The Turkic middle voice system: deponency and paradigm reorganization

References

Akhmetov, M. A. 1978. Glagol v jazyke Orxono-Enisejskix Pamjatnikov. [The verb in the Orkhon-Yenisei inscriptions]. Ufa: Bashkir State University.Suche in Google Scholar

Baerman, Matthew. 2007. Deponency in Latin. In Matthew Baerman, Greville Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Proceedings of the British Academy 145: Deponency and Morphological Mismatches, 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5871/bacad/9780197264102.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Bahrt, Nicklas N. 2020. Towards a typology of voice syncretism. Helsinki: University of Helsinki PhD Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Baisa, Vít & Vít Suchomel. 2015. Turkic language support in Sketch Engine. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on computer processing in Turkic languages (TurkLang 2015), 214–223. Kazan: Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bammatov, Burghan G. & Nurmagomed E. Hadjiaxmedov. 2011. Kumyksko-russkij slovar’ [Kumyk-Russian dictionary]. Makhachkala: Russian Academy of Sciences.Suche in Google Scholar

Baskakov, Nikolai A. 1952. Karakalpakskij jazyk: Fonetika i morfologija II [Karakalpak language: Phonetics and morphology II]. Moscow: Publishing house of the USSR Academy of Sciences.Suche in Google Scholar

Bennett, Charles. 1907. New Latin grammar. New York: Allyn and Bacon.Suche in Google Scholar

Bogdanovskiy, P. V. 2003. Морфология татарского языка [Morphology of the Tatar language]. Moscow: Альфа-Омега.Suche in Google Scholar

Clauson, Gerhard. 1972. An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth century Turkish. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Deponency, syncretism and what lies between. In Matthew Baerman, Greville Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Proceedings of the British Academy 145: Deponency and Morphological Mismatches, 21–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5871/bacad/9780197264102.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar

Dammann, Ernst. 1954. Reziprok und Assoziativ in Bantusprachen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 104(1). 163–174.Suche in Google Scholar

Erdal, Marcel. 1991. Old Turkic word formation. A functional approach to the lexicon, vol. I–II. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Suche in Google Scholar

Erdal, Marcel. 2004. A grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789047403968Suche in Google Scholar

Əskər, Ramiz. 2006a. Divanü Lüğat-it-Türk, vol. 1. Bakı: Ozan.Suche in Google Scholar

Əskər, Ramiz. 2006b. Divanü Lüğat-it-Türk, vol. 2. Bakı: Ozan.Suche in Google Scholar

Əskər, Ramiz. 2006c. Divanü Lüğat-it-Türk, vol. 3. Bakı: Ozan.Suche in Google Scholar

Əskər, Ramiz. 2006d. Divanü Lüğat-it-Türk, vol. 4. Bakı: Ozan.Suche in Google Scholar

Gabain, Annemarie von. 1941. Alttürkische Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Suche in Google Scholar

Gandon, Ophélie. 2013. Le suffixe verbal du réciproque en turc et dans les langues turciques: un marqueur polysémique. Lyon: Université Lumiere Lyon II M.A. thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Ganiev, Fuat Ashrafovich. 1997. Russko-tatarskij slovar’ [Russian-Tatar dictionary]. Moscow: Insan.Suche in Google Scholar

Georg, Stefan. 1990. Some thoughts on the etymology of the Turkic plural suffix -lar/-ler. In Bernt Brendemoen (ed.), Altaica Osloensia. Proceedings from the 32nd Meeting of the Permanent International Asiatic Conference, 141–152. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Suche in Google Scholar

Gochijaeva, Sofiya A. & Khanafi I. Suyunchev. 1989. Karachaevo-balkarsko-russkij slovar’ [Karachay-Balkar-Russian dictionary]. Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Suche in Google Scholar

Göksel, Aslı & Celia Kerslake. 2005. Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203340769Suche in Google Scholar

Grestenberger, Laura. 2019. Deponency in morphology. Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.553Suche in Google Scholar

Grønbech, Kaare. 1936. Der türkische Sprachbau. Kopenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.Suche in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 87–120. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.23.05hasSuche in Google Scholar

Inglese, Guglielmo. 2020. The Hittite middle voice: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004432307Suche in Google Scholar

Inglese, Guglielmo. 2022. Towards a typology of middle voice systems. Linguistic Typology 26(3). 489–531. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-0131.Suche in Google Scholar

Janhunen, Juha. 2017. Issues of comparative Uralic and Altaic Studies (3): The Turkic plural in *-s. Altai Hakpo 27. 155–168. https://doi.org/10.15816/ask.2017.27.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars. 1981. Pluralsuffixformen im Südwesttürkischen. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Suche in Google Scholar

Johanson, Lars. 2021. Turkic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139016704Suche in Google Scholar

Judaxin, Konstantin K. 1965. Kirgizsko-russkij slovar’ [Kirghiz-Russian dictionary], vol. 2. Moscow: Sovetskaja enciklopedija.Suche in Google Scholar

Kazımov, Qəzənfər. 2010. Müasir Azərbaycan Dili: Morfologiya [Modern Azerbaijani: Morphology]. Baku: Elm və Təhsil.Suche in Google Scholar

Kemmer, Susanne. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.23Suche in Google Scholar

Klaiman, Miriam H. 1991. Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Klyashtorny, Sergey G. 1982. The Terkhin inscription. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 36(1). 335–366.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, Sooman Noah. 2008. A grammar of Iranian Azerbaijani. Seoul: The Altaic Society of Korea.Suche in Google Scholar

Lewis, Geoffrey. 2000. Turkish grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198700364.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Luge, Matthew L. 2013. Defectiveness and deponency in diachrony. Diachronica 30(1). 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.30.1.05jug.Suche in Google Scholar

Musayev, Mehman M. 2012. Azərbaycan Dilinin Funksional Qrammatikası: Morfologiyaya Yeni Baxıšlar və Leksemantika [A functional grammar of the Azerbaijani language: New perspectives on morphology and lexical semantics]. Baku: Azərbaycan Milli Elmlər Akademiyası Nəsimi adına Dilçilik İnstitutunun Elmi Šurası.Suche in Google Scholar

Nadelyaev, Vladimir M., Dmitry M. Nasilov, Edgem R. Tenishev & Aleksandr M. Sherbak. 1969. Drevnetjurkskij slovar’. [Old Turkic dictionary]. Leningrad: Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Igor & Vladimir Nedjalkov. 2007. Reciprocals, sociatives, comitatives, and assistives in Yakut. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušienė & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 1095–1161. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71.37nedSuche in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 2007a. Polysemy of reciprocal markers. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušienė & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 231–334. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71.10nedSuche in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 2007b. Reciprocals, assistives, and plural in Kirghiz. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušienė & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 1231–1279. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71.39nedSuche in Google Scholar

Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Emma Š. Geniušiene. 2007. Questionnaire on reciprocals. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov, Emma Š. Geniušienė & Zlatka Guentchéva (eds.), Reciprocal constructions, 379–434. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.71.13nedSuche in Google Scholar

Newman, Paul. 2012. Pluractional verbs: An overview. In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Brenda Laca (eds.), Verbal plurality and distributivity, 185–209. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110293500.185Suche in Google Scholar

Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2). 149–211. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Nigmatov, Khamid G. 1973. Залогы глагола в восточно-тюркском языке XI–XII веков [Verbal voice in the East-Turkic language of the 11–12th centuries]. ST 1973(1). 46–61.Suche in Google Scholar

Orucov, Əliheydar (primary ed.), Bəhruz Abdullayev, Nərgiz Rəhimzadə & Aɣamusa Axundov. 2006. Azərbaycan dilinin izahlı lüğəti [Explanatory dictionary of the Azerbaijani language]. Baku: Šərq-Qərb.Suche in Google Scholar

Rónas-Tas, András. 1987. On the development and origin of the East Turkic “Runic” script. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 41(1). 7–14.Suche in Google Scholar

Rónas-Tas, András. 1998. The reconstruction of Proto-Turkic and the genetic question. In Lars Johanson & Éva Csató (eds.), The Turkic languages, 67–80. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Schönig, Claus. 1999. The internal division of Modern Turkic and its historical implications. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientarium Hungaricae 52(1). 63–95.Suche in Google Scholar

Serbrennikov, Boris A. & Ninel Zeynal qızı Hacıyeva. 2002. Türk dillərinin müqayisəli tarixi qrammatikası [Historical-comparative grammar of the Turkic languages]. Baku: Səda.Suche in Google Scholar

Sevortjan, Ervand V. 1962. Affiksy glagoloobrazovanija v azerbajdžanskom jazyke: Opyt sravnitel’nogo issledovanija [Affixes of verb formation in the Azerbaijani language: A comparative investigation]. Moscow: Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar

Stump, Gregory T. 2007. A non-canonical pattern of deponency and its implications. In Matthew Baerman, Greville Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds.), Proceedings of the British Academy 145: Deponency and morphological mismatches, 127–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5871/bacad/9780197264102.003.0004Suche in Google Scholar

Sultanzade, Vügar. 2001. A retrospective view of the passive, reflexive, reciprocal, causative and decausative in Azerbaijanian. Turkic Languages 5. 29–67.Suche in Google Scholar

Tekin, Talat. 1968. A grammar of Orkhon Turkic. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Suche in Google Scholar

Tenishev, Edgem R., Vladimir D. Arakin, Galina F. Blagova, Aliy A. Čečenov, Ljudmila A. Pokrovskaja, Fyodor D. Ašnin, Liya S. Levitskaja, Akhnjev A. Juldašev, Nikolai A. Baskakov, Igor V. Kormušin, Ninel Zeynal qızı Hacıyeva & Kenesbai M. Musaev. 1988. Sravnitel’no-istoričeskaja grammatika tjurkskix jazykov: Morfologija [Comparative-historical grammar of the Turkic languages: Morphology]. Moscow: Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar

Thornton, Anna M. 2011. Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.), Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology, 358–381. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589982.003.0017Suche in Google Scholar

Thornton, Anna M. 2012. Reduction and maintenance of overabundance. A case study on Italian verb paradigms. Word Structure 5(2). 183–207. https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2012.0026.Suche in Google Scholar

Useinov, Seyran Memetovich. 2007. Russko-krymskotatarskij slovar’ [Russian-Crimean Tatar dictionary]. Simferopol: Tezis.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilkens, Jens. 2021. Handwörterbuch des Altuigurischen/Eski Uygurcanın El Sözlüğü. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.10.17875/gup2021-1590Suche in Google Scholar