Random attractors for three-dimensional stochastic globally modified Navier–Stokes equations driven by additive noise on unbounded domains

References

[1] J. M. Ball, Continuity properties and global attractors of generalized semiflows and the Navier–Stokes equations, J. Nonlinear Sci. 7 (1997), no. 5, 475–502. 10.1007/s003329900037Suche in Google Scholar

[2] P. W. Bates, K. Lu and B. Wang, Random attractors for stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded domains, J. Differential Equations 246 (2009), no. 2, 845–869. 10.1016/j.jde.2008.05.017Suche in Google Scholar

[3] M. Capiński and N. J. Cutland, Existence of global stochastic flow and attractors for Navier–Stokes equations, Probab. Theory Related Fields 115 (1999), no. 1, 121–151. 10.1007/s004400050238Suche in Google Scholar

[4] T. Caraballo, M. J. Garrido-Atienza, B. Schmalfuss and J. Valero, Non-autonomous and random attractors for delay random semilinear equations without uniqueness, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 21 (2008), no. 2, 415–443. 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.415Suche in Google Scholar

[5] T. Caraballo, M. J. Garrido-Atienza, B. Schmalfuss and J. Valero, Asymptotic behaviour of a stochastic semilinear dissipative functional equation without uniqueness of solutions, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 14 (2010), no. 2, 439–455. 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.439Suche in Google Scholar

[6] T. Caraballo and P. E. Kloeden, The three-dimensional globally modified Navier–Stokes equations: Recent developments, Recent Trends in Dynamical Systems, Springer Proc. Math. Stat. 35, Springer, Basel (2013), 473–492. 10.1007/978-3-0348-0451-6_18Suche in Google Scholar

[7] T. Caraballo and J. A. Langa, On the upper semicontinuity of cocycle attractors for non-autonomous and random dynamical systems, Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. Ser. A Math. Anal. 10 (2003), no. 4, 491–513. Suche in Google Scholar

[8] T. Caraballo, J. A. Langa, V. S. Melnik and J. Valero, Pullback attractors of nonautonomous and stochastic multivalued dynamical systems, Set-Valued Anal. 11 (2003), no. 2, 153–201. 10.1023/A:1022902802385Suche in Google Scholar

[9] T. Caraballo, J. Real and I. D. Chueshov, Pullback attractors for stochastic heat equations in materials with memory, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 9 (2008), no. 3–4, 525–539. 10.3934/dcdsb.2008.9.525Suche in Google Scholar

[10] T. Caraballo, J. Real and P. E. Kloeden, Unique strong solutions and 𝑉-attractors of a three dimensional system of globally modified Navier–Stokes equations, Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 6 (2006), no. 3, 411–436. 10.1515/ans-2006-0304Suche in Google Scholar

[11] H. Crauel, A. Debussche and F. Flandoli, Random attractors, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 9 (1997), no. 2, 307–341. 10.1007/BF02219225Suche in Google Scholar

[12] H. Crauel and F. Flandoli, Attractors for random dynamical systems, Probab. Theory Related Fields 100 (1994), no. 3, 365–393. 10.1007/BF01193705Suche in Google Scholar

[13] G. Deugoué and T. Tachim Medjo, The stochastic 3D globally modified Navier–Stokes equations: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 17 (2018), no. 6, 2593–2621. 10.3934/cpaa.2018123Suche in Google Scholar

[14] F. Flandoli and B. Schmalfuss, Random attractors for the 3D stochastic Navier–Stokes equation with multiplicative white noise, Stochastics Stochastics Rep. 59 (1996), no. 1–2, 21–45. 10.1080/17442509608834083Suche in Google Scholar

[15] B. Gess, Random attractors for degenerate stochastic partial differential equations, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 25 (2013), no. 1, 121–157. 10.1007/s10884-013-9294-5Suche in Google Scholar

[16] P. E. Kloeden, J. A. Langa and J. Real, Pullback 𝑉-attractors of the 3-dimensional globally modified Navier–Stokes equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 6 (2007), no. 4, 937–955. 10.3934/cpaa.2007.6.937Suche in Google Scholar

[17] P. E. Kloeden and M. Rasmussen, Nonautonomous Dynamical Systems, Math. Surveys Monogr. 176, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2011. 10.1090/surv/176Suche in Google Scholar

[18] P. E. Kloeden and J. Valero, The weak connectedness of the attainability set of weak solutions of the three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 463 (2007), no. 2082, 1491–1508. 10.1098/rspa.2007.1831Suche in Google Scholar

[19] P. Marín-Rubio, A. M. Márquez-Durán and J. Real, Three dimensional system of globally modified Navier–Stokes equations with infinite delays, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 14 (2010), no. 2, 655–673. 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.14.655Suche in Google Scholar

[20] P. Marín-Rubio, A. M. Márquez-Durán and J. Real, Pullback attractors for globally modified Navier–Stokes equations with infinite delays, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 31 (2011), no. 3, 779–796. 10.3934/dcds.2011.31.779Suche in Google Scholar

[21] P. Marín-Rubio, A. M. Márquez-Durán and J. Real, Asymptotic behavior of solutions for a three dimensional system of globally modified Navier–Stokes equations with a locally Lipschitz delay term, Nonlinear Anal. 79 (2013), 68–79. 10.1016/j.na.2012.11.006Suche in Google Scholar

[22] M. Romito, The uniqueness of weak solutions of the globally modified Navier–Stokes equations, Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 9 (2009), no. 2, 425–427. 10.1515/ans-2009-0209Suche in Google Scholar

[23] R. Temam, Navier–Stokes Equations. Theory and Numerical Analysis, 2nd ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979. 10.1115/1.3424338Suche in Google Scholar

[24] R. Temam, Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics, Appl. Math. Sci. 68, Springer, New York, 1997. 10.1007/978-1-4612-0645-3Suche in Google Scholar

[25] B. Wang, Periodic random attractors for stochastic Navier–Stokes equations on unbounded domains, Electron. J. Differential Equations 2012 (2012), Paper No. 59. Suche in Google Scholar

[26] B. Wang, Sufficient and necessary criteria for existence of pullback attractors for non-compact random dynamical systems, J. Differential Equations 253 (2012), no. 5, 1544–1583. 10.1016/j.jde.2012.05.015Suche in Google Scholar

[27] C. Zhao and L. Yang, Pullback attractors and invariant measures for the non-autonomous globally modified Navier–Stokes equations, Commun. Math. Sci. 15 (2017), no. 6, 1565–1580. 10.4310/CMS.2017.v15.n6.a4Suche in Google Scholar