Home The development of Indo-European obstruent clusters of types plosive + t/s into Slavic
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The development of Indo-European obstruent clusters of types plosive + t/s into Slavic

  • Ondřej Šefčík EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 9, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Summary

This paper aims to demonstrate that the development of Pre-Slavic clusters plosive + t/s in later Common Slavic followed the trajectory of spirantization and subsequent lenition and not the trajectory of gemination, contrary to the prevailing view.

Abbreviations of languages

Av. – AvestanSearch in Google Scholar

B. – BulgarianSearch in Google Scholar

Br. – BrethonicSearch in Google Scholar

Bryth. – BrythonicSearch in Google Scholar

Celt. – CelticSearch in Google Scholar

Co. – CornishSearch in Google Scholar

CS. – Common SlavicSearch in Google Scholar

Cz. – CzechSearch in Google Scholar

Ga. – GaulishSearch in Google Scholar

Goid. – GoidelicSearch in Google Scholar

Goth. – GothicSearch in Google Scholar

Gr. – GreekSearch in Google Scholar

Hitt. – HittiteSearch in Google Scholar

IE. – Indo-EuropeanSearch in Google Scholar

Ir. – IrishSearch in Google Scholar

L. – Latin Search in Google Scholar

Lith. – LithuanianSearch in Google Scholar

MBr. – Middle BretonicSearch in Google Scholar

MIr. – Middle IrishSearch in Google Scholar

MW. – Middle WelshSearch in Google Scholar

OAv. – Old AvestanSearch in Google Scholar

OBr. – Old BretonicSearch in Google Scholar

OCo. – Old CornishSearch in Google Scholar

OCS. – Old Church SlavonicSearch in Google Scholar

OHG. – Old High GermanSearch in Google Scholar

OIA. – Old Indo-AryanSearch in Google Scholar

OIr. – Old IrishSearch in Google Scholar

ON. – Old NorseSearch in Google Scholar

OP. – Old PolishSearch in Google Scholar

Os. – OscanSearch in Google Scholar

P. – PolishSearch in Google Scholar

PCelt. – Proto-CelticSearch in Google Scholar

PIE. – Proto-Indo-EuropeanSearch in Google Scholar

Ru. – RussianSearch in Google Scholar

RuCS. – Russian Church SlavonicSearch in Google Scholar

Sab. – SabellianSearch in Google Scholar

SCr. – Serbo-CroatianSearch in Google Scholar

Sln. – SlovenianSearch in Google Scholar

Uk. – UkrainianSearch in Google Scholar

Um. – UmbrianSearch in Google Scholar

W. – WelshSearch in Google Scholar

YAv. – Young AvestanSearch in Google Scholar

References

Andersen, Henning. 1968. IE. *s after i, u, r, k in Baltic and Slavic. In Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 11 (2). 171–190.10.1080/03740463.1968.10416024Search in Google Scholar

Arumaa, Peeter. 1976. Urslavische Grammatik. II. Band. Konsonantismus. Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar

Belić, Aleksandar. 1921. Srpskohrvatske glasovne grupe ‑jt‑,jd- i praslovansko ‑kti‑, ‑gdi‑, ‑hti- [The Serbo-Croatian phonemic clusters ‑jt‑,jd- and Pre-Slavic ‑kti‑, ‑gdi‑, ‑hti-]. In Južnoslovenski Filolog 5. 217–226.Search in Google Scholar

Blažek, Václav. 1999. Numerals. Brno: Masarykova univerzita v Brně.Search in Google Scholar

Buck, Carl D. 1904. A Grammar of Oscan and Umbrian. Boston: Ginn & Company. Search in Google Scholar

Carlton, Terence. R. 1991. Introduction to the Phonological History of the Slavic Languages. Columbus: Slavica Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Cheung, Johny. 2007. Etymological Dictionary of the Iranian Verb. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Darden, Bill. J. 1978. On the Slavic reflexes of Indo-European *pt. GL 18, 10–13.Search in Google Scholar

Derksen, Rick. 2008. Etymological dictionary of the Slavic Inherited Lexicon. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

ESSJ = Erhart, Adolf, Eva Havlová & Ilona Janyšková (eds.). 1989–2016. Etymologický slovník jazyka staroslověnského, 1–16 [Etymological dictionary of Old Church Slavonic Language, 1–16]. Praha: Academia/ Brno: Tribun.Search in Google Scholar

Fortunatov, Filipp. F. 1888. Phonetische Bemerkungen veranlasst durch Miklosich’s Etymologisches Wörterbuch der slavischen Sprachen. In Archiv für Slavische Philologie 11. 561–575.Search in Google Scholar

Fraenkel, Ernst. 1950. Slavisch gospodъ, lit. viẽšpats, preuss. Waispattin und Zubehör. In Zeitschrift für slavische Philologie 20. 51–89.Search in Google Scholar

Gippert, Jost. 2002. Neues zu “Slavisch st aus älterem pt”?. In Anreiter, Peter, Peter Ernst & Isolde Hausner (eds.), Namen, Sprachen und Kulturen. Imena, Jeziki i Kulture. Festschrift für Heinz Dieter Pohl zum 60. Geburtstag, 239–256. Wien: Edition Praesens.Search in Google Scholar

Hock, Wolfgang. 2004. Forschungsbericht: Baltoslavisch. I. Teil: Phonologie. In Kratylos 49. 1–32.10.29091/KRATYLOS/2004/1/1Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Karl & Bernard Forssman. 1996. Avestische Laut- und Flexionslehre. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar

Hujer, Oldřich. 1913. Skupina kt ve slovanštině [The Cluster kt in Slavic]. In Časopis moderních filologů 3. 356–360.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of Language. ‘S-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Kellens, Jean. 1995. Liste du verbe avestique. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Kortlandt, Frederik H. H. 1982. IE. *pt in Slavic. In Folia Linguistica Historica 3 (1). 25–28.10.1515/flih.1982.3.1.25Search in Google Scholar

Kortlandt, Frederik H. H. 1994. From Proto-Indo-European to Slavic. In The Journal of Indo-European Studies 22. 91–112.Search in Google Scholar

Kümmel, Martin. J. 2007. Konsonantenwandel. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Lamprecht, Arnošt. 1987. Praslovanština [The Pre-Slavic language]. Brno: Univerzita J. E. Purkyně.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Henry & Holger Pedersen. 1937. A Concise Comparative Celtic Grammar. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Lipp, Reiner. 2009. Die indogermanischen und einzelsprachlichen Palatale im Indoiranischen. Band I: Neurekonstruktion, Nuristan-Sprachen, Genese der indoarischen Retroflexe, Indoarisch von Mitanni. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Mareš, František V. 19691. Diachronische Phonologie des Ur- und Frühslavischen. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Search in Google Scholar

Mareš, František V. 19992. Diachronische Phonologie des Ur- und Frühslavischen. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Martinet, André. 1952. Langues à syllabes ouvertes: le cas du slave commun. In Zeitschrift für Phonetik 6. 145–163.10.1524/stuf.1952.6.12.145Search in Google Scholar

Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonètiques. Traité de phonologie diachronique. Berne: A. Francke.Search in Google Scholar

Matasović, Ranko. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Celtic. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Meillet, Antoine. 1902. Études sur l’etymologie et le vocabulaire du vieux slave I. Paris: Bouillon. Search in Google Scholar

Meillet, Antoine. 1924. Le slave commun. Paris: Librairie ancienne Honoré Champion.Search in Google Scholar

Meiser, Gerhard. 1986. Lautgeschichte der umbrischen Sprache. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar

Mikkola, Jooseppi J. 1942. Urslavische Grammatik. II. Teil. Konsonantismus. Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar

Patri, Sylvain. 2003. Les traitements contradictoires de */pt/ en slave commun (avec une note sur «þ» indo-européen). In Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 63. 121–137.Search in Google Scholar

Pedersen, Holger. 1895. Das indogermanische s im Slavischen. In Indogermanische Forschungen 5. 33–87.10.1515/9783110242478.33Search in Google Scholar

von Planta, Robert. 1892. Grammatik der oskisch-umbrischen Dialekte. Erster Band. Einleitung und Lautlehre. Strassburg: Karl Trübner Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Pohl, Hans D. 1980. Slavisch st aus älterem *pt? In Die Sprache 26. 62–63.Search in Google Scholar

Rejzek, Jiří. 2008. K vývoji psl. kt [On the development of Pre-Slavic kt]. In Slavia 77. 165–170.Search in Google Scholar

Schenker, Alexander M. 2002. Proto-Slavonic. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds), The Slavonic languages, 60–121. London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, Gernot. 1973. Die iranischen Wörter für „Tochter“ und „Vater“ und die Reflexe des interkonsonantischen H (ǝ) in den idg. Sprachen. In Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 87. 36–83.Search in Google Scholar

Shevelov, George Y. 1964. A Prehistory of Slavic: the Historical Phonology of Common Slavic. Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar

Tolkien, John R. R. 2010. Quenya Phonology. Ed. by Christopher Gilson. Mountain View, CA: The Tolkien Trust.Search in Google Scholar

Townsend, Charles E. & Laura A. Janda. 1996. Common and Comparative Slavic: Phonology and Inflection with Special Attention to Russian, Polish, Czech, Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian. Columbus: Slavica Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Uhlenbeck, Christianus C. 1894. Etymologisches. 3 Flëhtan. In Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 19. 517–519.10.1515/bgsl.1894.1894.19.327Search in Google Scholar

Vaillant, André. 1950. Grammaire comparée des langues slaves, tome I, phonétique. Lyon & Paris: IAC.Search in Google Scholar

Vasmer, Max. 1953–1958. Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch 1–3. Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag.Search in Google Scholar

Vey, Marc. 1931 a. Slave st provenant ďi.-e- *pt. In Bulletin de la Société de linguistique 32. 65–67.Search in Google Scholar

Vey, Marc. 1931 b. [Procèses-verbaux des séances:] V. sl. nestera. In Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 32. XV.Search in Google Scholar

Vey, Marc. 1953. Les noms de l’«autour» en slave. In Bulletin de la Société de linguistique 49 (1). 24–40.Search in Google Scholar

Vey, Marc. 1958. [Procèses-verbaux des séances:] Hypothèse sur l’etymologie de vieux russe Stribogъ. In Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique 53 (1). XLI.Search in Google Scholar

Zubatý, Josef. 1891. Slav. pastorъkъ. In Archiv für slavische Philologie 13. 315–317.Search in Google Scholar

Zupitza, Ernst. 1899. Wortdeutungen. In Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 35. 265–270.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-06-09
Published in Print: 2020-05-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/slaw-2020-0012/html
Scroll to top button