Grammar and grammaticalization in Zapotec

References

Adam, Christopher C. 2003. A study of Dixidx Bilyáhab (Santo Domingo Albarradas Zapotec) morphophonology. Northridge: California State University Northridge MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Adam, Christopher C. 2012. BP nominal to preposition grammaticalization in Dixidx Bilyahab. In Brook Danielle Lillehaugen & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Expressing location in Zapotec, 37–55. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Alonso Ortiz, Ana D. 2020. Propiedades de los verbos posicionales en el zapoteco de Yalálag. Lingüística Mexicana, Nueva Época, II, 1, 77–99.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Carolyn Jane & Brook Danielle Lillehaugen. 2016. Negation in colonial valley Zapotec. Transactions of the Philological Society 114. 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.12082.Search in Google Scholar

Antonio Ramos, Pafnuncio. 2015. La fonología y morfología del zapoteco de San Pedro Mixtepec. Tlalpan: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G. 2004. A Coatlán-Loxicha Zapotec grammar. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G. 2012. Southern Zapotec toponyms. In Brook Danielle Lillehaugen & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Expressing location in Zapotec, 261–287. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G. 2015. Valency-changing devices in two Southern Zapotec languages. In Natalie Operstein & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Valence changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology, 139–173. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.110.08beaSearch in Google Scholar

Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G. 2017. Spanish infinitives borrowed into Zapotec light verb constructions. In Karen Dakin, Claudia Parodi & Natalie Operstein (eds.), Language contact and change in Mesoamerica and beyond, 55–80. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.185.03deaSearch in Google Scholar

Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G. 2019. Southern Zapotec verb classes. Amerindia 41. 121–165. https://doi.org/10.56551/nvjz1964.Search in Google Scholar

Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G. 2023. The historical dialectology of stative morphology in Zapotecan. Journal of Historical Linguistics 13. 115–172. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21008.bea.Search in Google Scholar

Beam de Azcona, Rosemary & Emiliano Cruz. 2022. Los compuestos verbales y las expresiones idiomáticas del zapoteco miahuateco de San Bartolomé Loxicha. In Francisco Arellanes, Mario Chávez and Rosa María Rojas (eds.), Estudios descriptivos de lenguas zapotecas. Fonética-fonología, morfosintaxis y semántica léxica. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Search in Google Scholar

Benton, Joseph. 2012. The grammaticalization of body part terms in two varieties of Zapotec. In Brook Danielle Lillehaugen & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Expressing location in Zapotec, 57–75. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Benton, Joseph. 2015. Valence-changing operations in Coatecas Altas Zapotec. In Natalie Operstein & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Valence changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology, 117–138. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.110.07benSearch in Google Scholar

Bisang, Walter. 1998. Grammaticalization and language contact, constructions and positions. In Anna Giacalone-Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization, 13–58. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.37.02bisSearch in Google Scholar

Black, Cheryl A. 1993. Negative concord with obligatory fronting in Zapotec. In Geoffrey K. Pullum & Eric Potsdam (eds.), Syntax and semantics at Santa Cruz, vol. II, 1–20. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center, University of California Santa Cruz.Search in Google Scholar

Black, Cheryl A. 1994. Quiegolani Zapotec syntax. Santa Cruz: University of California Santa Cruz PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Black, Cheryl A. 2000. Quiegolani Zapotec syntax: A principles and parameters account. Dallas, Texas: SIL International and University of Texas at Arlington.Search in Google Scholar

Black, Cheryl A. 2012. Body part terms and their uses in Quiegolani Zapotec. In Brook Danielle Lillehaugen & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Expressing location in Zapotec, 77–98. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615962Search in Google Scholar

Broadwell, George Aaron. 2012. Clausal negation as raising in San Dionisio Ocotepec Zapotec. Anthropology Faculty Scholarship 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/cas_anthro_scholar/2.Search in Google Scholar

Broadwell, George Aaron. 2015. The historical development of the progressive aspect in Central Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 81. 151–185. https://doi.org/10.1086/680236.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Inez M. 1976. Reflexive constructions of Yatzachi Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 42. 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/465437.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Inez M. 1980. Gramática zapoteca: Zapoteco de Yatzachi el Bajo. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Calderón Corona, Mariana Itzel. 2021. Adaptación sintáctica de préstamos verbales del español en el zapoteco de San Pablo Güilá. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle, Terrence Kaufman & Thomas C. Smith-Stark. 1986. Meso-America as a linguistic area. Language 62. 530–570. https://doi.org/10.2307/415477.Search in Google Scholar

Claudi, Ulrike & Bernd Heine. 1989. On the nominal morphology of ‘alienability’ in some African languages. In Paul Newman & Robert D. Botne (eds.), Current approaches to African linguistics, 3–19. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783112420089-002Search in Google Scholar

Córdova, Juan de. 1578 [1987]a. Arte en lengua zapoteca, Facsimile edn. Mexico City: Ediciones Toledo.Search in Google Scholar

Córdova, Juan de. 1578 [1987]b. Vocabulario en lengva çapoteca, Facsimile edn. Mexico City: Ediciones Toledo.Search in Google Scholar

Craig, Collette. 1986. Jacaltec noun classifiers: A study in language and culture. In Colette Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 263–293. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.7.17craSearch in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 1991. The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 27. 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700012391.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2009. Increases in complexity as a result of language contact. In Kurt Braunmüller & Juliane House (eds.), Convergence and divergence in language contact situations, 41–52. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/hsm.8.02dahSearch in Google Scholar

de Ávila, Alejandro. 2010. Mixtec plant nomenclature and classification. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

de León, Pasquel María de Lourdes. 1988. Noun and numeral classifiers in Mixtec and Tzotzil: A referential view. Sussex: University of Sussex PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2022. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 25th edn. Dallas, Texas: SIL International.Search in Google Scholar

Feria, Pedro de. 1567. Doctrina christiana en lengua castellana y çapoteca. Mexico City: En casa de Pedro Ocharte.Search in Google Scholar

Foreman, John Olen. 2006. The morphosyntax of subjects in macuiltianguis Zapotec. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Foreman, John & Brook Danielle Lillehaugen. 2017. Positional verbs in colonial Valley Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 83. 263–305. https://doi.org/10.1086/689846.Search in Google Scholar

Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 2021. The grammaticalization of reference systems. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 625–635. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0051Search in Google Scholar

Galant, Michael. 1998. Comparative constructions in Spanish and San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Galant, Michael. 2004. The nature of the standard of comparison in San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec comparative. In Rosemary Beam de Azcona & Mary Paster (eds.), Papers from the conference on Otomanguean and other Oaxacan languages, 59–74. Berkeley: Survey of California and Other Indian Languages Report 13.Search in Google Scholar

Galant, Michael. 2007. The morphosyntactic status of animacy markers in San Andrés Yaá Zapotec. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 26. 21–37.Search in Google Scholar

Galant, Michael. 2008. La expresión de conceptos de propiedad en el zapoteco de San Andrés Yaá. In Ausencia López Cruz & Michael Swanton (eds.), Memorias del coloquio Francisco Belmar, 311–327. Oaxaca: Biblioteca Francisco de Burgoa.Search in Google Scholar

Galant, Michael. 2015. Changes in valence in San Andrés Yaá Zapotec. In Natalie Operstein & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Valence changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology, 213–235. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.110.11galSearch in Google Scholar

Gisborne, Nikolas & Amanda Patten. 2021. Construction grammar and grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0008Search in Google Scholar

Guillaume, Antoine. Forthc. Associated motion and associated posture in Tacana (Takanan family, Amazonian Bolivia). Studies in Language.Search in Google Scholar

Guillaume, Antoine & Harold Koch. 2021. Introduction: Associated motion as a grammatical category in linguistic typology. In Antoine Guillaume & Harold Koch (eds.), Associated motion, 3–30. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110692099-001Search in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, Ambrosio. 2018. Where are Zapotec negative constructions situated from a typological perspective? Poster of paper presented at Syntax of the World Languages VIII. Available at: https://swl8.sciencesconf.org/data/pages/Gutierrez_SoWL8_2_Negation_Zapotec.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez Lorenzo, Ambrosio. 2021. A description and analysis of the syntax and functions of subordinate clauses in Teotitlán del Valle Zapotec. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Harder, Peter & Kasper Boye. 2021. Grammaticalization and functional linguistics. In Heiko Narrog &Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 56–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0005Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive source, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511581908Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613463Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd & Kyung-An Song. 2011. On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47. 587–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226711000016.Search in Google Scholar

Hernández Luna, Mario Ulises. 2021. La palabra fonológica en miahuateco. Cuadernos de lingüística de El Colegio de México 8. e239.10.24201/clecm.v8i0.239Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2021. Grammaticalization in Germanic languages. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 708–718. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0058Search in Google Scholar

Honda, Isao. 1996. Negation: A cross-linguistic study. Buffalo: University of New York at Buffalo PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 17–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar

Hunn, Eugene S. 1998. Mixtepec Zapotec ethnobiological classification: A preliminary sketch and theoretical commentary. Anthropologica 40. 35–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/25605871.Search in Google Scholar

Hunn, Eugene S. & Donato Acuca Vásquez. 2001. La etnobiología en el Vobabvlario de la Lengva Çapoteca de Fray Juan de Córdova, comparación con la actual de San Juan Mixtepec. Cuadernos del Sur 16. 21–32.Search in Google Scholar

Hunn, Eugene S., Akesha Baron, Roger Reeck, Meinardo Hernández Pérez & Hermilo Silva Cruz. n.d. A sketch of Mixtepec Zapotec grammar. https://faculty.washington.edu/hunn/vitaeHunn_Zapotec_Grammar_English.pdf (accessed 13 November 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Jensen de López, Kristine. 2012. The syntactic and semantic status of body part locatives in San Marcos Tlapazola Zapotec (Valley Zapotec). In Brook Danielle Lillehaugen & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Expressing location in Zapotec, 99–116. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Kahrel, Pieter Johannus. 1996. Aspects of negation. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, Terrence. 2006. Oto-Manguean languages. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 9, 118–124. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02286-0Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, Terrence. 2016. Proto-Sapotek(an) reconstructions. Unpublished Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria. 1996. Possessive noun phrases in Maltese: Alienability, iconicity and grammaticalization. Italian Journal of Linguistics 8(1). 245–274.Search in Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania. 1999. On ‘sit’/‘stand’/‘lie’ auxiliation. Linguistics 37. 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.2.191.Search in Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania & Bernd Heine. 2008. On the explanatory value of grammaticalization. In Jeff Good (ed.), Linguistic universals and language change, 215–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316479704Search in Google Scholar

Lamiroy, Béatrice & Walter De Mulder. 2021. Degrees of gcrammaticalization across languages. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 302–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0024Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Felicia. 2003. Remnant raising and VSO clausal architecture: A case study of San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Lightfoot, Douglas J. 2005. Can the lexicalization/grammaticalization distinction be reconciled? Studies in Language 29. 583–615. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.29.3.03lig.Search in Google Scholar

Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle. 2003. The categorial status of body part prepositions in Valley Zapotec languages. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle. 2006. Expressing location in Tlacolula Valley Zapotec. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein. 2012. Expressing location in Zapotec: An introduction. In Brook Danielle Lillehaugen & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Expressing location in Zapotec, 1–34. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Long, Rebecca & Sofronio Cruz. 2000. Diccionario zapoteco de San Bartolomé Zoogocho, Oaxaca. Coyoacán: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

López Corona, Georgette Aimmé. 2016. La codificación del objeto en el zapoteco de San Pablo Güilá: Una muestra de marcación diferenciada. Lingüística Mexicana 8. 41–74.Search in Google Scholar

López Cruz, Ausencia. 1997. Morfología verbal del zapoteco de San Pablo Güíla. Tlalpan: Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia Tesis de Licenciatura.Search in Google Scholar

López Nicolás, Oscar. 2015. La gramaticalización de los verbos posicionales en el zapoteco de Zoochina. Amerindia 37(2). 31–68.Search in Google Scholar

López Nicolás, Oscar. 2016. Estudios de la fonología y gramática del zapoteco de Zoochina. Tlalpan: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

López, Filemón L. & Ronaldo Y. Newberg. 2005. La conjugación del verbo zapoteco: Zapoteco de Yalálag, 2nd edn. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad. 1977. Behind the mirror: A search for a natural history of human knowledge. New York and London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Search in Google Scholar

Lyman Boulden, Hilario. 2007. Grámatica popular del zapoteco de Comaltepec, Choapan, Oaxaca. Tlalpan: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Lyman, Larry G. 2012. Location and position in Comaltepec Zapotec: Some aspects of Comaltepec Zapotec locative adverbs, demonstrative adjectives, and body part prepositions. In Brook Danielle Lillehaugen & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Expressing location in Zapotec, 289–306. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

MacLaury, Robert E. 1989. Zapotec body-part locatives: Prototypes and metaphoric extensions. International Journal of American Linguistics 55. 119–154. https://doi.org/10.1086/466110.Search in Google Scholar

Maisak, Timur A. 2005. Tipologija grammatikalizatsii konstruktsij s glagolami dvizhenija i glagolami pozitsii [Typology of grammaticalization of constructions with motion and positional verbs]. Moscow: Jazyki Slavjanskix Kultur.Search in Google Scholar

Marcus, Joyce & Kent V. Flannery. 1978. Ethnoscience of the sixteenth-century Valley Zapotec. In Richard I. Ford (ed.). The nature and status of ethnobotany, 51–79. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar

Marlett, Stephen A. 1985. Some aspects of Zapotecan clausal syntax. Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session 29. 83–154.10.31356/silwp.vol29.06Search in Google Scholar

Marlett, Stephen A. 1993. Zapotec pronoun classification. International Journal of American Linguistics 59. 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1086/466186.Search in Google Scholar

Marlett, Stephen A. 2010. Possession. In Cheryl A. Black, H. Andrew Black & Stephen A. Marlett (eds.), The Zapotec grammar files. SIL International. http://mexico.sil.org/resources/archives/60872.Search in Google Scholar

Merrill, Elizabeth D. 2008. The formation of causative in Tilquiapan Zapotec. SIL-Mexico Branch Electronic Working Papers #005. Available at: http://mexico.sil.org/resources/archives/10701.10.1017/S0025100308003344Search in Google Scholar

Miestamo, Matti. 2007. Negation: An overview of typological research. Language & Linguistics Compass 1(5). 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2007.00026.x.Search in Google Scholar

Munro, Pamela. 2002. Hierarchical pronouns in discourse: Third-person pronouns in San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec narratives. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 21. 37–65.Search in Google Scholar

Munro, Pamela. 2005. Zapotec grammar without tears (except perhaps for the grammarian). In Rosemary Beam de Azcona & Mary Paster (eds.), Papers from the conference on Otomanguean and other Oaxacan languages, 87–106. Berkeley: University of California.Search in Google Scholar

Munro, Pamela. 2006. Modal expression in Valley Zapotec. In William Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality, 173–205. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197570.173Search in Google Scholar

Munro, Pamela. 2011. On the avoidance of abstract nominalizations. Italian Journal of Linguistics 23(1). 21–38.Search in Google Scholar

Munro, Pamela. 2015. Zapotec reciprocals. In Natalie Operstein & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Valence changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology, 297–322. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.110.14munSearch in Google Scholar

Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine (eds.). 2021 [2011]. The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1975. English aspectual verbs. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783110818451Search in Google Scholar

Operstein, Natalie. 2002. First-person plural and the aspect morphology of Zapotec. In Proceedings of the 5th annual workshop on the American indigenous languages, Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics n.n., 53–64. Santa Barbara: University of California at Santa Barbara.Search in Google Scholar

Operstein, Natalie. 2003. Personal pronouns in Zapotec and Zapotecan. International Journal of American Linguistics 69. 154–185. https://doi.org/10.1086/379683.Search in Google Scholar

Operstein, Natalie. 2012. Proto-Zapotec ∗tty/∗ty and ∗ttz/∗tz. International Journal of American Linguistics 78. 1–40.10.1086/662636Search in Google Scholar

Operstein, Natalie. 2014. Origin of the Zapotec causative marker *k-: A diachronic-typological perspective. International Journal of American Linguistics 80. 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1086/674162.Search in Google Scholar

Operstein, Natalie. 2015a. Zaniza Zapotec. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Operstein, Natalie. 2015b. Valence-altering operations in Zapotec. In Natalie Operstein & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Valence changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology, 23–53. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Operstein, Natalie. 2017. Suppletion in Zapotec. Linguistics 55. 739–782. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Operstein, Natalie. 2022. Review of Heiko Narrog and Bernd Heine (eds.), 2021. The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Linguist List 33.2869.Search in Google Scholar

Operstein, Natalie & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.). 2015. Valence changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.110Search in Google Scholar

Oudijk, Michel (coord). 2015. Diccionario zapoteco-español, español-zapoteco basado en el Vocabvlario en lengva çapoteca de fray Juan de Córdova (1578). Available at: https://www.iifilologicas.unam.mx/cordova/.Search in Google Scholar

Padilla Pérez, Roberto. 2010. Adjetivos y conceptos de propiedad en el zapoteco de Santiago Apóstol, Oaxaca. Tlalpan: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez Báez, Gabriela & Terrence Kaufman. 2016. Verb classes in Juchitán Zapotec. Anthropological Linguistics 58. 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2016.0030.Search in Google Scholar

Persons, David D., Cheryl A. Black & Jan A. Persons. 2009. Gramática de zapoteco de Lachixío, Electronic edn. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Pickett, Velma B. 1976. Further comments on Zapotec motion verbs. International Journal of American Linguistics 42. 162–164. https://doi.org/10.1086/465406.Search in Google Scholar

Pickett, Velma B., Cheryl A. Black & Vicente Marcial Cerqueda. 2001. Gramática popular del zapoteco del Istmo, 2nd electronic edn. Juchitán and Tucson: Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Binnizá and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Riggs, David B. & Stephen A. Marlett. 2010. The leꞋe focus phrase: Structural aspects. In Cheryl A. Black, H. Andrew Black & Stephen A. Marlett (eds.), The Zapotec grammar files. SIL International. http://mexico.sil.org/resources/archives/60868.Search in Google Scholar

Robert, Stéphane. 2004. The challenge of polygrammaticalization for linguistic theory: Fractal grammar and transcategorial functioning. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 119–142. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.72.07robSearch in Google Scholar

Rojas Torres, Rosa María. 2007. Los procesos de formación de palabras en el zapoteco de Santa Ana del Valle, Oaxaca. Dimensión Antropológica 14. 55–89.Search in Google Scholar

Romero, Sergio. 2012. A Maya version of Jespersen’s Cycle: The diachronic evolution of negative markers in K’iche’ Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics 78. 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1086/662638.Search in Google Scholar

Seifart, Frank. 2010. Nominal classification. Language and Linguistics Compass 4. 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00194.x.Search in Google Scholar

Smeaton, B. Hunter. 1973. Lexical expansion due to technical change. Bloomington, Indiana: Research Center for the Language Sciences Indiana University.Search in Google Scholar

Smith Stark, Thomas C. 2007. Algunas isoglosas zapotecas. In Cristina Buenrostro, Samuel Herrera Castro, Yolanda Lastra, Juan José Rendón, Otto Schumann, Leopoldo Valiñas & María Aydée Vargas Monroy (eds.), Clasificación de las lenguas indígenas de México. Memorias del III Coloquio Internacional de Lingüística Mauricio Swadesh, 69–133. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México & Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas.Search in Google Scholar

Smith Stark, Thomas C. 2008. La flexión de tiempo, aspecto y modo en el verbo del zapoteco colonial del Valle de Oaxaca. In Ausencia López Cruz & Michael Swanton (eds.), Memorias del coloquio Francisco Belmar, 377–419. Oaxaca: Biblioteca Francisco de Burgoa.Search in Google Scholar

Smith Stark, Thomas & Fermín Tapia García. 1984. Los tonos del amuzgo de San Pedro Amuzgos. Anales de Antropología 21. 199–220.Search in Google Scholar

Solá-Llonch, Elizabeth. 2021. Aspects and arguments of the Lachirioag Zapotec verb. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Sonnenschein, Aaron Huey. 2004. A descriptive grammar of San Bartolomé Zoogocho Zapotec. Los Angeles: University of Southern California PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sonnenschein, Aaron Huey. 2005. The grammaticalization of relational nouns in Zoogocho Zapotec. In Rosemary Beam de Azcona & Mary Paster (eds.). Berkeley: Survey of California and Other Indian Languages Report 13. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Sonnenschein, Aaron Huey. 2015. Indirect object ‘lowering’ in San Bartolomé Zoogocho Zapotec. In Natalie Operstein & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Valence changes in Zapotec: Synchrony, diachrony, typology, 281–296. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.110.13sonSearch in Google Scholar

Speck, Charles H. 1978. The phonology of Texmelucan Zapotec verb irregularity. Grand Forks: University of North Dakota MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Speck, Charles H. 1984. The phonology of the Texmelucan Zapotec verb. International Journal of American Linguistics 50. 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1086/465825.Search in Google Scholar

Speck, Charles H. 2012. The existential use of positional verbs in Texmelucan Zapotec. In Brook Danielle Lillehaugen & Aaron Huey Sonnenschein (eds.), Expressing location in Zapotec, 241–257. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Speck, Charles H. & Velma B. Pickett. 1976. Some properties of the Texmelucan Zapotec verbs go, come, and arrive. International Journal of American Linguistics 42. 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/465387.Search in Google Scholar

Stolz, Christel & Thomas Stolz. 2001. Mesoamerica as a linguistic area. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, 1539–1553. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110194265-047Search in Google Scholar

Stolz, Thomas. 1992. On turning bellies into locatives: Mesoamerican, universal or both? Papiere zur Linguistik 47. 165–189.Search in Google Scholar

Stubblefield, Morris & Carol Miller de Stubblefield. 1991. Diccionario zapoteco de Mitla, Oaxaca. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Search in Google Scholar

Uchihara, Hiroto. 2021. La pérdida de la vocal átona en el zapoteco central. In Francisco Arellanes Arellanes & Lilián Guerrero (eds.), Estudios lingüísticos y filológicos de lenguas indígenas mexicanas. Celebración por los 30 años del seminario de lenguas indígenas, 347–394. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Search in Google Scholar

Uchihara, Hiroto & Ambrosio Gutiérrez. 2020. Open and closed mid-front vowels in Teotitlán del Valle Zapotec. Phonological Data & Analysis 2. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3765/pda.v2art7.42.Search in Google Scholar

Ventayol-Boada, Albert. 2021. From classifiers to subordination: Nominal origins of relativizers and subordinators in Tù’un na Ñuu Sá Mátxíí Ntxè’è (Mixtec). Amerindia 43. 177–210. https://doi.org/10.56551/jkfg5183.Search in Google Scholar

Veerman-Leichsenring, Annette. 2004. Popolocan noun classifiers: A reconstruction. International Journal of American Linguistics 70. 416–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/429208.Search in Google Scholar

Veselinova, Ljuba. 2013. Negative existentials: A cross-linguistic study. Italian Journal of Linguistics 25(1). 107–145.Search in Google Scholar

Viberg, Åke. 1993. Crosslinguistic perspectives on lexical organization and lexical progression. In Kenneth Hyltenstam & Åke Viberg (eds.), Progression and regression in language, 340–385. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Whitecotton, Joseph W. & Judith Bradley Whitecotton. 1993. Vocabulario zapoteco-castellano. Nashville, Tennessee: Vanderbilt University.Search in Google Scholar

Wichmann, Anne. 2021. Grammacalization and prosody. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 331–341. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0026Search in Google Scholar

Wischer, Ilse. 2021. Grammaticalization and word formation. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 356–364. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0028Search in Google Scholar