The status of the oblique possessor in BE-possessives: Evidence from Russian and Hungarian

References

Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou 1998. Parametrizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 491–539. 10.1023/A:1006090432389Search in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer 2015. External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations. A Layering Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571949.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Arylova, Aysa 2012. AnchorP. Argument structure of the Russian BE-possessive. In Proceedings of ConSole XIX, 25–48. Search in Google Scholar

Bailyn, John 2010. The Syntax of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi 1988. Psych-verbs and Theta-theory. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 291–352. 10.1007/BF00133902Search in Google Scholar

Benedicto, Elena 1995. Mne ne chitaetsia. Relativized modality and dative impersonal reflexive constructions. In UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 2 (2), 1–17. Search in Google Scholar

Benveniste, Ėmile 1966. Ȇtre et avoir dans leurs fonctions lingistiques. In Ėmile Benveniste, Problèmes de linguistique générale. Vol. 1, 187–207. Paris: Gallimard. Search in Google Scholar

Błaszczak, Joanna 2007. Phase Syntax. The Polish Genitive of Negation. Habilitation treatise. University of Potsdam.Search in Google Scholar

Błaszczak, Joanna 2010. A spurious genitive puzzle in Polish. In Thomas Hanneforth & Gisbert Fanselow (eds.), Language and Logos. Studia Grammatica 72, 17–47. Berlin: Akademieverlag.10.1524/9783050062365.17Search in Google Scholar

Błaszczak, Joanna 2018. Clause structure, case and agreement in Polish existential, possessive and copular sentences. A phase-based account. In Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 54 (4), 637–696.10.1515/psicl-2018-0025Search in Google Scholar

Bosković, Zhel’ko 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. In Linguistic Inquiry 33, 351–383.10.1162/002438902760168536Search in Google Scholar

Burzio, Luigi 1986. Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna 1997. Subjects and clause structure. In Lilianne Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, 33–64. London: Longman. Search in Google Scholar

Cardinaletti, Anna 2004. Toward a cartography of subject positions. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Vol. 2, 115–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chvany, Catherine 1972. On the Syntax of BE-sentences in Russian. Cambridge, MA: Slavica.Search in Google Scholar

Coppock, Elisabeth & Stephen Wechsler 2012. The objective conjugation in Hungarian: Agreement without phi features. In Natural Language and Linguistics Theory 30, 699–740.10.1007/s11049-012-9165-5Search in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 1981. A case of re-analysis in a ‘topic-prominent’ language. In Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 31, 57–85. Search in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 1994. Hungarian Infinitival Constructions. MPhil dissertation. Department of Linguistics. The University of Sydney, Sydney. Search in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 2000. The structure of psych-impersonal predicates. In Arthur Holmer & Jan-Olof Svantesson & Ake Viberg (eds.), Proceedings of SCL18, 193–206. Search in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 2005. The Role of Agreement in Non-finite Predication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.90Search in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 2010. Copular sentences, predication and cyclic agree. Saarbruecken: Lambert Academic Publishing (VDM).Search in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 2012. Copular sentences as Kimian states in Irish and Russian. In Canadian Journal of Linguistics 57, 341–358. 10.1017/S0008413100002322Search in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 2014. The feature geometry of generic inclusive null DPs in Hungarian. In Anna Bondaruk, Gréte Dalmi & Alexander Grosu (eds.), Advances in the Syntax of DPs. Structure, Agreement and Case, 165–191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.217.07dalSearch in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 2016. What does it take to be a copula? In YPLM 2, 1–28. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/yplm-2016-0001Search in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 2017. Little pro’s but how many of them? – On 3SG generic inclusive null pronominals in Hungarian. In LingBaW Journal 3, 61–73.10.31743/lingbaw.5650Search in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 2020 a. The argument structure of BE-possessives and BE-existentials in Hungarian. In Gréte Dalmi, Piotr Ceglowski & Jacek Witkoś (eds.), Approaches to Predicative Possession. The View from Slavic and Finno-Ugric, 136–162. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350062498.ch-007Search in Google Scholar

Dalmi, Gréte 2020 b. Existence and Possession. A cartographic approach to Hungarian possessive sentences. Manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Den Dikken, Marcel 1997. The syntax of possession sentences and the verb have. In Lingua 101, 129–150.10.1016/S0024-3841(96)00054-XSearch in Google Scholar

Den Dikken, Marcel 1999. On the structural representation of possession and agreement. The case of anti-agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. In István Kenesei (ed.), Crossing Boundaries: Theoretical Advances in Central and Eastern European Languages, 137–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.182.10dikSearch in Google Scholar

Den Dikken, Marcel 2006. Relators and Linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

É. Kiss, Katalin 1987. Configurationality in Hungarian. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 10.1007/978-94-009-3703-1Search in Google Scholar

É. Kiss, Katalin 2002. Hungarian Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

É. Kiss, Katalin 2013. From Proto-Hungarian SOV to Old Hungarian Top, Foc, V X*. In Diachronica 3 (2), 202–231.10.1075/dia.30.2.03kisSearch in Google Scholar

É. Kiss, Katalin 2014. Ways of licensing external possessors. In Acta Linguistica Hungarica 61 (1), 45–68.10.1556/ALing.61.2014.1.2Search in Google Scholar

Francez, Itamar 2007. Existential propositions. PhD dissertation. Stanford University. Search in Google Scholar

Freeze, Ray 1972. Existentials and other locatives. In Language 68 (3), 553–595.10.2307/415794Search in Google Scholar

Geist, Ljudmila 2008. Predication and equation in copular sentences: Russian vs. English. In Ileana Comorowski & Karl von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and Syntax, 79–105, New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_3Search in Google Scholar

Geist, Ljudmila 2015. Genitive alternation in Russian. A situation semantics approach. In Gerhild Zybatov, Petr Biskup, Marcel Guhl, Claudia Hurtig, Olav Mueller-Reichau & Maria Yastrebova (eds.), Slavic Grammar from a Formal Perspective, 157–174. Berlin: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Grimshaw, Jane 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harley, Heidi 2002. Possession and the double object construction. In Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (eds.), The Yearbook of Linguistic Variation. Vol 2: 31–70. Amsterdam: John Benja-mins.10.1075/livy.2.04harSearch in Google Scholar

Hegedűs, Veronika 2014. Predicate movement in Hungarian. The syntax of non-verbal predicates. PhD dissertation. Tilburg. Search in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders & Urpo Nikanne 2002. Expletives, subjects and topics in Finnish. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP, 1–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195142242.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Jung, Hakyung 2011. The syntax of BE-possessives. Parametric variation and surface diversities. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la.172Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, Olga 2013. Semantics of Genitive Objects. A Study of Genitive of Negation and Intensional Genitive Case. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5225-2Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, Olga 2020. Definiteness Effect in Russian existential and possessive sentences. In Gréte Dalmi, Piotr Ceglowski & Jacek Witkoś (eds.), Approaches to Predicative Possession. The View from Slavic and Finno-Ugric, 61–80. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350062498.ch-004Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika 1996. Severing the external argument from the verb. In Johan Rooryck & Laura Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Koopman, Hilda & Dominique Sportiche 1991. The position of subjects. In Lingua 85, 211–258. 10.1016/0024-3841(91)90022-WSearch in Google Scholar

Larson, Robert 1988. The double object construction. In Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335–391.Search in Google Scholar

Livitz, Inna 2006. What’s in a nominative? Implications of Russian non-nominative subjects for a cross-linguistic approach to subjecthood. Harvard University, BA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Livitz, Inna 2012. Modal possessive construction: evidence from Russian. In Lingua 122, 714–747.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Milsark, Gary 1979. Existential sentences in English. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Myler, Neil 2016. Building and Interpreting Possession Sentences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262034913.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Paducheva, Elena 2000. Definiteness Effect: the case of Russian. In Karl von Heusinger & Urs Egli (eds.), Reference and Anaphoric Relations, 133–146. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 10.1007/978-94-011-3947-2_7Search in Google Scholar

Partee, Barbara & V. Borschev 2008. Existential sentences, BE and GEN NEG in Russian. In Ileana Comorowski & Karl von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Semantics and Syntax, 147– 191. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6197-4_6Search in Google Scholar

Pereltsvaig, Asya 2007. Copular sentences in Russian. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/1-4020-5793-8Search in Google Scholar

Puskás, Genoveva 1997. Focus and the CP domain. In Lilianne Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, 145–165. London: Longman. Search in Google Scholar

Rákosi, György 2014. Possessed by something out there. On anaphoric possessors in Hungarian. In Argumentum 10, 548–559.Search in Google Scholar

Rebrus, Péter 1999. Morfofonológiai jelenségek [Morpho-phonological phenomena]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 3. Morfológia [The structure of Hungarian 3. Morphology], 763–947. Budapest: Akadmémiai Kiadó.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi 1997. The fine structure of the Left Periphery. In Lilianne Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi 2004. On the cartography of syntactic structures. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures Volume 2, 3–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195159486.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi 2006. On the form of chains. Criterial position and the ECP effects. In Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on, 97–134. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7197.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi 2013. Topic, focus and the cartography of the Left Periphery. In Silvia Luragi & Claudia Parodi (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, 436–451. London: Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781472542090.ch-026Search in Google Scholar

Stassen, Leon 2009. Predicative Possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199211654.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna 1983. The possessor that ran away from home. In The Linguistic Review 3, 89–102.10.1515/tlir.1983.3.1.89Search in Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna 1992. A birtokos szerkezet és az egzisztenciális mondat [Possessive constructions and existential sentences]. Budapest: Akadémiai kiadó. Search in Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna 1994. The noun phrase. In Katalin É. Kiss & Ferenc Kiefer (eds.), The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian, 179–274. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004373174_004Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar