Summary
This paper aims to demonstrate that the development of Pre-Slavic clusters plosive + t/s in later Common Slavic followed the trajectory of spirantization and subsequent lenition and not the trajectory of gemination, contrary to the prevailing view.
Abbreviations of languages
Av. – AvestanSearch in Google Scholar
B. – BulgarianSearch in Google Scholar
Br. – BrethonicSearch in Google Scholar
Bryth. – BrythonicSearch in Google Scholar
Celt. – CelticSearch in Google Scholar
Co. – CornishSearch in Google Scholar
CS. – Common SlavicSearch in Google Scholar
Cz. – CzechSearch in Google Scholar
Ga. – GaulishSearch in Google Scholar
Goid. – GoidelicSearch in Google Scholar
Goth. – GothicSearch in Google Scholar
Gr. – GreekSearch in Google Scholar
Hitt. – HittiteSearch in Google Scholar
IE. – Indo-EuropeanSearch in Google Scholar
Ir. – IrishSearch in Google Scholar
L. – Latin Search in Google Scholar
Lith. – LithuanianSearch in Google Scholar
MBr. – Middle BretonicSearch in Google Scholar
MIr. – Middle IrishSearch in Google Scholar
MW. – Middle WelshSearch in Google Scholar
OAv. – Old AvestanSearch in Google Scholar
OBr. – Old BretonicSearch in Google Scholar
OCo. – Old CornishSearch in Google Scholar
OCS. – Old Church SlavonicSearch in Google Scholar
OHG. – Old High GermanSearch in Google Scholar
OIA. – Old Indo-AryanSearch in Google Scholar
OIr. – Old IrishSearch in Google Scholar
ON. – Old NorseSearch in Google Scholar
OP. – Old PolishSearch in Google Scholar
Os. – OscanSearch in Google Scholar
P. – PolishSearch in Google Scholar
PCelt. – Proto-CelticSearch in Google Scholar
PIE. – Proto-Indo-EuropeanSearch in Google Scholar
Ru. – RussianSearch in Google Scholar
RuCS. – Russian Church SlavonicSearch in Google Scholar
Sab. – SabellianSearch in Google Scholar
SCr. – Serbo-CroatianSearch in Google Scholar
Sln. – SlovenianSearch in Google Scholar
Uk. – UkrainianSearch in Google Scholar
Um. – UmbrianSearch in Google Scholar
W. – WelshSearch in Google Scholar
YAv. – Young AvestanSearch in Google Scholar
References
Andersen, Henning. 1968. IE. *s after i, u, r, k in Baltic and Slavic. In Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 11 (2). 171–190.10.1080/03740463.1968.10416024Search in Google Scholar
Arumaa, Peeter. 1976. Urslavische Grammatik. II. Band. Konsonantismus. Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar
Belić, Aleksandar. 1921. Srpskohrvatske glasovne grupe ‑jt‑, ‑jd- i praslovansko ‑kti‑, ‑gdi‑, ‑hti- [The Serbo-Croatian phonemic clusters ‑jt‑, ‑jd- and Pre-Slavic ‑kti‑, ‑gdi‑, ‑hti-]. In Južnoslovenski Filolog 5. 217–226.Search in Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav. 1999. Numerals. Brno: Masarykova univerzita v Brně.Search in Google Scholar
Buck, Carl D. 1904. A Grammar of Oscan and Umbrian. Boston: Ginn & Company. Search in Google Scholar
Carlton, Terence. R. 1991. Introduction to the Phonological History of the Slavic Languages. Columbus: Slavica Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Johny. 2007. Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Verb. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Darden, Bill. J. 1978. On the Slavic reflexes of Indo-European *pt. GL 18, 10–13.Search in Google Scholar
Derksen, Rick. 2008. Etymological dictionary of the Slavic Inherited Lexicon. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
ESSJ = Erhart, Adolf, Eva Havlová & Ilona Janyšková (eds.). 1989–2016. Etymologický slovník jazyka staroslověnského, 1–16 [Etymological dictionary of Old Church Slavonic Language, 1–16]. Praha: Academia/ Brno: Tribun.Search in Google Scholar
Fortunatov, Filipp. F. 1888. Phonetische Bemerkungen veranlasst durch Miklosich’s Etymologisches Wörterbuch der slavischen Sprachen. In Archiv für Slavische Philologie 11. 561–575.Search in Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst. 1950. Slavisch gospodъ, lit. viẽšpats, preuss. Waispattin und Zubehör. In Zeitschrift für slavische Philologie 20. 51–89.Search in Google Scholar
Gippert, Jost. 2002. Neues zu “Slavisch st aus älterem pt”?. In Anreiter, Peter, Peter Ernst & Isolde Hausner (eds.), Namen, Sprachen und Kulturen. Imena, Jeziki i Kulture. Festschrift für Heinz Dieter Pohl zum 60. Geburtstag, 239–256. Wien: Edition Praesens.Search in Google Scholar
Hock, Wolfgang. 2004. Forschungsbericht: Baltoslavisch. I. Teil: Phonologie. In Kratylos 49. 1–32.10.29091/KRATYLOS/2004/1/1Search in Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Karl & Bernard Forssman. 1996. Avestische Laut- und Flexionslehre. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar
Hujer, Oldřich. 1913. Skupina kt ve slovanštině [The Cluster kt in Slavic]. In Časopis moderních filologů 3. 356–360.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of Language. ‘S-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co.Search in Google Scholar
Kellens, Jean. 1995. Liste du verbe avestique. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H. 1982. IE. *pt in Slavic. In Folia Linguistica Historica 3 (1). 25–28.10.1515/flih.1982.3.1.25Search in Google Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H. 1994. From Proto-Indo-European to Slavic. In The Journal of Indo-European Studies 22. 91–112.Search in Google Scholar
Kümmel, Martin. J. 2007. Konsonantenwandel. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Lamprecht, Arnošt. 1987. Praslovanština [The Pre-Slavic language]. Brno: Univerzita J. E. Purkyně.Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, Henry & Holger Pedersen. 1937. A Concise Comparative Celtic Grammar. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar
Lipp, Reiner. 2009. Die indogermanischen und einzelsprachlichen Palatale im Indoiranischen. Band I: Neurekonstruktion, Nuristan-Sprachen, Genese der indoarischen Retroflexe, Indoarisch von Mitanni. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Search in Google Scholar
Mareš, František V. 19691. Diachronische Phonologie des Ur- und Frühslavischen. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Search in Google Scholar
Mareš, František V. 19992. Diachronische Phonologie des Ur- und Frühslavischen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1952. Langues à syllabes ouvertes: le cas du slave commun. In Zeitschrift für Phonetik 6. 145–163.10.1524/stuf.1952.6.12.145Search in Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonètiques. Traité de phonologie diachronique. Berne: A. Francke.Search in Google Scholar
Matasović, Ranko. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Celtic. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1902. Études sur l’etymologie et le vocabulaire du vieux slave I. Paris: Bouillon. Search in Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1924. Le slave commun. Paris: Librairie ancienne Honoré Champion.Search in Google Scholar
Meiser, Gerhard. 1986. Lautgeschichte der umbrischen Sprache. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar
Mikkola, Jooseppi J. 1942. Urslavische Grammatik. II. Teil. Konsonantismus. Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar
Patri, Sylvain. 2003. Les traitements contradictoires de */pt/ en slave commun (avec une note sur «þ» indo-européen). In Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 63. 121–137.Search in Google Scholar
Pedersen, Holger. 1895. Das indogermanische s im Slavischen. In Indogermanische Forschungen 5. 33–87.10.1515/9783110242478.33Search in Google Scholar
von Planta, Robert. 1892. Grammatik der oskisch-umbrischen Dialekte. Erster Band. Einleitung und Lautlehre. Strassburg: Karl Trübner Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Pohl, Hans D. 1980. Slavisch st aus älterem *pt? In Die Sprache 26. 62–63.Search in Google Scholar
Rejzek, Jiří. 2008. K vývoji psl. kt [On the development of Pre-Slavic kt]. In Slavia 77. 165–170.Search in Google Scholar
Schenker, Alexander M. 2002. Proto-Slavonic. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds), The Slavonic languages, 60–121. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gernot. 1973. Die iranischen Wörter für „Tochter“ und „Vater“ und die Reflexe des interkonsonantischen H (ǝ) in den idg. Sprachen. In Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 87. 36–83.Search in Google Scholar
Shevelov, George Y. 1964. A Prehistory of Slavic: the Historical Phonology of Common Slavic. Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar
Tolkien, John R. R. 2010. Quenya Phonology. Ed. by Christopher Gilson. Mountain View, CA: The Tolkien Trust.Search in Google Scholar
Townsend, Charles E. & Laura A. Janda. 1996. Common and Comparative Slavic: Phonology and Inflection with Special Attention to Russian, Polish, Czech, Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian. Columbus: Slavica Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Uhlenbeck, Christianus C. 1894. Etymologisches. 3 Flëhtan. In Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 19. 517–519.10.1515/bgsl.1894.1894.19.327Search in Google Scholar
Vaillant, André. 1950. Grammaire comparée des langues slaves, tome I, phonétique. Lyon & Paris: IAC.Search in Google Scholar
Vasmer, Max. 1953–1958. Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch 1–3. Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar
Vey, Marc. 1931 a. Slave st provenant ďi.-e- *pt. In Bulletin de la Société de linguistique 32. 65–67.Search in Google Scholar
Vey, Marc. 1931 b. [Procèses-verbaux des séances:] V. sl. nestera. In Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 32. XV.Search in Google Scholar
Vey, Marc. 1953. Les noms de l’«autour» en slave. In Bulletin de la Société de linguistique 49 (1). 24–40.Search in Google Scholar
Vey, Marc. 1958. [Procèses-verbaux des séances:] Hypothèse sur l’etymologie de vieux russe Stribogъ. In Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 53 (1). XLI.Search in Google Scholar
Zubatý, Josef. 1891. Slav. pastorъkъ. In Archiv für slavische Philologie 13. 315–317.Search in Google Scholar
Zupitza, Ernst. 1899. Wortdeutungen. In Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 35. 265–270.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Aufsätze
- The phonotactics of syllabic liquids in Czech words of foreign origin
- Czech analytic agreement and the characteristics of little pro
- The development of Indo-European obstruent clusters of types plosive + t/s into Slavic
- Between ingressivity and resultativity: The prefix za- in contemporary Polish from a cross-Slavic perspective
- Definiteness markers in the Life of St Petka
- Andrej Platonovs ‚Unsterblichkeit‘
- Buchbesprechung
- Аргументация в русско- и белорусскоязычном научно-гуманитарном дискурсе
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Frontmatter
- Aufsätze
- The phonotactics of syllabic liquids in Czech words of foreign origin
- Czech analytic agreement and the characteristics of little pro
- The development of Indo-European obstruent clusters of types plosive + t/s into Slavic
- Between ingressivity and resultativity: The prefix za- in contemporary Polish from a cross-Slavic perspective
- Definiteness markers in the Life of St Petka
- Andrej Platonovs ‚Unsterblichkeit‘
- Buchbesprechung
- Аргументация в русско- и белорусскоязычном научно-гуманитарном дискурсе