References

Bailey, Thomas Grahame. 1909. A brief grammar of the Kanauri language. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 63. 661–687.Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, Thomas Grahame. 1911. Kanauri vocabulary in two parts. London: The Royal Asiatic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, Thomas Grahame. 1920. Linguistic studies from the Himalayas, being studies in the grammar of fifteen Himalayan dialects. London: The Royal Asiatic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cunningham, Joseph Davey. 1844. Notes on Moorcroftʼs travels in Ladakh, and on Gerardʼs account of Kunáwar, including a general description of the latter district. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 13. 172–253.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Henry. 1997. Deep unaccusativity and zero syntax in S’tát’imcets. In Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Amaya Mendikoetxea (eds.), Theoretical issues at the morphology-syntax interface: Supplements of the International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology XL. 55–96.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1992. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25. 39–62.10.1080/03740463.1992.10412277Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33–52.10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 369–382.10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80001-1Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16. 529–564.10.1515/lity-2012-0020Search in Google Scholar

Demirdache, Hamida 1997. ‘Out of control’ in Salish and event (de)composition. In Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Amaya Mendikoetxea (eds.), Theoretical issues at the morphology-syntax interface: Supplements of the International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology XL. 97–143.Search in Google Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7Search in Google Scholar

Driem, George van. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004492530Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Marcelo. 2005. Event quantification and plurality. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Marcelo. 2016. The semantic ingredients of imperfectivity in progressives, habituals, and counterfactuals. Natural Language Semantics 24. 353–397.10.1007/s11050-016-9127-2Search in Google Scholar

Gerard, Alexander. 1842. A vocabulary of the Koonawur languages. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 11. 478–551.Search in Google Scholar

Grierson, George Abraham (ed.) 1909. Linguistic survey of India. Vol. III. Tibeto-Burman family. Part I. General introduction, specimens of the Tibetan dialects, the Himalayan dialects, and the North Assam group. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing.Search in Google Scholar

Grimes, Barbara F. (ed.) 2000. Ethnologue. Vol. 2: Maps and indexes. 14th edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Ron Trail (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian linguistics 7. 95–10. Canberra: Australian National University. Online: http://sealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/hale1980person.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Hargreaves, David J. 1991. The concept of intentional action in the grammar of Kathmandu Newari. PhD thesis, University of Oregon. Online: https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/3088.Search in Google Scholar

Hargreaves, David J. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 5. 1–48. Online: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/36093022.10.5070/H95022977Search in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. 2007. Researching local languages in Kinnaur. In Julia Ahamer & Gerda Lechleitner (eds.), Um-Feld-Forschung: Erfahrungen – Erlebnisse – Ergebnisse, 249–266. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. 2008. Erforschung undokumentierter Sprachen in Upper Kinnaur – Zur Präzisierung der Sprachsituation in Upper Kinnaur (Himachal Pradesh, Indien). Wien: Austrian Academy of Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. 2011. Some notes on gender and number marking in Shumcho. In Gerda Lechleitner & Christian Liebl (eds.), Jahrbuch des Phonogrammarchivs der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2, 52–90. Göttingen: Cuvillier.Search in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. 2013. Subject and object agreement in Shumcho. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics, 221–274. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110310832.221Search in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. 2014. The verbal plural marker in Shumcho. In Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds.), Complex visibles out there, 193–216. Olomouc: Palacky University. Online: http://olinco.upol.cz/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/olinco-2014-proceedings.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. in progress. Gender marking in Shumcho. In Marc Tang & Marcin Kilarski (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Nominal classification in South-East Asia”, 46th Poznań Linguistic Meeting 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M. 2011. Aspects of the progressive in English and Icelandic. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia.Search in Google Scholar

Joshi, Tika Ram. 1909. A dictionary and grammar of Kanâwari, the language of Kanâwar, in the Bashahr State, Punjab. Calcutta: The Baptist Mission Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch & Karl Erich Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Kirk, John M. 2015. The progressive in Irish English: Looking both ways? In Peter Collins (ed.), Grammatical change in English World-Wide, 87–118. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.67.05kirSearch in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Godehard Link & Gennaro Chierchia. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier, The generic book, 1–124. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Landman, Fred & Susan Rothstein. 2014. Habituals and the progressive. Handout. Pisa: Chronos 11. Online: https://www.tau.ac.il/~landman/Online_papers/Handouts/Fred%20Landman%20and%20Susan%20Rothstein%202014%20Habituals%20and%20the%20Progressive%20-%20Chronos%2011%20-%20handout.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Mamgain, M.D. (ed.) 1971. Himachal Pradesh District Gazetteers: Kinnaur. Shimla: Quick Printers.Search in Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Montaut, Annie. 2004. A grammar of Hindi. München: Lincom.Search in Google Scholar

Montaut, Annie. 2008. Reduplication and echo-words in Hindi. In Rajendra Singh (ed.), Annual Review of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2008, 22–62. Berlin &New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110211504.1.21Search in Google Scholar

Negi, Thakur Sen. 1976. Scheduled tribes of Himachal Pradesh: A profile. Shimla: Published by the author himself.Search in Google Scholar

Neethivanan, Jekatican. 1976. Survey of Kanauri in Himachal Pradesh. Calcutta: Office of the Registrar General.Search in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41. 47–81.10.1016/0010-0277(91)90032-YSearch in Google Scholar

Saxena, Anju. 1995. Finite verb morphology in Kinnauri. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 24. 257–282.10.1163/19606028-90000412Search in Google Scholar

Saxena, Anju. 1997. Internal and external factors in language change: Aspect in Tibeto-Kinnauri. Uppsala: Department of Linguistics, Uppsala University.Search in Google Scholar

Saxena, Anju. 2000. Evidentiality in Kinnauri. In: Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentiality: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages, 471–482. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Saxena, Anju. 2017. Sangla Kinnauri. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 756–772. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, Banshi Ram. 1976. Kinnar lok sahitya [Kinnar Folk literature]. Bilaspur: Lalit Prakashan.Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, Devi Datta. 1988. A descriptive grammar of Kinnauri. Delhi: Mittal Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, Devi Datta. 1989. Tribal languages of Himachal Pradesh. Part 1. Delhi: Mittal Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Sharma, Devi Datta. 1992. Tribal languages of Himachal Pradesh. Part 2. Delhi: Mittal Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Takahashi, Yoshiharu. 2001. A descriptive study of Kinnaur (Pangi dialect): A preliminary report. In Yasuhiko Nagano & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), New research on Zhangzhung and related Himalayan languages, 97–119. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Search in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter & Jean Hannah. 2008. International English: A guide to the varieties of Standard English. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66. 143–160.10.7591/9781501743726-005Search in Google Scholar

Widmer, Manuel. 2014. A descriptive grammar of Bunan. PhD thesis, University of Bern.Search in Google Scholar

Zoller, Claus Peter. 1983. Die Sprache der Rang Pas von Garhwal [The language of the Rang Pas of Garhwal]. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Search in Google Scholar