Argumentation in participant-driven photo interviews: A case in ICT for development in Mozambique

References

Aakhus, M. 2003. Neither naïve nor critical reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation. Argumentation 17(3). 265–290.10.1023/A:1025112227381Search in Google Scholar

Aakhus, M. 2007. Communication as design. Communication Monographs 74(1). 112–117.10.1080/03637750701196383Search in Google Scholar

Avgerou, C. & G. Walsham. 2000. Information technology in context: Studies from the perspective of developing countries. London: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Barceló Aspeitia, A. A. 2012. Words and images in argumentation. Argumentation 26(3). 355–368.10.1007/s10503-011-9259-ySearch in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1964. Rhétorique de l’image. Communications 4. 40–51.10.3406/comm.1964.1027Search in Google Scholar

Berger, A. 1989. Seeing is believing: An introduction to visual communication. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Search in Google Scholar

Bignante, E. 2010. The use of photo-elicitation in field research. EchoGéo 11. http://echogeo.revues.org/11622 (accessed 19 October 2017).10.4000/echogeo.11622Search in Google Scholar

Billig, M. 1996. Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology (New ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brunello, P. 2010. ICT for education projects: A look from behind the scenes. Information Technology for Development 16(3). 232–239.10.1080/02681102.2010.497275Search in Google Scholar

Byford, J. 2002. Anchoring and objectifying “neocortical warfare”: Representation of a biological metaphor in Serbian conspiracy literature. Papers on Social Representations 11(3). 1–14.Search in Google Scholar

Coffin, C. 2009. Contemporary educational argumentation: A multimodal perspective. Argumentation 23(4). 513–530.10.1007/s10503-009-9161-zSearch in Google Scholar

Collier, J. 1967. Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Creech, H. 2006. Evaluation of UNESCO’s Community Multimedia Centers. United Nations Organization for Education Science and Culture. http://portal.unesco.org/pv_obj_cache/pv_obj_id_BE7A0D92CAAF9399898BB8BE86A10234676C0500/filename/CMC+Evaluation_Final.pdf (accessed 19 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

De Ascaniis, S. 2013. Destination online travel reviews. An argumentative and textual genre perspective. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano (Switzerland). http://doc.rero.ch/record/31482?ln=itSearch in Google Scholar

Dodman, D. R. 2003. Shooting in the city: An autophotographic exploration of the urban environment in Kingston, Jamaica. Area 35(3). 293–304.10.1111/1475-4762.00178Search in Google Scholar

Gaster, P., C. Cumbana, G. Macueve, L. N. Cabral Domingos & F. Mabila. 2009. Digital inclusion in Mozambique: A challenge for all. Maputo: CIUEM. http://www.ngopulse.org/sites/default/files/FinalMozambiqueReport10July2009-English.pdf (accessed 19 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Gould, E. A., R. Gómez & K. Camacho. 2010. Information needs in developing countries: How are they being served by public access venues? In Proceedings of the sixteenth Americas conference on information systems, 1–12. Lima: ScholarONE.Search in Google Scholar

Groarke, L. 1996. Logic, art, and argument. Informal Logic 18(2). 105–129.10.22329/il.v18i2.2376Search in Google Scholar

Groarke, L. 1999. The pragma-dialectics of visual argument. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, A. Blair & C. A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international society for the study of argumentation, 276–280. Amsterdam: Kluwer.Search in Google Scholar

Harper, D. 2002. Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies 17(1). 13–26.10.1080/14725860220137345Search in Google Scholar

Heeks, R. 2002. Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. Information Society 18(2). 101–112.10.1080/01972240290075039Search in Google Scholar

Hitchcock, D. & B. Verheij. 2006. Arguing on the Toulmin model. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-4938-5Search in Google Scholar

Howarth, C. 2006. A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology 45(1). 65–86.10.1348/014466605X43777Search in Google Scholar

Lewiński, M. 2010. Internet political discussion forums as an argumentative activity type: A pragma-dialectical analysis of online forms of strategic maneuvering with critical reactions. Amsterdam: SicSat.Search in Google Scholar

Lindekens, R. 1971. Éléments pour une sémiotique de la photographie. Brussels: AIMAV.Search in Google Scholar

Mabila, F., J. M. Nhabinda Mboane & A. I. Mondlane. 2010. Mozambique sector performance review 2009/2010 (No. Volume 2, Number 16, 1–28). IDRC Study/Acacia Initiative. http://www.researchictafrica.net/publications.php (accessed 19 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Mazzali Lurati, S. & L. Cantoni. 2005. Photography, semiotics of. In K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, 2nd edn., vol. 9, 569–571. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01437-1Search in Google Scholar

Mazzali Lurati, S. & C. Pollaroli. 2014. A pragma-semiotic analysis of advertisements as multimodal texts: A case study. In A. Maiorani & C. Christie (eds.), Multimodal epistemologies: Towards an integrated framework, 66–82. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. 1995. Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. 1961. La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: PUF.Search in Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. 1988. Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology 18(3). 211–250.10.1002/ejsp.2420180303Search in Google Scholar

Perelman, C. & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric, John Wilkinson & Purcell Weaver (trans.). Notre Dame: The University of Notre Dame PressSearch in Google Scholar

Rega, I. 2010. What do local people think about teleCenters? A key issue for sustainability. Lugano: Università della Svizzera Italiana dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rega, I., S. Vannini, E. Fino & L. Cantoni. 2013. Exploring the meanings of community multimedia centers in Mozambique: A social representation perspective. Information Technologies & International Development 9(4). 35–54.Search in Google Scholar

Rocci, A. 2008. Analyzing and evaluating persuasive media discourse in context. In M. Burger (ed.), L’analyse linguistique des discours des médias: Théories, méthodes et enjeux, 247–284. Québec: Nota Bene.Search in Google Scholar

Rocci, A. 2009. Maneuvering with voices: The polyphonic framing of arguments in an institutional advertisement. In F. H. van Eemeren (ed.), Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering, 257–283. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/aic.1.15rocSearch in Google Scholar

Rose, G. 2007. Visual methodologies an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. Los Angeles: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Samuels, J. 2004. Breaking the ethnographer’s frames reflections on the use of photo elicitation in understanding Sri Lankan monastic culture. American Behavioral Scientist 47(12). 1528–1550.10.1177/0002764204266238Search in Google Scholar

Sclavi, M. 2003. Arte di ascoltare e mondi possibili: Come si esce dalle cornici di cui siamo parte. Milan: Bruno Mondadori.Search in Google Scholar

Slade, C. 2003. Seeing reasons: Visual argumentation in advertisements. Argumentation 17(2). 145–160.10.1023/A:1024025114369Search in Google Scholar

Snoek Henkemans, A. F. 2001. Argumentation structures. In F. H. van Eemeren (ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, 101–134. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tedre, M., E. Sutinen, E. Kähkönen & P. Kommers. 2006. Ethnocomputing: ICT in cultural and social context. Communications of the ACM 49(1). 126–130.10.1145/1107458.1107466Search in Google Scholar

Toulmin, S. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

UNESCO. 2004. Scale up initiative for Community Multimedia Centers in Mozambique. http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=17568&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (accessed 19 October 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Unwin, T. (ed.). 2009. ICT4D: Information and communication technology for development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Eemeren, F. H. 2001. Crucial concepts in argumentation theory. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.10.5117/9789053565230Search in Google Scholar

van Eemeren, F. H., B. Garssen, E. C. W. Krabbe, A. S. Henkemans, B. Verheij & J. H. M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of argumentation theory. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5Search in Google Scholar

van Eemeren, F. H. & R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616389Search in Google Scholar

van Eemeren, F. H., R. Grootendorst & A. F. Snoek Henkemans. 2002. Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410602442Search in Google Scholar

Vannini, S. 2014. Social representations of Community Multimedia Centers in Mozambique. Lugano: Università della Svizzera Italiana dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Vannini, S., I. Rega, S. Sala & L. Cantoni. 2015. Using photo-elicitation to explore social representations of Community Multimedia Centers in Mozambique. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 67(8). 1–23.10.1002/j.1681-4835.2015.tb00486.xSearch in Google Scholar