Startseite Progressivity and habituality in Shumcho
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Progressivity and habituality in Shumcho

  • Christian Huber EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. Februar 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article is concerned with some features of the tempo-aspectual system of Shumcho, a small West Himalayish (Tibeto-Burman) language spoken in a few villages in the district Kinnaur (State of Himachal Pradesh) in the Indian Himalayas, and provides a descriptive account of the language’s strategies to express progressive or habitual action and the effects of the respective markers with various types of predicates. I also consider the semantic (evidential) properties of the copulas and their interaction with the aspect/tense system, and offer some thoughts on the historical development of imperfective and perfective constructions as met in the present-day language.

Abbreviations

1/2/3/4

first/second/third/fourth person

1/2

first/second person AgrO or AgrS

abl

ablative

adess

adessive

AgrO

object agreement

AgrS

subject agreement

ass

assertive

aux

auxiliary

coh

cohortative

cond

conditional

conv

converb

cop

copula

dat

dative

dd

discourse-deictic prefix

dm

discourse marker

emph

emphatic

erg

ergative

etc.

etcetera

excl

exclusive

exp

experiencer

f, f

feminine

foc

focus

fut

future

gen

genitive

h

honorific

imp

imperative

impf

imperfective

incl

inclusive

inf

infinitive

intr

intransitive

irr

irrealis

loc

locative

m, m

masculine

mir

mirative

neg

negation

nh

non-honorific

onom.

onomatopoetic

past

past

perf

perfective

pl

plural

poss

possessive

prs

present

prog

progressive

q

question marker

qty/nr

quantity/number

s

singular

TAM

tense, aspect, or mood marker

top

topic marker

WH

West Himalayish

References

Bailey, Thomas Grahame. 1909. A brief grammar of the Kanauri language. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 63. 661–687.Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Thomas Grahame. 1911. Kanauri vocabulary in two parts. London: The Royal Asiatic Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Bailey, Thomas Grahame. 1920. Linguistic studies from the Himalayas, being studies in the grammar of fifteen Himalayan dialects. London: The Royal Asiatic Society.Suche in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cunningham, Joseph Davey. 1844. Notes on Moorcroftʼs travels in Ladakh, and on Gerardʼs account of Kunáwar, including a general description of the latter district. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 13. 172–253.Suche in Google Scholar

Davis, Henry. 1997. Deep unaccusativity and zero syntax in S’tát’imcets. In Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Amaya Mendikoetxea (eds.), Theoretical issues at the morphology-syntax interface: Supplements of the International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology XL. 55–96.Suche in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1992. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 25. 39–62.10.1080/03740463.1992.10412277Suche in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33–52.10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33Suche in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 369–382.10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80001-1Suche in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16. 529–564.10.1515/lity-2012-0020Suche in Google Scholar

Demirdache, Hamida 1997. ‘Out of control’ in Salish and event (de)composition. In Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Amaya Mendikoetxea (eds.), Theoretical issues at the morphology-syntax interface: Supplements of the International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology XL. 97–143.Suche in Google Scholar

Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7Suche in Google Scholar

Driem, George van. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004492530Suche in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Marcelo. 2005. Event quantification and plurality. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferreira, Marcelo. 2016. The semantic ingredients of imperfectivity in progressives, habituals, and counterfactuals. Natural Language Semantics 24. 353–397.10.1007/s11050-016-9127-2Suche in Google Scholar

Gerard, Alexander. 1842. A vocabulary of the Koonawur languages. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 11. 478–551.Suche in Google Scholar

Grierson, George Abraham (ed.) 1909. Linguistic survey of India. Vol. III. Tibeto-Burman family. Part I. General introduction, specimens of the Tibetan dialects, the Himalayan dialects, and the North Assam group. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing.Suche in Google Scholar

Grimes, Barbara F. (ed.) 2000. Ethnologue. Vol. 2: Maps and indexes. 14th edition. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Suche in Google Scholar

Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In Ron Trail (ed.), Papers in South-East Asian linguistics 7. 95–10. Canberra: Australian National University. Online: http://sealang.net/sala/archives/pdf8/hale1980person.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Hargreaves, David J. 1991. The concept of intentional action in the grammar of Kathmandu Newari. PhD thesis, University of Oregon. Online: https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/3088.Suche in Google Scholar

Hargreaves, David J. 2005. Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics 5. 1–48. Online: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/36093022.10.5070/H95022977Suche in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. 2007. Researching local languages in Kinnaur. In Julia Ahamer & Gerda Lechleitner (eds.), Um-Feld-Forschung: Erfahrungen – Erlebnisse – Ergebnisse, 249–266. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Suche in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. 2008. Erforschung undokumentierter Sprachen in Upper Kinnaur – Zur Präzisierung der Sprachsituation in Upper Kinnaur (Himachal Pradesh, Indien). Wien: Austrian Academy of Sciences.Suche in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. 2011. Some notes on gender and number marking in Shumcho. In Gerda Lechleitner & Christian Liebl (eds.), Jahrbuch des Phonogrammarchivs der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 2, 52–90. Göttingen: Cuvillier.Suche in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. 2013. Subject and object agreement in Shumcho. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan W. Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics, 221–274. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110310832.221Suche in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. 2014. The verbal plural marker in Shumcho. In Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds.), Complex visibles out there, 193–216. Olomouc: Palacky University. Online: http://olinco.upol.cz/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/olinco-2014-proceedings.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Huber, Christian. in progress. Gender marking in Shumcho. In Marc Tang & Marcin Kilarski (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Nominal classification in South-East Asia”, 46th Poznań Linguistic Meeting 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

Jóhannsdóttir, Kristín M. 2011. Aspects of the progressive in English and Icelandic. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia.Suche in Google Scholar

Joshi, Tika Ram. 1909. A dictionary and grammar of Kanâwari, the language of Kanâwar, in the Bashahr State, Punjab. Calcutta: The Baptist Mission Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In Manfred Bierwisch & Karl Erich Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 143–173. The Hague: Mouton.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirk, John M. 2015. The progressive in Irish English: Looking both ways? In Peter Collins (ed.), Grammatical change in English World-Wide, 87–118. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.67.05kirSuche in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Godehard Link & Gennaro Chierchia. 1995. Genericity: An introduction. In Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier, The generic book, 1–124. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Landman, Fred & Susan Rothstein. 2014. Habituals and the progressive. Handout. Pisa: Chronos 11. Online: https://www.tau.ac.il/~landman/Online_papers/Handouts/Fred%20Landman%20and%20Susan%20Rothstein%202014%20Habituals%20and%20the%20Progressive%20-%20Chronos%2011%20-%20handout.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Mamgain, M.D. (ed.) 1971. Himachal Pradesh District Gazetteers: Kinnaur. Shimla: Quick Printers.Suche in Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Masica, Colin P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Montaut, Annie. 2004. A grammar of Hindi. München: Lincom.Suche in Google Scholar

Montaut, Annie. 2008. Reduplication and echo-words in Hindi. In Rajendra Singh (ed.), Annual Review of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2008, 22–62. Berlin &New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110211504.1.21Suche in Google Scholar

Negi, Thakur Sen. 1976. Scheduled tribes of Himachal Pradesh: A profile. Shimla: Published by the author himself.Suche in Google Scholar

Neethivanan, Jekatican. 1976. Survey of Kanauri in Himachal Pradesh. Calcutta: Office of the Registrar General.Suche in Google Scholar

Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41. 47–81.10.1016/0010-0277(91)90032-YSuche in Google Scholar

Saxena, Anju. 1995. Finite verb morphology in Kinnauri. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 24. 257–282.10.1163/19606028-90000412Suche in Google Scholar

Saxena, Anju. 1997. Internal and external factors in language change: Aspect in Tibeto-Kinnauri. Uppsala: Department of Linguistics, Uppsala University.Suche in Google Scholar

Saxena, Anju. 2000. Evidentiality in Kinnauri. In: Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentiality: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages, 471–482. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Saxena, Anju. 2017. Sangla Kinnauri. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 756–772. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Sharma, Banshi Ram. 1976. Kinnar lok sahitya [Kinnar Folk literature]. Bilaspur: Lalit Prakashan.Suche in Google Scholar

Sharma, Devi Datta. 1988. A descriptive grammar of Kinnauri. Delhi: Mittal Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Sharma, Devi Datta. 1989. Tribal languages of Himachal Pradesh. Part 1. Delhi: Mittal Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Sharma, Devi Datta. 1992. Tribal languages of Himachal Pradesh. Part 2. Delhi: Mittal Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Takahashi, Yoshiharu. 2001. A descriptive study of Kinnaur (Pangi dialect): A preliminary report. In Yasuhiko Nagano & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), New research on Zhangzhung and related Himalayan languages, 97–119. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Suche in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter & Jean Hannah. 2008. International English: A guide to the varieties of Standard English. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66. 143–160.10.7591/9781501743726-005Suche in Google Scholar

Widmer, Manuel. 2014. A descriptive grammar of Bunan. PhD thesis, University of Bern.Suche in Google Scholar

Zoller, Claus Peter. 1983. Die Sprache der Rang Pas von Garhwal [The language of the Rang Pas of Garhwal]. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-02-26
Published in Print: 2019-04-24

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 9.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/stuf-2019-0004/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen