Home Peirce, evolutionary aesthetics, and literary meaning: Tension, index, symbol
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Peirce, evolutionary aesthetics, and literary meaning: Tension, index, symbol

  • Dustin Hellberg EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 28, 2018

Abstract

This paper will use several notions of Charles Peirce – his Categories and semiotics – and interweave evolutionary theory, neuroscience, and literary studies in order to connect the disciplines such that the natural sciences may be used as interpretive tools in literary exegesis. Despite the ostensible differences between literary texts and the endeavors of the natural sciences, Peirce’s ideas can put them into conversation. Current evolutionary literary theories like Literary Darwinism require a more solid footing and methodology from which to ground their hypotheses, and this paper will use a philosophical frame to connect the pieces. Peirce and those following his ideas provide the inroads for such a mixed methodology, which will undergird current evolutionary aesthetic practice without needlessly replacing other literary theories. This article will outline Peirce’s schema and a modern reconfiguration thereof, and then will posit that literature (here focusing on a short story) functions as a tension between the iconic, indexical, and symbolic modes of representation. Peirce’s Categories permit reality into the language/text/literature debate, and his notion of the Index can be used as reference to evolved traits in homo sapiens in literary representation. Peirce gives organization, coherence, and cohesion without limiting the interpretational possibility of a literary work.

References

Anderson, Douglas. 2016. Peirce on metaphor. Transactions of the Charles Peirce Society 20(4). 453–468.Search in Google Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto. 1995. Charles S. Peirce: From pragmatism to pragmaticism. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aziz-Zadeh, Lisa, Stephen M. Wilson, Giacomo Rizzolatti & Marco Iacoboni. 2013. Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology 16. 1818–1823.10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.060Search in Google Scholar

Bogost, Ian. 2006. Unit operations. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6997.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, Brian. 2009. On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjf9xvkSearch in Google Scholar

Boyd, Brian. 2010. Getting it all wrong. In Brian Boyd, Joseph Carroll & Jonathan Gottschall (eds.), Evolution, literature, and film: A reader, 197–210. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, Brian. 2012. Why lyrics last. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674064843Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, Brian, Joseph Carroll & Jonathan Gottschall (eds.). 2010. Evolution, Literature, and Film: A Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, Joseph. 1999. “Theory,” anti-theory, and empirical criticism. In Brett Cooke & Frederick Turner (eds.), Biopoetics: Evolutionary explorations in the arts, 139–156. Lexington: Paragon House.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, Joseph. 2004. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, human nature, and literature. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203505274Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, Joseph. 2011. Reading human nature: Literary Darwinism in theory and in practice. New York: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, Joseph, Jonathan Gottschall, John Johnson & Daniel Kruger. 2010. Imagining human nature. In Brian Boyd, Joseph Carroll & Jonathan Gottschall (eds.), Evolution, literature, and film: A reader, 211–218. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Christopher. 2013. Paleopoetics: The evolution of the preliterate imagination. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cooke, Brett & Frederick Turner (eds.). 1999. Biopoetics: Evolutionary explorations in the arts. Lexington: Paragon House.Search in Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. 2008. The God delusion. New York: Mariner.Search in Google Scholar

Deacon, Terrance. 1997. The symbolic species. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Decety, Jean & William Ickes (eds.). 2011. The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dissanayake, Ellen. 1999. Antecedents of musical meaning in the mother-infant dyad. In Brett Cooke & Frederick Turner (eds.), Biopoetics: Evolutionary explorations in the arts, 367–398. Lexington: Paragon House.Search in Google Scholar

Dissanayake, Ellen. 2000. Art and intimacy: How the arts began. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dutton, Denis. 2009. The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure, and human evolution. New York: Bloosmbury.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1979. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1984. The role of the reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto. 1986. Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, John. 1989. Against deconstruction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691186177Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Dylan. 2005. From Lacan to Darwin. In Jonathan Gottschall & David Sloan Wilson (eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative, 38–55. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.10.2307/j.ctvw1d5h1.9Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, Martin. 1999. The whys of a philosophical scrivener. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Search in Google Scholar

Gottschall, Jonathan. 2008a. Literature, science, and a new humanities. New York: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230615595Search in Google Scholar

Gottschall, Jonathan. 2008b. The rape of Troy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gottschall, Jonathan. 2012: The storytelling animal: How stories make us human. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar

Gottschall, Jonathan & David Sloan Wilson (eds.). 2005. The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.10.2307/j.ctvw1d5h1Search in Google Scholar

Haack, Susan. 2009. Evidence and inquiry. Amherst: Prometheus.Search in Google Scholar

Haig, David. 2007. Weismann rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian temptation. Biology and Philosophy 22. 415–428.10.1007/s10539-006-9033-ySearch in Google Scholar

Hausman, Carl R. 1993. Charles S. Peirce’s evolutionary philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570773Search in Google Scholar

Hellberg, Dustin. 2015. World enough: The abductive witness, evolutionary aesthetics, and Peirce. New York: Atropos.Search in Google Scholar

Hickok, Gregory. 2014. The myth of mirror neurons. New York: Norton.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 2008. Biosemiotics: An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs, Jesper Hoffmeyer & Donald Favareau (trans.). Scranton: University of Scranton Press.Search in Google Scholar

Iacoboni, Marco. 2009. Mirroring people: The science of empathy and how we connect with others. New York: Picador.Search in Google Scholar

Jablonka, Eva & Marion J. Lamb. 2002. The changing concept of epigentics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 981. 82–86.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04913.xSearch in Google Scholar

Keysers, Christian. 2009. Mirror neurons. Current Biology 19(21). R971–973.10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.026Search in Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. 1973. The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis, Alan Sheridan (trans.). London: Hogarth Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lindstrom, Martin. 2012. Brandwashed. London: Crown.Search in Google Scholar

McGuire, Bill. 2002. Global catastrophes. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mukame, R., A. Ekstrom, J. Kaplan, M. Iacobini & I. Fried. 2010. Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology 20(8). 750–756.10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.045Search in Google Scholar

Nordlund, Marcus. 2010. Consilient literary interpretation. In Brian Boyd, Joseph Carroll & Jonathan Gottschall (eds.), Evolution, literature, and film: A reader, 224–230. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1955. The scientific attitude and fallibilism. In J. Buchler (ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce, 42–59. New York: Dover.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1992. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 1 (1867–1893), N. Hauser & C. Kloesel (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 1 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 1.]Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Peirce Edition Project (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [Reference to vol. 2 of Essential Peirce will be designated EP 2.]Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 2008. The stuff of thought. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven. 2011. The better angels of our nature. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Plato. 1997. Complete works, John M. Cooper & D. S. Hutchinson (eds.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, Giacomo & Laila Craighero. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27. 169–192.10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230Search in Google Scholar

Rorty, Richard. 1961. Pragmatism, categories, and language. Philosophical Review 70. 197–223.10.2307/2183238Search in Google Scholar

Rosenblatt, Louise. 1978. The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Saunders, George. 2014. Tenth of December. New York: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1998. Mind, language, and society. New York: Basic.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John. 2007. Freedom and neurobiology: Reflections on free will, language, and political power. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sheriff, John. 1989. The fate of meaning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400859979Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2014. Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of dicisigns. Boston: Docent.10.1007/s11229-014-0406-5Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2016. A natural history of human morality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press10.4159/9780674915855Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Frederick. 1999. An ecopoetics of beauty and meaning. In B. Cook & F. Turner (eds.), Biopoetics: Evolutionary exploration in the arts, 119–137. Lexington: ICUS.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. 1989. Consilience. New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Zlatev, Jordan. 2008. From proto-mimesis to language: Evidence from primatology and social neuroscience. Journal of Physiology 10. 137–151.10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.016Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-2-28
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 18.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sem-2015-0099/pdf
Scroll to top button