Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik A rhetoric of inauthenticity: critical object images in Woolf’s Victorian scenes
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A rhetoric of inauthenticity: critical object images in Woolf’s Victorian scenes

  • Margaret J.-M. Sönmez ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 27. Mai 2022

Abstract

This paper extends the fields of visual and object semiosis, style, and rhetoric by introducing the concept of critical object images. It identifies five of their rhetorical functions in literature and demonstrates the semiotic and rhetorical specificity and force of literary object images. Inter-disciplinary concepts and theories used in the study are introduced before the concept is tested and developed through analyses of object images with critical roles in the Victorian scenes of Virginia Woolf’s novels. The inductive analyses trace the semiosis and stylistic affordances (meanings) of the selected critical object images, with reference to three categories of kitsch inauthenticity, and their formal and cultural contexts, noting the rhetorical function(s) they serve. Multimodal stylistics and the semiotics of visual images and of objects are used in these analyses, and the unique contribution of critical object images as rhetorical elements in literature is uncovered and explained. The analysis of Woolf’s representation of selected objects shows how the critical object images function rhetorically, through their stylistic connotations (here of kitsch inauthenticity), to present unambiguous meanings that are not openly stated in the texts’ verbal discourse.


Corresponding author: Margaret J.-M. Sönmez, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, E-mail:

References

Barthes, Roland. 1997. Image-music-text, Stephen Heath (trans.). London: HarperCollins.Suche in Google Scholar

Beer, Gillian. 1996. Virginia Woolf: The common ground. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bell, Clive. 1914. Art. New York: Frederick A. Stokes.Suche in Google Scholar

Bell, Quentin. 1987. Virginia Woolf: A biography. London: Grafton Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Boutaud, Jean Jacques. 1994. Visual semiotics, pragmatics, and communication. In Thomas A. Sebeok & Jean Umiker-Sebeok (eds.), Advances in visual semiotics: The semiotic web 1992–1993, 3–19. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110874259.3Suche in Google Scholar

Briggs, Julia. 2010. The novels of the 1930s and the impact of history. In Susan Sellers (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Virginia Woolf, 70–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521896948.004Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Bill. 2003. A sense of things: The object matter of American literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226076317.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Bill. 2015. The secret life of things (Virginia Woolf). In Other things, 49–78. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226283166.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, Julia Prewitt. 2008. The bourgeois interior. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Brzyski, Anna. 2013. Art, kitsch, and art history. In Monica Kjellman-Chapin (ed.), Kitsch: History, theory, practice, 1–15. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Suche in Google Scholar

Calinescu, Matei. 1987. Five faces of modernity: Modernism, avant garde, decadence, kitsch, postmodernism, 2nd edn. Durham: Duke University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Caughie, Pamela L. 1991. Virginia Woolf and postmodernism: Literature in quest and question of itself. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cobley, Paul. 2001. Introduction. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 3–13. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Conrad, Peter. 1973. The Victorian treasure house. London: Collins.Suche in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 2004. Fakes in arts and crafts. In Roland Posner, Klaus Robering & Thomas A. Sebeok (eds.), Semiotics: A handbook on the sign-theoretic foundations of nature and culture, vol. 4, 3571–3579. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110179620.4.15.3571Suche in Google Scholar

Eliot, Thomas Stearns. 1947. Notes towards the definition of culture. London: Faber and Faber.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Steve. 2007. Virginia Woolf and the Victorians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511484780Suche in Google Scholar

Foss, Sonja K. 2004. Theory of visual rhetoric. In Ken Smith, Sandra Moriarty, Gretchen Barbatsis & Keith Kenney (eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, 141–152. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Freedgood, Elaine. 2006. The ideas in things. Fugitive meaning in the Victorian novel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226261546.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Fry, Roger. 1920. Vision and design. London: Chatto and Windus.Suche in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Clement. 1965 [1939]. Avant-garde and kitsch. In Art and culture: Critical essays, 3–21. Boston: Beacon Press.10.1525/9780520340770-005Suche in Google Scholar

Hoberman, Ruth. 2005. Aesthetic taste, kitsch, and The Years. Woolf Studies Annual 11. 77–98.Suche in Google Scholar

Hopkins, Chris. 1998. Victorian modernity? Writing the great exhibition. In Gary Day (ed.), Varieties of victorianism: The uses of a past, 40–61. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-26742-2_3Suche in Google Scholar

Kenney, Keith. 2004. Representation theory. In Kenneth L. Smith, Sandra Moriarty, Keith Kenney & Gretchen Barbatis (eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, 99–115. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Kingstone, Helen & Kate Lister (eds.). 2018. Paraphernalia! Victorian objects. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Kjellman-Chapin, Monica. 2013. Introduction. In Kitsch: History, theory, practice, ix–xx. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Suche in Google Scholar

Kluger, Ruth. 2003. Kitsch and art: Broch’s essay “das Böse im Wertsystem der Kunst”. In Paul Michael Lützeler (ed.), Hermann Broch, visionary in exile: The 2001 Yale symposium, 13–20. New York: Camden House.10.1515/9781571136312-003Suche in Google Scholar

Köksal, Fatma Nazlı & Ümit İnatçı. 2020. Visual rhetoric based on triadic approach: Intellectual knowledge, visual representation and aesthetics as modality. Semiotica 233(1/4). 35–53.10.1515/sem-2018-0075Suche in Google Scholar

Koppen, Randi Synnøve. 2009. Virginia Woolf: Fashion and literary modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748638727.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Krampen, Martin. 1994. Semiotics of objects revisited. In Thomas A. Sebeok & Jean Umiker-Sebeok (eds.), Advances in visual semiotics: The semiotic web 1992–1993, 515–534. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110874259.515Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther. 2001. Sociolinguistics and social semiotics. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 66–82. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203619728Suche in Google Scholar

Kulka, Tomas. 2002. Kitsch and art. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kundera, Milan. 1999. The unbearable lightness of being, Michael Henry Heim (trans.). New York: Harper Perennial.Suche in Google Scholar

Leaska, Mitchell A. 1977. Introduction. In The Pargiters by Virginia Woolf: The novel-essay portion of The Years, vii–xxiv. New York: New York Public Library and Readex Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, Hermione. 1996. Virginia Woolf. London: Chatto and Windus.Suche in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey. 2008. Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

McNeillie, Andrew. 2010. Bloomsbury. In Susan Sellers (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Virginia Woolf, 2nd edn., 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521896948.001Suche in Google Scholar

Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia. 1988. Markedness in English discourse: A semiotic approach. Parma: Edizioni Zara.Suche in Google Scholar

Merrell, Floyd. 2001. Charles Sanders Peirce’s concept of the sign. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 28–39. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, Monica J. 2010. Odds, ends, and others: Objects and the narration of Woolf’s servant characters. Woolf Studies Annual 16. 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13586841003787209.Suche in Google Scholar

Moriarty, Sandra & Gretchen Barbatis. 2004. From an oak to a stand of aspen: Visual communication theory mapped as rhizome analysis. In Kenneth L. Smith, Sandra Moriarty, Keith Kenney & Gretchen Barbatis (eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, xi–xxii. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Nørgaard, Nina. 2018. Multimodal stylistics of the novel: More than words. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315145556Suche in Google Scholar

Ophir, Ella. 2017. “Writing the history of my own times”: Virginia Woolf and the diary. In Jane de Gay, Tom Breckin & Anne Reus (eds.), Virginia Woolf and heritage, 196–201. Clemson, SC: Clemson University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1ps32z5.32Suche in Google Scholar

Parker, De Witt H. 1946. Principles of aesthetics, 2nd edn. New York: F. S. Crofts.Suche in Google Scholar

Peach, Lynden. 2000. Virginia Woolf. New York: St Martin’s Press.10.1057/978-1-137-15294-7Suche in Google Scholar

Purcell, Mark. 2017. The country house library. New Haven: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Quigley, Megan. 2015. Modernist fiction and vagueness: Philosophy, form, and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316105597Suche in Google Scholar

Ryan, Derek. 2013. Virginia Woolf and the materiality of theory: Sex, animal, life. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748676439.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Seshagiri, Urmila. 2004. Orienting Virginia Woolf: Race, aesthetics, and politics in To the Lighthouse. Modern Fiction Studies 50(1). 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2004.0013.Suche in Google Scholar

Sonesson, Göran. 1996. An essay concerning images: From rhetoric to semiotics by way of ecological physics. Semiotica 109(1/2). 41–140.Suche in Google Scholar

Spiropoulou, Angeliki. 2010. Virginia Woolf, modernity and history: Constellations with Walter Benjamin. Houndmills: Macmillan.10.1057/9780230250444Suche in Google Scholar

Stefl, Matin. 2014. “A very remarkable piece of iron”: Towards a theory of material imagination in Virginia Woolf’s “solid objects.” Prague Journal of English Studies 3(1). 19–34.10.2478/pjes-2014-0015Suche in Google Scholar

Swanson, Diana L. 2012. Woolf’s shift: Nonhuman nature in Virginia Woolf’s short fiction. Woolf Studies Annual 18. 53–74.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Nicholas. 1998. Foreword. In Alfred Gell (ed.), Art and agency: An anthropological theory, vii–xiii. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5594/M00586Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Nigel, J. T. 2019. Mental imagery. In Edward, N. (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/mental-imagery/ (accessed 1 July 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Transcue, Pamala J. 1986. Virginia Woolf and the politics of style. Albany: State University of New York Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Veereshwar, Prakash & Nupur Sharma. 2001. Aesthetics. Meerut: Krishna Prakashan.Suche in Google Scholar

Welz, Stefan. 2007a. Introduction. In Elmar Schenkel & Stefan Welz (eds.), Magical objects: Things and beyond, i–vi. Berlin: Galda & Wilch Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Welz, Stefan. 2007b. Virginia Woolf’s solid objects. In Elmar Schenkel & Stefan Welz (eds.), Magical objects: Things and beyond, 145–156. Berlin: Galda & Wilch Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1948 [1941]. The years. London: Pan.10.1002/9781118234266Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1975. The letters of Virginia Woolf: Volume III (1923–1928), Nigel Nicolson & Joanne Trautmann (eds.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1977a. The diary of Virginia Woolf: Volume I (1915–1919), Anne Olivier Bell (ed.). San Diego: Harvest.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1977b. The pargiters: The novel-essay portion of The Years, Mitchell A. Leaska (ed.). New York: New York Public Library.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1977c. [1931]c. The waves. London: Granada.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1977d. [1933]d. Flush: A biography. London: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1980. The Letters of Virginia Woolf. Volume VI (1936–1941), Nigel Nicolson & Joanne Trautmann (eds.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1982a. The diary of Virginia Woolf: Volume III (1925–1930), Anne Olivier Bell (ed.). London: Harvest.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1982b. The diary of Virginia Woolf: Volume IV (1931–1935), Anne Olivier Bell (ed.). London: Harvest.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1986. The essays of Virginia Woolf: Volume III (1919–1924), Andrew McNeille (ed.). London: Hogarth Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1987. The essays of Virginia Woolf: Volume II (1912–1918), Andrew McNeille (ed.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1989. The essays of Virginia Woolf: Volume I (1904–1912), Andrew McNeille (ed.). San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1992 [1941]. Between the acts. London: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1994. The essays of Virginia Woolf: Volume IV (1925–1928), Andrew McNeille (ed.). London: Hogarth Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia. 1998 [1928]. Orlando. London: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Zink, Suzana. 2018. Virginia Woolf’s rooms and the spaces of modernity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-71909-2Suche in Google Scholar

Zwerdling, Alex. 1986. Virginia Woolf and the real world. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520353220Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-07-16
Accepted: 2022-01-22
Published Online: 2022-05-27
Published in Print: 2022-07-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 6.3.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2020-0072/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen