Startseite Kenneth Waltz talks through Mark Rothko: Visual metaphors in the discipline of International Relations Theory
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Kenneth Waltz talks through Mark Rothko: Visual metaphors in the discipline of International Relations Theory

  • Serdar Ş. Güner ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. Oktober 2019

Abstract

Semiotics constitutes an untapped and interdisciplinary source of enrichment for the discipline of International Relations (IR) theory. We propose two visual metaphors to that effect to interpret the figure depicting the central claim of structural realism (SR) offered by late Kenneth Waltz who is one of the most disputed, read, and inspiring IR theorists. The figure is the tenor of both metaphors. The vehicles are two paintings by Mark Rothko, namely, “Green and Tangerine on Red” and the “Number 14.” The metaphors generate innumerable meanings for the tenor and eliminate the criticism that SR is a static and an ahistorical theory. Thus, they benefit the Discipline characterised by academic cleavages on the meaning of theory, science, and production of knowledge.

References

Albers, J. 1963. Interaction of colour. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Aldrich, V. C. 1968. Visual metaphor. The Journal of Aesthetic Education 2(1). 73–86.10.2307/3331241Suche in Google Scholar

Arnheim, R. 1997. Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520353213Suche in Google Scholar

Ashley, R. K. 1986. The poverty of neorealism. In R. O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its critics, 255–300. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Berger, J. 2008. The ways of seeing. London: Penguin Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Cockcroft, E. 1985. Abstract expressionism, weapon of the Cold War. In F. Frascina (ed.), Pollock and after: The critical debate, 125–133. London: Paul Chapman.Suche in Google Scholar

Forceville, C. 1994. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9(1). 1–29.10.1207/s15327868ms0901_1Suche in Google Scholar

Fyfe, G. & J. Law. 1988. Picturing power: Visual depiction and social relations. New York: Chapman and Hall.Suche in Google Scholar

George, J. 1995. Realist ‘ethics’, international relations, and post-modernism: Thinking beyond the egoism-anarchy thematic. Millenium 4(2). 195–223.10.1177/03058298950240020301Suche in Google Scholar

Gombrich, E. 1960. Art and illusion. New York: Pantheon Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Gombrich, E. 1972. Symbolic images: Studies in the art of the renaissance. London: Phaidon.Suche in Google Scholar

Goodman, N. 1976. Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.10.5040/9781350928541Suche in Google Scholar

Gottlieb, A. & M. Rothko. 1943. The portrait and the modern artist. Typescript of a broadcast on “Art in New York,” Radio WNYC, 13 October 1943.Suche in Google Scholar

Harrison, C. 2003. Visual social semiotics: Understanding how still images make meaning. Communication 50(1). 46–60.Suche in Google Scholar

Hester, M. B. 1966. Metaphor and aspect seeing. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25(2). 205–212.10.2307/429393Suche in Google Scholar

Itten, J. 1961. The art of colour: The subjective experience and objective rationale of colour. New York: Van Nostrand.Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, J. M. 1982. Metaphor in pictures. Perception 11(5). 589–605.10.1068/p110589Suche in Google Scholar

Kjeldsen, J. E. 2018. Visual rhetorical argumentation. Semiotica 220(1/4). 69–94.10.1515/sem-2015-0136Suche in Google Scholar

Klee, P. 1920. Creative credo. Tribune der Kunst und Zeit.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lapid, Y. 1989. The third debate: On the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era. International Studies Quarterly 33(3). 235–254.10.2307/2600457Suche in Google Scholar

Lyotard, J. F. 1993. The postmodern explained. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Marcuse, H. 1978. The aesthetic dimension: Toward a critique of Marxist aesthetic. Boston: Beacon Press.10.1007/978-1-349-04687-4Suche in Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. 1994. Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Molloy, S. 2010. From the twenty years crisis to theory of international politics: A rhizomatic reading of realism. Journal of International Relations and Development 13(4). 378–404.10.1057/jird.2010.15Suche in Google Scholar

Nöth, W. 1990. Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctv14npk46Suche in Google Scholar

Pachirat, T. 2006. Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (eds.), Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes, 373–379. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. 1955. Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Pond, E. & K. N. Waltz. 1994. Correspondence: International politics, viewed from the ground. International Security 19(1). 195–199.10.2307/2539153Suche in Google Scholar

Richards, I. 1932. The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Rose, G. 1998. Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics 51(1). 144–172.10.1017/S0043887100007814Suche in Google Scholar

Rothenberg, A. 1980. Homospatial thinking in the creative process. Leonardo 13(1). 17–27.10.2307/1577915Suche in Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de. 1916. Cours de linguistique général. Paris: Payot.Suche in Google Scholar

Schapiro, M. 1972–1973. On some problems in the semiotics of visual art: Field and vehicle in image-signs. Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art 6(1). 9–19.10.2307/3780400Suche in Google Scholar

Schroeder, P. 1994. Historical reality vs. neo-realist theory. International Security 19(1). 108–148.10.2307/2539150Suche in Google Scholar

Sylvester, C. 1996. Picturing the Cold War: An art graft/eye graft. Alternatives 21(4). 393–418.10.1177/030437549602100401Suche in Google Scholar

Sylvester, C. 2001. Art abstraction and international relations. Millenium 30(3). 535–554.10.1177/03058298010300031101Suche in Google Scholar

Wæver, O. 2009. Waltz’s theory of theory. International Relations 23(2). 201–222.10.1177/0047117809104635Suche in Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N. 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.Suche in Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N. 1986. Reflections on theory of international politics: A response to my critics. In R. O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and its critics, 322–345. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N. 1997. Evaluating theories. American Political Science Review 91(4). 913–917.10.2307/2952173Suche in Google Scholar

Waltz, K. N. 2000. Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security 25(1). 5–41.10.1162/016228800560372Suche in Google Scholar

Wendt, A. 1998. On constitution and causation in international relations. Review of International Studies 24(4). 101–117.10.1017/S0260210598001028Suche in Google Scholar

Wendt, A. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612183Suche in Google Scholar

Wight, C. 2002. Philosophy of social science and international relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse & B. A. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of international relations, 23–31. London: Sage.10.4135/9781848608290.n2Suche in Google Scholar

Yanow, D. & P. Schwartz-Shea (eds.). 2006. Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. New York, London: M. E. Sharpe.Suche in Google Scholar

Zaporozhtseva, L. 2018. Darth Vader in Ukraine: On the boundary between reality and mythology. Semiotica 221(1/4). 261–277.10.1515/sem-2016-0147Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-10-15
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 20.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2018-0042/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen