Startseite The Peircean order of signification and its encoding system in Chinese landscape painting
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Peircean order of signification and its encoding system in Chinese landscape painting

  • Lian Duan EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. Februar 2018

Abstract

Applying Peirce’s semiotics to the study of art history, this essay explores the order of signification in the Peircean theory and the visual order in Chinese landscape painting. Since the purpose of Chinese landscape painting is not simply to represent the beauty of scenery but to encode and manifest the philosophy of Tao, then, the author argues that the establishment of the encoding mechanism in Chinese landscape painting signifies the origination, development, and establishment of this genre in Chinese art history. In this essay, the Peircean order of signification is described as a T-shaped structure, consisting of a horizontal dimension of signs (icon, index, and symbol) while and a vertical dimension of the signification process (representamen, interpretant, and object). Correspondingly, the visual order in Chinese landscape painting is also described as a T-shaped structure as well: the horizontal dimension at the formal level consists of three signs (mountain path, flowing water, and floating air, the three constitute a compound sign), while the vertical dimension at the ideological level consists of three concepts (the way in nature, the metaphysical Way of nature, and the Tao). The significance of this order is found in re-interpreting the formation of landscape painting in Chinese art history.

References

Chen, Chuanxi. 2006. Zhongguo Shanshuihua Shi [History of Chinese landscape painting]. Tianjin: Renmin Meishu Chubanshe.Suche in Google Scholar

Panofsky, Erwin. 1991. Perspective as symbolic form. New York: Zone Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Suche in Google Scholar

Peng, Lai. 2009. Gudai Hualun [Texts of classical art theory]. Shanghai: Shudian Chubanshe.Suche in Google Scholar

Short, T. L. 2007. Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498350Suche in Google Scholar

Sullivan, Michael. 1979. Symbols of eternity: The art of landscape painting in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhao, Yiheng. 2012. Fuhao Xue [Semiotics]. Nanjing: Nanjing Daxue Chubanshe.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-2-28
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 23.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2015-0032/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen