Startseite Against Ethical Exceptionalism – Through Critical Reflection on the History of Use of the Terms ‘Ethics’ and ‘Morals’ in Philosophy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Against Ethical Exceptionalism – Through Critical Reflection on the History of Use of the Terms ‘Ethics’ and ‘Morals’ in Philosophy

  • Hans Fink EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. November 2020
SATS
Aus der Zeitschrift SATS Band 21 Heft 2

Abstract

In this paper, I aim to support contextual ethics as a broad and open understanding of ethics and the ethical by commenting on the origin of the words ‘ethics’ and ‘ethical’ in Greek philosophy and on the ambiguities built into them from the beginning. I further list some complexities that arose when the Latinate words ‘morals’ and ‘moral’ began to be used in Roman, medieval and modern philosophy, sometimes as synonyms of and sometimes in contrast to ‘ethics’ and ‘ethical’. Finally, I return to discuss the prospects of contextual ethics in the context of developments in moral philosophy in the twentieth century, adding some pragmatist arguments in its favour.


Corresponding author: Hans Fink, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark, E-mail:

References

For works by Homer and Hobbes, for works by Homer, Hesiod, Plato, Aristotle, Diogenes Laertius, Augustin, Hobbes, Hume, Kant, Hegel and Mill, references are given by standard notation.

Other Works Referred to:

Bauman, Z. 1993. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Cassin, B., ed. 2014. Dictionary of Untranslatables. A Philosophical Lexicon. Princeton and London: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400849918Suche in Google Scholar

Crary, A. 2016. Inside Ethics. On the Demands of Moral Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674089075Suche in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1982(1920). “Reconstruction in Philosophy.” In Middle Works of John Dewey, 12, edited by J. A. Boydston, 77–202. Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.10.1037/14162-000Suche in Google Scholar

Fink, H. 2006. “Three Sorts of Naturalism.” European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2): 202–21.10.1002/9781444306736.ch4Suche in Google Scholar

Fink, H. 2012. “Hvad er etik, egentlig?.” In Filosofi og etik (Aalborg, Aalborg Universitetsforlag), edited by U. Thøgersen, and B. Troelsen, 15–27.Suche in Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 2001. “On the Pragmatic, the Ethical and the Moral Employments of Practical Reasons.” In Justification and Application, edited by J. Habermas, 1–17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ritter, J., K. Gründer, and G. Gabriel, eds. 1970–2007. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Basel, Schabe AG.Suche in Google Scholar

Sidgwick, H. 1886. Outlines of the History of Ethics for English Readers, 6th ed. London: Macmillan. 1962.Suche in Google Scholar

Singer, P., ed. 1994. Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1974. “Social Morality and Personal Ideal.” In Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, edited by P. F. Strawson, 29–49. London: Methuen.Suche in Google Scholar

von Wright, G. H. 1963. The Varieties of Goodness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Suche in Google Scholar

Watkins, C. 2000. The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots, 2nd ed. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-11-30
Published in Print: 2020-11-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/sats-2020-2010/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen