Kubrick’s audible bodies: unseen subjectivities in 2001 and The Shining

James Batcho

doi:10.1515/sem-2020-0105

Article

Kubrick’s audible bodies: unseen subjectivities in 2001 and The Shining

James Batcho

Published/Copyright: November 2, 2021

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Submit Manuscript Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal Semiotica Volume 2021 Issue 243

Abstract

Stanley Kubrick is regarded as a filmmaker of complex imagery. Yet the vitality of his more metaphysical works lies in what is unseen. There is an embodiment to Kubrick’s films that maintains a sense of subjectivity, but one which is unapparent and non-visual. This opens another way into Kubrick’s works, that of conditions of audibility (hearing/listening), affectivity, and signs. To think of embodiment from such an audible perspective requires one to subvert film spectatorship (the frame) and instead enter the reality of the film’s immanent, borderless unfolding as itself. This essay applies Gilles Deleuze’s semiotic concepts of cinema, metaphysics, and subjectivity to conditions of audibility and unseeing, a connection Deleuze largely ignored in his writings. These dual concepts of audibility and unseeing break prevailing analytical norms in cinema discourse that affirm limitations via material, visual, textual, and spatial reification: subjective-objective delineations, the body and the gaze, sound as necessarily spatial/material, and the dominance of images in regard to aesthetics, surveillance, and evidence. Instead, this essay moves through Kubrick’s constructions of milieu that are unseen in the midst of an otherwise visual unfolding, and audible in the midst of an otherwise sonic unfolding. To consider Kubrick’s films through their audible embodiment, one must detach (1) the microphone from its adherence to space, (2) the body from its visual gaze. Here, sounds, images, and objects become secondary to hearing and signs in a temporal unfolding, resulting in a cinema that is experiential rather than representational. This opens to an actuality of spirit within the world of the film, offering new opportunities for creativity in the cinematic form.

Keywords: audibility; Deleuze; embodiment; milieu; sound; subjectivity

Corresponding author: James Batcho, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, E-mail: jimb@jimbatcho.com

References

Bachelard, Gaston. 1960. The poetics of reverie: Childhood, language, and the cosmos. Boston: Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1967. Elements of semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Bogue, Ronald. 2003. Deleuze on cinema. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203826065Search in Google Scholar

Boljkovac, Nadine. 2013. Untimely affects: Gilles Deleuze and an ethics of cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748646449.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chion, Michel. 1994. Audio-vision: Sound on screen. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chion, Michel. 2009. Film: A sound art. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Clarke, Arthur C. 1991. 2001: A space odyssey. New York: Ace.Search in Google Scholar

Colman, Felicity. 2011. Deleuze and cinema: The film concepts. Oxford: Berg.10.5040/9781501351099Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1983. Nietzsche and philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1986. Cinema 1. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1989. Cinema 2. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1993. The fold: Leibniz and the baroque. London: Athlone.Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles & Félix Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles & Félix Guattari. 1991. What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Elsaesser, Thomas & Malta Hagener. 2015. Film theory: An introduction through the senses, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315740768Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, Martin. 1988. The essence of truth: On Plato’s cave allegory and Theaetetus. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Hitchcock, Alfred. 1963. The birds [film]. Universal City, CA: Alfred J. Hitchcock Productions, Universal.Search in Google Scholar

King, Stephen. 1977. The shining. New York: Anchor.Search in Google Scholar

Kubrick, Stanley. 1968. 2001: A space odyssey [film]. Beverly Hills, CA: MGM.Search in Google Scholar

Kubrick, Stanley. 1980. The shining [film]. Hollywood, CA: Peregrine Productions, Producers Circle, Warner Bros.Search in Google Scholar

Metz, Christian. 1974. Film language. New York: Oxford University.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955. Logic as a semiotic: The theory of signs. In Justus Buchler (ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce, 98–119. New York: Dover.Search in Google Scholar

Powell, Anna. 2005. Deleuze and horror film. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748617470.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959. Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.Search in Google Scholar

Silverman, Kaja. 1988. The acoustic mirror: The female voice in psychoanalysis and cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tarkovsky, Andrei. 1989. Sculpting in time. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Kristin & David Bordwell. 2008. Categorical coherence: A closer look at character subjectivity. http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/2008/10/24/categorical-coherence-a-closer-look-at-character-subjectivity/ (accessed 29 May 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Williams, James. 2016. A process philosophy of signs. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748695027Search in Google Scholar

Žižek, Slavoj. 1996. “I hear you with my eyes”; or, the invisible master. In Renata Salecl & Slavoj Žižek (eds.), Gaze and voice as love objects (Sic 1), 90–126. Durham & London: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822379447-005Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-10-22

Accepted: 2021-04-14

Published Online: 2021-11-02

Published in Print: 2021-11-25

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0105

Keywords for this article

audibility; Deleuze; embodiment; milieu; sound; subjectivity