Systematizing evil in literature: twelve models for the analysis of narrative fiction

References

Aguirre, Manuel. 1990. The closed space: Horror literature and western symbolism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Alvarez, Jeannette M., Diane N. Ruble & Niall Bolger. 2001. Trait understanding or evaluative reasoning? An analysis of children’s behavioral predictions. Child Development 72. 1409–1425. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00356.Suche in Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. 1976. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: Penguin.Suche in Google Scholar

Bal, Mieke. 2009. Narratology: Introduction into the theory of narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2011. The science of evil: On empathy and the origins of cruelty. New York: Basic.Suche in Google Scholar

Bertl, Bianca, Jakob Pietschnig, Ulrich S. Tran, Stefan Stieger & Martin Voracek. 2017. More or less than the sum of its parts? Mapping the dark triad of personality onto a single dark core. Personality and Individual Differences 114. 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Book, Angela, Beth A. Visser & Anthony A. Volk. 2015. Unpacking “evil”: Claiming the core of the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences 73. 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.016.Suche in Google Scholar

Botting, Fred. 1996. The gothic. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Breithaupt, Fritz. 2017. Die dunklen Seiten der Empathie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Candel, Daniel. 2013a. Advanced literacy and the place of literary semantics in secondary education: A tool of fictional analysis. Semiotica 195(1/4). 305–330. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2013-0031.Suche in Google Scholar

Candel, Daniel. 2013b. Moving possible world theory from logic to value. Poetics Today 34(1/2). 177–231.10.1215/03335372-2087572Suche in Google Scholar

Candel, Daniel. 2013c. Literatur interpetieren – ein Analysetool. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Suche in Google Scholar

Candel, Daniel. 2016. Possible worlds in the history of the novel. Poetics Today 37(1). 107–136.10.1215/03335372-3452631Suche in Google Scholar

Candel, Daniel. 2018. A report on the reports of the Stanford literary lab: A reason why the digital humanities may find it difficult to change literary history. Semiotica 224(1/4). 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0223.Suche in Google Scholar

Candel, Daniel. 2020. Extending the embodied semiotic square: A cultural-semantic analysis of “Follow your Arrow.”. Semiotica 236(1/4). 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0144.Suche in Google Scholar

Caracciolo, Marco. 2019. Form, science, and narrative in the Anthropocene. Narrative 27(3). 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2019.0016.Suche in Google Scholar

Carroll, Joseph. 2005. Human nature and literary meaning: A theoretical model illustrated with a critique of Pride and Prejudice. In Jonathan Gottschall & David Sloan Wilson (eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative, 76–106. Evanston: Northeastern University Press.10.2307/j.ctvw1d5h1.11Suche in Google Scholar

Carroll, Joseph. 2015. Evolutionary social theory: The current state of knowledge. Style 49(4). 512–541. https://doi.org/10.5325/style.49.4.0512.Suche in Google Scholar

Carroll, Joseph, Mathias Clasen, Emelie Jonsson, Alexandra R. Kratschmer, Luseadra McKerracher, Felix Riede, Jens-Christian Svenning & Peter C. Kjærgaard. 2017. Biocultural theory: The current state of knowledge. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences 11(1). 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000058.Suche in Google Scholar

Catani, Damian. 2013. Evil: A history in modern French literature and thought. London: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Chapple, John A. V. 1986. Science and literature in the nineteenth century. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-18470-5Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, Timothy. 2015. Ecocriticism on the edge: The Anthropocene as a threshold concept. London: Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Clasen, Mathias. 2017. Why horror seduces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190666507.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Cole, Phillip. 2006. The myth of evil. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622009.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Costa, Paul T. & Robert R. McCrae. 1992. Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences 13. 653–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-i.Suche in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 2001. Four ages of understanding: The first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto: Toronto University Press.10.3138/9781442675032Suche in Google Scholar

Dolezel, Lubomír. 1998. Heterocosmica: Fiction and possible worlds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Donaldson, E. Talbot. 1966. Beowulf: A new prose translation. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. 2010. On evil. New Haven: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Fischer, Andreas. 2004. The notional structure of thesauruses. In Christian J. Kay & Jeremy J. Smith (eds.), Categorization in the history of English, 41–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.261.04fisSuche in Google Scholar

Gelder, Ken. 1994. Reading the vampire. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203320266Suche in Google Scholar

Gillespie, Michael Allan. 2006. Where did all the evils go? In Ruth W. Grant (ed.), Naming evil, judging evil, 15–34. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226306742.003.0002Suche in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Lewis R. 1993. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist 48. 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.48.1.26.Suche in Google Scholar

Greenblatt, Stephen. 2017. The rise and fall of Adam and Eve. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar

Herman, David. 2012. Story-telling and the sciences of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hochberg, Shifra. 1991. Male authority and female subversion in Browning’s “My Last Duchess.” LIT 3(1). 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10436929108580072.Suche in Google Scholar

Höffe, Otfried. 2001. Kleine Geschichte der Philosophie. München: Beck.Suche in Google Scholar

Ingersoll, Earl G. 1990. Lacan, Browning and the murderous voyeur: “Porphyria’s Lover” and “My Last Duchess.”. Victorian Poetry 28. 151–157.Suche in Google Scholar

James, Henry. 2015. From “The art of fiction.” In Victor Shea & William Whitla (eds.), Victorian literature: An anthology, 96–98. Chichester: Wiley.Suche in Google Scholar

Kilgour, Maggie. 1995. The rise of the Gothic novel. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Kowalski, Christopher Marcin. 2018. The dark triad traits and intelligence: Machiavellians are bright, and narcissists and psychopaths are ordinary. Personality and Individual Differences 135. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.049.Suche in Google Scholar

Lukács, Georg. 1971. The theory of the novel: A historico-philosophical essay on the forms of great epic literature. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1990. Three rival versions of moral enquiry: Encyclopedia, genealogy, and tradition. Notre Dame: University Press of Notre Dame.Suche in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2006. Ethics and politics: Selected essays, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606670Suche in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2007. After virtue: A study in moral theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2016. Ethics in the conflicts of modernity: An essay on desire, practical reasoning, and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316816967Suche in Google Scholar

Margolin, Uri. 1986. The doer and the deed: Action as a basis for characterization in narrative. Poetics Today 7(2). 205–225. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772759.Suche in Google Scholar

Maxwell, Catherine. 1992. Not the whole picture: Browning’s “Unconquerable Shade.”. Word & Image 8(4). 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02666286.1992.10435844.Suche in Google Scholar

McCrae, Robert R. & Paul T. Costa. 2013. Introduction to the empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In Thomas A. Widiger & Paul T. Costa (eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality, 15–27. Washington: American Psychological Association.10.1037/13939-002Suche in Google Scholar

McKeon, Michael. 2002. The origins of the English novel: 1600–1740. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801869952Suche in Google Scholar

McKeon, Michael. 2005. The secret history of domesticity: Public, private, and the division of knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Midgley, Mary. 1984. Wickedness. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Morton, Adam. 2004. On evil: Thinking in action. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203704127Suche in Google Scholar

Mulvey-Roberts, Mary. 1998. The handbook to Gothic literature. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-26496-4Suche in Google Scholar

Neiman, Susan. 2002. Evil in modern thought: An alternative history of philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Norton, Rictor (eds.). 2000. Gothic readings: The first wave, 1764–1840. London: Leicester University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Oates, Joyce Carol. 1992. Heat. In Joyce Carol Oates (ed.), The Oxford book of American short stories, 607–619. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-011288-6.50015-2Suche in Google Scholar

O’Boyle, Ernest H., Donelson Forsyth, George C. Banks & Paul A. Story. 2013. A meta-analytic review of the dark triad–intelligence connection. Journal of Research in Personality 47. 789–794.10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.001Suche in Google Scholar

Osgood, Charles E., William H. May & Murray S. Miron. 1975. Cross-cultural universals of affective meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Otto, Rudolph. 1920. Das Heilige: Über das Irrationale in der Idee des Göttlichen und sein Verhältnis zum Rationalen. Breslau: Trewendt und Granier.Suche in Google Scholar

Paulhus, Delroy L. & Kevin M. Williams. 2002. The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality 36. 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Pavel, Thomas G. 2013. The lives of the novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Phelan, Jim. 1989. Reading people, reading plots: Character, progression, and the interpretation of narrative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Phelan, Jim. 2007. Experiencing fiction: Judgments, progressions, and the rhetorical theory of narrative. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Punter, David. 1980. The literature of terror: A history of Gothic fictions from 1765 to the present day. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Punter, David. 2000. A companion to the Gothic. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631206200.2001.00002.xSuche in Google Scholar

Reichl, Susanne. 2009. Cognitive principles, critical practice: Reading literature at university. Vienna: Vienna University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ricoeur, Paul. 1969. The symbolism of evil. Boston: Beacon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Riemann, Fritz. 2009. Anxiety: Using depth psychology to find a balance in your life. München: Ernst Reinhardt.Suche in Google Scholar

Rouse, Robert A. 2005. The idea of Anglo-Saxon England in middle English romance. Woodbridge: Brewer.10.1515/9781846154034Suche in Google Scholar

Saucier, Gerard. 2009. What are the most important dimensions of personality? Evidence from studies of descriptors in diverse languages. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3(4). 620–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00188.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Sage, Victor & Allan Lloyd Smith (eds.). 1996. Modern Gothic: A reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Slade, Benjamin. 2012. Beowulf: Diacritically-marked text and facing translation. Available at: https://www.heorot.dk/beowulf-rede-text.html (accessed 4 June 2020).Suche in Google Scholar

Spaemann, Robert. 1994. Philosophische essays. Stuttgart: Reclam.Suche in Google Scholar

Sternberg, Meir. 2001. How narrativity makes a difference. Narrative 9(2). 115–22.Suche in Google Scholar

Stone, Michael H. 2009. The anatomy of evil. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Stuhmiller, Jacqueline. 2006. “Ludicium Dei, iudicium fortunae”: Trial by combat in Malory’s “Le Morte Darthur.”. Speculum 81(2). 427–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0038713400002645.Suche in Google Scholar

Walsh, Richard & Susan Stepney. 2018. Narrative theory for complexity scientists. In Richard Walsh (ed.), Narrating complexity, 11–26. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-64714-2_2Suche in Google Scholar

Watt, Ian P. 1987. The rise of the novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding. London: The Hogarth Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Watt, Ian P. 1997. Myths of modern individualism: Faust, Don Quixote, Don Juan, Robinson Crusoe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511549236Suche in Google Scholar

Woods, Derek. 2014. Scale critique for the Anthropocene. Minnesota Review 83. 133–42. https://doi.org/10.1215/00265667-2782327.Suche in Google Scholar

Zunshine, Lisa. 2015. Introduction to cognitive literary studies. In Lisa Zunshine (ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive literary studies, 1–9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199978069.013.0001Suche in Google Scholar