How to Work with Context in Moral Philosophy?

References

Annas, J. 2006. “Virtue Ethics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theories, edited by D. Copp, 515–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195147790.003.0019Search in Google Scholar

Bader, V., and S. Saharso. 2004. “Contextualized Morality and Ethno-Religious Diversity.” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 7 (2): 107–15, https://doi.org/10.1023/b:etta.0000032758.77152.0a.10.1023/B:ETTA.0000032758.77152.0aSearch in Google Scholar

Baier, A. C. 1985. “What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory?” Noûs 9 (1): 53–63, https://doi.org/10.2307/2215117.Search in Google Scholar

Baier, A. C. 1989. “Doing without Moral Theory.” In Anti-Theory in Ethics and Moral Conservatism, edited by S. G. Clarke, and E. Simpson. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beauchamp, T. L., and J. F. Childress. 1979. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Birnbacher, D. 1999. “Ethics and Social Science: Which Kind of Co-operation?” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 2 (4): 319–36, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009903815157.10.1023/A:1009903815157Search in Google Scholar

Björnsson, G., and S. Finlay. 2010. “Metaethical Contextualism Defended.” Ethics 121 (1): 7–36, https://doi.org/10.1086/656304.Search in Google Scholar

Brink, D. O. 2006. “Some Forms and Limits of Consequentialism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, edited by D. Copp, 380–423.10.1093/0195147790.003.0015Search in Google Scholar

Brogaard, B. 2008. “Moral Contextualism and Moral Relativism.” The Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232): 385–409, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.543.x.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 2000. “Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research.” Ethics 110 (2): 350–87, https://doi.org/10.1086/233273.Search in Google Scholar

Cavell, S. 1979. The Claim of Reason. Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chappell, T. 2009. Ethics and Experience: Ethics beyond Moral Theory. Durham: Acumen.10.1017/UPO9781844654161Search in Google Scholar

Chappell, S. G. 2014. Knowing what to Do. Imagination, Virtue and Platonism in Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684854.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, A-M. S. 2018. “What Is Ethical Cannot Be Taught’ – Understanding Moral Theories as Descriptions of Moral Grammar.” In Wittgenstein’s Moral Thought, edited by R. Agam-Segal, and E. Dain. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315180762-8Search in Google Scholar

Christensen, A-M. S. 2020. Moral Philosophy & Moral Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In press.10.1093/oso/9780198866695.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Copp, D. 2006. The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195147790.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Crary, A. 2007. Beyond Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Crary, A. 2016. Inside Ethics. On the Demands of Moral Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674089075Search in Google Scholar

Dancy, J. 1991. “An Ethic of Prima Facie Duties.” In A Companion to Ethics, edited by P. Singer, 219–30. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Dancy, J. 1993. Moral Reasons. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Dancy, J. 2017. “Moral Particularism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Also Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-particularism/ (accessed 28 November, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Darwall, S. 2006. “Morality and Practical Reason: A Kantian Approach.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theories, edited by D. Copp, 282–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195147790.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Diamond, C. 1991. The Realistic Spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5797.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Diamond, C. 1997. “Moral Differences and Distances: Some Questions.” In Commenality and Particularity in Ethics, edited by S. Heinämaa, and T. Wahlgren. London: Macmillan Press.10.1007/978-1-349-25602-0_10Search in Google Scholar

Diamond, C. 2009. “The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy.” In Philosophy and Animal Life, edited by S. Cavell, C. Diamond, J. McDowell, I. Hacking, and C. Wolfe. New York: Columbia University Press.10.1353/pan.0.0090Search in Google Scholar

Dohn, N. B., S. B. Hansen, and S. H. Klausen. 2018. “On the Concept of Context.” Education Sciences 8 (3): 111, https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030111.Search in Google Scholar

Evers, D. 2014. “Moral Contextualism and the Problem of Triviality.” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 17 (2): 285–97, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9437-0.Search in Google Scholar

Hämäläinen, N. 2016. Descriptive Ethics. What Does Moral Philosophy Know about Morality? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-58617-9_1Search in Google Scholar

Hertzberg, L. 2002. “Moral Escapism and Applied Ethics.” Philosophical Papers 31 (3): 251–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/05568640209485105.Search in Google Scholar

Herzog, L., and B. Zacka. 2019. “Fieldwork in Political Theory: Five Arguments for an Ethnographic Sensibility.” British Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 763–84, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123416000703.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, T. E. 2006. “Kantian Normative Ethics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theories, edited by D. Copp, 480–514. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195147790.003.0018Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmaster, B. 2017. “From Applied Ethics to Empirical Ethics to Contextual Ethics.” Bioethics 32: 119–25.10.1111/bioe.12419Search in Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S. 1843. Either/Or. Part II, edited and translated by H. V. Hong, and E. H. Hong. Princeton, Princeton University Press 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S. 1846. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, ed. and translated by H. V. Hong, and E. H. Hong. Princeton, Princeton University Press 1980.Search in Google Scholar

Lægaard, S. 2019. “Contextualism in Normative Political Theory and the Problem of Critical Distance.” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 22 (4): 953–70, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10026-6.Search in Google Scholar

McNaughton, D., and P. Rawling. 2006. “Deontology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theories, edited by D. Copp, 424–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195147790.003.0016Search in Google Scholar

Montminy, M. 2007. “Moral Contextualism and the Norms for Moral Conduct.” American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1): 1–13.Search in Google Scholar

Musschenga, A. W. 2005. “Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5): 467–90, https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310500253030.Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. 1990. Love’s Knowledge. Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rudd, J. A. 2000. “On Straight and Crooked Readings: Why the Postscript does not Self-Destruct.” In Authority and Anthropology: Essays on Søren Kierkegaard, edited by G. D. Marino, P. Houe, and S. H. Rossel, 119–27. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.10.1163/9789004456167_015Search in Google Scholar

Rysiew, P. 2016. “Epistemic Contextualism”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Also available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/contextualism-epistemology/.10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_694-1Search in Google Scholar

Silverbauer, G. 1991. “Ethics in Small-Scale Societies.” In A Companion to Ethics, edited by P. Singer, 14–28. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Singer, P, ed. 1991. A Companion to Ethics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

van der Stoep, J. 2004. “Towards a Sociological Turn in Contextualist Moral Philosophy.” Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 7 (2): 133–46, https://doi.org/10.1023/b:etta.0000032756.53525.55.10.1023/B:ETTA.0000032756.53525.55Search in Google Scholar

Walker, M. U. 2003. Moral Contexts. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Weirich, P. 2013. “Causal Decision Theory.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (accessed 28 September, 2013).10.1093/obo/9780195396577-0207Search in Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations/Philosophische Untersuchungen, revised 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell 2001.Search in Google Scholar