Home The implications for education of Peirce’s agapist principle
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The implications for education of Peirce’s agapist principle

  • Alin Olteanu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 29, 2016

Abstract

In his divisions of science, Peirce placed pedagogy in the branch of practical sciences. This means that the profession of teaching can only be meliorated by experience, through practice. However, I argue that a holistic look at Peirce’s semiotics reveals an implicit philosophy of education. The key lies in understanding his account of experience in the context of his theory of evolution. By experience Peirce meant semiosis (action of signs), not the modern empirical notion of experience. The sign, unlike an idea (purely mental entity) does not belong strictly to mental or non-mental phenomena. Experience is a characteristic of the Universe (CP 5.448), understood as a physiology of arguments (Stjernfelt 2007). According to Peirce’s taxonomy of signs, learning is the evolution of signification from the Icon sign type to the Argument sign type, being the Universe’s way of discovering itself through life forms. The Argument sign type is a result of agapasm, evolution due to creative love (CP 6.302). The paper explains how Peirce’s theory of agapistic evolution underpins an educational paradigm.

References

Bains, Paul. 2006. The primacy of semiosis: An ontology of relations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442682139Search in Google Scholar

Bellucci, Francesco. 2013. Peirce’s continuous predicates. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49(2). 178–202.10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.49.2.178Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 1982. Introducing semiotics: Its history and doctrine. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 2001. Four ages of understanding. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442675032Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 2009. Augustine & Poinsot. Scranton & London: University of Scranton Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey John. 1997 [1938]. Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey John. 1969. Education today. London: Greenwood Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.10.1007/978-1-349-15849-2Search in Google Scholar

Gough, Steve & Andrew Stables. 2012. Interpretation as adaptation: Education for survival in uncertain times. Curriculum Inquiry 42(3). 368–385.10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00595.xSearch in Google Scholar

James, William. 2001 [1907a]. Essays in radical empiricism. South Bend, IN: Infomotions.Search in Google Scholar

James, William 1907b. Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking: Popular lectures on philosophy. New York: Longmans, Green.10.1037/10851-000Search in Google Scholar

Kull, K. 2005. Semiotics is a theory of life. In R. Williamson, L. G. Sbrocchi & J. Deely (eds.), Semiotics 2003: “Semiotics and national identity”, 15–31. New York: Legas.10.5840/cpsem200337Search in Google Scholar

Kull, K. 2007. Biosemiotics and biophysics: The fundamental approaches to the study of life. In Marcello Barbieri (ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics: The new biological synthesis, 167–177. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-4814-9_7Search in Google Scholar

Lock, Charles. 1997. Iconic space and the materiality of the sign. Religion and the Arts 1(4). 6–22.10.1163/156852996X00252Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, Winfried. 2014. The semiotics of learning new words. Journal of Philosophy of Education 48(3). 446–456.10.1111/1467-9752.12076Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, Winfried & Lucia Santaella. 2011. Meaning and the vagueness of their embodiments. In T. Thellefsen, B. Sørensen & P. Cobley (eds.), From first to third via cybersemiotics: A festschrift honoring professor Søren Brier on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, 247–282. Copenhagen: SL Forlagene.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar

Semetsky, Inna. 2005. Peirce’s semiotics, subdoxastic aboutness, and the paradox of inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory 37(2). 227–238.10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00111.xSearch in Google Scholar

Semetsky, Inna (ed.). 2009. Semiotics, education, experience. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1515/semi.2009.060Search in Google Scholar

Stables, Andrew. 2006. Sign(al)s: Living and learning as semiotic engagement. Journal of Curriculum Studies 38(4). 373–387.10.1080/00220270600732260Search in Google Scholar

Stables, Andrew. 2012. Be(com)ing human: Semiosis and the myth of reason. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6091-997-8Search in Google Scholar

Stepanov, J. S. 1971. Semiotika. Moscow: Nauka.Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5652-9Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2011. Signs conveying information. On the range of Peirce’s notion of propositions: Dicisigns. International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 1(2). 40–52.10.4018/978-1-5225-5622-0.ch008Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2014. Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press.10.1007/s11229-014-0406-5Search in Google Scholar

Strand, Torill. 2014. “Experience is our great and only teacher”: A Peircean reading of Wim Wenders’ Wings of desire. Journal of Philosophy of Education 48(3). 433–445.10.1111/1467-9752.12084Search in Google Scholar

Uexküll, Jakob von. 1926. Theoretical biology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Search in Google Scholar

Uexkull, Jakob von. [1934, 1940]. . 2010. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans with a Theory of Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-6-29
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0132/html
Scroll to top button