It’s all about logics?! Analyzing the rhetorical structure of multimodal filmic text

References

Alcolea-Banegas, Jesus. 2009. Visual arguments in film. Argumentation 23. 259–275.10.1007/s10503-008-9124-9Suche in Google Scholar

Aristoteles. 1999. Rhetorik, Gernot Krapinger (ed.). Stuttgart: Reclam.Suche in Google Scholar

Asher, Nicolas & Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bateman, John A. & Karl-Heinrich Schmidt. 2011. Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Birdsell, David S. & Leo Groarke. 1996. Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 33(1). 1–10.Suche in Google Scholar

Birdsell, David S. & Leo Groarke. 2006. Outlines of a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 43. 103–113.10.1080/00028533.2007.11821666Suche in Google Scholar

Blair, Anthony. 1996. The possibility and actuality of visual arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy 33(1). 23–39.10.1007/978-94-007-2363-4_16Suche in Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. 1985. Narration in the fiction film. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. 1989. Making meaning: Inference and rhetoric in the interpretation of cinema. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674028531Suche in Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. 2006. The way Hollywood tells it: Story and style in modern movies. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520932326Suche in Google Scholar

Bordwell, David. 2008. Poetics of cinema. London: Taylor & Francis.Suche in Google Scholar

Bordwell, David, Janet Staiger & Kristin Thompson. 1985. The classical Hollywood cinema: Film style and mode of production to 1960. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.10.2307/1772109Suche in Google Scholar

Doxiadis, Apostolos. 2010. Narrative, rhetoric, and the origins of logic. Story Worlds 2. 77–99.Suche in Google Scholar

Herman, David. 2002. Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hobbs, Jerry R. 2003. Discourse and inference. Information Sciences Institute. http://www.isi.edu/~hobbs/disinf-tc.html (accessed 18 October 2017).Suche in Google Scholar

Hobbs, Jerry R., Mark E. Stickel, Douglas E. Appelt & P. Martin. 1993. Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence 63. 69–142.10.3115/982023.982035Suche in Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang. 1980. Interaction between text and reader. In Inge Suleiman & Susan R. Crosman (eds.), The reader in the text: Essays on audience and interpretation, 106–119. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400857111.106Suche in Google Scholar

Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle. 1993. From discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic, and discourse representation theory. Dortrecht: Kluwer.Suche in Google Scholar

Knape, Joachim. 2005. Rhetorik. In Klaus Sachs-Hombach (ed.), Bildwissenschaft: Disziplinen, themen, methoden, 134–148. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & van Leeuwen. Theo 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther & Theo Van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuypers, J. A. 2009. Rhetorical criticism: Perspectives in action. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Suche in Google Scholar

Maestro, J. (dir.). 2012. El Vendedor de Humo. Spain: PrimerFrame. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwWqMgddes4 (accessed 18 October 2017).Suche in Google Scholar

O’Halloran, K. 2004. Visual semiosis in film. In Kay O’Halloran (ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic functional perspectives, 109–130. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Keefe, D. J. 1977. Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association 13. 121–128.10.1080/00028533.1977.11951098Suche in Google Scholar

O’Keefe, D. J. 1982. The concepts of argument and arguing. In J. R. Cox & C. A. Willard (eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research, 3–23. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Suche in Google Scholar

Roque, Georges. 2012. Visual argumentation: A further reappraisal. In F. H. Van Eemeren & B. Garssen (eds.), Topical themes in argumentation theory: Twenty exploratory studies, 273–288. Dortrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_18Suche in Google Scholar

Sandys, John Edwin, Edward Meredith Cope & Aristoteles. 1970. The rhetoric of Aristotle, John Edwin Sandys (ed.). New York: Olms.Suche in Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Kristin. 1988. Breaking the glass armor: Neoformalist film analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691213156Suche in Google Scholar

Van den Hoven, Paul. 2011. Iconicity in visual and verbal argumentation. In F. H. Van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden & G. Mitchell (eds.), Seventh international conference of the international society for the study of the argumentation proceedings, 831–834. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Suche in Google Scholar

Van den Hoven, Paul. 2012. Getting your ad banned to bring the message home? A rhetorical analysis of an ad on the US national debt. Informal Logic 32(4). 381–402.10.22329/il.v32i4.3588Suche in Google Scholar

Van den Hoven, Paul & Ying Yang. 2013. The argument reconstruction of multimodal discourse, taking the ABC coverage of president Hu Jintao’s visit to the USA as an example. Argumentation 27. 403–424.10.1007/s10503-013-9293-zSuche in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Teun A. & Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wildfeuer, Janina. 2012a. Intersemiosis in film: Towards a new organization of semiotic resources in multimodal filmic text. Multimodal Communication 1(3). 276–304.10.1515/mc-2012-0016Suche in Google Scholar

Wildfeuer, Janina. 2012b. More than WORDS: Semantic continuity in moving images. Image and Narrative 13(4). 181–203.Suche in Google Scholar

Wildfeuer, Janina. 2014. Film discourse interpretation: Towards a new paradigm for multimodal film analysis. London: Routledge.10.4324/978020376620Suche in Google Scholar

Wirth, Uwe. 2000. Die Welt als Zeichen und Hypothese. Perspektiven des semiotischen Pragmatismus von Charles Sanders Peirce. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Wirth, Uwe. 2005. Abductive reasoning in Peirce’s and Davidson’s account of interpretation. Semiotica 153(1/4). 199–208.10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.199Suche in Google Scholar