Home Zero sign duality in visual semiotics
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Zero sign duality in visual semiotics

  • Robert M. Cantor EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 15, 2016

Abstract

In this paper, the dyadic concept of zero sign in general linguistics is transformed into a triadic concept of zero sign in visual semiotics. A formal duality relation is defined between two types of visual zero sign. It is argued that the common experience of failure to perceive visual zero signs may be due to either inattention of the interpreter or camouflage of the object of the sign. We conclude that dual zero signs act as detectors in visual semiotics.

References

Cantor, Robert M. 2000. Foundations of Roentgen semiotics. Semiotica 131(1/2). 1–18.10.1515/semi.2000.131.1-2.1Search in Google Scholar

Cantor, Robert M. 2006. The effects of Roentgen signs on the mind of the interpreter. Semiotica 162(1/4). 309–321.10.1515/SEM.2006.082Search in Google Scholar

Cantor, Robert M. 2014. A semiotic model of visual perception. Semiotica 200(1/4). 1–20.10.1515/sem-2014-0008Search in Google Scholar

Cantor, Robert M. this volume. Conceptual embodiment in visual semiotics. Semiotica 210(1/4).10.1515/sem-2016-0052Search in Google Scholar

Coxeter, H. S. M. 1974 [1987]. Projective geometry, 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-6385-2Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John N. 2014. Definitions of sign in Charles Sanders Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Presented at the Charles S. Peirce International Centennial Congress. U.SA: Lowell, AM.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman 1984 [1939]. Zero sign. In Linda R. Waugh & Morris Halle (eds.), Russian and Slavic grammar, 1–14. New York: Mouton.10.1515/9783110822885Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 1990 [1949]. Current issues of general linguistics. In Linda R. Waugh & Monique Monville-Burston (eds.), On language, 49–55. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Melchuk, Igor. 1999. Zero sign in morphology. Presented at the third international Tbilisi symposium on language, logic and computation. http://www.illc.uva.nl/Tbilisi/Batumi1999 (accessed 7 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Stephen E. 1999. Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.]Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1966 [1916]. Course in general linguistics. Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye (eds.) with Albert Riedlinger, Wade Baskin (trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Weyl, Hermann. 1952. Symmetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400874347Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-3-15
Published in Print: 2016-5-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 29.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2016-0051/html
Scroll to top button