Abstract
To solve problems of radiation balance, optical sounding, and tomography, it may be necessary to take into account multiple scattering of radiation in a stochastically inhomogeneous medium. In real radiation models, for this purpose, the numerical-statistical ‘majorant cross-section method’ (MCM, delta-Woodcock tracking) is used based on the alignment of the optical density field by adding an artificial ‘delta scattering’ event. However, the computation cost of the corresponding unbiased estimate of the averaged problem solution infinitely increases as the correlation scale (correlation radius L) of standard mosaic models for a random medium density decreases. Previously, we constructed the MCM randomization providing asymptotically (for L → 0) unbiased estimates of the required functionals, in which the value of the physical attenuation coefficient is randomly chosen at the end of the particle free path l under condition l > L. Otherwise the value of the physical attenuation coefficient is the same as at the starting point of the particle (CR algorithm). In a more accurate functional correlative randomized algorithm (FCR algorithm), the coefficient remains the same with a probability determined by the correlation function. These correlative randomized algorithms were implemented for a mixture of homogeneous substance (water) and a Poisson ensemble of ‘empty’ balls. In the present paper, we construct correlative randomized algorithms for problems related to transfer through a ‘thick’ layer containing a water and a Poisson ensemble of ‘empty’ layers. A detailed comparative analysis of the results obtained by exact direct simulation (MCM) and approximate algorithms (CR, FCR) for the problems of gamma radiation transfer through a ‘thick’ water layer containing a Poisson ensemble of ‘empty’ layers or balls is presented.
Funding statement: The study was carried out under state contract with ICMMG SB RAS No. 0251-2021-0002.
Acknowledgment
The author expresses his gratitude to the staff of the Laboratory of Monte Carlo Methods of the ICM&MG, SB RAS, namely, to Corresponding member of RAS G. A. Mikhailov and Ph.D. G. Lotova for useful advice and comments.
References
[1] A. Y. Ambos and G. A. Mikhailov, Numerically statistical simulation of the intensity field of the radiation transmitted through a random medium. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling 33 (2018), No. 3, 161–171.10.1515/rnam-2018-0014Search in Google Scholar
[2] Yu. K. Belyaev, Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Encyclopedia. Scientific BDE Publ. House, Moscow, 1999, pp. 525–526.Search in Google Scholar
[3] W. A. Coleman, Mathematical verification of a certain Monte Carlo sampling technique and applications of the techniques to radiation transport problems. J. Nucl. Sci. Engrg. 32 (1968), No. 1, 76–81.10.13182/NSE68-1Search in Google Scholar
[4] S. M. Ermakov and G. A. Mikhailov, Statistical Modelling, 1980, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar
[5] U. Fano, L. V. Spencer, and M. J. Berger, Penetration and Diffusion of X Rays. Springer, Berlin–Heidelberg, 1959.10.1007/978-3-642-45920-7_2Search in Google Scholar
[6] W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications. J. Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, 1971.Search in Google Scholar
[7] G. N. Glazov and G. A. Titov, Statistical characteristics of the attenuation coefficient in a broken cloud cover, I. Model with balls of equal radius. In: Issues of Laser Sensing of the Atmosphere, Novosibirsk, 1976, pp. 126–139 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar
[8] C. Larmier, A. Zoia, F. Malvagi, E. Dumonteil, and A. Mazzolo, Monte Carlo particle transport in random media: The effects of mixing statistics. J. Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 196 (2017), 270–286.10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.04.006Search in Google Scholar
[9] G. I. Marchuk, G. A. Mikhailov, M. A. Nazaraliev, et al., The Monte Carlo Methods in Atmospheric Optics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1980.10.1007/978-3-540-35237-2Search in Google Scholar
[10] I. N. Medvedev and G. A. Mikhailov, Randomized exponential transformation algorithm for solving the stochastic problems of gamma-ray transport theory. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling 35 (2020), No. 3, 153–162.10.1515/rnam-2020-0012Search in Google Scholar
[11] I. N. Medvedev and G. A. Mikhailov, New correlative randomized algorithms for statistical modelling of radiation transfer in stochastic medium. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling 36 (2021), No. 4, 219–225.10.1515/rnam-2021-0018Search in Google Scholar
[12] G. A. Mikhailov, Randomized Monte Carlo algorithms for problems with random parameters (‘double randomization’ method). Numer. Anal. Appl. 12 (2019), 155–165.10.1134/S1995423919020058Search in Google Scholar
[13] G. A. Mikhailov and I. N Medvedev, New correlative randomized algorithm for estimating the influence of the medium stochasticity on particle transport. Doklady Math. 103 (2021), No. 3, 143–145.10.1134/S1064562421030133Search in Google Scholar
[14] E. Storm and H. Israel, Cross Sections for the Interaction of Gamma Radiation. Reference Book. Atomizdat, Moscow, 1973 (in Russian).Search in Google Scholar
[15] P. Switzer, A random set process in the plane with a Markovian property. Annals Math. Stat. 36 (1965), 1859–1863.10.1214/aoms/1177699816Search in Google Scholar
[16] E. Woodcock, T. Murphy, P. Hemmings, and S. Longworth, Techniques used in the GEM code for Monte Carlo neutronics calculations in reactors and other systems of complex geometry. In: Proc. Conf. Applications of Computing Methods to Reactor Problems. 1965, pp. 557–579.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Glacier parameterization in SLAV numerical weather prediction model
- Optimal disturbances for periodic solutions of time-delay differential equations
- Construction and optimization of numerically-statistical projection algorithms for solving integral equations
- Linear regularized finite difference scheme for the quasilinear subdiffusion equation
- On the efficiency of using correlative randomized algorithms for solving problems of gamma radiation transfer in stochastic medium
- Error identities for the reaction–convection–diffusion problem and applications to a posteriori error control
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Glacier parameterization in SLAV numerical weather prediction model
- Optimal disturbances for periodic solutions of time-delay differential equations
- Construction and optimization of numerically-statistical projection algorithms for solving integral equations
- Linear regularized finite difference scheme for the quasilinear subdiffusion equation
- On the efficiency of using correlative randomized algorithms for solving problems of gamma radiation transfer in stochastic medium
- Error identities for the reaction–convection–diffusion problem and applications to a posteriori error control