Home The structure of non-human cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The structure of non-human cognitive neuroscience: an epistemological critique

  • Francisco Almeida EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 27, 2019
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Every scientific practice rests on implicit unrevised theoretical assumptions. Neuroscience, in particular, focuses on a very controversial object of study-the brain and is therefore prone to tacitly embrace philosophical positions in its everyday workings. It is thus, of utmost importance, to develop a critique of the structure of neuroscientific investigation so as to understand what the uncovered pillars of the field are, what pitfalls they may implicate and how we can correct them. In this paper, I gather the first critiques in animal cognitive neuroscience and hope to establish the first step in a continuous process of revision. By applying a conceptual division of neuroscience into cognitive, behavioral and neurobiological theories, I point out the main problems in articulating the three, based on actual scientific practice rather than purely theoretical reasoning. I conclude by proposing developments on behavioral theory and set an initial critique on assumptions on both cognitive and neurobiological theories.

Acknowledgments

I thank Prof. Vasco Galhardo, Jorge Félix Cardoso and Alexandra Rodrigues for carefully reading and commenting on the manuscript.

References

Arakawa, H. and Iguchi, Y. (2018). Ethological and multi-behavioral analysis of learning and memory performance in laboratory rodent models. Neurosci. Res. 135, 1–12.10.1016/j.neures.2018.02.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience (New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).Search in Google Scholar

Berridge, K.C. and Kringelbach, M.L. (2015). Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron 86, 646–664.10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Bickle, J. (2006). Reducing mind to molecular pathways: explicating the reductionism implicit in current cellular and molecular neuroscience. Synthese 151, 411–434.10.1007/s11229-006-9015-2Search in Google Scholar

Bogen, J. and Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. Phil. Rev. 97, 303–352.10.2307/2185445Search in Google Scholar

Brette, R. (2019). Is coding a relevant metaphor for the brain? Behav. Brain Sci. 1–44.10.1017/S0140525X19000049Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Britton, D.R. and Britton, K.T. (1981). A sensitive open field measure of anxiolytic drug activity. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 15, 577–582.10.1016/0091-3057(81)90212-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Brody, C.D. and Hanks, T.D. (2016). Neural underpinnings of the evidence accumulator. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 37, 149–157.10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Buzsaki, G. and Llinas, R. (2017). Space and time in the brain. Science 358, 482–485.10.1126/science.aan8869Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Craver, C.F. (2009). Explaining the Brain (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Drew, M.R., Denny, C.A., and Hen, R. (2010). Arrest of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mice impairs single-but not multiple-trial contextual fear conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 124, 446–454.10.1037/a0020081Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Fetsch, C.R. (2016). The importance of task design and behavioral control for understanding the neural basis of cognitive functions. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 37, 16–22.10.1016/j.conb.2015.12.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Friston, K.J., Price, C.J., Fletcher, P., Moore, C., Frackowiak, R.S., and Dolan, R.J. (1996). The trouble with cognitive subtraction. Neuroimage 4, 97–104.10.1006/nimg.1996.0033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Gibson, J.J. (2014). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (New York: Psychology Press).10.4324/9781315740218Search in Google Scholar

Gomez-Marin, A., Paton, J.J., Kampff, A.R., Costa, R.M., and Mainen, Z.F. (2014). Big behavioral data: psychology, ethology and the foundations of neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1455–1462.10.1038/nn.3812Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Gouvea, T.S., Monteiro, T., Motiwala, A., Soares, S., Machens, C., and Paton, J.J. (2015). Striatal dynamics explain duration judgments. eLife 4. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11386.10.7554/eLife.11386Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Jazayeri, M. and Afraz, A. (2017). Navigating the neural space in search of the neural code. Neuron 93, 1003–1014.10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Juavinett, A.L., Erlich, J.C., and Churchland, A.K. (2018). Decision-making behaviors: weighing ethology, complexity, and sensorimotor compatibility. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 49, 42–50.10.1016/j.conb.2017.11.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Kim, J.J. and Jung, M.W. (2018). Fear paradigms: the times they are a-changin’. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 24, 38–43.10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.02.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Krakauer, J.W., Ghazanfar, A.A., Gomez-Marin, A., MacIver, M.A., and Poeppel, D. (2017). Neuroscience needs behavior: correcting a reductionist bias. Neuron 93, 480–490.10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kyriazi, P., Headley, D.B., and Pare, D. (2018). Multi-dimensional coding by basolateral amygdala neurons. Neuron 99, 1315–1328.e1315.10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.036Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

LeDoux, J.E. (2017). Semantics, surplus meaning, and the science of fear. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 303–306.10.1016/j.tics.2017.02.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Marr, D. (2010). Vision: A Computation Investigation into the Human Representational System and Processing of Visual Information (Cambridge: MIT Press).10.7551/mitpress/9780262514620.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mau, W., Sullivan, D.W., Kinsky, N.R., Hasselmo, M.E., Howard, M.W., and Eichenbaum, H. (2018). The same hippocampal CA1 population simultaneously codes temporal information over multiple timescales. Curr. Biol. 28, 1499–1508.10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Mello, G.B., Soares, S., and Paton, J.J. (2015). A scalable population code for time in the striatum. Curr. Biol. 25, 1113–1122.10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.036Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Mobbs, D. and Kim, J.J. (2015). Neuroethological studies of fear, anxiety, and risky decision-making in rodents and humans. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 5, 8–15.10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.06.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Mobbs, D., Trimmer, P.C., Blumstein, D.T., and Dayan, P. (2018).Foraging for foundations in decision neuroscience: insights from ethology. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 419–427.10.1038/s41583-018-0010-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Nestler, E.J. and Hyman, S.E. (2010). Animal models of neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1161–1169.10.1038/nn.2647Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Poldrack, R. (2010a). Subtraction and Beyond: The Logic of Experimental Designs for Neuroimaging Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping (Cambridge: MIT Press). pp. 147–159.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014021.003.0014Search in Google Scholar

Poldrack, R.A. (2010b). Mapping mental function to brain structure: how can cognitive neuroimaging succeed? Perspect Psychol. Sci. 5, 753–761.10.1177/1745691610388777Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Poldrack, R.A. and Yarkoni, T. (2016). From brain maps to cognitive ontologies: informatics and the search for mental structure. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67, 587–612.10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033729Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Schultz, W. (2016). Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: a two-component response. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 183–195.10.1038/nrn.2015.26Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Schwartz, N., Miller, C., and Fields, H.L. (2017). Cortico-accumbens regulation of approach-avoidance behavior is modified by experience and chronic pain. Cell Rep. 19, 1522–1531.10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.073Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shagrir, O. and Bechtel, W. (2017). Marr’s Computational Level and Delineating Phenomena Explanation and Integration in Mind and Brain Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press). pp. 190–214.10.1093/oso/9780199685509.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Silva, A.J., Bickle, J., and Landreth, A. (2013). Engineering the Next Revolution in Neuroscience: The New Science of Experiment Planning (Oxford: Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199731756.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Soares, S., Atallah, B.V., and Paton, J.J. (2016). Midbrain dopamine neurons control judgment of time. Science 354, 1273–1277.10.1126/science.aah5234Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Tsilidis, K.K., Panagiotou, O.A., Sena, E.S., Aretouli, E., Evangelou, E., Howells, D.W., Al-Shahi Salman, R., Macleod, M.R., and Ioannidis, J.P. (2013). Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases. PLoS Biol 11, e1001609.10.1371/journal.pbio.1001609Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Weele, C.M.V., Siciliano, C.A., and Tye, K.M. (2018). Dopamine tunes prefrontal outputs to orchestrate aversive processing. Brain Res. 1713, 16–31.10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.044Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2019-01-11
Accepted: 2019-03-17
Published Online: 2019-05-27
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/revneuro-2019-0006/html
Scroll to top button