Startseite Czech analytic agreement and the characteristics of little pro
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Czech analytic agreement and the characteristics of little pro

  • Ludmila Veselovská EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. Juni 2020
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study deals with subject predicate agreement in Czech and the structure of a null subject. First, it introduces the concept of Null Subject Languages as it has been used in a generative framework. Then it shows the complex feature content of the Czech subject-predicate agreement morphology, arguing that the data repeatedly signal a division of the agreement features into two clear cut feature sets and two distinct agreement domains: (a) the lower, lexical domain inside vP containing the nominal n[±φ] feature set (Gender and N-Number), and (b) the higher, functional domain on the T head, which contains the functional D[±φ] feature set (Person and D-Number). The study relates the analysis to the present day microparametric concept of a Null Subject Parameter as in, e. g., the studies in Biberauer (2010), accepting the hypothesis of the checking of the subject-predicate agreement with two levels of predicate (separate heads v and T). It proposes that with pronominal subjects, the φ feature values can be re-set with respect to the speech act information located in the Aboutness Topic. Given the several levels of agreement, each of which can be licensed by a zero morpheme, the study proposes that pro is a complex entity consisting of two separate parts, each endowed with a distinct set of φ features.

Literature

Akmajian, Adrian, et al. 2013 [1984]. Linguistics: An Introduction to Language and Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2006. Uniform and Non-uniform Aspects of Pro-drop Languages. In P. Ackema, P. Brandt, M. Schoorlemmer & F. Weerman (eds.), Arguments and Agreement, 127–158. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199285730.003.0005Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1985. The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntactic Explanation. In Linguistic Inquiry 16 (3), 373–415. Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical-Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Suche in Google Scholar

Barbosa, Pilar. 2018. Pro as a Minimal NP: Towards a Unified Theory of ‘Pro’-drop. See https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001949/current.pdf . Last accessed October 21, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Biberauer, Theresa, et al. (eds). 2010. Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770784Suche in Google Scholar

Bonet, Eulalia. 1991. Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Suche in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. 10.1515/9783110808506Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Roger & Albert Gillman. 1960. The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok, (ed.), Style in Language, 235–276. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1991. Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation. In R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, 417–454. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2014. Lecture Series. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March-May.Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2012. Features. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139206983Suche in Google Scholar

D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2014. The Null Subject Parameter: Where Are We and Where Are We Headed? Master’s thesis, Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph E. 1987. The Invisible Category Principle. In Linguistic Inquiry 18, 613–632.Suche in Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph E. 2000. Lexicon and Grammar: The English Syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110872996Suche in Google Scholar

Emonds, Joseph E. 2012. Blackjack! 21 Arguments that Agreeing Adjectives are Derived Nominals. In E. Torrego (ed.), Of Grammar, Words and Verses: In Honor of Carlos Piera, 171–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lfab.8.11emoSuche in Google Scholar

Gilligan, Gary Martin. 1987. A Crosslinguistic Approach to Prodrop Parameter. PhD. dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Suche in Google Scholar

Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission. In B. Bruening, Y. Kang & M. McGinnis (eds.), Papers at the Interface. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish. In Linguistic Inquiry 36, 533–564.10.1162/002438905774464322Suche in Google Scholar

Holmberg Anders. 2010. Null subject parameters. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: null subjects in minimalist theory, 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770784.003Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the Distribution and Reference of Empty Pronouns. In Linguistic Inquiry 15, 531–574.Suche in Google Scholar

Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Ken Safir (eds.). 1989. The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3Suche in Google Scholar

Jensen, Britta. 2003. Imperatives in English and Scandinavian. Ph.D. dissertation, Oxford University.Suche in Google Scholar

Kayne, Richard S. 1980. Extensions of Binding and Case-Marking. In Linguistic Inquiry 11, 74–96.Suche in Google Scholar

Kosta, Peter. 1990. Zur formalen Lizenzierung und inhaltlichen Determination leerer Subjekte im Russischen. In W. Breu (ed.), Slavistische Linguistik 1989: Referate des XV. Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens Bayreuth 18.–22.9.1989, 117–165. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Suche in Google Scholar

Kosta, Peter. 1992. Leere Kategorien in den nordslavischen Sprachen. Zur Analyse leerer Subjekte und leerer Objekte in der Rektions-Bindungs-Theorie. Habilschrift. J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main.Suche in Google Scholar

Kosta, Peter. 1995/1996. Empty Categories, Null-Subjects and Null-Objects and How to Treat Them in the Minimalist Program. Ms. Lecture Univ. of Chicago, IL/ 8 November 1996. In Linguistics in Potsdam Series 2 (3), 7–38.Suche in Google Scholar

Kosta, Peter. 2001. Negace a větná struktura v češtině. In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 3, 117–138.Suche in Google Scholar

Kosta, Peter. (In prep.). The Syntax of Meaning and Meaning of Syntax: Minimal Computations and Maximal Derivations within a Label-/Phase-Based Approach of Radical Minimalism. To appear in Potsdam Linguistic Investigations. Suche in Google Scholar

Krivochen, Diego G. & Peter Kosta. 2013. Eliminating Empty Categories: A Radically Minimalist View on their Ontology and Justification. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-653-02592-7Suche in Google Scholar

Kučerová, Ivona. 2000. K subjektpredikátové shodě v češtině. Master’s thesis, Charles University.Suche in Google Scholar

Kučerová, Ivona. 2014. The Syntax of Null Subjects. In Syntax 17 (2). 132–167.10.1111/synt.12015Suche in Google Scholar

Lindsay, Wallace M. (ed.). 1991 [1904]. T. Macci Plauti Comoediae, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2008. Reference to Individuals, Person, and the Variety of Mapping Parameters. In A. Klinge & H. Müller (eds.), Essays on Nominal Determination: From Morphology to Discourse Management, 189–211. Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.99.11lonSuche in Google Scholar

Montalbetti, Mario. 1986. How Pro Is It? In O. Jaeggli & C. Silva-Corvalan (eds.), Studies in Romance Linguistics, 137–152. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110878516-011Suche in Google Scholar

Nevins, Andrew & Jeffrey K. Parrott. 2010. Variable Rules Meet Impoverishment Theory: Patterns of Agreement Leveling in English Varieties. In Lingua 120 (5), 113–159. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.05.008Suche in Google Scholar

Noyer, Rolf. 1998. Impoverishment Theory and Morphosyntactic Markedness. In S. Lapointe, D. Brentari & P. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, 264–285. Stanford: CSLI. Suche in Google Scholar

Panevová, Jarmila & Vladimír Petkevič. 1997. Agreement in Czech and Its Formal Account. In U. Junghanns & G. Zybatow (eds), Formale Slavistic, 321–333. Frankfurt am Main: Vervuert Verlag. Suche in Google Scholar

Parrott, Jeffrey K. 2015. Gender Impoverishment in Czech, Slavic, and Beyond. In M. Ziková, P. Caha & M. Dočekal (eds.), Slavic Languages in the Perspective of Formal Grammar, 215–232. Berlin: Peter Lang. Suche in Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and Surface Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Suche in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David. 2013. Russian Case Morphology and the Syntactic Categories. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262019729.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Richards, Mark. 2014. Defective Agree, Case Alterations, and the Prominence of Person. In I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, A. Malchukov & M. Richards (eds.), Scales and Hierarchies, 173–196. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110344134.173Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110883718Suche in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of Pro. In Linguistic Inquiry 17, 501–557.Suche in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian & Anders Holmberg. 2010. Introduction. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan, Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, 1–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Suche in Google Scholar

Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis. In Language Research 43, 203–227.Suche in Google Scholar

Shlonsky, Ur. 2014. Referential Third Person Null Subjects in Hebrew. In Brill’s Journal of Annual of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 6, 27–44. Suche in Google Scholar

Taraldsen, Knut T. 1980. On the Nominative Island Constraint, Vacuous Application and the That Trace Filter. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistic Circle.Suche in Google Scholar

Tomioka, Satoshi. 2003. The Semantics of Japanese Null Pronouns and Its Cross-linguistic Implications. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (eds.), The Interfaces Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures, 321–339. Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins. 10.1075/la.61.16tomSuche in Google Scholar

Veselovská, Ludmila. 2002. Struktura subjektpredikátové shody. In Z. Hladká & P. Karlík (eds.), Čeština – univerzália a specifika 4, 199–212. Brno: Masaryk University. Suche in Google Scholar

Veselovská, Ludmila. 2004. The Extended Verbal Projection in Czech: Three Variants of the Verb Be. In G. Zybatow, L. Szucsich, U. Junghanns & R. Meyer (eds.), Formal Description of Slavic Languages: The Fifth Conference, Leipzig 2003, 555–569. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Suche in Google Scholar

Veselovská, Ludmila. 2014. The Universal DP Analysis in Articleless Languages: A Case Study in Czech. In L. Veselovská & M. Janebová (eds.), Nominal Structures: All in Complex DPs., 12–28. Olomouc: Palacký University. Suche in Google Scholar

Veselovská, Ludmila. 2018. Noun Phrases in Czech: Their Structure and Agreements. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.10.3726/b14278Suche in Google Scholar

Veselovská, Ludmila & Petr Karlík. 2004. Analytic Passives in Czech. In Zeitschrift für Slavistik 49 (2), 163–243.10.1524/slaw.2004.49.2.163Suche in Google Scholar

Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195083934.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Wechsler, Stephen & Larisa Zlatić. 2003. The Many Faces of Agreement. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1981. Argument Structure and Morphology. In The Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.81Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2008. Microcomparative Syntax in English Verbal Agreement. Presentation at NELS 39, November.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-06-09
Published in Print: 2020-05-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 11.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/slaw-2020-0011/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen