Abstract
The adsorption isotherms and structural evolution of alkyl quaternary ammonium bromide (Cn TAB) on graphite oxide (GO) were measured by means of an elemental analyzer, X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. In order to interpret the adsorption mechanism of surfactants onto GO, the adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics were further investigated. It was found that GO is a relatively efficient adsorbent within a wide range of temperatures (297–353 K), and the Cn TAB was intercalated and then agglomerated into the interlayer spacing of GO via ionic bonding and hydrophobic bonding. The saturation amount of alkyl ammonium adsorbed on GO was decreased with the rise in temperature, and the experimental data fitted well into the modified Langmuir (Langmuir-Freundlich) equation. In addition, the negative values of ΔG and ΔH showed that the adsorption process of Cn TAB onto the GO was spontaneous and exothermic.
1 Introduction
Being a layered material, graphite oxide (GO) is considered to have large numbers of oxygen functional groups, such as hydroxyl (C-OH), carbonyl (C=O), carboxyl (COOH) and epoxy (C-O-C) groups [1, 2]. It is found that the hydroxyl and carboxyl groups are easily ionized in aqueous or alkaline solution, leading to a negatively charged property to the surface of GO. Owing to the existence of oxygen functional groups, GO can easily adsorb polar micromolecules or surfactants, forming an intercalation compound as a result. In recent years, adsorption of surfactants [3–9] onto GO has been extensively studied because of the exceptional adsorption property of GO, which can also be a promising adsorbent for organic pollutants as well as the precursor of graphene-based nanocomposites [5–7].
Nowadays, many different theoretical models have been proposed to characterize the adsorption process and adsorption mechanism of surfactants on solids, such as the Langmuir, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and Freundlich isotherms [10–14]. Most of these models note that the molecules were adsorbed onto the surface of solids through van der Waals interactions, hydrophobic bonding, ionic bonding, charge transfer, etc. [15, 16]. Moreover, the well-known thermodynamic functions have also been investigated in order to interpret the adsorption mechanism [17, 18]. However, previous research was focused on the structural evolution of surfactant-intercalated GO, and the adsorption mechanism of surfactants onto GO was seldom reported. Hence, it is desirable to discuss the influence of adsorption temperature and thus obtain as much information as possible about the system from the most common source of adsorption isotherm data.
With the purpose of evaluating the adsorption mechanism, several cationic surfactants have been adsorbed by GO. In addition, in order to interpret the adsorption mechanism of alkyl quaternary ammonium bromide (Cn TAB) onto GO, the adsorption kinetics together with the thermodynamics and structural evolution were further investigated by elemental analyzer, X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Reagents and materials
Natural flake graphite, obtained from Qingdao Shenshu Graphite Manufacturing Plant, Qingdao, Shandong, China, was sieved through a 200-mesh sieve. The cationic surfactants used in this study were dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (C12 TAB), tetradecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (C14 TAB) and hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (C16 TAB), and were obtained from Chengdu Kelong Chem. Co., Ltd. (Sichuan, China). Other materials and reagents, such as potassium permanganate (KMnO4) and concentrated sulfuric acid (H2 SO4), were chemically pure and purchased from Kelong Chem, Co., Ltd., China.
2.2 Preparation of Cn TAB/GO composites
GO was synthesized with natural flake graphite according to modified Hummers’ method [19]. GO (0.2 g) was dissolved in 50 ml of 0.05 m NaOH and the mixture was evenly stirred in order to produce a GO suspension. Then, surfactants such as C12 TAB, C14 TAB and C16 TAB (dissolved in 50 ml of deionized water to obtain an aqueous solution) were added into the GO suspension and stirred for 1 h at different temperatures. The concentrations of added Cn TAB were 2.2, 3.3, 5.5, 11.0, 16.5, 22.0, 33.0 and 44.0 mm. The precipitate was filtered and then washed with deionized water to remove the residual Cn TAB and NaOH. After drying at 333 K overnight, Cn TAB/GO intercalation composite samples were obtained, marking Cn-GO-t (n=12, 14, 16; t=2.2, 3.3, 5.5, 11, 16.5, 22, 33, 44).
2.3 Instrumentation
Nitrogen content was measured by a Vario EL CUBE elemental analyzer (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Germany) with 2 mg of sulfanilic acid as a reference. The amount adsorbed and the equilibrium concentration of surfactants were then calculated. XRD patterns were recorded on an X’pert Pro diffractometer (PANalytical B.V., The Netherlands) with Cu Ka radiation (40 kV and 40 mA in the continuous scanning range from 0.5° to 60°). FTIR spectra were recorded by a Nicolet 5700 infrared absorption spectrometer (Nicolet, USA) using KBr pellets. Raman spectra were recorded by an InVia spectrometer (Renishaw, UK) using a He-Ne laser operating at 514 nm.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Adsorption kinetics
In order to evaluate the adsorption process of Cn TAB on GO, adsorption isotherms were plotted through measuring the nitrogen content of Cn-GO-t via elemental analyzer. Figure 1 shows the adsorption isotherms of C12 TAB, C14 TAB and C16 TAB on GO at different temperatures. It is found that the adsorption process of C12 TAB on GO is similar to that of C14 TAB and C16 TAB and can be divided into three stages. First, when the Cn TAB concentration is less than 5.5 mm, the adsorption amount of Cn TAB on GO is increased sharply with increasing equilibrium concentration. Second, the adsorption amount of Cn TAB on GO is increased sluggishly when the Cn TAB concentration is increased from 5.5 to 16.5 mm. Finally, the saturated adsorption amount of Cn TAB is reached when the Cn TAB concentration is higher than 22.0 mm.

Adsorption isotherms of C12 TAB (A), C14 TAB (B) and C16 TAB (C) on GO at different temperatures.
Experimental data of C12 TAB, C14 TAB and C16 TAB were fitted into the Freundlich, Langmuir, modified Langmuir (Langmuir-Freundlich) and BET isotherm equations. It was found that the experimental data fitted well into the nonlinear modified Langmuir isotherm equation, with correlation coefficients higher than 0.91 (Table 1). Furthermore, the experimental data of C12 TAB, C14 TAB and C16 TAB are in line with the linear regression equation Γ=ac at low Cn TAB concentration (<5.5 mm), but are in line with the linear regression equation Γ=bc+d at high Cn TAB concentration (from 5 to 16.5 mm). The parameter a is the parameter related to the ionic bonding force, and the parameters b and d are the hydrophobic bonding force and saturated adsorption amount via ionic bonding, respectively [12]. This indicated that the Cn TAB molecules are adsorbed onto the interlayer spacing of GO via ionic bonding under a low Cn TAB concentration, and the main driving force for the adsorption under a high Cn TAB concentration is hydrophobic bonding, which is weaker than the ionic bonding.
Parameters of modified Langmuir equation fitted into the adsorption isotherms of Cn TAB on GO at different temperatures.
| Surfactants | T (K) | Γ∞ (mmol·g-1) | Modified Langmuir equation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k (l·mol-1) | R2 | n | |||
| C12 TAB | 293 | 4.065 | 3.720 | 0.917 | 0.831 |
| 313 | 4.123 | 3.366 | 0.912 | 0.828 | |
| 333 | 3.913 | 3.269 | 0.912 | 0.901 | |
| 353 | 3.705 | – | – | – | |
| C14 TAB | 293 | 4.277 | 2.338 | 0.941 | 0.700 |
| 313 | 4.171 | 2.445 | 0.953 | 0.728 | |
| 333 | 3.836 | 2.717 | 0.963 | 0.778 | |
| 353 | 3.757 | 2.711 | 0.951 | 0.766 | |
| C16 TAB | 293 | 3.879 | 4.702 | 0.973 | 0.720 |
| 313 | 3.714 | 4.199 | 0.966 | 0.749 | |
| 333 | 3.629 | 4.325 | 0.979 | 0.832 | |
| 353 | 3.493 | 3.782 | 0.985 | 0.824 | |
It was also found that the adsorption amount of Cn TAB on GO has little change while the temperature changed at a low Cn TAB concentration but has obvious reduction along with the rise in temperature at a high Cn TAB concentration. In pace with the temperature rising from 293 to 353 K, the saturated adsorption amounts of C12 TAB, C14 TAB and C16 TAB on GO are reduced from 4.065 to 3.705, 4.277 to 3757 and 3.879 to 3.493 mmol·g-1, respectively (Table 1). This can be attributed to the solubility and desorption of Cn TAB. (1) Owing to the powerful force of ionic bonding, temperature has little influence on the adsorption amount of Cn TAB at low Cn TAB concentration. (2) At high Cn TAB concentration, the driving force changed to a powerless one (hydrophobic bonding); the Brownian motion of Cn TAB molecules was enhanced with the rise in temperature and thus increased the kinetic energy of Cn TAB molecules, consequently leading to a desorption of Cn TAB from GO. (3) Due to the rise in temperature, the interaction between Cn TAB molecules and water molecules intensified and led to a weaker adsorption tendency of Cn TAB onto GO [15, 20]. All of these led to the decrease in the saturated adsorption amount of Cn TAB on GO.
3.2 Adsorption thermodynamics
The thermodynamic parameters can be obtained by using the thermodynamic equations (1)–(3) [13, 14].



ΔG is Gibbs free energy change of the adsorption process, and ΔH and ΔS are the enthalpy change and entropy change of the adsorption process, respectively. The thermodynamic parameters of the adsorption process of C12 TAB, C14 TAB and C16 TAB onto GO at various concentrations and different temperatures are shown in Table 2.
Thermodynamic parameters for the absorption of the surfactants on GO in various concentrations and at different temperatures.
| Surfactant | Concentration (mm) | ΔH (kJ·mol-1) | ΔS (kJ·K-1·mol-1) | ΔG (kJ·mol-1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 293 K | 313 K | 333 K | 353 K | ||||
| C12 TAB | 2.2 | -6.96 | 69.66 | -27.39 | -28.78 | -30.17 | -31.57 |
| 3.3 | -4.28 | 90.39 | -30.77 | -32.57 | -34.38 | -36.19 | |
| 5.5 | -3.18 | 67.34 | -22.91 | -24.25 | -25.60 | -26.95 | |
| 11.0 | -1.76 | 62.34 | -20.03 | -21.27 | -22.52 | -23.77 | |
| 16.5 | -3.70 | 55.43 | -19.94 | -21.05 | -22.16 | -23.27 | |
| 22.0 | -5.77 | 40.78 | -17.72 | -18.53 | -19.35 | -20.16 | |
| 33.0 | -2.12 | 44.51 | -15.16 | -16.05 | -16.94 | -17.83 | |
| 44.0 | -2.17 | 40.14 | -13.93 | -14.73 | -15.54 | -16.34 | |
| C14 TAB | 2.2 | -8.72 | 59.25 | -26.08 | -27.26 | -28.45 | -29.64 |
| 3.3 | -28.54 | 6.19 | -30.36 | -30.48 | -30.60 | -30.73 | |
| 5.5 | -5.89 | 58.42 | -23.01 | -24.18 | -25.35 | -26.52 | |
| 11.0 | -2.77 | 58.03 | -19.77 | -20.93 | -22.09 | -23.25 | |
| 16.5 | -3.84 | 50.70 | -18.70 | -19.71 | -20.73 | -21.74 | |
| 22.0 | -2.81 | 49.26 | -17.24 | -18.23 | -19.21 | -20.20 | |
| 33.0 | -3.12 | 41.81 | -15.36 | -16.20 | -17.04 | -17.87 | |
| 44.0 | -3.20 | 37.12 | -14.07 | -14.81 | -15.56 | -16.30 | |
| C16 TAB | 2.2 | -12.10 | 47.26 | -25.95 | -26.89 | -27.84 | -28.78 |
| 3.3 | -18.83 | 29.76 | -27.55 | -28.14 | -28.74 | -29.33 | |
| 5.5 | -12.11 | 44.05 | -25.02 | -25.90 | -26.78 | -27.66 | |
| 11.0 | -6.52 | 48.46 | -20.72 | -21.69 | -22.65 | -23.62 | |
| 16.5 | -5.85 | 45.28 | -19.12 | -20.03 | -20.93 | -21.84 | |
| 22.0 | -5.04 | 41.46 | -17.19 | -18.02 | -18.84 | -19.67 | |
| 33.0 | -2.92 | 40.64 | -14.82 | -15.64 | -16.45 | -17.26 | |
| 44.0 | -2.18 | 39.17 | -13.66 | -14.44 | -15.23 | -16.01 | |
The negative values of ΔH in different Cn TAB concentrations are an indication of an exothermic adsorption process. It is obvious that the rise in temperature will hinder the adsorption. The value of ΔH is also appropriate to determine the molecules’ interactions in the adsorption process. As introduced by Oepen et al. [21], the measured energies of each interaction are as follows: van der Waals interaction, 4–9 kJ·mol-1; hydrophobic bonding, 4 kJ·mol-1; hydrogen bonding, 2–40 kJ·mol-1; and chemisorptions, 62–84 kJ·mol-1. The absolute value of ΔH in the adsorption of C12 TAB amounts to 1.76–6.96 kJ·mol-1, and those of C14 TAB and C16 TAB amount to 2.15–28.54 and 2.18–18.83 kJ·mol-1, respectively. This indicated that the driving forces of the adsorption process include ionic bonding, hydrophobic bonding and hydrogen bonding.
In addition, ΔG reflects the driving force of the adsorption process. As shown in Table 2, the negative value of ΔG indicates that Cn TAB molecules are adsorbed onto GO spontaneously, and the values of ΔS, which indicate the degree of confusion in the random motion of microscopic particles, are decreased along with the increase in Cn TAB concentration. This can be interpreted by the further filling and agglomeration of Cn TAB in the interlayer spacing of GO, thus decreasing the degrees of freedom of motion of the Cn TAB molecules.
Furthermore, increasing the Cn TAB concentration will also lead to fewer negative values of ΔH. This indicated that the driving forces of adsorption changed from a strong one (ionic bonding) to a weak one (hydrophobic bonding). In addition, decreasing the force will weaken the spontaneity of the adsorption process, consequently leading to a less negative value of ΔG.
3.3 Formation of Cn TAB/GO composites
In order to confirm the adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics of Cn TAB absorbed onto GO, XRD and FTIR spectroscopy were used to investigate the formation of Cn TAB/GO composites. Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of GO together with Cn TAB/GO prepared in different concentrations of C12 TAB, C14 TAB and C16 TAB at 293 K. The diffraction peak of GO gradually shifts toward the lower angle with the increase in Cn TAB concentration, indicating that the Cn TAB molecules are intercalated into the interlayer spacing of GO, leading to an expansion of GO layer spacing. However, the diffraction peaks of intercalation composites become more diffuse than that of GO under a low Cn TAB concentration but become sharper with increasing Cn TAB concentration. This indicated that at low Cn TAB concentration, the low packing density of Cn TAB on GO will lead to the random distribution of Cn TAB into the interlayer spacing of GO, representing a disordered stacking of GO layers. The packing density of Cn TAB into GO was increased with the increase in Cn TAB concentration, thus leading to regular distribution and aggregation of Cn TAB into the interlayer spacing of GO. It is noteworthy that the two diffraction peaks of the C14 TAB-GO-22 sample can be assigned to different arrangement models of C14 TAB into the GO layer.

XRD patterns of GO and series of C12-GO-t (A), C14-GO-t (B) and C16-GO-t (C).
Figure 3 shows the FTIR spectra of GO and series of C16-GO-t. The peaks at 3390, 1722, and 1400–1095 cm-1 for GO are attributed to the OH, C=O in COOH and C-O in C-OH/C-O-C (epoxy) functional groups, respectively [22]. Compared with the peaks of GO, the peaks at 1722 and 1400–1095 cm-1 for C16-GO-t disappeared along with the increase in C16 TAB concentration. These indicate that the cationic surfactants with positive charge are ionically bonded to COO- and CO- groups of GO. Those at 2917, 2850 and 1473 cm-1 assigned to intercalated surfactant appeared when C16 TAB molecules were inserted into the interlayer spacing of GO. Moreover, the peak at 2917 cm-1 of C16 TAB is blue-shifted to 2920 cm-1, and the peak at 1473 cm-1 red-shifted to 1466 cm-1. These prove that in pace with the increase in C16 TAB concentration, the conformation of C16 TAB molecules is becoming more ordered and aggregated in the interlayer spacing of GO [23].

FTIR spectra of GO and series of C16-GO-t.
4 Conclusion
In this study, the adsorption isotherms of Cn TAB on GO have been obtained and fitted well into the modified Langmuir equations. The adsorption mechanism of Cn TAB on GO was interpreted by the adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics, which were obtained from the studies of adsorption isotherms at different temperatures.
On the basis of the adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics, the Cn TAB molecules were intercalated into the interlayer spacing of GO via ionic bonding and hydrophobic bonding, and then further filled and agglomerated in the interlayer spacing of GO. Owing to the powerful force of ion bonding, temperature has little influence on the adsorption amount of Cn TAB at low Cn TAB concentration but has a large influence at high Cn TAB concentration. In addition, the adsorption process of Cn TAB onto the GO is spontaneous and exothermic.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41272051), the Doctoral Fund of Southwest University of Science and Technology (Grant No. 11ZX7135) and the Graduate Innovation Fund of Southwest University of Science and Technology (Grant No. 13ycjj49).
References
[1] Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Ruoff RS. Carbon 2007, 45, 1558–1565.10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034Search in Google Scholar
[2] Nethravathi C, Rajamathi M. Carbon 2008, 46, 1994–1998.10.1016/j.carbon.2008.08.013Search in Google Scholar
[3] Liang YY, Wu DQ, Mullen K. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1679–1683.10.1002/adma.200803160Search in Google Scholar
[4] Vadukumpully S, Paul J, Valiyaveettil S. Carbon 2009, 47, 3288–3294.10.1016/j.carbon.2009.07.049Search in Google Scholar
[5] Matsuo Y, Watanabe K, Sugie Y. Carbon 2003, 41, 1545–1550.10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00079-4Search in Google Scholar
[6] Ramesha GK, Kumara AV, Sampath S. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 361, 270–277.10.1016/j.jcis.2011.05.050Search in Google Scholar
[7] Matsuo Y, Higashika S, Sugie Y. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 1592–1596.10.1039/b107436aSearch in Google Scholar
[8] Hang ZD, Wang JQ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 5, 459–461.Search in Google Scholar
[9] Matsuo Y, Niwa T, Sugie YP. Carbon 1999, 37, 897–901.10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00226-7Search in Google Scholar
[10] Xu SH, Boyd SA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 3022–3028.Search in Google Scholar
[11] Lee SY, Cho WJ, Lee M. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 284, 667–673.10.1016/j.jcis.2004.10.070Search in Google Scholar
[12] Chen BL, Mao JF, Lv SF. Chem. J. Chin. Universities 2009, 30, 1830–1834.Search in Google Scholar
[13] Xu S, Sheng G, Boyd SA. Adv. Agron. 1997, 59, 25–62.10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60052-8Search in Google Scholar
[14] Ghiaci M, Kalbasi RJ, Shariatmadari H. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2004, 36, 707–713.10.1016/j.jct.2004.05.007Search in Google Scholar
[15] Zhao GX. Physico-Chemistry of Surfactant, Peking University Press: Peking, 1991, pp 105–109.Search in Google Scholar
[16] He HP, Ray F, Bostrom T. Appl. Clay Sci. 2006, 31, 262–271.10.1016/j.clay.2005.10.011Search in Google Scholar
[17] Ghiaci M, Kia R, Kalbasi RJ. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2004, 36, 95–100.10.1016/j.jct.2003.09.002Search in Google Scholar
[18] Ghiaci M, Kalbasi RJ, Abbaspour A. Colloids Surf., A 2007, 297, 105–113.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.10.032Search in Google Scholar
[19] Yang YH, Sun HJ, Peng TJ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 26, 2083–2090.10.1002/ejic.201190079Search in Google Scholar
[20] Teng XR. Surface Physical Chemistry, Chemical Industry Press: Peking, 2009, pp 96–101.Search in Google Scholar
[21] Oepen BV, Kordel W, Klein W. Chemosphere 1991, 22, 285–304.10.1016/0045-6535(91)90318-8Search in Google Scholar
[22] Titelman GI, Gelman V, Bron S, Khalfin RL, Cohen Y, Peled HB. Carbon 2005, 43, 641.10.1016/j.carbon.2004.10.035Search in Google Scholar
[23] Vaia RA, Teukolsky RK, Giannelis EP. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 1017–1022.10.1021/cm00043a025Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original articles
- The adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics of cationic surfactants on graphite oxide
- An energy-based equivalent inclusion for the determination of nanocomposite behavior
- Fabrication of aluminum wires treated with nanocomposite pellets
- Morphology and ferroelectric properties of Ce-substituted Bi4 Ti3 O12 thin films prepared by sol-gel method
- Effect of additive Al2 O3 powders on micro-arc oxide coating of magnesium alloy
- The flexural behaviors of the impacted composite single-lap adhesive joints
- Investigations on interface microstructure and strength properties of dissimilar tin bronze/superalloy diffusion bonded joints
- Damage behavior of potting materials in sandwich composites with pinned joints
- Low velocity impact behaviour of glass fabric/epoxy honeycomb core sandwich composites
- Properties of PVA-reinforced cement-bonded fiberboards processed with calender extrusion
- Preparation of optimal feedstock for low-pressure injection molding of Al/SiC nanocomposite
- The effects of open holes on the fracture behaviors and mechanical properties of glass fiber mat composites
- The effect of hybridization and boundary conditions on damping and free vibration of composite plates
- Effect of the amount of SiC, number of strokes, and applied load on the reciprocating wear behavior of Al-SiC composites
- Stabilization of clayey subgrade with waste pumice for road infrastructure
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original articles
- The adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics of cationic surfactants on graphite oxide
- An energy-based equivalent inclusion for the determination of nanocomposite behavior
- Fabrication of aluminum wires treated with nanocomposite pellets
- Morphology and ferroelectric properties of Ce-substituted Bi4 Ti3 O12 thin films prepared by sol-gel method
- Effect of additive Al2 O3 powders on micro-arc oxide coating of magnesium alloy
- The flexural behaviors of the impacted composite single-lap adhesive joints
- Investigations on interface microstructure and strength properties of dissimilar tin bronze/superalloy diffusion bonded joints
- Damage behavior of potting materials in sandwich composites with pinned joints
- Low velocity impact behaviour of glass fabric/epoxy honeycomb core sandwich composites
- Properties of PVA-reinforced cement-bonded fiberboards processed with calender extrusion
- Preparation of optimal feedstock for low-pressure injection molding of Al/SiC nanocomposite
- The effects of open holes on the fracture behaviors and mechanical properties of glass fiber mat composites
- The effect of hybridization and boundary conditions on damping and free vibration of composite plates
- Effect of the amount of SiC, number of strokes, and applied load on the reciprocating wear behavior of Al-SiC composites
- Stabilization of clayey subgrade with waste pumice for road infrastructure