Abstract
It has been recognized that Mandarin speakers use the neutral form (ni) and the honorific form (nin) of second-person pronouns to refer to others based on the social distance and power dynamics between the speakers. Drawing on eighteen hours of journalist-government official conversations in live broadcast TV programs, this study shows that the journalists often shift between the two forms of second-person pronouns when referring to government officials and that the shifts in the two directions appear in different sequential environments. Incorporating the stance triangle model and membership categorization devices, the findings reveal that the shifts indicate changes in the journalists’ self-categorization and their evaluative stances toward the officials in the conversation. The shift from nin to ni tends to occur in the main actions where the interviewer has previously displayed a positive stance but shifts to a negative stance while holding the official accountable; the shift from ni to nin is often used rhetorically to help construct the inconsistencies and self-contradictions of the officials, which also indicates a negative stance.
Appendix A: Transcript conventions
- ,
-
rising to mid final pitch movement
- .
-
falling to low final pitch movement
- ?
-
rising final pitch movement
- -
-
cut-off
- =
-
latching
- < >
-
slower speed
- [ ]
-
overlap
- hhh
-
laughter
- .hh
-
inhale
- (.)
-
micro-pause
- (1)
-
measured pause of approximately 1 s
- ::
-
prolongation
- ((XX))
-
unintelligible syllables
Appendix B: Gloss abbreviations
- 1PL
-
first-person plural
- 1SG
-
first-person singular
- NI
-
second-person singular, the neutral form
- NIN
-
second-person singular, the honorific form
- BEN
-
benefactive gei
- CL
-
classifier
- COMP
-
complement
- CRS
-
current relative state le
- EXP
-
Experiential aspect guo
- GEN
-
genitive
- NEG
-
negator
- NOM
-
nominalizer de
- PFV
-
perfective aspect le
- PRT
-
particle ne, a
- PASS
-
passive bei
- Q
-
question particle ma
References
Besnier, Niko. 1993. Reported speech and affect on the Nukulaelae Atoll. In Jane H. Hill & Judith T. Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, 161–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Biq, Yung O. 1991. The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun ni in conversational Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 16(4). 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90084-B.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Joshua A. Fishman (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language, 252–276. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110805376.252Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Chun. 1987. Rencheng daici “ni/nin” de shidai tezheng he guifanhua [The historical context and the normalization of second-person pronouns “ni/nin”]. Hubei Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban) [Journal of Hubei University (philosphy and social science)] 14(2). 53–55. https://doi.org/10.13793/j.cnki.42-1020/c.1987.02.012.Search in Google Scholar
Chao, Xing. 2018. Yulun jiandu de genben mudi shi jiejue wenti [The fundamental goal of supervision by public opinion is to solve problems]. Beijing: Beijing Ribao [Beijing Daily]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/zgjx/2018-08/17/c_137397229.htm (accessed 19 June 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1956. Chinese terms of address. Language 32(1). 217. https://doi.org/10.2307/410666.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Dan. 2017. “Supervision by public opinion” or by government officials? Media criticism and central-local government relations in China. Modern China 43(6). 620–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700417706704.Search in Google Scholar
Chen, Songcen. 1986. Beijinghua “ni” “nin” shiyong guilv chutan [A preliminary investigation of ni and nin in Beijing dialect]. Yuwen Yanjiu [Linguistic Researches] 20(8). 24–31.Search in Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., March N. Elliott, John Heritage & Laureie L. Mcdonald. 2006. Historical trends in questioning presidents, 1953–2000. Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(4). 561–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x.Search in Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven & John Heritage. 2002. Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication 52(4). 749–775. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/52.4.749.Search in Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S. & Paul Drew. 2008. Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language & social Interaction 41(2). 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613.Search in Google Scholar
Dictionary Editing Office, Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. 2016 [1978]. Xiandai hanyu cidian [Contemporary Chinese dictionary]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.164.07du (accessed 22 July 2017).10.1075/pbns.164.07duSearch in Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2011. Co-opting intersubjectivity: Dialogic rhetoric of the self. In Christian Meyer & Felix Girke (eds.), The rhetorical emergence of culture, vol. 4, 52–83. Oxford: Berghahn.10.1515/9780857451132-005Search in Google Scholar
Du Bois, JohnW. & Elise Kärkkäinen. 2012. Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk 32(4). 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0021.Search in Google Scholar
Du, Xujia & Johanna Rendle-Short. 2016. Journalist questions: Comparing adversarialness in Chinese political press conferences. Discourse, Context and Media 12(June 2016). 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.02.002.Search in Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 2006. Narrating the political self in a campaign for U.S. congress. Language in Society 35(4). 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060222.Search in Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gu, Zhaonong & Wen Fu. 2014. Wuhan: Mala wenti tang guanyuan lianhong chu han mashangban [Wuhan: Aggressive questions make officials hot and sweaty, immediately rectify]. Beijing: Renmin Ribbao [The People’s Daily]. http://cpc.people.com.cn/n/2014/0419/c64387-24916446.html (accessed 20 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Guo, Li. 1993. Qianlun “nin” yu “ni” [A discussion on “nin” and “ni”]. Shenzhen Daxue (Renwen shehui kexue ban) [Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities and social science)] 10(1). 84–91.Search in Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa & Galina B Bolden. 2012. The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 57–76. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118325001.ch4Search in Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012. The Epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(1). 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685.Search in Google Scholar
Heritage, John & Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. New Jersey: Wiley. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781444318135 (accessed 21 November 2020).10.1002/9781444318135Search in Google Scholar
Heritage, John & David Greatbatch. 1989. On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, 93–137. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2000. Read my article: Ideological complexity and the overdetermination of promising in American presidential politics. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 259–292. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jo, Jaehyun. 2018. Korean ‘Formality’ endings ‘-supnita/-supnikka’ and ‘-eyo’ in the negotiation of interactional identity in the news interview. Journal of Pragmatics 136. 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.004.Search in Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai Hua. 2002. From solidarity to antagonism: The uses of the second-person singular pronoun in Chinese political discourse. Text 22(1). 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.004.Search in Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Ostermann, Ana Cristina. 2003. Localizing power and solidarity: Pronoun alternation at an all-female police station and a feminist crisis intervention center in Brazil. Language in Society 32(3). 351–381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503323036.Search in Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2016a. Linguistic reference in the negotiation of identity and action: Revisiting the T/V distinction. Language 92(3). 636–670. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0053.Search in Google Scholar
Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2016b. Reconceptualizing identity and context in the deployment of forms of address. In María Irene Moyna & Susana Rivera-Mills (eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas, 267–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.10.13raySearch in Google Scholar
Repnikova, Maria. 2017. Media openings and political transitions: Glasnost versus yulun jiandu. Problems of Post-Communism 64(3–4). 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2017.1307118.Search in Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1995. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444328301Search in Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 1999. Conceptualizing accountability. In Andreas Schedler, Larry Jay Diamond & Marc F. Plattner (eds.), The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies, vol. 13, 13–28. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.10.1515/9781685854133-003Search in Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3). 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007.Search in Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya & Jack Sidnell. 2012. Introduction. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 1–8. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch1 (accessed 21 November 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Tang, Ruifeng. 2019. Wenzheng jiemu weihe “bushuaifanxing”? [Why Wenzheng programs are becoming more popular?]. Chuanmei Neican. https://xueqiu.com/5868117133/134211532 (accessed 29 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 2013. The argument culture: Agonism & the common good. Daedalus 142(2). 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00211.Search in Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin. 2001. Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember. In Rita Simpson & John Swales (eds.), Corpus Linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium, 116–144. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Tong, Jingrong. 2011. Investigative journalism in China: Journalism, power, and society. London: Bloomsbury Academics.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Haiyan. 2021. Generational change in Chinese journalism: Developing Mannheim’s theory of generations for contemporary social conditions. Journal of Communication 71(1). 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa040.Search in Google Scholar
Wen, Suolin. 2001. Leiyu zhong “ni” “nin” de shiyong yishu [The art of “ni” and “nin” in Thunderstorm]. Xiuci Xuexi [ContemporaryRhetoric] 20(3). 45–46. https://doi.org/10.16027/j.cnki.cn31-2043/h.2001.03.029.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 2003. Political discourse. In Deborah Schiffrin, Tannen Deborah & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 18, 398–415. Malden, MA: Wiley Online Library.10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00021.xSearch in Google Scholar
Wu, Feng, Cheng Yang & Duo Chao. 2017. Global questioners: Examining journalists’ aggressiveness at Chinese premiers’ press conferences (1993–2015). Asian Journal of Communication 27(4). 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1281322.Search in Google Scholar
Xing, Fuyi. 2002. Hanyu Yufa Sanbai wen [Answers to three hundred Chinese grammatical questions]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, Yuezhi. 2000. Watchdogs on party leashes? Contexts and implications of investigative journalism in post-Deng China. Journalism Studies 1(4). 577–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/146167000441312.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Guest Editorial
- Editorial
- Research Articles
- Stancetaking in motion: stance triangle and double dialogicality
- The use of animal classifiers as a stance negotiation strategy in Cantonese interactional discourse
- Questioning Chinese government officials on a live broadcast TV program: shifted second-person pronouns and journalists’ stance and identity
- “Hypophora” and “question cascade” in Cantonese political discourse: the stance triangle and the use of rhetorical moves and utterance final particles
- On the face-threat attenuating functions of Korean com: implications for internal and external dialogic processing in interaction
- Divergence in uncertainty: the Korean non-committal suffix -(u)lkel
- Epilogue
- Epilogue: commentary on stancetaking in motion
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Guest Editorial
- Editorial
- Research Articles
- Stancetaking in motion: stance triangle and double dialogicality
- The use of animal classifiers as a stance negotiation strategy in Cantonese interactional discourse
- Questioning Chinese government officials on a live broadcast TV program: shifted second-person pronouns and journalists’ stance and identity
- “Hypophora” and “question cascade” in Cantonese political discourse: the stance triangle and the use of rhetorical moves and utterance final particles
- On the face-threat attenuating functions of Korean com: implications for internal and external dialogic processing in interaction
- Divergence in uncertainty: the Korean non-committal suffix -(u)lkel
- Epilogue
- Epilogue: commentary on stancetaking in motion