The grammaticalization and dissolution of High Extended Intonation: an inalienable possession paradigm in Roon

References

Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman. 2013. Subset controllers in agreement. Morphology 23. 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-013-9218-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman. 2018. Features of person, from the inventory of persons to their morphological realization. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/11145.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman. 2019. Processing differences between person and number: A theoretical interpretation. Frontiers in Psychology 10. 211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00211.Suche in Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. & Edward L. Keenan. 1985. Deixis. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Arnold, Laura. 2018a. A grammar of Ambel: An Austronesian language of West New Guinea. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh (PhD thesis).Suche in Google Scholar

Arnold, Laura. 2018b. A preliminary archaeology of tone in Raja Ampat. In Antoinette Schapper (ed.) Contact and substrate in the languages of Wallacea Part 2. [Special issue.]. NUSA 64. 7–37.Suche in Google Scholar

Arnold, Laura. 2020. Four undocumented languages of Raja Ampat, West Papua, Indonesia. In Peter K. Austin (ed.), Language documentation and description, vol. 17, 25–43.Suche in Google Scholar

Arnold, Laura & David Gil. 2018. eeeH. Paper presented at the Fourteenth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (14ICAL), Antananarivo, Madagascar, 18 July.Suche in Google Scholar

Bach, Xavier Cédric Alain. 2021. ‘Alienable’ possession in Biakic. Transactions of the Philological Society 119(3). 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.12221.Suche in Google Scholar

Baerman, Matthew, Dunstan Brown & Greville Corbett. 2005. The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486234Suche in Google Scholar

Birch, Bruce. 2003. A tour of Iwaidja intonation. Paper presented at the Australian Linguistics Society Conference, Newcastle, 26–28 September.Suche in Google Scholar

Bishop, Judith B. 2003. Aspects of intonation and prosody in Bininj Gun-wok: An autosegmental-metrical analysis. Melbourne: University of Melbourne (PhD dissertation).Suche in Google Scholar

Blasi, Damián, Søren Wichmann, Harald Hammarström, Peter F. Stadler & Morten H. Christiansen. 2016. Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(2016). 10818–10823. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605782113.Suche in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight D. 1986. Intonation and gesture. American Speech 58(2). 156–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/455326.Suche in Google Scholar

Cassell, Justine. 2000. A framework for gesture generation and interpretation. In Roberto Cipolla & Alex Pentland (eds.), Computer vision in human-machine interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chapman, Jeffrey. 2007. Some aspects of intonation in Warlpiri. Paper presented at the Australian Languages Workshop, University of Sydney, 16–18 March.Suche in Google Scholar

Conners, Thomas J., Claudia M. Brugman & Nikki Adams. 2016. Reference tracking and non-canonical referring expressions in Indonesian. NUSA 60. 59–88. https://doi.org/10.15026/87444.Suche in Google Scholar

Cormier, Kearsy, Adam Schembri & Bencie Woll. 2013. Pronouns and pointing in sign languages. Lingua 137. 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.09.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Dalrymple, Mary & Suriel Mofu. 2012. Dusner. Munich: Lincom Europa.Suche in Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark & Antoinette Schapper. 2009. Whence the Austronesian indirect possession construction. Oceanic Linguistics 47. 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0017.Suche in Google Scholar

Enfield, Nick. 2003. Producing and editing diagrams using co-speech gesture: Spatializing non-spatial relationships in explanations of kinship in Laos. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 13. 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2003.13.1.7.Suche in Google Scholar

Fabritius, G. J. 1855. Anteekeningen omtrent Nieuw-Guinea [Annotations about New Guinea]. Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde IV. 209–215.Suche in Google Scholar

Frampton, John. 2002. Syncretism, impoverishment and the structure of person features. In Mary Andronis, Erin Debenport, Anne Pycha & Keiko Yoshimori (eds.), Papers from the 38th regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, 207–222. Chicago: University of Chicago.Suche in Google Scholar

Galis, Klaas Wilhelm. 1955. Talen en dialecten van Nederlands Nieuw-Guinea [Languages and dialects of Netherlands New Guinea]. Tijdschrift Nieuw-Guinea 16. 109–118, 134–145, 161–178.Suche in Google Scholar

Gasser, Emily. 2014. Windesi Wamesa morphophonology. New Haven: Yale University (PhD dissertation).Suche in Google Scholar

Gasser, Emily & David Gil. 2016. Roon talking dictionary. Swarthmore: Living Tongues Institute for Endangered Languages. Available at: http://www.talkingdictionary.org/roon.Suche in Google Scholar

Gil, David. 2017a. e. Paper presented at the 21st International Symposium on Malay/Indonesian Linguistics (ISMIL21), Langkawi, Malaysia, 5 May.Suche in Google Scholar

Gil, David. 2017b. Roon ve, DO/GIVE coexpression, and language contact in Northwest New Guinea. In Antoinette Schapper (ed.), Contact and substrate in the languages of Wallacea Part 1. [Special issue]. NUSA 62. 41–100. https://doi.org/10.15026/89844.Suche in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 58–90. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Gupta, Anthea Fraser. 1992. The pragmatic particles of Singapore Colloquial English. Journal of Pragmatics 18. 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90106-l.Suche in Google Scholar

Harbour, Daniel. 2016. Impossible persons. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034739.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi & Elizabeth Ritter. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78. 482–526. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0158.Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2017. Explaining alienability contrasts in adpossessive constructions: Predictability versus iconicity. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 36. 193–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2017-0009.Suche in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey G. 1984. Functional grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Suche in Google Scholar

Hellmuth, Sam, Frank Kügler & Ruth Singer. 2006. Quantitative investigation of intonation in an endangered language. In Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond & David Nathan (eds.), Proceedings of conference on language endangerment and linguistic theory, 123–132. London: SOAS.Suche in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2018. Some preliminary observations on prosody and information structure in Austronesian languages of Indonesia and East Timor. In Sonja Riesberg, Asako Shiohara & Atsuko Utsumi (eds.), Perspectives on information structure in Australian languages, 347–374. Berlin: Language Science Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Huehnergard, John & Na’ama Pat-El. 2018. The origin of the semitic relative marker. Bulletin of SOAS 81(2). 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0041977x18000496.Suche in Google Scholar

Hyman, Larry M. 2000. Privative tone in Bantu. Paper presented at the Symposium on Tone, ILCAA, Tokyo, 12–16 December.Suche in Google Scholar

Imai, Shingo. 2003. Spatial deixis. Buffalo: State University of New York, Buffalo (PhD dissertation).Suche in Google Scholar

Jannedy, Stefanie & Norma Mendoza-Denton. 2005. Structuring information through gesture and intonation. In Shinichiro Ishihara, Michaela Schmitz & Anne Schwarz (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure, vol. 3, 199–244. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Suche in Google Scholar

Johansson, Niklas Erben. 2017. Tracking linguistic primitives: The phonosemantic realization of fundamental oppositional pairs. In Matthias Bauer, Angelika Zirker, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljungberg (eds.), Dimensions of iconicity, iconicity in language and literature, vol. 15, 39–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.15.03johSuche in Google Scholar

Johansson, Niklas Erben, Andrey Anikin, Gerd Carling & Arthur Holmer. 2020. The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology 24. 253–310. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2034.Suche in Google Scholar

Kamholz, David. 2014. Austronesians in Papua: Diversification and change in South Halmahera–West New Guinea. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley (PhD dissertation).Suche in Google Scholar

Kamholz, David. 2017. Tone and language contact in Southern Cenderawasih Bay. In Antoinette Schapper (ed.), Contact and substrate in the languages of Wallacea Part 1. [Special issue]. NUSA 62. 7–39. https://doi.org/10.15026/89843.Suche in Google Scholar

Kluge, Angela. 2014. A grammar of Papuan Malay. Utrecht: LOT.10.17510/wjhi.v16i1.373Suche in Google Scholar

Kwan-Terry, Anna. 1992. Towards a dictionary of Singapore: Issues relating to making entries for particles in Singapore English. In Anne Pakir (ed.), Words in a cultural context, 62–72. Singapore: Unipress.Suche in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1998. Possession in Yucatec Maya: Structures – functions – typology. Munich: Lincom Europa.Suche in Google Scholar

Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615054Suche in Google Scholar

Liddell, Scott K. & Melanie Metzger. 1998. Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30(6). 657–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00061-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Lim, Lisa. 2007. Mergers and acquisitions: On the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes 26. 446–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2007.00522.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Loehr, Daniel. 2004. Gesture and intonation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University (PhD dissertation).Suche in Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 1978. Universals of tone. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, volume 2: Phonology, 335–365. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mailhammer, Robert & Patrick Caudal. 2019. Linear lengthening intonation in English on Croker Island: Identifying substrate origins. Language in Contact, Yesterday – Today – Tomorrow 6. 40–56.Suche in Google Scholar

McGregor, William. 1990. A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.22Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David, Francis Quek, Karl-Eric McCullough, Susan Duncan, Nobuhiro Furuyama, Robert Bryll, Xin Feng Ma & Rashid Ansari. 2001. Catchments, prosody and discourse. Gesture 1(1). 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.1.1.03mcn.Suche in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1996. New directions in referentiality. In Barbara A. Fox (ed.), Studies in Anaphora, 413–435. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.33.13mitSuche in Google Scholar

Mofu, Suriel S. 2008. Biak morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University (PhD dissertation).Suche in Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna & Balthasar Bickel. 2005a. Obligatory possessive inflection. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 238–241. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna & Balthasar Bickel. 2005b. Possessive classification. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 242–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Okrent, Arika. 2002. A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme versus gesture question in sign language linguistics (Or at least give us some criteria to work with). In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 175–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486777.009Suche in Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2006. Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages. Linguistics in Potsdam 24. 5–98.Suche in Google Scholar

Price, David S. & Mark Donohue. 2007. Stress in Ambai, and how it became that way. Paper presented at the First Workshop on the Languages of Papua, Manokwari, 9 August.Suche in Google Scholar

Remijsen, Bert. 2001. Word-prosodic systems of Raja Ampat languages. Utrecht: LOT.Suche in Google Scholar

Rolle, Nicholas Revett. 2018. Grammatical tone: Typology and theory. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley (PhD dissertation).10.5070/BF211040767Suche in Google Scholar

Rowley, Charles D. 1972. The New Guinea villager: A retrospect from 1964, Melbourne: Frank W. Chesire.Suche in Google Scholar

Sawaki, Yusuf. 2016. A grammar of Wooi: An Austronesian language of Yapen Island, Western New Guinea. Canberra: Australian National University (PhD dissertation).Suche in Google Scholar

Senghas, Anne & Marie Coppola. 2010. Getting to the point: Development of a linguistic device in Nicaraguan signing. In Donna Jo Napoli & Gaurav Mathur (eds.), Deaf around the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sharpe, Margaret C. 1972. Alawa phonology and grammar. Canberra: Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies.Suche in Google Scholar

Simard, Candide. 2013. Prosody and function of “iconic lengthening” in Jaminjung. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 16. 65–77.Suche in Google Scholar

Smits, Leo & Cornelis L. Voorhoeve. 1992a. The J. C. Anceaux collection of wordlists of Irian Jaya languages A: Austronesian languages (Part I) (Irian Jaya Source Material No. 4 Series B 1). Leiden-Jakarta: DSALCUL/IRIS.Suche in Google Scholar

Smits, Leo & Cornelis L. Voorhoeve. 1992b. The J. C. Anceaux collection of wordlists of Irian Jaya languages A: Austronesian languages (Part II) (Irian Jaya Source Material No. 5 Series B 2). Leiden-Jakarta: DSALCUL/IRIS.Suche in Google Scholar

Steinhauer, Hein. 1985. Number in Biak: Counterevidence to two alleged language universals. Bijdragen tot de Taal-Land- en Volkenkunde 141. 462–485. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003377.Suche in Google Scholar

Stevick, Earl W. 1969. Tone in Bantu. International Journal of American Linguistics 35. 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1086/465078.Suche in Google Scholar

Tongue, Ray K. 1974. The English of Singapore and Malaysia. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press.Suche in Google Scholar

van den Berg, René. 2009. Possession in South Halmahera-West New Guinea: Typology and reconstruction. In Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Robert Blust, 217–247. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar

van den Heuvel, Wilco. 2006. Biak, description of an Austronesian language of Papua. Utrecht: LOT.Suche in Google Scholar

von Humboldt, Wilhelm. 1830. Über die Verwandtschaft der Ortsadverbien mit dem Pronomen in einigen Sprachen. Berlin: Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Suche in Google Scholar

Voorhoeve, Cornelis L. 1975. Languages of Irian Jaya, checklist: Preliminary classification, language maps, wordlists. Pacific Linguistics Series B 31. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Suche in Google Scholar

Waag, Christine. 2010. The Fur verb and its context. In Nilo-Saharan, vol. 26. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Wong, Jock. 2004. The particles of Singapore English: A semantic and cultural interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 36. 739–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00070-5.Suche in Google Scholar