Visual rhetoric based on triadic approach: Intellectual knowledge, visual representation and aesthetics as modality

References

Altuğ, T. 1989. Kant estetiği. İstanbul: Payel Yayınları.Search in Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. 2004. Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1017/S2753906700000784Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, R. 1977. Image music text. New York: Hill & Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Berger, A. A. 2012. Seeing is believing: An introduction to visual communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Burke, K. 1966. Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520340664Search in Google Scholar

Callow, M. & L. Schiffman. 1999. A visual esperanto? The pictorial metaphor in global advertising. European Advances in Consumer Research 4. 17–20.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 1999. Philosophy of art: A contemporary introduction. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Dake, D. 2005. Aesthetics theory. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis & K. Kenney (eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, 3–22. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Dyer, G. 1982. Advertising as communication. London: Methuen.10.4324/9780203328132Search in Google Scholar

Eco, U. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar

Ehninger, D. 1972. Contemporary rhetoric: A reader’s coursebook. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Search in Google Scholar

Foss, S. 1986. Ambiguity as persuasion: The Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Communication Quarterly 34(3). 362–340.10.1080/01463378609369643Search in Google Scholar

Foss, S. 1987. Body art: Insanity as communication. Central States Speech Journal 38(2). 122–131.10.1080/10510978709368236Search in Google Scholar

Foss, S. 1988. Judy Chicago’s The Dinner Party: Empowering of women’s voice in visual art. In B. Bate & A. Taylor (eds.), Women communicating: Studies of women’s talk, 9–26. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Foss, S. 1994. A rhetorical schema for the evaluation of visual imagery. Communication Studies 45(3/4). 213–224.10.1080/10510979409368425Search in Google Scholar

Foss, S. 2005. Theory of visual rhetoric. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis & K. Kenney (eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, 141–152. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Foss, S. & M. Kanengieter. 1992. Visual communication in the basic course. Communication Education 41(3). 312–323.10.1080/03634529209378891Search in Google Scholar

Gombrich, E. 1994. The image and the eye: Further studies in the psychology of pictorial representation. Oxford: Phaidon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Holt, D. & M. Mulvey. 1997. The reading profile: An interpretive framework for analyzing the meanings of ads. Advances in Consumer Research 24. 98–100.Search in Google Scholar

Kagan, M. 1993. Estetik ve Sanat Dersleri. Ankara: İmge Yayınları.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. 1990. Visual metaphors in the representation of communication technology. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7. 37–47.10.1080/15295039009360162Search in Google Scholar

Kenney, K. 2005. Representation theory. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis & K. Kenney (eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media, 99–115. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Kjeldsen, J. 2017. Visual rhetorical argumentation. Semiotica 220. 69–94.10.1515/sem-2015-0136Search in Google Scholar

Leppert, R. 1996. Art and the committed eye: The cultural functions of imagery. Boulder: Westview Press.Search in Google Scholar

Marchand, R. 1985. Advertising the American dream: Making way for modernity 1920–1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520342668Search in Google Scholar

Morello, J. 1992. The “look” and language of clash: Visual structuring of argument in the 1988 Bush-Dukakis debates. Southern Speech Communication Journal 57(3). 205–218.10.1080/10417949209372866Search in Google Scholar

Neufeldt, V. & D. Guralnik. 1988. Aesthetics. Webster’s new world dictionary. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar

Olson, L. 1987. Ben Franklin. Quarterly Journal of Speech 73. 18–42.10.1080/00335638709383792Search in Google Scholar

Peterson, V. 2001. The rhetorical criticism of visual elements: An alternative to Foss’s schema. The Southern Communication Journal 67(1). 19–30.10.1080/10417940109373216Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, B. & E. McQuarrie. 2004. Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory 4(1/2). 113–136.10.1177/1470593104044089Search in Google Scholar