Abstract
This essay explores the bases for a process theory of learning applicable across the disciplines in today’s academy. First it traces the modern history of process pedagogy beginning with Kant and leading through Cassirer and Whitehead to an array of contemporary approaches that favor the symbiosis of art and science over the lingering Cartesian dichotomy of “subjective” mental processes and “objective” forms of knowledge. Second, it examines the case of science education, specifically as regards habit formation, ethical instruction, and qualitative research. Thinkers as diverse as Whitehead, Bourdieu, Serres, Latour, and Dewey are seen to oppose the neoscholastic myth of scientific objectivity and favor a language of relations that fosters an “anastomosis” between the disciplines. Lastly, the essay examines the pedagogical role played by logical abduction, as articulated by Peirce and developed further by later scholars. Thus the essay’s three sections – starting with the historical discussion, moving to the field-specific problem of science education, and finally the issue of abductive reasoning – reinforce one another and aim to exemplify the dynamic integration of the general and specific, of mind and nature, that is a goal of process pedagogy.
References
Barthes, R. 1988. The semiotic challenge, R. Howard (trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar
Bateson, G. 1980. Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Bantam.Search in Google Scholar
Bateson, G. 1991. A sacred unity: Further steps to an ecology of mind, R. E. Donaldson (ed.). New York: Cornelia and Michael Bessie.Search in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1997. Pascalian meditations, R. Nice (trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford, University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, M. D. 1991. Abduction and rhetorical theory. Philosophy and Rhetoric 24(4). 281–300.Search in Google Scholar
Carr, D. 1999. The paradox of subjectivity: The self in the transcendental tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1964. On education: Selected writings, Reginald D. Archambault (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fann, K. T. 1970. Peirce’s theory of abduction. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-010-3163-9Search in Google Scholar
Fornasa, Walter. 1998. Maestro perché le cose finiscono in disordine? Epistemologia ecologica e processi educativi. In Sergio Manghi (ed.), Attraverso Bateson. Ecologia della mente e relazioni sociali, 201–212. Milan: Raffaello Cortina.Search in Google Scholar
Glasersfeld, Ernst von. 1995. Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2007. Critique of pure reason, Marcus Weigelt (trans. and ed.). New York: Penguin.10.1007/978-1-137-10016-0Search in Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Leplin, Jarrett. 1997. A novel defense of scientific realism. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Margulis, Lynn & Dorion Sagan. 2002. Acquiring genomes: A theory of the origins of species. New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar
Moriarty, S. E. 1996. Abduction: A theory of visual interpretation. Communication Theory 6(2). 167–187.10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00125.xSearch in Google Scholar
Pearce, W. B. & V. E. Cronen. 1980. Communication, action, and meaning: The creation of social realities. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.]Search in Google Scholar
Pollitt, Katha. 2002. Pierre Bourdieu, 1930–2002. The Nation, February 18. 10.Search in Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1996. Process metaphysics: An introduction to process philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1974. Parerga and paralipomena, vol. 1, E. F. J. Payne (trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Semetsky, Inna. 2013. The edusemiotics of images: Essays on the art~science of Tarot. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6209-055-2Search in Google Scholar
Serres, Michel. 1995. The natural contract, Elizabeth MacArthur & William Paulson (trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9725Search in Google Scholar
Serres, Michel. 1997. The troubadour of knowledge, Sheila F. Glaser & William Paulson (trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9722Search in Google Scholar
Serres, Michel & Bruno Latour. 1995. Conversations on science, culture, and time, Roxanne Lapidus (trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9736Search in Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. 1959. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, George. 1989. Real presences: Is there anything in what we say? London: Faber & Faber.Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, George. 2003. Lessons of the masters: The Charles Eliot Norton lectures 2001–2002. London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Thagard, P. 1988. Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1968.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Thagard, P. 1992. Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691186672Search in Google Scholar
Verene, Donald Phillip. 2008. Cassirer’s metaphysics. In Jeffrey Andrew Barash (ed.), The symbolic construction of reality: The legacy of Ernst Cassirer, 93–103. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226036892.003.0005Search in Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1929a. The aims of education and other essays. New York: MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1929b. The function of reason. Boston, Beacon Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1957. Process and reality. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1961. The interpretation of science, A. H. Johnson (Ed.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Search in Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1971. Concept of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wilden, Anthony. 1987. The rules are no game: The strategy of communication. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Contemporary approaches to a pedagogy of process
- Signs as functions: Edusemiotic and ontological foundations for a semiotic concept of a sign
- Edusemiotics as process semiotics: Towards a new model of semiosis for teaching and learning
- The implications for education of Peirce’s agapist principle
- Writing and Différance
- Seeing through the metaphor: The OECD quality toolbox for early childhood
- Values, edusemiotics, and intercultural dialogue: From Russia with questions
- Usage de l’objet, signification et émergence de la conscience à l’étape préverbale du développement: Une perspective édusémiotique
- Les intuitions édusémiotiques des grands pédagogues : Engagement sémiotique, théorie de l’enquête et narrativité
- Edusemiotics and Karl-Otto Apel’s transcendental semiotics
- Edusemiotics of meaningful learning experience: Revisiting Kant’s pedagogical paradox and Greimas’ semiotic square
- Can design inquiry advance edusemiotics? Rethinking factual information and imaginative interpretation
- Monstrous hermeneutics: Learning from diagrams
- Learning to take play seriously: Peirce, Bateson, and Huizinga on the sacrality of play
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Contemporary approaches to a pedagogy of process
- Signs as functions: Edusemiotic and ontological foundations for a semiotic concept of a sign
- Edusemiotics as process semiotics: Towards a new model of semiosis for teaching and learning
- The implications for education of Peirce’s agapist principle
- Writing and Différance
- Seeing through the metaphor: The OECD quality toolbox for early childhood
- Values, edusemiotics, and intercultural dialogue: From Russia with questions
- Usage de l’objet, signification et émergence de la conscience à l’étape préverbale du développement: Une perspective édusémiotique
- Les intuitions édusémiotiques des grands pédagogues : Engagement sémiotique, théorie de l’enquête et narrativité
- Edusemiotics and Karl-Otto Apel’s transcendental semiotics
- Edusemiotics of meaningful learning experience: Revisiting Kant’s pedagogical paradox and Greimas’ semiotic square
- Can design inquiry advance edusemiotics? Rethinking factual information and imaginative interpretation
- Monstrous hermeneutics: Learning from diagrams
- Learning to take play seriously: Peirce, Bateson, and Huizinga on the sacrality of play