Home The lens of firstness: Shamanic/Aboriginal culture as cosmos-sign
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The lens of firstness: Shamanic/Aboriginal culture as cosmos-sign

  • Steven Bonta EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 28, 2018

Abstract

Having identified previously (Bonta 2015) the Peircean Category Firstness as the semiotic basis (or cultural Prime Symbol) for Australian Aboriginal culture, this paper examines the “lens” of Firstness as it is manifest in a variety of aboriginal (or “Shamanic”) cultures worldwide. By studying the semiotic contours of religion, language, social organization, and art, we find systemic prioritization of Firstness in its various manifestations, across a wide range of aboriginal cultures from Australia to the Indian Subcontinent to aboriginal Siberia and the New World. Shamanic culture, despite its ethnic and geographic variety, may therefore be represented as a semiotic type – and, in addition, one that, in its pristine form, is nearly extinct.

References

Bergson, Henri. 1971 [1910]. Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness. New York: Humanities Press.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, B. J. 2006. Australian languages. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Boston: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/02108-8Search in Google Scholar

Bonta, Steven. 2015. A Peircean typology of cultural prime symbols: Culture as category. Semiotica 207(1/4).10.1515/sem-2015-0038Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter, Edmund. 1956. The timeless present in the mythology of the Aivilik Eskimos. Anthropologica 3. 1–4.10.2307/25604382Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1981. The languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Du Ponceau, Peter S. 1819. Report of the corresponding secretary to the committee, of his progress in the investigation committed to him of the general character and forms of the languages of the American Indians: Read, 12th Jan 1819. Transactions of the Historical & Literary Committee of the American Philosophical Society 1. xvii–xlvi.Search in Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile & Marcel Mauss. 1963 [1903]. Primitive classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eliade, Mircea. 1972. Shamanism: Archaic techniques of ecstasy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eliade, Mircea. 1996 [1958]. Patterns in comparative religion. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & Hans-Jürgen Sasse. 2002. Introduction: Problems of polysynthesis. In Nicholas Evans & Hans-Jürgen Sasse (eds.), Problems of polysynthesis (Studia Typologica 4). Berlin: Akademia Verlag.10.1524/9783050080956Search in Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar

Gombay, Nicole. 2009. Today is today and tomorrow is tomorrow: Reflections on Inuit understanding of time and place. In Béatrice Collignon & Michèle Therrien (eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth Inuit studies conference: Orality (Paris 2006).Search in Google Scholar

Hoppál, Mihály. 2007. Shamans and traditions. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Search in Google Scholar

Lawlor, Robert. 1991. Voices of the first day: Awakening in the Aboriginal dreamtime. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Jennifer. 1987. Tiwi today: A study of language change in a contact situation. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1983. The genius of polysynthesis. In James S. Thayer (ed.), North American Indians: Humanistic perspectives (University of Oklahoma Papers in Anthropology 24[2]), 221–242. Norman: Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.]Search in Google Scholar

Ramamurti, G. V. 1931. A Manual of the So:ra (or Savara) language. Madras: Government of Madras Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rowicka, G. J. 2006. Canada: Language situation. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Boston: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01848-4Search in Google Scholar

Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Search in Google Scholar

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Skorik, P. 1961. Grammatika Chukotskogo Jazyka. Moscow: Akademia Nauk.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Baldwin & F. J. Gillen. 1938 [1899]. The native tribes of central Australia. London: MacMillan.10.1017/CBO9780511751196Search in Google Scholar

Spengler, Oswald. 1926. The decline of the West: Form and actuality, vol. 1. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Stanner, W. E. H. 1979. White man got no dreaming: Essays, 1938–1973. Canberra: Australian National University, Research School of Social Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Vitebsky, Piers. 1995. Shamanism. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Search in Google Scholar

Weltfish, Gene. 1937. Caddoan texts: Pawnee, South Band dialect (American Ethnological Society 17). New York: G. E. Stechert.Search in Google Scholar

Whorf, Benjamin. 1956. Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-2-28
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0139/pdf
Scroll to top button