Rauniomaa (eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity, 57–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.186.03mikSuche in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2007. Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies 9. 194–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607075346.Suche in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2016. Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of SocioLinguistics 20. 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177.Suche in Google Scholar

Mortensen, Kristian. 2013. Writing aloud: Some interactional functions of the public display of emergent writing. In Helinä Melkas & Buur Jacob (eds.), Proceedings of the participatory innovation conference PIN-C 2013, 119–125. Lahti, Finland: Lappeenranta University of Technology.Suche in Google Scholar

Nevile, Maurice, Pentti Haddington, Trine Hinemann & Mirka Rauniomaa. 2014. Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/z.186Suche in Google Scholar

Nissi, Riika. 2015. From entry proposals to a joint statement: Practices of shared text production in multiparty meeting interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 79. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Pälli, Pekka & Esa Lehtinen. 2014. Making objectives common in performance appraisal interviews. Language & Communication 39. 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.09.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Park, Innhwa. 2018. Reported thought as (hypothetical) assessment. Journal of Pragmatics 129. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Peverly, Stephen T., Joanna K. Garner & Pooja C Vekaria. 2014. Both handwriting speed and selective attention are important to lecture note-taking. Reading and Writing 27. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9431-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Raymond, Geoffrey T. 2004. Prompting action: The stand-alone “so” in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37. 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_4.Suche in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1995. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444328301Suche in Google Scholar

Sandlund, Erica. 2014. Prescribing conduct: Enactments of talk or thought in advice-giving sequences. Discourse Studies 16(5). 645–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614539065.Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Suche in Google Scholar

Sert, Olcay. 2015. Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748692651Suche in Google Scholar

Storch, Neomy. 2009. The impact of studying in a second language (L2) medium university on the development of L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18(2). 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2009.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Streeck, Jürgen & Werner Kallmeyer. 2001. Interaction by inscription. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00126-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Svinhufvud, Kimmo. 2016. Nodding and note-taking: Multimodal analysis of writing and nodding in student counselling interaction. Languages and Dialogues 6(1). 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.03svi.Suche in Google Scholar

Walsh, Steve. 2011. Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203827826Suche in Google Scholar

Waring, Hansun Z. 2007a. Complex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetries. Text & Talk 27(1). 107–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2007.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Waring, Hansun Z. 2007b. The multi-functionality of accounts in advise giving. Journal of SocioLinguistics 11. 367–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00328.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Whittaker, Steve, Rachel Laban & Simon Tucker. 2005. Analysing meeting records: An ethnographic study and technological implications. In Steve Renals & Samy Bengio (eds.), Machine learning for multimodal interaction, 101–113. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/11677482_9Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Jessica. 2004. Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Second Language Writing 13. 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.009.Suche in Google Scholar