References

Arminen, Ilka. 2005. Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate.Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Nicholas, William Housley & Phillip Belcher. 2006. Navigation, interaction and bridge team work. The Sociological Review 54(2). 342–362.10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00617.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bøgh Andersen, Peter. 2000. Communication and work on maritime bridges. Centre for Human-Machine Interaction. Report CHMI-1-2000. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitets Forlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Buttny, Richard. 1993a. Social accountability in communication. London: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Buttny, Richard. 1993b. Accounts and the accountability of social action. In Brenda Dervin & Usha Hariharan (eds.), Progress in communication sciences, vol. XI, 45–74. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Suche in Google Scholar

Buttny, Richard. 2007. Discursive affect in situations of social accountability. In Jonathan Potter (ed.), Discourse and psychology Vol. III, 345–363. London: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Cook, Richard & David D. Woods. 1994. Operating at the sharp end: The complexity of human error. In Marilyn Sue Bogner (ed.), Human error in medicine, 255–310. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.1201/9780203751725-13Suche in Google Scholar

Coulter, Jeff. 1986. Affect and social context: Emotion definition as a social task. In Rom Harre (ed.), The social construction of emotions, 120–134. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Cushing, Steven. 1994. Fatal words: Communication clashes and aircraft crashes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dekker, Sidney W. A. 2001. The disembodiment of data in the analysis of human factors accidents. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 1(1). 39–57.Suche in Google Scholar

Dekker, Sidney W. A. 2002. The field guide to human error investigations. Cornwall: Cranfield University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dekker, Sidney W. A. 2006. The field guide to understanding human error. Cornwall: Ashgate.Suche in Google Scholar

Drew, Paul & Heritage John (eds.). 1992. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, Derek. 1999. Emotion discourse. Culture and Psychology 5(3). 271–291.10.1177/1354067X9953001Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, Derek. 2007. Managing subjectivity in talk. In Alexa Hepburn & Sally Wiggins (eds.), Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology in interaction, 31–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611216.002Suche in Google Scholar

Edwards, Derek & Jonathan Potter. 2005. Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In Hedvig Te Molder & Jonathan Potter (eds.), Conversation and cognition, 241–259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489990.012Suche in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203697078Suche in Google Scholar

Firth, Hannah & Celia Kitzinger. 1998. “Emotion work” as a participant resource: A feminist analysis of young women’s talk-in-interaction. Sociology 32(2). 299–320.10.1177/0038038598032002005Suche in Google Scholar

Froholdt, Lisa L. 2008. Kommunikation i Det Blå Danmark: Et case studie af kommunikation imellem skib og land i en nødsituation. Mercator: Maritime Innovation, Research and Education Feb. 2008. 100–104. Copenhagen: Iver C. Weilbach & Co. A/S.Suche in Google Scholar

Froholdt, Lisa L. 2010. Getting closer to context: A case study of communication between ship and shore in an emergency situation. Text and Talk 30(4). 385–402.10.1515/text.2010.019Suche in Google Scholar

Froholdt, Lisa L. 2010a. A year after CEC Future: Reflection and retrospect from a ship owner’s perspective. Mercator: Maritime Innovation, Research and Education March 2010.173–181. Copenhagen: Iver C. Weilbach & Co. A/S.Suche in Google Scholar

Froholdt, Lisa L. 2012. Pirate negotiation communication – Whose risk? Whose responsibility? In Burkhard Lemper, Thomas Pawlik & Susanne Neumann (eds.), The human element in container shipping. Institute of shipping economics and logistics. Vol. 5 maritime logistics, 139–161. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Suche in Google Scholar

Froholdt, Lisa L. 2012a. The Communicative Blue. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Southern Denmark.Suche in Google Scholar

Froholdt, Lisa L. 2013. “We are like animals”: A case study of coping strategies in an authentic pirate hijacking situation. Archives Des Maladies Professionnelles Et De l’Environnement 74(5). 538.10.1016/j.admp.2013.07.053Suche in Google Scholar

Froholdt, Lisa L. 2015. “I see you on my radar”: Displays of the confirmatory form in technologically mediated interaction. The Sociological Review 64(3). 468–494. Article first published online: 20 AUG 2015: doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12333.Suche in Google Scholar

Froholdt, Lisa L. 2017. Coping with captivity in a maritime pirate hijacking situation. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 16(1). 53–72. Article first published online May 2016. doi: 10.1007/s13437-016-0101-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of talk. London: Basil Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1987. Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1). 1–52.10.1075/iprapip.1.1.01gooSuche in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1992. Assessments and the construction of context. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon, 147–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Heath, Christian & Paul Luff. 1992. Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground line control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1. 69–94.10.1007/BF00752451Suche in Google Scholar

Heath, Christian & Paul Luff. 1996. Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Yrjo Engestrøm & David Middleton (eds.), Cognition and communication at work, 96–129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174077.005Suche in Google Scholar

Heath, Christian & Paul Luff. 2000. Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489839Suche in Google Scholar

Helmreich, Robert L. & H. Clayton Foushee. 1993. Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. In Earl Wiener, Barbara G. Kanki & Robert L. Helmreich (eds.), Cockpit resource management, 3–45. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-812995-1.00001-4Suche in Google Scholar

Hepburn, Alexa. 2004. Crying: Notes on description, transcription and interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(3). 251–290.10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_1Suche in Google Scholar

Hetherington, Catherine, Rhona Flin & Kathy Mearns. 2006. Safety in shipping: The human element. Journal of Safety Research 37. 401–411.10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.007Suche in Google Scholar

Hochschild, Arlie R. 1975. The sociology of feeling and emotion: Selected possibilities. Sociological Inquiry 45(2–3). 280–307.10.1111/j.1475-682X.1975.tb00339.xSuche in Google Scholar

Hochshild, Arlie R. 1983. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hollan, James, Edwin Hutchins & David Kirsh. 2000. Distributed Cognition: Toward a new foundation for Human-computer interaction research. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7(2). 174–196.10.1145/353485.353487Suche in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin, et al. 1990. The technology of team navigation. In Jolene Galegher (ed.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work, 191–220. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 1991. The social organization of distributed cognition. In Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine & Stephanie D. Teasely (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 283–307. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10096-012Suche in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the wild. London: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 1996. Learning to navigate. In Seth Chaiklin & Jean Lave (eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, 35–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625510.003Suche in Google Scholar

International Maritime Organisation (IMO). 2002. Safer shipping demands a safety culture. Paper presented at The World Maritime Day.Suche in Google Scholar

International Maritime Organisation (IMO). 2018, May 27. Retrieved June 18, 2018. https://worldmaritimenews.com/archives/253639/imo-moves-forward-to-address-autonomous-ships/Suche in Google Scholar

Lutzhoft, Margareta & Sidney W. A. Dekker. 2002. On your watch: Automation on the bridge. Journal of Navigation 55(1). 83–96.10.1017/S0373463301001588Suche in Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Jenny. 2003. Interactive methods for constructing relationships. In Phillip J. Glenn, Curtis D. LeBaron & Jenny Mandelbaum (eds.), Studies in language and social interaction. In honor of Robert Hopper, 207–220. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.10.4324/9781410606969Suche in Google Scholar

The MARCOM project. 1999. The impact of multicultural and multilingual crews on maritime communication. Contract No. WA-96-AM-1181. A Transport RTD Programme DG VII.Suche in Google Scholar

Nevile, Maurice. 2004. Beyond the black box. Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Cornwall: Ashgate.Suche in Google Scholar

Nevile, Maurice & Michael B. Walker. 2005. A context for error: Using conversation analysis to represent and analyse recorded voice data. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 5(2). 109–135.Suche in Google Scholar

Nikander, Pirjo. 2007. Emotions in meeting talk. In Alexa Hepburn & Sally Wiggins (eds.), Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction, 50–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611216.003Suche in Google Scholar

O’Neil, William. 1994. Better standards, training and certification: IMO’s response to human error. Secretary General’s message for World Maritime Day 1994. London: International Maritime Organization.Suche in Google Scholar

Perakyla, Anssi & Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds.). 2012. Emotion in interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730735.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Pommerantz, Anita. 1986. Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9. 219–229.10.1007/BF00148128Suche in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan. 1998. Cognition as context (whose cognition?). Research on Language and Social Interaction 31. 29–44.10.1207/s15327973rlsi3101_2Suche in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan. 2005. Making psychology relevant. Discourse & Society 16. 739–747.10.1177/0957926505054944Suche in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan & Alexa Hepburn. 2003. I’m a bit concerned – Early actions and psychological constructions in a child protection helpline. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36. 197–240.10.1207/S15327973RLSI3603_01Suche in Google Scholar

Potter, Jonathan & Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Pritchard, Boris & Damir Kalogjera. 2000. On some features of conversations in maritime VHF communications. In Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill & Frances Rock (eds.), Dialogue analysis VII: Working with dialogue, 185–196. Tubingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783110941265-015Suche in Google Scholar

Psathas, George. 1990. Methodological issues in the study of naturally occurring interaction. In George Psathas (ed.), Interaction competence: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis 17. Washington D.C.: University Press of America.Suche in Google Scholar

Pyne, Robin & Thomas Koester. 2005. Methods and means for analysis of crew communication in the maritime domain. The Archives of Transport XVII(3–4). 193–208.Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, Celia & Srikant Sarangi. 1999. Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: Issues of practical relevance for the researcher. In Srikant Sarangi & Celia Roberts (eds.), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, 473–503. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208375.4.473Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, John M. 1964. The self-management of culture. In Ward H. Goodenough (ed.), Explorations in cultural anthropology: Essays in honor of George Peter Murdock, 433–454. London: McGraw-Hill.Suche in Google Scholar

Sampson, Helen & Minghua Zhao. 2003. Multilingual crews: Communication and the operation of ships. World Englishes 22(1). 31–43.10.1111/1467-971X.00270Suche in Google Scholar

Sanders, Robert E. 1985. The interpretation of non-verbals. Semiotica 55. 195–216.10.1515/semi.1985.55.3-4.195Suche in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958/1953. Philosophical investigations. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Woods, David & Erik Hollnagel (eds). 2005. Joint cognitive systems. Foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.10.1201/9781420038194Suche in Google Scholar