Home Language and radical anthropocentrism: the view from the supercategory
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Language and radical anthropocentrism: the view from the supercategory

  • Adrian Pablé EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 24, 2022

Abstract

The article critically engages with the posthumanist discourse on anthropocentrism and human exceptionalism. It adopts an “integrational” approach to signs, language, and communication, as outlined in the works of Oxford linguist Roy Harris. Integrational linguistics is committed to a demythologized view of “language,” which it considers to exist only as part of the experience of human individuals and human collectivities. From an integrational point of view, language is not an “object” of scientific inquiry, but a complex of human activities that make such an inquiry possible in the first place. This paper argues that posthumanists falsely ascribe language to animals and to hypothetical extraterrestrials. Based on Harris’ concept of the supercategory, it is shown that the worldviews encapsulated in science, history, and religion only make sense because they are human worldviews. No other intelligent life could grasp the various supercategorical discourses, and how they relate to each other, the main reason being that language is a uniquely integrated mode of human communication. The article thus supports a radical anthropocentrism as the only intellectually viable philosophy on which to draw in our reflections on, and inquiries into both intraspecies and interspecies communication.


Corresponding author: Adrian Pablé, School of English, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., P.R. China, E-mail:

References

Bergoglio, Jorge Mario. 2015. Laudato sì [Papal encyclical by Pope Francis]. https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html (accessed 26 April 2022).Search in Google Scholar

Besson, Luc(dir.). 2014. Lucy [film]. France: EuropaCorp.Search in Google Scholar

Burghardt, Gordon. 2007. Critical anthropomorphism, uncritical anthropocentrism, and naïve nominalism. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews 2. 136–138.10.3819/ccbr.2008.20009Search in Google Scholar

Consolmagno, Guy & Paul Mueller. 2014. Would you baptize an extraterrestrial? New York: Image.10.1017/CBO9781316272480.019Search in Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie. 2019. The final Frontier: Non-human animals on the linguistic research agenda. Linguistics in the Netherlands 36. 13–19.10.1075/avt.00015.corSearch in Google Scholar

Cornips, Leonie. 2021. The animal turn in sociolinguistics: About the interspecies and intraspecies greeting by the dairy cow. Paper presented online for the University of Stockholm, February 9. https://www.su.se/slabafinety/om-oss/evenemang/tidigare-evenemang/guest-lecture-leonie-cornips-maastricht-the-animal-turn-in-sociolinguistics-1.539128 (accessed 18 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Daniel R. 1997. The three-dimensional sign. Language Sciences 19(1). 23–31.10.1016/0388-0001(95)00024-0Search in Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. 2008. Science and the God delusion: A conversation with Richard Dawkins. U. H. I. Millennium Institute. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSZ_fsG5uMg (accessed 13 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

de Burgh, Chris. 1976. A spaceman came travelling [song lyrics]. https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/chrisdeburgh/aspacemancametravelling.html (accessed 19 April 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Duncker, Dorthe. 2019. The reflexivity of language and linguistic inquiry. London & NewYork: Routledge.10.4324/9781351060394Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1980. The language-makers. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1981. The language myth. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1984. The semiology of textualization. Language Sciences 6(2). 271–286.10.1016/S0388-0001(84)80020-0Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1987. The language machine. London: Duckworth.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1996. Signs, language, and communication. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 1998. Introduction to integrational linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.10.1163/9789004454057_003Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2003a. History, science, and the limits of language. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2003b. The necessity of artspeak. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2003c. Nagarjuna, Heracleitus, and the problem of language. In Hayley Davis & Talbot Taylor (eds.), Rethinking linguistics, 171–188. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2004. The linguistics of history. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474468909Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2005. The semantics of science. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2006a. Integrationism and godspeak. Integrationist notes and papers 2003–2005, 67–70. Crediton: Tree Tongue.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2006b. Integrationism and the foundations of mathematics. Integrationist notes and papers 2003–2005, 63–66. Crediton: Tree Tongue.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2009a. The integrational conception of the sign. Integrationist notes and papers 2006–2008, 61–81. Bright Pen: Gamlingay.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2009b. After epistemology. Bright Pen: Gamilingay.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2009c. Implicit and explicit language teaching. In Michael Toolan (ed.), Language teaching: Integrational linguistic approaches, 24–46. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2010. Linguistic inquiry. Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy. 2013. Language and intelligence. Gamlingay: Bright Pen.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Sam. 2010. The moral landscape: How science can determine human values. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy & Talbot J. Taylor. 1989. Landmarks in linguistic thought, vol. 1. London & New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, Roy & Christopher Hutton. 2007. Definition in theory and practice. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Hauck, Jan-David & O. Heurich Guilherme. 2018. Language in the Amerindian imagination: An inquiry into linguistic natures. Language & Communication 63. 1–8.10.1016/j.langcom.2018.03.005Search in Google Scholar

Horn Stephan (ed.). 2008. Creation and evolution: A conference with Pope Benedict XVI in Castel Gandolfo. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Peter. 2018. Integrationist reflections on the place of dialogue in our communicational universe: Laying the ghost of segregationism? Language and Dialogue 8(1). 118–138.10.1075/ld.00008.jonSearch in Google Scholar

Kwok, Sinead. 2020. The human-animal divide in communication: Anthropocentric, posthuman, and integrationist answers. Language & Communication 74. 61–73.10.1016/j.langcom.2020.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2003. The embodied mind, and how to live with one. In Anthony Sanford (ed.), The nature and limits of human understanding, 47–108. London & New York: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Oberhaus, Daniel. 2019. Extraterrestrial languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/11229.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Öberg, Karin. 2019. Do aliens need Jesus too? Scientists debate creation beyond earth. https://religionunplugged.com/news/2019/5/2/do-aliens-need-jesus-too-scientists-debate-creation-beyond-earth (accessed 12 March 2021).Search in Google Scholar

O’Meara, Thomas. 2012. Vast universe: Extraterrestrials and Christian revelation. Collegeville, MI: Liturgical Press.Search in Google Scholar

Orman, Jon. 2017. Explanation and theory in linguistic inquiry. Empedocles 8(2). 167–186.10.1386/ejpc.8.2.167_1Search in Google Scholar

Pablé, Adrian. 2012. Logophilia, logophobia and the terra mota of personal linguistic experience. Language & Communication 32. 257–264.10.1016/j.langcom.2012.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Pablé Adrian (ed.). 2017. Critical humanist perspectives. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315621760Search in Google Scholar

Pablé, Adrian. 2019a. In what sense is integrational theory lay-oriented? Notes on Harrisian core concepts and explanatory terminology. Language Sciences 72(1). 150–159.10.1016/j.langsci.2018.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Pablé, Adrian. 2019b. Is a general non-ethnocentric theory of communication possible? An integrationist approach. Lingua 230. 102735.10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102735Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, Alastair. 2018. Posthumanist applied linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315457574Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, Alastair & Sinfree Makoni. 2019. Innovations and challenges in applied linguistics from the global south. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429489396Search in Google Scholar

Quayle, Stephen. 2014. Xenogenesis. Bozeman: End Time Thunder.Search in Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph. 1995. In the beginning: A Catholic understanding of the story of creation and the fall. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173865.012Search in Google Scholar

Savage-Rumbaugh, Sue, Shanker Stuart & Talbot Taylor. 1998. Apes, language, and the human mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195109863.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, Talbot. 1997. The origin of language: Why it never happened. In Taylor Talbot (ed.), Theorizing language: Analysis, normativity, rhetoric, history, 241–262. Bingley: Emerald.10.1016/0388-0001(95)00028-3Search in Google Scholar

Timberlake, William. 1999. Biological behaviorism. In William O’Donohue & Richard Kitchener (eds.), Handbook of behaviorism, 243–284. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012524190-8/50011-5Search in Google Scholar

Toolan, Michael. 1996. Total speech: An integrational linguistic approach to language. Durham & London: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11hph6gSearch in Google Scholar

Wynne, Clive. 2007. What are animals? Why anthropomorphism is still not a scientific approach to behavior. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews 2. 135–145.10.3819/ccbr.2008.20008Search in Google Scholar

Zilinsky, Sheila. 2021. Technogeddon: The coming human extinction. Crane, MO: Kingsmen Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-08-10
Accepted: 2022-02-07
Published Online: 2022-05-24
Published in Print: 2022-07-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2021-0107/html
Scroll to top button