How different priming stimulations affect the corticospinal excitability induced by noninvasive brain stimulation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques could induce changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE) and neuroplasticity. These changes could be affected by different factors, including having a session of stimulation called the ‘priming’ protocol before the main stimulation session called the ‘test’ protocol. Literature indicates that a priming protocol could affect the activity of postsynaptic neurons, form a neuronal history, and then modify the expected effects of the test protocol on CSE indicated by the amplitude of transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potentials. This prior history affects a threshold to activate the necessary mechanism stabilizing the neuronal activity within a useful dynamic range. For studying the effects of this history and related metaplasticity mechanisms in the human primary motor cortex (M1), priming-test protocols are successfully employed. Thirty-two studies were included in this review to investigate how different priming protocols could affect the induced effects of a test protocol on CSE in healthy individuals. The results showed that if the history of synaptic activity were high or low enough to displace the threshold, the expected effects of the test protocol would be the reverse. This effect reversal is regulated by homeostatic mechanisms. On the contrary, the effects of the test protocol would not be the reverse, and at most we experience a prolongation of the lasting effects if the aforementioned history is not enough to displace the threshold. This effect prolongation is mediated by nonhomeostatic mechanisms. Therefore, based on the characteristics of priming-test protocols and the interval between them, the expected results of priming-test protocols would be different. Moreover, these findings could shed light on the different mechanisms of metaplasticity involved in NIBS. It helps us understand how we can improve the expected outcomes of these techniques in clinical approaches.
References
Abbot, L.F. and Nelson, S.B. (2000). Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1178–1183.10.1038/81453Search in Google Scholar
Abraham, W.C. and Bear, M.F. (1996). Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 19, 126–130.10.1016/S0166-2236(96)80018-XSearch in Google Scholar
Bastani, A. and Jaberzadeh, S. (2014). Within-session repeated a-tDCS: the effects of repetition rate and inter-stimulus interval on corticospinal excitability and motor performance. Clin. Neurophysiol. 125, 1809–1818.10.1016/j.clinph.2014.01.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Bienenstock, E.L., Cooper, L.N., and Munro, P.W. (1982). Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2, 32–48.10.1142/9789812795885_0006Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, L.N. and Bear, M.F. (2012). The BCM theory of synapse modification at 30: interaction of theory with experiment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 798–810.10.1038/nrn3353Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Cosentino, G., Fierro, B., Paladino, P., Talamanca, S., Vigneri, S., Palermo, A., Giglia, G., and Brighina, F. (2012). Transcranial direct current stimulation preconditioning modulates the effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the human motor cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 35, 119–124.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07939.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Delvendahl, I., Jung, N.H., Mainberger, F., Kuhnke, N.G., Cronjaeger, M., and Mall, V. (2010). Occlusion of bidirectional plasticity by preceding low-frequency stimulation in the human motor cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121, 594–602.10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Doeltgen, S.H. and Ridding, M.C. (2011). Modulation of cortical motor networks following primed theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 215, 199–206.10.1007/s00221-011-2886-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Downs, S.H. and Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 52, 377–384.10.1136/jech.52.6.377Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Fricke, K., Seeber, A.A., Thirugnanasambandam, N., Paulus, W., Nitsche, M.A., and Rothwell, J.C. (2010). Time course of the induction of homeostatic plasticity generated by repeated transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 105, 1141–1149.10.1152/jn.00608.2009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Gamboa, O.L., Antal, A., Moliadze, V., and Paulus, W. (2010). Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 204, 181–187.10.1007/s00221-010-2293-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Gamboa, O.L., Antal, A., Laczo, B., Moliadze, V., Nitsche, M.A., and Paulus, W. (2011). Impact of repetitive theta burst stimulation on motor cortex excitability. Brain Stimul. 4, 145–151.10.1016/j.brs.2010.09.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Gentner, R., Wankerl, K., Reinsberger, C., Zeller, D., and Classen, J. (2008). Depression of human corticospinal excitability induced by magnetic theta-burst stimulation: evidence of rapid polarity-reversing metaplasticity. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2046–2053.10.1093/cercor/bhm239Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Goldsworthy, M.R., Pitcher, J.B., and Ridding, M.C. (2012). The application of spaced theta burst protocols induces long-lasting neuroplastic changes in the human motor cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 35, 125–134.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07924.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Goldsworthy, M.R., Pitcher, J.B., and Ridding, M.C. (2013). Neuroplastic modulation of inhibitory motor cortical networks by spaced theta burst stimulation protocols. Brain Stimul. 6, 340–345.10.1016/j.brs.2012.06.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Goldsworthy, M.R., Muller-Dahlhaus, F., Ridding, M.C., and Ziemann, U. (2014). Inter-subject variability of LTD-like plasticity in human motor cortex: a matter of preceding motor activation. Brain Stimul. 7, 864–870.10.1016/j.brs.2014.08.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Goldsworthy, M.R., Pitcher, J.B., and Ridding, M.C. (2015). Spaced noninvasive brain stimulation: prospects for inducing long-lasting human cortical plasticity. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 29, 714–721.10.1177/1545968314562649Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Hamada, M., Terao, Y., Hanajima, R., Shirota, Y., Nakatani-Enomoto, S., Furubayashi, T., Matsumoto, H., and Ugawa, Y. (2008). Bidirectional long-term motor cortical plasticity and metaplasticity induced by quadripulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Physiol. 586, 3927–3947.10.1113/jphysiol.2008.152793Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Hordacre, B., Ridding, M.C., and Goldsworthy, M.R. (2015). Response variability to non-invasive brain stimulation protocols. Clin. Neurophysiol. 126, 2249–2250.10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.052Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Huang, Y.Z., Edwards, M.J., Rounis, E., Bhatia, K.P., and Rothwell, J.C. (2005). Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 45, 201–206.10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Huang, Y.Z., Rothwell, J.C., Lu, C.S., Chuang, W.L., Lin, W.Y., and Chen, R.S. (2010). Reversal of plasticity-like effects in the human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 588, 3683–3693.10.1113/jphysiol.2010.191361Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Iezzi, E., Suppa, A., Conte, A., Li Voti, P., Bologna, M., and Berardelli, A. (2011). Short-term and long-term plasticity interaction in human primary motor cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 33, 1908–1915.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07674.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Iyer, M., Schepler, N., and Wassermann, E. M. (2003). Priming stimulation enhances the depressant effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Neurosci. 23, 10867–10872.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-34-10867.2003Search in Google Scholar
Jaberzadeh, S., Bastani, A., and Kidgell, D. (2013). Does the longer application of anodal-transcranial direct current stimulation increase corticomotor excitability further? a pilot study. Basic Clin. Neurosci. 3, 28–35.Search in Google Scholar
Joseph, A. Plot Digitizer 2.5.1 2011. Available at: http://plotdigitizer.sourceforge.net/.Search in Google Scholar
Karabanov, A., Ziemann, U., Hamada, M., George, M.S., Quartarone, A., Classen, J., Massimin, M., Rothwell, J., and Siebner, H.R. (2015). Consensus paper: probing homeostatic plasticity of human cortex with non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 8, 442–454.10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.404Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Lang, N., Siebner, H.R., Ernst, D., Nitsche, M.A., Paulus, W., Lemon, R.N., and Rothwell, J.C. (2004). Preconditioning with transcranial direct current stimulation sensitizes the motor cortex to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation and controls the direction of after-effects. Biol. Psychiatry 56, 634–639.10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.07.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Mastroeni, C., Bergmann, T.O., Rizzo, V., Ritter, C., Klein, C., Pohlmann, I., Brueggemann, N., Quartarone, A., and Siebner, H. R. (2013). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor – a major player in stimulation-induced homeostatic metaplasticity of human motor cortex? PLoS One 8, e57957.10.1371/journal.pone.0057957Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Moloney, T.M. and Witney, A.G. (2014). Pressure pain thresholds increase after preconditioning 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation. PLoS One 9, e92540.10.1371/journal.pone.0092540Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Monte-Silva, K., Kuo, M.F., Liebetanz, D., Paulus, W., and Nitsche, M.A. (2010). Shaping the optimal repetition interval for cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). J. Neurophysiol. 103, 1735–1740.10.1152/jn.00924.2009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Monte-Silva, K., Kuo, M.F., Hessenthaler, S., Fresnoza, S., Liebetanz, D., Paulus, W., and Nitsche, M.A. (2013). Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 6, 424–432.10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Muller, J.F., Orekhov, Y., Liu, Y., and Ziemann, U. (2007). Homeostatic plasticity in human motor cortex demonstrated by two consecutive sessions of paired associative stimulation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25, 3461–3468.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05603.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Müller-Dahlhaus, F. and Ziemann, U. (2015). Metaplasticity in human cortex. Neuroscientist 21, 185–202.10.1177/1073858414526645Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Muller-Dahlhaus, F., Lucke, C., Lu, M. K., Arai, N., Fuhl, A., Herrmann, E., and Ziemann, U. (2015). Augmenting LTP-like plasticity in human motor cortex by spaced paired associative stimulation. PLoS One 10, e0131020.10.1371/journal.pone.0131020Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Murakami, T., Muller-Dahlhaus, F., Lu, M.K., and Ziemann, U. (2012). Homeostatic metaplasticity of corticospinal excitatory and intracortical inhibitory neural circuits in human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 590, 5765–5781.10.1113/jphysiol.2012.238519Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Ni, Z., Gunraj, C., Kailey, P., Cash, R.F., and Chen, R. (2014). Heterosynaptic modulation of motor cortical plasticity in human. J. Neurosci. 34, 7314–7321.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4714-13.2014Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Nitsche, M.A., Roth, A., Kuo, M.F., Fischer, A.K., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Tergau, F., and Paulus, W. (2007). Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 27, 3807–3812.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5348-06.2007Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Opie, G.M., Post, A.K., Ridding, M.C., Ziemann, U., and Semmler, J.G. (2017a). Modulating motor cortical neuroplasticity with priming paired associative stimulation in young and old adults. Clin. Neurophysiol. 128, 763–769.10.1016/j.clinph.2017.02.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Opie, G.M., Vosnakis, E., Ridding, M.C., Ziemann, U., and Semmler, J.G. (2017b). Priming theta burst stimulation enhances motor cortex plasticity in young but not old adults. Brain Stimul. 10, 298–304.10.1016/j.brs.2017.01.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Player, M.J., Taylor, J.L., Alonzo, A., and Loo, C.K. (2012). Paired associative stimulation increases motor cortex excitability more effectively than theta-burst stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 123, 2220–2226.10.1016/j.clinph.2012.03.081Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Potter-Nerger, M., Fischer, S., Mastroeni, C., Groppa, S., Deuschl, G., Volkmann, J., Quartarone, A., Munchau, A., and Siebner, H.R. (2009). Inducing homeostatic-like plasticity in human motor cortex through converging corticocortical inputs. J. Neurophysiol. 102, 3180–3190.10.1152/jn.91046.2008Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Ridding, M.C. and Ziemann, U. (2010). Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects. J. Physiol. 588, 2291–2304.10.1113/jphysiol.2010.190314Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Siebner, H.R., Lang, N., Rizzo, V., Nitsche, M.A., Paulus, W., Lemon, R.N., and Rothwell, J.C. (2004). Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J. Neurosci. 24, 3379–3385.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5316-03.2004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Stefan, K., Kunesch, E., Chen, L.G., Benecke, R., and Classen, J. (2000). Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain 123, 572–584.10.1093/brain/123.3.572Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Todd, G., Flavel, S.C., and Ridding, M.C. (2009). Priming theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with low- and high-frequency stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 195, 307–315.10.1007/s00221-009-1791-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Ziemann, U. and Siebner, H.R. (2008). Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity. Brain Stimul. 1, 60–66.10.1016/j.brs.2007.08.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Roles of the exon junction complex components in the central nervous system: a mini review
- Metabolic regulation of synaptic activity
- CD200-, CX3CL1-, and TREM2-mediated neuron-microglia interactions and their involvements in Alzheimer’s disease
- Rab23 and developmental disorders
- When your face describes your memories: facial expressions during retrieval of autobiographical memories
- Balo’s concentric sclerosis: an update and comprehensive literature review
- How different priming stimulations affect the corticospinal excitability induced by noninvasive brain stimulation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: The functional role of all postsynaptic potentials examined from a first-person frame of reference
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Roles of the exon junction complex components in the central nervous system: a mini review
- Metabolic regulation of synaptic activity
- CD200-, CX3CL1-, and TREM2-mediated neuron-microglia interactions and their involvements in Alzheimer’s disease
- Rab23 and developmental disorders
- When your face describes your memories: facial expressions during retrieval of autobiographical memories
- Balo’s concentric sclerosis: an update and comprehensive literature review
- How different priming stimulations affect the corticospinal excitability induced by noninvasive brain stimulation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Corrigendum
- Corrigendum to: The functional role of all postsynaptic potentials examined from a first-person frame of reference