Summary
The development of literacy in Montenegrin society is a very reliable indicator of the state and level not only of the general culture and education, but also of the social culture. This lends immense significance to any work on improving the language culture in Montenegro in all of its diverse manifestations, as well as to the popularisation of the basic principles of good literacy. Orthography has an important place within the entire course of schooling in the Montenegrin language syllabus, and so it is very important to be developing and encouraging skills of linguistic expression among the student population, that is, perfecting their spoken and written use of language. In this paper we will deal with the normative aspect of students’ writing skills in the Montenegrin system of higher education. Our primary goal is to establish the quality of written expression and to highlight omissions in the application of orthographic knowledge of Montenegrin language to further contribute to the enhancement of functional knowledge associated with the orthographical culture of the student population in Montenegro. The sample consists of 100 first-year students from the Department for German Language and Literature of the Faculty of Philology and 100 students from the study programme for Translation (English/Russian and English/French group). Qualitative methodology was used to analyse the prevalence of certain types of mistakes in student tests, and comparative analysis of the tests was aimed at showing the degree of application of orthographical norms by students. It is nothing new that orthographical knowledge among students is not at a satisfactory level, and the results of this study confirm the hypothesis that the level of adoption of orthographical rules is not in line with the defined outcomes of the curriculum for Montenegrin language, as well as there being certain differences between students of different study programmes. Our analysis shows that one of the basic goals of the orthography of the Montenegrin language is not fully realised – the enabling of students to apply standard-level writing rules and the raising of students’ awareness of the importance of standard language norms. It is evident that students adopt orthographical rules that are fragmented and that orthographical principles are not viewed as a system, as evidenced by examples of the deviation from the norms.
References
Aladrović, Katarina. 2008. Kompetencije učenika prvog razreda u poznavanju pravopisa na kraju školske godine. Metodika 9 (1). 39–52. Search in Google Scholar
Anić, Vladimir & Josip Silić. 1987. Pravopisni priručnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Search in Google Scholar
Babić, Željka. 2005. Analiza grešаka u pisanim radovima. Philologia 3. 55–61.Search in Google Scholar
Badurina Lada. 1996. O interpunkcijskim načelima – s osobitim obzirom na hrvatsku interpunkciju. Fluminensia 8 (1–2). 257–264.Search in Google Scholar
Badurina, Lada & Mihaela Matešić. 2011. Jezik i pravopis: teorijsko-metodološki pristup pravopisnom normiranju. Croatica et Slavica Iadertina 7 (1). 17–31.10.15291/csi.354Search in Google Scholar
Bogush, Alla & Korolova, Tetiana & Oleksandra V. Popova. 2020. Foreign Language Education Standards: Ukrainian Dimension. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(4). 1261–1272. 10.13189/ujer.2020.080417Search in Google Scholar
Bošković, Dušan & Čabarkapa, Svetlana & Kosović, Rajko & Perazić, Mladen & Vesna Radulović. 2016. Nacionalni okvir kvalifikacija u Crnoj Gori. Podgorica: Ministarstvo prosvjete. Search in Google Scholar
Brborić, Veljko & Milorad Dešić. 2003. O standardizaciji pravopisne terminologije. Naučni sastanak lingvista u Vukove dane 42/3. 219–227. Search in Google Scholar
Češi, Marijana & Mirela Barbaroša-Šikić. 2008. Praćenje, vrednovanje i ocjenjivanje pismenih radova učenika. In: Vučo, J. (Ed.), Evaluacija u nastavi jezika i književnosti, 303–319. Nikšić: Filozofski fakultet. Search in Google Scholar
Dešić, Milorad. 1998. Pravopis srpskog jezika, Zemun: Nijansa. Search in Google Scholar
Dragićević, Rajna. 2006. Kultura izražavanja u nastavi srpskog jezika. Inovacije u nastavi XIX, 1. 29–35. Search in Google Scholar
Đorđev, Ivana. 2015. Ortografska norma u pismenim zadacima učenika srednjih škola kao putokaz moderne nastave pravopisa. Doktorska disertacija. Beograd: Filološki fakultet. Search in Google Scholar
Đorđev, Ivana. 2016. Upotreba velikog slova u pismenim zadacima učenika srednjih škola. Metodički vidici 7. 113–136.Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, Jennifer. 2007. The Writing Exam as Index of Policy, Curriculum, and Assessment: An Academic Literacies Perspective on High Stakes Testing in an American University. Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. University of Pennsylvania.Search in Google Scholar
Hadžović, Emina. 2019. Izvori, sredstva, tehnologija i mediji nastave maternjeg jezika u osnovnoj školi (Komparacija sa metodičkim iskustvima iz osnovnoškolske nastave jezika u Švicarskoj). Sarajevo: Filozofski fakultet. Search in Google Scholar
Ispitni Centar Crne Gore. 2021. PISA u Crnoj Gori – rezultati. Podgorica: Ispitni centar. https://pisa.iccg.co.me/ (last accessed 22.01. 2024)Search in Google Scholar
Jelaska, Zrinka & Vesna Bjedov. 2015. Pogrješke ili promjene – ovladanost odabranim hrvatskim morfosintaksičkim sadržajima učenika završnoga razreda osnovne škole. Jezikoslovlje 16 (2–3). 227–252. Search in Google Scholar
Kirsten, Johanita. 2016. Grammatikale verandering in Afrikaans van 1911–2010. Thesis, North-West University South Africa, Vanderbijlpark. Search in Google Scholar
Kraš, Tihana & Maja Miličević. 2015. Eksperimentalne metode u istraživanjima usvajanja drugoga jezika. Rijeka: Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci. Search in Google Scholar
Lazarević, Radmila. 2011. Uloga maternjeg jezika (L1) u nastavi italijanskog jezika na Fakultetu. In: Vučo, Julijana & Bilijana Milatović (eds.). Međunarodni tematski zbornik radova: Stavovi promjena – promjena stavova. Nikšić, 16–17. IX 2010. 177–181.Search in Google Scholar
Matešić, Mihaela. 2018. Pravogovor i pravopis izazovi suvremene hrvatske standardologije. Rijeka: Filozofski fakultet. Search in Google Scholar
Mat, Nur. 2020. Understanding academic writing practices in Malaysian university classrooms. Thesis, Malaysia, University of East Anglia. Search in Google Scholar
Miletić, Josip & Marija Novaković. 2009. Istraživanja pravopisa učenika osnovne škole s posebnim naglaskom na pravilnu uporabu velikih i malih slova. Hrvatski: časopis za teoriju i praksu nastave hrvatskoga jezika, književnosti, govornoga i pismenoga izražavanja te medijske kulture VII, 2. 31–46. Search in Google Scholar
Nikolić, Milija. 1992. Metodika nastave srpskog jezika i kniževnosti. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike. Search in Google Scholar
Peco, Asim & Mitar Pešikan. 1967. Informator o savremenom književnom jeziku. Beograd: Mlado pokolenje. Search in Google Scholar
Peko, Anđelka, & Rahaela Varga. 2016. Učenička inicijativnost u kontekstu nastave. Croatian Journal of Education 18 (3). 727–753.10.15516/cje.v18i3.1608Search in Google Scholar
Pešikan, Mitar & Jerković, Jovan & Mato Pižurica. 1993. Pravopis srpskoga jezika. Novi Sad: Matica srpska.Search in Google Scholar
Pešikan, Mitar & Jerković, Jovan & Mato Pižurica. 2013. Pravopis srpskoga jezika. Novi Sad: Matica srpska.Search in Google Scholar
Popović, Dušanka. 2019. Čitalačka pismenost i nastava jezika u osnovnim školama u Crnoj Gori. In: Dijete i jezik danas razvoj pismenosti u materinskom i inom jeziku, 159–185. Osijek: Sveučičište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku. Search in Google Scholar
Popović, Dušanka. 2020. Jezik u obrazovnoj vertikali. Lingua Montenegrina XIII/1, br. 25. 41–67. Search in Google Scholar
Popović, Dušanka. 2021. Jezik u osnovnoškolskim planovima i programima XIX i prve decenije XX vijeka – lingvistička i istorijsko-pedagoška perspektiva obrazovne paradigme. Folia Linguistica et Litteraria 34. 261–283. 10.31902/fll.34.2021.15Search in Google Scholar
Pravopis srpskohrvatskog književnog jezika, MS/MH, 1960. Novi Sad/Zagreb: Matica srpska, Matica hrvatska.Search in Google Scholar
Pravopis crnogorskoga jezika. 2010. Podgorica: Ministarstvo prosvjete i nauke Crne Gore. Search in Google Scholar
Radovanović, Milorad. 1996. Spisi iz kontekstualne lingvistike. Sremski Karlovci/Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.Search in Google Scholar
Raičević, Vučina. 2008. O metodologiji i metodama istraživanja u metodici. In: Vučo, J. (ed.), Evaluacija u nastavi jezika i književnosti, 56–63. Nikšić: Filozofski fakultet.Search in Google Scholar
Reljac Fajs, Emilija & Tamara Jerković. 2014. Pravopis u razrednoj nastavi hrvatskoga jezika. Hrvatski: časopis za teoriju i praksu nastave hrvatskoga jezika, književnosti, govornoga i pismenoga izražavanja te medijske kulture 12 (1). 37–55. Search in Google Scholar
Rosandić, Dragutin. 1990. Pismene vježbe u nastavi hrvatskog ili srpskog jezika. Zagreb: Školska knjiga. Search in Google Scholar
Selimagić, R. Šutalo. 2013. Deskriptori učeničkih postignuća u nastavi maternjeg jezika i književnosti od I. do V. razreda devetogodišnje osnovne škole u Bosni i Hercegovini. Školski vjesnik 62(4). 521–540.Search in Google Scholar
Simić, Radoje & Stanojčić, Živojin & Ostojić, Branislav & Ćorić, Božo & Miloš Kovačević. 1993. Pravopis srpskoga jezika sa rečnikom. Nikšić/Beograd: Unireks. Search in Google Scholar
Stevanović, Jelena & Slavica Maksić. 2009. O pismenom izražavanju učenika osnovne škole. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja 41, br. 1. 147–164. Search in Google Scholar
Stevanović, Jelena. 2011. Pravopisne odlike jezičke kulture učenika u osnovnoj školi. Srpski jezik XVI/1–2. 637–652. Search in Google Scholar
Stevanović, Jelena. 2020. Pravopis srpskoga jezika u srednjoškolskoj nastavnoj praksi: pisanje skraćenica. Pedagogija. LXXV. 217–231. Search in Google Scholar
Šipka, Milan. 2008. Kultura govora. Novi Sad: Prometaj. Search in Google Scholar
Špilar, Monika. 2018. Pravopisna zmožnost slovenskih četrtošolcev. Magistarsko delo, Maribor, Univerza v Mariboru. Search in Google Scholar
Takač, Iva. 2018. Metodičke mogućnosti usvajanja pravopisnih sadržaja u razrednoj nastavi. Doktorska teza, Osijek: Sveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Fakultet za odgojne i obrazovne znanosti. Search in Google Scholar
Ulaga, Anja. 2020. Šolska vabila z vidika načel uspešnega sporočanja, s poudarkom na upoštevanju pravopisa. Magistarsko delo, Maribor, Univerza v Mariboru. Search in Google Scholar
UNICEF. 2001. Sveobuhvatna analiza sistema osnovnog obrazovanja u SRJ. Beograd: MPS. Search in Google Scholar
Vesić, Ljubica. 2020. Pravopis u nastavi srpskog jezika (na primjeru skraćenica). Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia ad Didacticam Litterarum Polonarum et Linguae Polonae Pertinentia 11. 39–51. 10.24917/20820909.11.3Search in Google Scholar
Verdel, Tamara. 2019. Pravopisna zmožnost bodočih učiteljev razrednega pouka. Magistarsko delo, Maribor, Univerza v Mariboru. Search in Google Scholar
Zahra, Anada Annisa & Sutiono, Cayandrawati & Mu’in, Fatchul & Emma Rosana Febriyanti. 2020. Analysis On The Students’ Grammatical Errors In Writing Descriptive Texts And Narrative Texts. Lingua Educatia Journal Vol. 2 No. 1. 14–28.Search in Google Scholar
Zeljić, Goran. 2004. Jezička kultura u obrazovanju. Pedagogija LIX/1. 121–127. Search in Google Scholar
Zeljić, Goran. 2016. Pravopisna znanja budućih učitelja i vaspitača. Književnost i jezik LXIII/3–4. 263–277.Search in Google Scholar
Zlatić, Marina & Jelena Đorđević. 2014. Problemi kulture pismenog izražavanja u osnovnoj školi. Sinteze 5. 85–94. 10.5937/Sinteze1405085ZSearch in Google Scholar
Zoghbor, Wafa & Thomaï Alexiou. 2020. Advancing English Language Education. Dubai: Zayed University press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Introduction to the special issue
- Multilingualism as right and choice: A case study of Slovene speakers in Northeast Italy
- Language in post-Yugoslav Montenegro: An unstable complex of contested values
- The Prevalence of Italian Lexical Components in the Montenegrin Magazine Zeta
- Contemporary Croatian future II: a tense or a mood?
- Normative aspects and adoption of orthographical content in Montenegrin higher education
- The loss of synthetic past tense forms in Slovene in the context of the hypothesised Central European convergence area
- Egda žena otročęmь xoditъ. On the 5th prescription in the Old Church Slavic Folia medicinalia
- Aufklärung im Spiegel der slowenischen und deutschen Presse in der Krain im späten 18. Jahrhundert
- Variants and forms of physical lazzi in Dubrovnik’s smješnice of the 17th-century
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Introduction to the special issue
- Multilingualism as right and choice: A case study of Slovene speakers in Northeast Italy
- Language in post-Yugoslav Montenegro: An unstable complex of contested values
- The Prevalence of Italian Lexical Components in the Montenegrin Magazine Zeta
- Contemporary Croatian future II: a tense or a mood?
- Normative aspects and adoption of orthographical content in Montenegrin higher education
- The loss of synthetic past tense forms in Slovene in the context of the hypothesised Central European convergence area
- Egda žena otročęmь xoditъ. On the 5th prescription in the Old Church Slavic Folia medicinalia
- Aufklärung im Spiegel der slowenischen und deutschen Presse in der Krain im späten 18. Jahrhundert
- Variants and forms of physical lazzi in Dubrovnik’s smješnice of the 17th-century