Home Linguistics & Semiotics Questioning Chinese government officials on a live broadcast TV program: shifted second-person pronouns and journalists’ stance and identity
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Questioning Chinese government officials on a live broadcast TV program: shifted second-person pronouns and journalists’ stance and identity

  • Yan Zhou ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 11, 2022

Abstract

It has been recognized that Mandarin speakers use the neutral form (ni) and the honorific form (nin) of second-person pronouns to refer to others based on the social distance and power dynamics between the speakers. Drawing on eighteen hours of journalist-government official conversations in live broadcast TV programs, this study shows that the journalists often shift between the two forms of second-person pronouns when referring to government officials and that the shifts in the two directions appear in different sequential environments. Incorporating the stance triangle model and membership categorization devices, the findings reveal that the shifts indicate changes in the journalists’ self-categorization and their evaluative stances toward the officials in the conversation. The shift from nin to ni tends to occur in the main actions where the interviewer has previously displayed a positive stance but shifts to a negative stance while holding the official accountable; the shift from ni to nin is often used rhetorically to help construct the inconsistencies and self-contradictions of the officials, which also indicates a negative stance.


Corresponding author: Yan Zhou, Department of Asian Languages and Cultures, Northwestern University, Kresge Hall Suite 4-512, 1880 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. E-mail:

Appendix A: Transcript conventions

,

rising to mid final pitch movement

.

falling to low final pitch movement

?

rising final pitch movement

-

cut-off

=

latching

< >

slower speed

[ ]

overlap

hhh

laughter

.hh

inhale

(.)

micro-pause

(1)

measured pause of approximately 1 s

::

prolongation

((XX))

unintelligible syllables

Appendix B: Gloss abbreviations

1PL

first-person plural

1SG

first-person singular

NI

second-person singular, the neutral form

NIN

second-person singular, the honorific form

BEN

benefactive gei

CL

classifier

COMP

complement

CRS

current relative state le

EXP

Experiential aspect guo

GEN

genitive

NEG

negator

NOM

nominalizer de

PFV

perfective aspect le

PRT

particle ne, a

PASS

passive bei

Q

question particle ma

References

Besnier, Niko. 1993. Reported speech and affect on the Nukulaelae Atoll. In Jane H. Hill & Judith T. Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, 161–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Biq, Yung O. 1991. The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun ni in conversational Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 16(4). 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90084-B.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger & Albert Gilman. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Joshua A. Fishman (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language, 252–276. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110805376.252Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Chun. 1987. Rencheng daici “ni/nin” de shidai tezheng he guifanhua [The historical context and the normalization of second-person pronouns “ni/nin”]. Hubei Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue shehui kexue ban) [Journal of Hubei University (philosphy and social science)] 14(2). 53–55. https://doi.org/10.13793/j.cnki.42-1020/c.1987.02.012.Search in Google Scholar

Chao, Xing. 2018. Yulun jiandu de genben mudi shi jiejue wenti [The fundamental goal of supervision by public opinion is to solve problems]. Beijing: Beijing Ribao [Beijing Daily]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/zgjx/2018-08/17/c_137397229.htm (accessed 19 June 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Chao, Yuen Ren. 1956. Chinese terms of address. Language 32(1). 217. https://doi.org/10.2307/410666.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Dan. 2017. “Supervision by public opinion” or by government officials? Media criticism and central-local government relations in China. Modern China 43(6). 620–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700417706704.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Songcen. 1986. Beijinghua “ni” “nin” shiyong guilv chutan [A preliminary investigation of ni and nin in Beijing dialect]. Yuwen Yanjiu [Linguistic Researches] 20(8). 24–31.Search in Google Scholar

Clayman, Steven E., March N. Elliott, John Heritage & Laureie L. Mcdonald. 2006. Historical trends in questioning presidents, 1953–2000. Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(4). 561–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02568.x.Search in Google Scholar

Clayman, Steven & John Heritage. 2002. Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication 52(4). 749–775. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/52.4.749.Search in Google Scholar

Curl, Traci S. & Paul Drew. 2008. Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language & social Interaction 41(2). 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613.Search in Google Scholar

Dictionary Editing Office, Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. 2016 [1978]. Xiandai hanyu cidian [Contemporary Chinese dictionary]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/pbns.164.07du (accessed 22 July 2017).10.1075/pbns.164.07duSearch in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2011. Co-opting intersubjectivity: Dialogic rhetoric of the self. In Christian Meyer & Felix Girke (eds.), The rhetorical emergence of culture, vol. 4, 52–83. Oxford: Berghahn.10.1515/9780857451132-005Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, JohnW. & Elise Kärkkäinen. 2012. Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk 32(4). 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0021.Search in Google Scholar

Du, Xujia & Johanna Rendle-Short. 2016. Journalist questions: Comparing adversarialness in Chinese political press conferences. Discourse, Context and Media 12(June 2016). 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.02.002.Search in Google Scholar

Duranti, Alessandro. 2006. Narrating the political self in a campaign for U.S. congress. Language in Society 35(4). 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060222.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Zhaonong & Wen Fu. 2014. Wuhan: Mala wenti tang guanyuan lianhong chu han mashangban [Wuhan: Aggressive questions make officials hot and sweaty, immediately rectify]. Beijing: Renmin Ribbao [The People’s Daily]. http://cpc.people.com.cn/n/2014/0419/c64387-24916446.html (accessed 20 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Guo, Li. 1993. Qianlun “nin” yu “ni” [A discussion on “nin” and “ni”]. Shenzhen Daxue (Renwen shehui kexue ban) [Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities and social science)] 10(1). 84–91.Search in Google Scholar

Hepburn, Alexa & Galina B Bolden. 2012. The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 57–76. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118325001.ch4Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John. 2012. The Epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction 45(1). 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685.Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & Steven Clayman. 2010. Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. New Jersey: Wiley. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781444318135 (accessed 21 November 2020).10.1002/9781444318135Search in Google Scholar

Heritage, John & David Greatbatch. 1989. On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In Deirdre Boden & Don H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, 93–137. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Jane H. 2000. Read my article: Ideological complexity and the overdetermination of promising in American presidential politics. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 259–292. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jo, Jaehyun. 2018. Korean ‘Formality’ endings ‘-supnita/-supnikka’ and ‘-eyo’ in the negotiation of interactional identity in the news interview. Journal of Pragmatics 136. 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.004.Search in Google Scholar

Kuo, Sai Hua. 2002. From solidarity to antagonism: The uses of the second-person singular pronoun in Chinese political discourse. Text 22(1). 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.004.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Ostermann, Ana Cristina. 2003. Localizing power and solidarity: Pronoun alternation at an all-female police station and a feminist crisis intervention center in Brazil. Language in Society 32(3). 351–381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503323036.Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2016a. Linguistic reference in the negotiation of identity and action: Revisiting the T/V distinction. Language 92(3). 636–670. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0053.Search in Google Scholar

Raymond, Chase Wesley. 2016b. Reconceptualizing identity and context in the deployment of forms of address. In María Irene Moyna & Susana Rivera-Mills (eds.), Forms of address in the Spanish of the Americas, 267–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.10.13raySearch in Google Scholar

Repnikova, Maria. 2017. Media openings and political transitions: Glasnost versus yulun jiandu. Problems of Post-Communism 64(3–4). 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2017.1307118.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1995. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444328301Search in Google Scholar

Schedler, Andreas. 1999. Conceptualizing accountability. In Andreas Schedler, Larry Jay Diamond & Marc F. Plattner (eds.), The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies, vol. 13, 13–28. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.10.1515/9781685854133-003Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3). 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007.Search in Google Scholar

Stivers, Tanya & Jack Sidnell. 2012. Introduction. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 1–8. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch1 (accessed 21 November 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Ruifeng. 2019. Wenzheng jiemu weihe “bushuaifanxing”? [Why Wenzheng programs are becoming more popular?]. Chuanmei Neican. https://xueqiu.com/5868117133/134211532 (accessed 29 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 2013. The argument culture: Agonism & the common good. Daedalus 142(2). 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00211.Search in Google Scholar

Tao, Hongyin. 2001. Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember. In Rita Simpson & John Swales (eds.), Corpus Linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium, 116–144. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tong, Jingrong. 2011. Investigative journalism in China: Journalism, power, and society. London: Bloomsbury Academics.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Haiyan. 2021. Generational change in Chinese journalism: Developing Mannheim’s theory of generations for contemporary social conditions. Journal of Communication 71(1). 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa040.Search in Google Scholar

Wen, Suolin. 2001. Leiyu zhong “ni” “nin” de shiyong yishu [The art of “ni” and “nin” in Thunderstorm]. Xiuci Xuexi [ContemporaryRhetoric] 20(3). 45–46. https://doi.org/10.16027/j.cnki.cn31-2043/h.2001.03.029.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, John. 2003. Political discourse. In Deborah Schiffrin, Tannen Deborah & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 18, 398–415. Malden, MA: Wiley Online Library.10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00021.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wu, Feng, Cheng Yang & Duo Chao. 2017. Global questioners: Examining journalists’ aggressiveness at Chinese premiers’ press conferences (1993–2015). Asian Journal of Communication 27(4). 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2017.1281322.Search in Google Scholar

Xing, Fuyi. 2002. Hanyu Yufa Sanbai wen [Answers to three hundred Chinese grammatical questions]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Yuezhi. 2000. Watchdogs on party leashes? Contexts and implications of investigative journalism in post-Deng China. Journalism Studies 1(4). 577–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/146167000441312.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-12-19
Accepted: 2022-07-11
Published Online: 2022-08-11
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2020-0224/pdf
Scroll to top button