Home Tracing orthographic debates through history: sociolinguistic perspectives on nineteenth-century spelling proposals for Galician and Luxembourgish
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Tracing orthographic debates through history: sociolinguistic perspectives on nineteenth-century spelling proposals for Galician and Luxembourgish

  • John Bellamy ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 5, 2025

Abstract

Discussions of orthography for recently standardised languages frequently focus on the extent to which spelling proposals resemble orthographic models of dominant existing standard languages, leading to tensions around notions of hybridity, differentiation and equivalence. This article examines an influential spelling proposal in the 19th century for Luxembourgish and one for Galician respectively in a comparative analysis of relationships in these early codification works between the nascent standard, the orthographic influence of dominant existing standard languages and the metalanguage of the text. The comparative methodology combines discursive approaches with a social semiotic analysis of the proposed spellings to develop a comprehensive framework for identifying both explicit and implicit meaning conveyed through the proposed orthographies. Whereas the authors’ metacommentaries explaining the proposed spellings aligns largely with a dominant standard language model (for example, German or Spanish respectively in these case studies), the iconic representations at the graphemic level suggest other convergences (for example, French or Portuguese) that are not always expressly formulated in the metalinguistic explanations. The fluid shifting between the influential orthographic norms of other languages continues to emerge in discussions about the spelling of Luxembourgish and of Galician from the 19th century until the present-day.

References

Agha, Asif. 2006. Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618284Search in Google Scholar

Álvarez, Rosario. 2019. Galician linguistics. Between Hispanic philological tradition and visibility in the Luso-Brazilian sphere. In Gabriel Rei-Doval & Fernando Tejedo-Herrero (eds.), Lusophone, Galician, and Hispanic linguistics: Bridging frames and traditions, 92–112. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315403946-6Search in Google Scholar

Álvarez-Cáccamo, Celso & Mário J. Herrero-Valeiro. 1996. O continuum da escrita na Galiza: Entre o espanhol e o português. Agália. Revista Internacional da Associaçom Galega da Língua 46. 143–156.Search in Google Scholar

Ambrosiani, Per & Elena Llamas-Pombo. 2023. Comparative historical perspectives. In Marco Condorelli & Hanna Rutkowska (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of historical orthography, 163–182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108766463.008Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, 2nd edn. London & New York: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Ayres-Bennett, Wendy. 2016. Codification and prescription in linguistic standardisation. In Josep Maria Nadal & Francesc Feliu (eds.), Constructing languages: Norms, myths and emotions, 13–40. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ivitra.13.07ayrSearch in Google Scholar

Ayres-Bennett, Wendy & John Bellamy. 2021. Introduction. In Wendy Ayres-Bennett & John Bellamy (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language standardization, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108559249.001Search in Google Scholar

Bellamy, John. 2021. Contemporary perspectives on language standardization: The role of digital and online technologies. In Wendy Ayres-Bennett & John Bellamy (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language standardization, 691–712. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108559249.027Search in Google Scholar

Bellamy, John. 2024. Codification in the shadow of standards: ideologies in early nineteenth-century metalinguistic texts on Luxembourgish. Language & History 67(3). 225–246.10.1080/17597536.2023.2300211Search in Google Scholar

Bermel, Neil. 2007. Linguistic authority, language ideology and metaphor: The Czech orthography war. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110197662Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 1999. Language ideological debates. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110808049Search in Google Scholar

Bunčić, Daniel. 2016. Other cases of diglyphia. In Daniel Bunčić, Sandra L. Lippert & Achim Rabus (eds.), Biscriptality: A sociolinguistic typology, 124–128. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Condorelli, Marco. 2023. What is spelling standardization? In Marco Condorelli & Hanna Rutkowska (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of historical orthography, 265–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108766463.013Search in Google Scholar

Condorelli, Marco & Hanna Rutkowska. 2023. Historical orthography: purposes, ambitions and boundaries. In Marco Condorelli & Hanna Rutkowska (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of historical orthography, 3–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108766463.001Search in Google Scholar

Cuveiro Piñol, Juan. 1868. El habla gallega. Observaciones y datos sobre su origen y vicisitudes. Pontevedra: Imp. de José A. Antúnez.Search in Google Scholar

Darquennes, Jeroen & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2015. The standardisation of minority languages (Sociolinguistica 29). Berlin: De Gruyter10.1515/soci-2015-0002Search in Google Scholar

Dayán-Fernández, Alejandro & Bernadette O’Rourke. 2020. Galician-Portuguese and the politics of language in contemporary Galicia. In Katerina Strani (ed.), Multilingualism and politics, 231–260. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-40701-8_10Search in Google Scholar

De la Fontaine, Edmond. 1855. Versuch über die Orthographie der luxemburger-deutschen Mundart. Luxemburg: V. Bück.Search in Google Scholar

Deumert, Ana & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2003. Germanic standardizations: Past to present. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.18Search in Google Scholar

Educatiounsministère Lëtzebuerg. 2017. Schreiwen.lu. https://portal.education.lu/schreiwen (accessed 16 July 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Fernández Salgado, Xosé A. 2019. A proposta ortográfica de Saco Arce no contexto do Rexurdimento. Boletín da Real Academia Galega 379. 385–405.10.32766/brag.379.739Search in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan. 2018. Visions and revisions of minority languages: Standardization and its dilemmas. In Pia Lane, James Costa & Haley De Korne (eds.), Standardizing minority languages, 222–242. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan & Judith Irvine. 2019. Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108649209Search in Google Scholar

Gal, Susan & Kathrine Woolard. 2001. Constructing languages and publics: Authority and representation. In Susan Gal & Katherine Woolard (eds.), Languages and publics: The making of authority, 13–29. Manchester: St. Jerome PublishingSearch in Google Scholar

Gilles, Peter. 2015. From status to corpus: Codification and implementation of spelling norms in Luxembourgish. In Winifred V. Davies & Evelyn Ziegler (eds.), Language planning and nicrolinguistics: From policy to interaction and vice versa, 128–149. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9781137361240_7Search in Google Scholar

Gilles, Peter. 2019. Komplexe Überdachung II: Luxemburg. Die Genese einer neuen Nationalsprache. In Joachim Herrgen & Jürgen Erich Schmidt (eds.), Language and space – An international handbook of linguistic variation (Vol. 4, Deutsch), 1039–1060. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261295-039Search in Google Scholar

Gilles, Peter. 2020. Ist die Luxemburgistik eine Nationalphilologie? Eine kurze Wissenschaftsgeschichte des Luxemburgischen. Zeitschrift für Deutsche Philologie 139. 109–124.Search in Google Scholar

Gilles, Peter & Claudine Moulin. 2003. Luxembourgish. In Ana Deumert & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic standardizations: Past to present, 303–329. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.18.12gilSearch in Google Scholar

González Seoane, Ernesto & Gabriel Rei-Doval. 2019. Language standardization and purism: A historiographical approach to Galician grammar and lexicography in the 19th century. In Gabriel Rei-Doval & Fernando Tejedo-Herrero (eds.), Lusophone, Galician, and Hispanic linguistics: Bridging frames and traditions, 73–91. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315403946-5Search in Google Scholar

Hawkey, James & Nils Langer. 2016. Language policy in the long nineteenth century: Catalonia and Schleswig. In Cinzia Russi (ed.) Current trends in historical sociolinguistics, 81–107. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110488401-008Search in Google Scholar

Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel & Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo. 1999. The social diffusion of linguistic innovations in 15th century England: Chancery spellings in private correspondence. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 8. 251–74.Search in Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith & Susan Gal. 2000. Language ideologies and linguistic differentiation. In Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language. Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Joseph, John. 1987. Eloquence and power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. New York: Basil BlackwellSearch in Google Scholar

Krogull, Andreas. 2021. Rethinking historical multilingualism and language contact ‘from below’. Evidence from the Dutch-German borderlands in the long nineteenth century. Dutch Crossing 45(2). 147–170.10.1080/03096564.2021.1943620Search in Google Scholar

Lane, Pia, James, Costa & Haley De Korne (eds.). 2018. Standardizing minority languages: Competing ideologies of authority and authenticity in the global periphery. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Luto-Kamińska, Anetta. 2023. Adapting alphabetic writing systems. In Marco Condorelli & Hanna Rutkowska (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of historical orthography, 224–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108766463.011Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, Anton & Henri Gloden. 1845. Luxemburgische Gedichte und Fabeln: nebst einer grammatischen Einleitung und einer Wörtererklärung der dem Dialekt mehr oder weniger eigenartigen Ausdrücke. Brüssel: Delevingne & Callewaert.Search in Google Scholar

Mirás, Francisco. 1864. Compendio de gramática gallega-castellana. Santiago: Manuel Mirás.Search in Google Scholar

McLelland, Nicola. 2020. Language standards, standardisation and standard ideologies in multilingual contexts. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 42(2). 109–124.10.1080/01434632.2019.1708918Search in Google Scholar

Moita-Lopes, Luiz Paulo. 2014. Introduction: Linguistic ideology. How Portuguese is being discursively constructed in late modernity. In Luiz Paulo Moita-Lopes (ed.), Global Portuguese: Linguistic ideologies in late modernity, 1–27. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315757391Search in Google Scholar

Monteagudo, Henrique. 1999. Historia social da lingua galega. Vigo: GalaxiaSearch in Google Scholar

Monteagudo, Henrique. 2003. A demanda da norma. Avances, problemas e perspectivas no procesos de estandarización do idioma galego. In: Henrique Monteagudo & Xan M. Bouzada (eds.), O proceso de normalización do idioma galego (1980–2000). Volume III. Elaboración e difusión da lingua, 37–129. Santiago de Compostela: Consello da Cultura Galega.Search in Google Scholar

Moulin, Claudine. 2006. Grammatisierung und Standardisierung des Luxemburgischen. Eine grammatikographisch-sprachhistorische Annäherung. In Claudine Moulin & Damaris Nübling (eds.), Perspektiven einer linguistischen Luxemburgistik. Studien zu Diachronie und Synchronie (Germanistische Bibliothek 25), 305–339. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

O’Rourke, Bernadette. 2017. Negotiating the standard in contemporary Galicia. In Pia Lane, James Costa & Haley De Korne (eds.), 84–100, Standardizing minority languages. New York & London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Péporté, Pit, Sonja Kmec, Benoît Majerus & Michel Margue. 2010. Inventing Luxembourg: Representations of the past, space and kanguage from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004181762.i-383Search in Google Scholar

Ramallo, Fernando & Gabriel Rei-Doval. 2015. The standardization of Galician. Sociolinguistica 29. 61–81.10.1515/soci-2015-0006Search in Google Scholar

Real Academia Española. 1815. Ortografía de la lengua castellana, 8th edn. Madrid: Real Academia Española.Search in Google Scholar

Rutten, Gijsbert. 2016. Standardization and the myth of neutrality in language history. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 242. 25–57.10.1515/ijsl-2016-0032Search in Google Scholar

Saco Arce, Juan. 1868. Gramática gallega. Lugo: Imprenta de Soto Freire.Search in Google Scholar

Screti, Francesco. 2018. Re-writing Galicia: Spelling and the construction of social space. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(5). 1–2910.1111/josl.12306Search in Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 2007. Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511486739Search in Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 2009. Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research. Writing Systems Research 1(1). 35–49.10.1093/wsr/wsp002Search in Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark 2012. Introduction: Orthography as social action. In Alexandra Jaffe, Jannis Androutsopoulos, Mark Sebba & Sally Johnson (eds.), Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity and power, 1–20. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614511038.1Search in Google Scholar

Sebba, Mark. 2015. Iconisation, attribution and branding in orthography. Written Language and Literacy 18(2). 208–227.10.1075/wll.18.2.02sebSearch in Google Scholar

Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2012. Floating ideologies. Metamorphoses of graphic ‘Germanness’. In Alexandra Jaffe, Jannis Androutsopoulos, Mark Sebba & Sally Johnson (eds.), Orthography as social action, 255–288. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614511038.255Search in Google Scholar

Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2013. Graphische Variation als soziale Praxis. Eine soziolinguistische Theorie skripturaler “Sichtbarkeit”. (Linguistik – Impulse und Tendenzen 56). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110334241Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, Megan C. 2007. K is for de-kolonization: Anti-colonial nationalism and orthographic reform. Comparative Studies in Society and History 49. 938–967.10.1017/S0010417507000813Search in Google Scholar

Unger, Johann. 2013. The discursive construction of the Scots language: education, politics and everyday life. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.51Search in Google Scholar

Van Rooy, Raf. 2020. Language or dialect? The history of a conceptual pair. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198845713.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Villa, Laura. 2015. Official orthographies, spelling debates and nation-building projects after the fall of the Spanish Empire. Written Language and Literacy 18(2). 228–47.10.1075/wll.18.2.03vilSearch in Google Scholar

Vogl, Ulrike. 2012. Multilingualism in a standard language culture. In Matthias Hüning, Ulrike Vogl & Olivier Moliner (eds.), Standard languages and multilingualism in European history, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/mdm.1.02vogSearch in Google Scholar

Vosters, Rik, Gijsbert Rutten & Wim Vandenbussche. 2012. The sociolinguistics of spelling: A corpus-based case study of orthographical variation in nineteenth-century Dutch in Flanders. In Ans van Kemenade & Nynke de Haas (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2009: Selected papers from the 19th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Nijmegen, 10–14 August 2009, 253–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.320.13vosSearch in Google Scholar

Watts, Richard, J. 2012. Language myths. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The Handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 585–606. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118257227.ch32Search in Google Scholar

Weth, Constanze, Manuela Böhm & Daniel Bunčić. 2020. Literacies in contact. Forms, functions, and practices. Written Language & Literacy 23 (2). 133–153.10.1075/wll.00037.wetSearch in Google Scholar

Weth, Constanze & Peter Gilles. Forthcoming. German and Luxembourgish as writing systems in contact. In Stefan Hartmann, Dimitrios Meletis & Rebecca Treiman (eds.), Handbook of Germanic Writing Systems and Literacies. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, Martin Reisigl & Karin Liebhart. 2009. The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zenter fir d’Lëtzebuerger Sprooch. 2021. Aktualiséierungen an der Orthografie. Wat gouf preziséiert, completéiert an ugepasst? Educatiounsministère Lëtzebuerg. https://portal.education.lu/Portals/79/Documents/Iwwersiichtsdokument_grouss.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-05-05
Published in Print: 2025-05-30

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/soci-2024-0025/html
Scroll to top button