Abstract
Most Nakh-Daghestanian languages have gender (or noun class) agreement in the verb, but do not have person agreement. This is the case with Chechen and Ingush, which are genetically the closest to Batsbi. Batsbi, by contrast, has developed person agreement with the subject in the verb along with gender agreement. This is assumed to be due to the strong influence of Georgian, which has long been the second language of Batsbi speakers. In Georgian, the verb shows person agreement with the subject as well as with the direct or indirect object. Present-day Batsbi, presumably inspired by the polypersonal agreement of Georgian, further develops the cliticization of non-subject personal pronouns. To put it simply, it seems as though Batsbi attempts to express what a Georgian verb may encode in a single, finite form by means of a verb and a personal pronoun that is cliticized to it.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments and advice. An earlier version of the present paper was read at the workshop “Morphological variation and change in languages of the Caucasus” held in the framework of 13th International Morphology Meeting in Vienna in 2008. Special thanks are also extended to the workshop participants for their feedback.
Abbreviations
- 1, 2, 3
first, second, third person
- abs
absolutive case
- adv
adverbial case
- all
allative case
- aor
aorist
- comp
complementizer
- con
contact case
- dat
dative case
- erg
ergative case
- excl
exclusive
- fut
future
- gen
genitive case
- imp
imperative
- incl
inclusive
- inf
infinitive
- intr
intransitive
- io
indirect object
- loc
locative case
- m
male
- neg
negation
- nom
nominative case
- o
object
- obl
oblique
- pass
passive
- pl
plural
- prs
present
- prv
preradical vowel
- pst
past
- ptcp
participle
- pv
preverb
- s
subject
- sg
singular
- ts
thematic suffix
References
Aliroev, Ibragim. 2004. Samoučitel’ Čečenskogo Jazyka [Chechen teach-yourself]. Moscow: Academia.Suche in Google Scholar
Chrelashvili, Konstantine. 1982. Xronologičeskie tipy sprjaženija glagolov bacbijskogo jazyka i vopros “polipersonalizma” v plane strukturno-tipologičeskogo copostavlenija s gruzinskim polipersonal’nym glagolom. [Chronological types of verb conjugation in Batsbi and the problem of “polypersonalism” in the light of structural-typological comparison with Georgian polypersonal verbs]. Annual of Ibero-Caucasian Linguistics 9. 120–138.Suche in Google Scholar
Chrelashvili, Konstantine. 2002. Ts’ova-Tušuri Ena [The Tsova-Tush language]. Tbilisi: Tbilisi State University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2003. Agreement: The range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. In Dunstan Brown, Greville G. Corbett & Carole Tiberius (eds.), Agreement: A typological perspective, 155–202. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/1467-968X.00117Suche in Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Dešeriev, Ju. D. 1953. Bacbijskij Jazyk. Moscow: Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar
Gagua, Rusudan. 1952. Zmnis cvla gramat’ik’uli k’las-k’at’egoriis mixedvit bacbur enaši [Verbal inflection according to the class category in Batsbi]. Iberiul-K’avk’asiuri Enatmecniereba 4. 129–134.Suche in Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2009. Exuberant exponence in Batsbi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27. 267–303.10.1007/s11049-009-9070-8Suche in Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2011. Clitics and affixes in Batsbi. In Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen & Eric Potsdam (eds.), Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen, 137–155. University of California, Santa Cruz: Linguistic Research Center.Suche in Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Arther G. Samuel. 2011. Perception of exuberant exponence in Batsbi: Functional or incidental? Language 87. 447–469.10.1353/lan.2011.0068Suche in Google Scholar
Holisky, Dee Ann. 1987. The case of the intransitive subject in Tsova-Tush. Lingua 71. 103–132.10.1016/0024-3841(87)90069-6Suche in Google Scholar
Holisky, Dee Ann & Rusudan Gagua. 1994. Tsova-Tush (Batsbi). In Rieks Smeets (ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus. Vol. 4: The North East Caucasian languages, Part 2, 147–212. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Imnaishvili, Davit. 1968. P’iris k’at’egoriis sak’itxisatvis naxuri (čačnuri) jgupis enata zmnaši [On the problem of the category of person in the verb of the Nakh (Chechen) languages]. Iberiul-K’avk’asiuri Enatmecniereba 16. 192–217.Suche in Google Scholar
Kadagidze, Davit & Niko Kadagidze. 1984. C’ova-Tušur-Kartul-Rusuli Leksik’oni [The Tsova-Tush-Georgian-Russian dictionary]. Tbilisi.Suche in Google Scholar
Mikeladze, Maq’vala. 2008. Int’erperent’uli P’rocesebi C’ovatušur Enaši, I nac’ili: Leksik’a da ponologia [Interferential processes in Tsova-Tush]. Telavi: Telavi State University.Suche in Google Scholar
Mikeladze, Maq’vala. 2011. Ts’ovatušuri Enis Saxelta Morpologia [Morphology of nouns of Tsova-Tush]. Tbilisi: Saari.Suche in Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1994. Ingush. In Rieks Smeets (ed.), The indigenous languages of the Caucasus. Vol. 4: The North East Caucasian languages, Part 2, 79–145. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Schiefner, A. 1856. Versuch über die Thusch-Sprache oder dis khistische Mundart in Thuschetien. St. Petersburg.Suche in Google Scholar
Shanidze, Akaki. 1970. Tušebi [The Tush people]. Mnatobi 2. 103–106.Suche in Google Scholar
Topchiashvili, Roland (ed.). 2010. Sakartvelos Etnograpia/Etnologia [The ethnography/ethnology of Georgia]. Tbilisi: Universali.Suche in Google Scholar
Uturgaidze, T. 1966. Kartuli Enis Mtis K’ilota Zogi Tavisebureba [Some peculiarities of Mountain dialects of Georgian]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.Suche in Google Scholar
Volkova, N. 1974. Etničeskij Sostav Naselenija Severnogo Kavkaza v XVIII–Načale XX Veka. [Ethnic composition of population of the North Caucasus from XVIII to the early XX century]. Moscow.Suche in Google Scholar
Volkova, N. 1977. Batsbijtsy Gruzii (Etnografičeskie Zametki) [Batsbi people of Georgia (Ethnographic remarks)]. Sovetskaja Etnografija [Soviet Ethnography] 2. 84–89.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Languages of the Caucasus and contact-induced language change
- The loss of case system in Ardeshen Laz and its morphosyntactic consequences
- The impact of language contact on Hinuq
- Complement clauses in Caucasian Urum
- The development of person agreement and the cliticization of personal pronouns in Batsbi
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Languages of the Caucasus and contact-induced language change
- The loss of case system in Ardeshen Laz and its morphosyntactic consequences
- The impact of language contact on Hinuq
- Complement clauses in Caucasian Urum
- The development of person agreement and the cliticization of personal pronouns in Batsbi