Home Free vibration analysis of symmetrically laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers
Article Open Access

Free vibration analysis of symmetrically laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers

  • Ahmed Guenanou and Abderrahim Houmat EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: June 18, 2015

Abstract

The free vibration analysis of symmetrically laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers is performed using the first-order shear deformation theory along with a curved hierarchical square finite element. The blending function method is used to describe accurately the geometry of the circular plate. The hierarchical shape functions are constructed from Legendre orthogonal polynomials. The element stiffness and mass matrices are integrated numerically by means of the Gauss-Legendre quadrature. The equations of motion are derived using Lagrange’s method. Results for the fundamental frequency are obtained for clamped and soft simply supported laminated composite circular plates with E-glass, graphite, and boron curvilinear fibers in epoxy matrices. The element is validated by means of the convergence test and comparison with published data for isotropic and laminated composite circular plates with rectilinear fibers. Contour plots of frequency as a function of fiber orientation angles for laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers are presented. The fiber material and boundary conditions are shown to influence the distribution of frequency throughout the design space. Frequency curves as a function of fiber orientation angles for the first five modes of laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers are also presented. They reveal that none of the first five modes of clamped and soft simply supported laminates is affected by crossing but modes 3 and 4 of clamped graphite/epoxy and boron/epoxy laminates are affected by veering.

1 Introduction

Modern technology requires high-performance materials that combine high-stiffness, high-strength, and low-weight. Composite materials provide the best combination of these properties. Layers with high-stiffness and high-strength fibers can be combined in different orientations to create a composite laminate that can be tailored to specific dynamical loading conditions.

In conventional laminated composite plates with rectilinear fibers, each layer has fiber orientation that remains constant throughout the layer. In laminated composite plates with curvilinear fibers, the fiber orientation varies throughout each layer. Curvilinear fibers allow the laminate to be accommodated to a wider range of applications than rectilinear fibers.

Circular plates find many applications in modern technology. Various researchers have investigated the free vibration of circular plates. Leissa [1] summarized a literature review on the vibration of plates of various shapes including plates of circular plan-form. Soni and Amba-Rao [2] studied the free axisymmetric vibration of orthotropic circular plates with linearly varying thickness using the first-order shear deformation theory and the Chebyshev collocation technique. Venkatesan and Kunukkasseril [3] analyzed the free vibration of layered circular plates using the first-order shear deformation theory in polar coordinates. Narita et al. [4] used the first-order shear deformation theory and the Ritz method to study the free vibration of moderately thick laminated composite circular and elliptical plates. Wu et al. [5] investigated the free vibration of circular plates using the generalized differential quadrature rule. Nallim and Grossi [6] used the Ritz method and the classical thin plate theory to solve the vibration problem of symmetrically laminated composite elliptical and circular plates with several complicating effects. Nguyen-Van et al. [7] investigated the free vibration of laminated composite plate/shell structures using a four-node quadrilateral finite element and the first-order shear deformation theory. Ngo-Cong et al. [8] studied the vibration of laminated composite plates of various shapes using the first-order shear deformation theory and a one-dimensional integrated radial basis function network method.

Few researchers applied the hierarchical finite element method to linear and nonlinear vibrations of laminated composite plates with curvilinear fibers. Honda and Narita [9] presented an analytical method for determining natural frequencies and vibration modes of laminated plates having curvilinear reinforcing fibers. Akhavan and Ribeiro [10] developed a hierarchical finite element based on the third-order shear deformation theory for the linear vibration of laminated composite rectangular plates with curvilinear fibers. Ribeiro and Akhavan [11] analyzed the nonlinear vibration of laminated composite rectangular plates using the first-order shear deformation theory and a hierarchical finite element. Houmat [12] developed a hierarchical finite element based on thin plate theory for the nonlinear vibration of symmetrically and antisymmetrically laminated composite rectangular plates with curvilinear fibers. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, solutions to the free vibration of symmetrically laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers are not available in the literature.

In this paper, a curved hierarchical square finite element based on the first-order shear deformation theory is developed for the free vibration of symmetrically laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers. The blending function method is used to model accurately the geometry of the circular plate. The shape functions are derived from Legendre orthogonal polynomials. The fiber orientation is chosen from an appropriate range due to manufacturing constraint. This limitation arises from the fact that the curvature of fibers should not exceed a specific value to prevent the occurrence of fiber kinking [13]. Results for the fundamental frequency are obtained for clamped and soft simply supported laminated composite circular plates. The convergence of frequency as a function of the polynomial order is studied. A comparison is made with published data for isotropic and laminated composite circular plates with rectilinear fibers. Contour plots of frequency as a function of fiber orientation angles for laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers are shown. The effects of fiber material and boundary conditions on frequency are explored. Frequency curves as a function of fiber orientation angles for the first five modes of laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers are also shown. The existence of mode crossing and mode veering is investigated.

2 Laminated composite circular plate with curvilinear fibers

The creation of a laminated composite circular plate with curvilinear fibers begins with the description of a reference fiber path. This reference fiber path will serve as a basis for creating other fiber paths that together will form a single layer.

2.1 Reference fiber path

A laminated composite circular plate with curvilinear fibers requires an appropriate method for describing the fiber orientation at any point in a single layer. The plate has radius a. The fiber orientation angle θ is defined as a linear function of x between two angles T0 and T1 along the x-axis, where T0 denotes the fiber orientation angle at the center and T1 denotes the fiber orientation angle at a distance a/2 from the center. The orientation of a single curvilinear fiber path is symbolized by 〈T0/T1〉. The reference fiber path and orientation are shown in Figure 1. The reference fiber path equation y(x) and orientation θ(x) are as follows:

Figure 1: Reference fiber path and orientation.
Figure 1:

Reference fiber path and orientation.

(1)y(x)={a2(T1-T0){-ln[cos(T0)]+2ln[cos(T1)]-ln[cos(-T0+2T1+2(T1-T0)ax)]}for-2a2x-a2a2(T1-T0){-ln[cos(T0)]+ln[cos(T0-2(T1-T0)ax)]}for-a2x0a2(T1-T0){ln[cos(T0)]-ln[cos(T0+2(T1-T0)ax)]}for0xa2a2(T1-T0){ln[cos(T0)]-2ln[cos(T1)]+ln[cos(-T0+2T1-2(T1-T0)ax)]}fora2x2a2
(2)θ(x)={2a(T1-T0)x+T0+2(T1-T0)for-2a2x-a2-2a(T1-T0)x+T0for-a2x02a(T1-T0)x+T0for0xa2-2a(T1-T0)x+T0+2(T1-T0)fora2x2a2.

The rest of fiber paths are defined using the method of shifted paths [13]. In this method, the reference fiber path is used to create a layer. Because tow paths are identical, all that is necessary to model the layer is to duplicate the reference tow path and shift the duplicate tow paths the correct distance along the y-axis. A tow placement machine can be used to spatially change the fiber orientation within a single layer.

2.2 Fiber curvature constraint

A laminated composite circular plate with curvilinear fibers is created by curving the tow paths. To prevent a tow from kinking, the magnitude of the largest curvature in any layer must not exceed a specified maximum value. The fiber paths of a layer made of shifted fibers are identical to the reference fiber path. It is therefore sufficient to apply the fiber curvature constraint only to the reference fiber path. The curvature κ of a function y(x) is

(3)κ=y(x)[1+(y(x))2]32,

where y′(x) and y″(x) denote the first and second derivatives of y(x) with respect to x.

Equation (3) yields

(4)κ=2a(T1-T0)cos[T0+2a(T1-T0)x].

At each location along the reference fiber path, the curvature κ is required not to exceed the maximum allowable curvature of 3.28 m-1 [13]. The design space for a circular layer made of shifted fibers and of radius a=0.5 m is shown in Figure 2. The fiber curvature constraint is satisfied everywhere in the gray region. The orientation angles T0 and T1 are equal along the dashed line.

Figure 2: [∓〈30°/60°〉]s layer with shifted curvilinear fibers.
Figure 2:

[∓〈30°/60°〉]s layer with shifted curvilinear fibers.

3 Formulation

3.1 Elastic parameters

The stresses and strains of the kth layer in the principal material directions under plane stress conditions are related by

(5){σ11σ22τ12τ13τ23}(k)=[Q11Q12000Q12Q2200000Q6600000Q4400000Q55](k){ε11ε22γ12γ13γ23}(k).

The material stiffnesses Qij are defined as

(6)Q11=E11-ν12ν21
(7)Q22=E21-ν12ν21
(8)Q12=ν12E21-ν12ν21
(9)Q66=G12
(10)Q44=G13
(11)Q55=G23,

where

(12)ν21=ν12E2E1.

The stresses of the kth layer in local and global coordinates are related by

(13){σ11σ22τ12τ13τ23}(k)=[cos2(θ)sin2(θ)2sin(θ)cos(θ)00sin2(θ)cos2(θ)-2sin(θ)cos(θ)00-sin(θ)cos(θ)sin(θ)cos(θ)cos2(θ)-sin2(θ)00000cos(θ)-sin(θ)000sin(θ)cos(θ)](k){σxxσyyτxyτxzτyz}(k).

The stresses and strains of the kth layer in global coordinates are related by

(14){σxxσyyτxyτxzτyz}(k)=[Q¯11Q¯12Q¯1600Q¯12Q¯22Q¯2600Q¯16Q¯26Q¯6600000Q¯44Q¯45000Q¯45Q¯55](k){εxxεyyγxyγxzγyz}(k),

where the material stiffnesses Q¯ij are written in terms of m=cos(θ) and n=sin(θ) as

(15)Q¯11=Q11m4+2(Q12+2Q66)m2n2+Q22n4
(16)Q¯12=(Q11+Q22-4Q66)m2n2+Q12(m4+n4)
(17)Q¯16=Q11m3n-Q22mn3-2(Q12+2Q66)mn(m2-n2)
(18)Q¯22=Q11n4+2(Q12+2Q66)m2n2+Q22m4
(19)Q¯26=(Q11-Q12-2Q66)n3m+(Q12-Q22+2Q66)m3n
(20)Q¯66=(Q11+Q22-2Q12)m2n2+Q66(m2-n2)2
(21)Q¯44=Q44m2+Q55n2
(22)Q¯45=(Q55-Q44)mn
(23)Q¯55=Q44n2+Q55m2.

3.2 Shape functions

The laminated composite circular plate is modeled as one curved hierarchical square finite element as shown in Figure 3. The coordinates of a vertex i are symbolized by Xi, ,Yi. The sides 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, and 4-1 are numbered 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.

Figure 3: The curved hierarchical square finite element.
Figure 3:

The curved hierarchical square finite element.

Using the hierarchical square finite element, the transverse displacement and rotations of cross-sections about the x and y axes will be expressed as

(24)w=β=1(p+1)2q3β2(t)Nβ(ξ,η)
(25)θx=β=1(p+1)2q3β-1(t)Nβ(ξ,η)
(26)θy=β=1(p+1)2q3β(t)Nβ(ξ,η),

where t is time and p is the polynomial order.

The shape functions Nβ are

(27)Nβ=gk(ξ)gl(η)  (k,l=1,2,,p+1),

where the subscript β is defined as

(28)β=l+(k-1)(p+1).

The shape functions gi(ξ) (i=1, 2, …, p+1) are

(29)g1(ξ)=12(1-ξ)
(30)g2(ξ)=12(1+ξ)
(31)gj+1(ξ)=-11Pj-1(ζ)dζ  (j=2, 3, , p),

where Pj-1 is the Legendre orthogonal polynomial of order j-1.

3.3 Stiffness and mass matrices

Using the blending function method, the curved sides of the hierarchical square finite element will be expressed in the parametric forms

(32)x=xi(ξ) ,  y=yi(ξ)  (-1ξ1)  (i=1,3)
(33)x=xi(η),  y=yi(η)  (-1η1)  (i=2,4),

where the subscript i denotes the side number.

The mapping functions of the curved hierarchical square finite element are

(34)x(ξ,η)=12[(1-η)x1(ξ)+(1+ξ)x2(η)+(1+η)x3(ξ)+(1-ξ)x4(η)]-14[(1-ξ)(1-η)X1+(1+ξ)(1-η)X2+(1+ξ)(1+η)X3+(1-ξ)(1+η)X4]
(35)y(ξ,η)=12[(1-η)y1(ξ)+(1+ξ)y2(η)+(1+η)y3(ξ)+(1-ξ)y4(η)]-14[(1-ξ)(1-η)Y1+(1+ξ)(1-η)Y2+(1+ξ)(1+η)Y3+(1-ξ)(1+η)Y4].

The derivatives with respect to local and global coordinates are related by

(36){ξη}=J{xy}.

The Jacobian matrix is

(37)J=[J1,1J1,2J2,1J2,2]=[xξyξxηyη].

The coefficients of J are

(38)J1,1(ξ,η)=12[(1-η)dx1dξ+x2(η)+(1+η)dx3dξ-x4(η)]+14[(1-η)X1-(1-η)X2-(1+η)X3+(1+η)X4]
(39)J1,2(ξ,η)=12[(1-η)dy1dξ+y2(η)+(1+η)dy3dξ-y4(η)]+14[(1-η)Y1-(1-η)Y2-(1+η)Y3+(1+η)Y4]
(40)J2,1(ξ,η)=12[-x1(ξ)+(1+ξ)dx2dη+x3(ξ)+(1-ξ)dx4dη]+14[(1-ξ)X1+(1+ξ)X2-(1+ξ)X3-(1-ξ)X4]
(41)J2,2(ξ,η)=12[-y1(ξ)+(1+ξ)dy2dη+y3(ξ)+(1-ξ)dy4dη]+14[(1-ξ)Y1+(1+ξ)Y2-(1+ξ)Y3-(1-ξ)Y4].

Equation (36) gives

(42){xy}=J-1{ξη},

where

(43)J-1=1|J|[J2,2-J1,2-J2,1J1,1]=[yη-yξ-xηxξ].

The determinant of J is

(44)|J|=J1,1J2,2-J1,2J2,1.

The strains, transverse displacement, and rotations in global coordinates are related by

(45)εxx=zθyx
(46)εyy=-zθxy
(47)γxy=z(θyy-θxx)
(48)γxz=wx+θy
(49)γyz=wy-θx.

The strain energy U of the curved hierarchical square finite element is

(50)U=12-11-11[D11(θyx)2+D22(θxy)2+D66(θyy-θxx)2-2D12(θyx)(θxy)+2D16(θyx)(θyy-θxx)-2D26(θxy)(θyy-θxx)+ksA44(wx+θy)2+ksA55(wy-θx)2+2ksA45(wx+θy)(wy-θx)]|J|dξdη,

where ks is the transverse shear correction factor and

(51)Aij=-h2h2Q¯ijdz  (i,j=4,5)
(52)Dij=-h2h2Q¯ijz2dz  (i,j=1,2,6).

The kinetic energy T of the curved hierarchical square finite element is

(53)T=12-11-11[I1(wt)2+I3(θxt)2+I3(θyt)2]|J|dξdη.

The constants of inertia are

(54)I1=ρh
(55)I3=ρh312,

where h and ρ are the thickness and density, respectively.

Using Lagrange’s method, the equations of motion will be obtained as

(56)[Kα,β-ω2Mα,β]qβ=0  (α,β=1,2,, (p+1)2),

where

(57)Kα,β=[K3α-2,3β-2K3α-2,3β-1K3α-2,3βK3α-1,3β-2K3α-1,3β-1K3α-1,3βK3α,3β-2K3α,3β-1K3α,3β]
(58)Mα,β=[M3α-2,3β-2000M3α-1,3β-1000M3α,3β].

The coefficients of the block stiffness and mass matrices Kα,β and Mα,β are given in Appendix 1.

Applying boundary conditions, Equation (56) will take the form

(59)[K-ω2M]q=0.

The symmetric generalized eigenvalue problem in Equation (59) can be solved for the frequencies using known routines.

4 Results

Results are presented for the fundamental frequency of isotropic and symmetrically laminated composite circular plates with rectilinear and curvilinear fibers. Clamped and soft simply supported boundary conditions are chosen. The layers are assumed to have identical thicknesses. Results for the non-dimensional frequency parameter Ω=ωaρ/E2 are presented. The transverse shear correction factor ks is taken as 5/6. The plate is modeled as one curved hierarchical square finite element. Convergence is achieved by increasing the polynomial order.

4.1 Convergence test and comparison with published data

Because of the unavailability of results for laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers, a comparison is made with published data for isotropic and symmetrically laminated composite circular plates with rectilinear fibers.

Table 1 shows the first five frequency parameters Ω of an isotropic circular plate with v=0.3. A comparison is made with values from [4]. A fast convergence is seen to occur as the polynomial order p is increased. The comparison of the results obtained with p=10 with values from [4] shows excellent agreement.

Table 1

Convergence and comparison of the first five frequency parameters Ω of the clamped isotropic circular plate.

P12345
40.0781.1962.8422.8924.278
60.0620.1380.2710.2870.483
80.0620.1290.2140.2440.327
100.0620.1280.2100.2400.309
Reference [4]0.0620.1280.2100.2400.307

Table 2 shows the first five frequency parameters Ω of the clamped [30°, -30°, 30°] composite circular plate with h/a=0.02. The composite material has the mechanical parameters E1=15.4E2, G12=G13=G23=0.792E2, v12=0.3. A comparison is made with the values from [4]. As can be seen in the table, a fast convergence occurs as the polynomial order p is increased. The results obtained with p=10 compare very well with the values from [4]. Accordingly, subsequent calculations are performed using p=10.

Table 2

Convergence and comparison of the first five frequency parameters Ω of the clamped laminated composite [30°, -30°, 30°] circular plate.

P12345
40.1691.7272.7953.4794.082
60.1500.2360.4050.4070.564
80.1490.2150.3200.3800.475
100.1480.2130.3120.3770.449
Reference [4]0.1490.2140.3120.3770.441

4.2 Free vibration analysis

The fundamental frequency parameter Ω is calculated for symmetrically laminated four-layer composite circular plates with E-glass, graphite, and boron fibers in epoxy matrices. The mechanical parameters of composite materials are given in Table 3. The material properties Em, Gm, and vm (for matrix) and Ef, Gf, and vf (for fiber) are taken from [14]. The material properties E1, E2, G12, and v12 are calculated from Em, Gm, vm, Ef, Gf, and vf using the rule of mixtures, as described in [15]. The average volume fraction of fiber is taken as 66.7%. It is well known that G13=G12, but G23 is not necessarily equal to G12; it can be different. In this work, it is assumed that G12=G13=G23. The radius a and thickness h are taken as 0.5 m and 0.005 m, respectively. The symmetrically laminated composite circular plate is symbolized by [∓〈T0/T1〉]s or equivalently by [+〈T0/T1〉, –〈T0/T1〉, –〈T0/T1〉, +〈T0/T1〉]. The angle T0 is increased from 0° to 90° and the angle T1 is increased from -90° to 90°. The increment is taken as 5°.

Table 3

Mechanical parameters of composite materials.

Fiber/matrixE1/E2G12/E2G13/E2G23/E2v12
E-glass/epoxy5.27500.37350.37350.37350.26
Graphite/epoxy18.32750.37140.37140.37140.25
Boron/epoxy27.22160.37160.37160.37160.25

Figures 46 show the contour plots of the frequency parameter Ω for the clamped four-layer laminated composite circular plate. As can be seen in the figures, the dashed lines do not cross the largest and smallest frequency parameters. Thus, the largest and smallest frequency parameters are obtained with curvilinear fibers rather than with rectilinear ones. The largest frequency parameters are calculated for the [∓〈90°/25°〉]s circular laminate with E-glass, graphite, and boron fibers as 0.050, 0.085, and 0.102, respectively. The smallest frequency parameters are calculated for the [∓〈20°/85°〉]s circular laminate with E-glass, graphite, and boron fibers as 0.044, 0.070, and 0.083, respectively. The percentage changes are computed for E-glass, graphite, and boron fibers as 14%, 21%, and 23%, respectively.

Figure 4: Contour plot of Ω for the clamped E-glass/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 4:

Contour plot of Ω for the clamped E-glass/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

Figure 5: Contour plot of Ω for the clamped graphite/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 5:

Contour plot of Ω for the clamped graphite/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

Figure 6: Contour plot of Ω for the clamped boron/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 6:

Contour plot of Ω for the clamped boron/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

Figures 79 show the contour plots of the frequency parameter Ω of the soft simply supported laminated composite circular plate. In this case, the dashed lines cross the smallest frequency parameters. The dashed line crosses the largest frequency parameters for the sole case of boron/epoxy. This can be explained by the fact that boron/epoxy has the highest E1/E2. The largest frequency parameters are calculated for the [∓〈5°/70°〉]s circular laminate with E-glass, graphite, and boron fibers as 0.016, 0.024, and 0.028, respectively. The smallest frequency parameter is calculated for the [∓〈0°/0°〉]s circular laminate as 0.011 regardless of the type of composite material. As can be seen in the figures, the fiber material and boundary conditions influence the distribution of frequency throughout the design space.

Figure 7: Contour plot of Ω for the soft simply supported E-glass/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 7:

Contour plot of Ω for the soft simply supported E-glass/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

Figure 8: Contour plot of Ω for the soft simply supported graphite/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 8:

Contour plot of Ω for the soft simply supported graphite/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

Figure 9: Contour plot of Ω for the soft simply supported boron/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 9:

Contour plot of Ω for the soft simply supported boron/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

To investigate the existence of mode crossing and mode veering, the variation of the frequency parameter Ω with the fiber orientation angle T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of clamped and soft simply supported E-glass/epoxy, graphite/epoxy, and boron/epoxy laminated composite circular plates is found. The frequency curves are represented in Figures 1015. It can be seen that none of the modes is affected by crossing but modes 3 and 4 of clamped graphite/epoxy and boron/epoxy circular laminates are affected by veering.

Figure 10: Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the clamped E-glass/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 10:

Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the clamped E-glass/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

Figure 11: Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the clamped graphite/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 11:

Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the clamped graphite/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

Figure 12: Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the clamped boron/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 12:

Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the clamped boron/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

Figure 13: Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the soft simply supported E-glass/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 13:

Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the soft simply supported E-glass/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

Figure 14: Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the soft simply supported graphite/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 14:

Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the soft simply supported graphite/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

Figure 15: Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the soft simply supported boron/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.
Figure 15:

Frequency parameter Ω versus T0 (T1=30°) for the first five modes of the soft simply supported boron/epoxy [∓〈T0/T1〉]s circular laminate.

5 Conclusion

The frequencies of the free vibration of symmetrically laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers are calculated using the first-order shear deformation theory and a curved hierarchical square finite element. Clamped and soft simply supported boundary conditions are chosen. The geometry of the circular laminate is represented accurately using the blending function method. The hierarchical shape functions are derived from Legendre orthogonal polynomials. The equations of motion are obtained using Lagrange’s method. Results for the frequencies of isotropic and laminated composite circular plates with rectilinear fibers illustrate the efficiency of the curved hierarchical square finite element. The contour plots of frequency as a function of fiber orientation angles are presented for laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers. The fiber material and boundary conditions are found to affect the distribution of frequency within the design space. Frequency curves as function of fiber orientation angles for the first five modes of laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers are also presented. It is shown that none of the first five modes is affected by crossing but modes 3 and 4 of clamped graphite/epoxy and boron/epoxy circular laminates are affected by veering.


Corresponding author: Abderrahim Houmat, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tlemcen, BP 213, Tlemcen 13000, Algeria, e-mail:

Appendix 1

The coefficients of the block stiffness and mass matrices Kα,β and Mα,β

(A.1)K3α-2,3β-2=-11-11ks(A44NαyNβy+A55NαxNβx+A45NαyNβx+A45NαxNβy)|J|dξdη
(A.2)K3α-2,3β-1=ks-11-11(A44NαxNβ+A45NαyNβ)|J|dξdη
(A.3)K3α-2,3β=-ks-11-11(A55NβNαy+A45NβNαx)|J|dξdη
(A.4)K3α-1,3β-2=ks-11-11(A44NαNβx+A45NαNβy)|J|dξdη
(A.5)K3α-1,3β-1=-11-11(D22NαyNβy+D66NαxNβx+D26NαyNβx+D26NαxNβy+ksA44NαNβ)|J|dξdη
(A.6)K3α-1,3β=--11-11(D12NαyNβx+D66NαxNβx+D16NαxNβx+D26NαyNβy+ksA45NαNβ)|J|dξdη
(A.7)K3α,3β-2=-ks-11-11(A55NαNβy+A45NαNβx)|J|dξdη
(A.8)K3α,3β-1=--11-11(D12NαxNβy+D66NαyNβx+D16NαxNβx+D26NαyNβy+ksA45NαNβ)|J|dξdη
(A.9)K3α,3β=-11-11(D11NαxNβy+D66NαyNβy+D16NαxNβy+D16NαyNβx+ksA55NαNβ)|J|dξdη
(A.10)M3α-2,3β-2=-11-11I1NαNβ|J|dξdη
(A.11)M3α-1,3β-1=-11-11I3NαNβ|J|dξdη
(A.12)M3α,3β=-11-11I3NαNβ|J|dξdη,

where

(A.13)Nα=gi(ξ)gj(η)(i,j=1,2,,p+1)

The subscript α is defined as

(A.14)α=j+(i-1)(p+1).

References

[1] Leissa AW. Vibration of plates. NASA SP-160, 1969.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Soni SR, Amba-Rao CL. J. Sound Vibr. 1975, 42, 57–63.10.1016/0022-460X(75)90302-8Search in Google Scholar

[3] Venkatesan S, Kunukkasseril VX. J. Sound Vibr. 1978, 60, 511–534.10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80089-3Search in Google Scholar

[4] Narita Y, Fukuchi K, Zhao X. JSME Int. J. C 2002, 45, 113–120.10.1299/jsmec.45.113Search in Google Scholar

[5] Wu TY, Wang YY, Liu GR. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2002, 191, 5365–5380.10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00463-2Search in Google Scholar

[6] Nallim LG, Grossi RO. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2008, 50, 1153–1167.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.04.005Search in Google Scholar

[7] Nguyen-Van H, Mai-Duy N, Tran-Cong T. J. Sound Vibr. 2008, 313, 205–223.10.1016/j.jsv.2007.11.043Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ngo-Cong D, Mai-Duy N, Karunasena W, Tran-Cong T. Comput. Struct. 2011, 89, 1–13.10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.07.012Search in Google Scholar

[9] Honda S, Narita Y. J. Sound Vibr. 2012, 331, 180–191.10.1016/j.jsv.2011.08.019Search in Google Scholar

[10] Akhavan H, Ribeiro P. Compos. Struct. 2011, 93, 3040–3047.10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.027Search in Google Scholar

[11] Ribeiro P, Akhavan H. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 2424–2432.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.03.025Search in Google Scholar

[12] Houmat A. Compos. Struct. 2013, 106, 211–224.10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.05.058Search in Google Scholar

[13] Waldhart C. MSc Thesis, VT Blacksburg, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ashton JE, Halpin JC, Petit PH. Primer on composite materials: Analysis. Stanford: Technomic Publishing, 1969.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Houmat A. Compos. Struct. 2012, 94, 3029–3036.10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.006Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-9-27
Accepted: 2015-5-4
Published Online: 2015-6-18
Published in Print: 2017-1-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Original articles
  3. Micro-XCT-based finite element method for predicting the elastic modulus of needle carbon-fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites
  4. A comparative analysis of evolutionary algorithms in the design of laminated composite structures
  5. Study on the impact of Fe2P phase on the electrochemical performance of LiFePO4
  6. Improved hydration resistance of magnesia by EDTA and ammonium phosphate as additives
  7. The interaction of delignification and fiber characteristics on the mechanical properties of old corrugated container fiber/polypropylene composite
  8. The effects of thermal residual stresses and interfacial properties on the transverse behaviors of fiber composites with different microstructures
  9. Impact response characterization of shear CFRP strengthened RC beams by Fourier and wavelet methods: tests and analyses
  10. Nanoscale investigation of polymer cement concretes by small angle neutron scattering
  11. Design of a compact UWB antenna with a partial ground plane on epoxy woven glass material
  12. Preparation of polyimide-graphite composite and evaluation of its friction behavior at elevated temperatures
  13. Finite element analysis of mechanical properties of woven composites through a micromechanics model
  14. Tensile strength of Z-pinned laminates in RTD and hot-wet environment
  15. Free vibration analysis of symmetrically laminated composite circular plates with curvilinear fibers
  16. Preparation and characterization of nano NC/HMX composite particles
  17. Effect of heat treatment on the mechanical and tribological properties of AA8090/6% SiCp composite
  18. Design and absorption analysis of a new multiband split-S-shaped metamaterial
  19. Effect of matrix temperature and powder size on the infiltration height of SiO2-reinforced Al 7075 matrix composites produced by vacuum infiltration
  20. Optimization of preparation conditions of epoxy-containing nanocapsules
Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2014-0340/html
Scroll to top button