Home Revolutionizing Metal-organic Frameworks (MOFs) in Wastewater Treatment Applications
Article Open Access

Revolutionizing Metal-organic Frameworks (MOFs) in Wastewater Treatment Applications

  • Doaa Zamel ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Atta Ullah Khan EMAIL logo , Rania Emara , Mohamed I. Elsalahaty , Ahmed S. S. Elsayed , Tarek M. Mohamed , Mohamed M. Hassan and Sikander Karim
Published/Copyright: October 25, 2024

Abstract

Nanotechnology revealed its unlimited success in many real-life applications. That’s why the incorporation of nanomaterials became vital for solving a lot of current problems. Metal Organic-frameworks (MOFs) are nanomaterials with outstanding advantages such as crystallinity, high surface area, various structures, and adsorption capacity. Furthermore, metal-Organic Frameworks have emerged as versatile and promising materials for various environmental applications, including wastewater treatment. These materials are stable in water which acquire them convenient properties for wastewater treatment applications, for instance adsorption, catalysis, separation and so on. Moreover, MOFs are characterized by their high surface area, tunable pore size, and exceptional adsorption capacity, have shown remarkable potential for the removal of contaminants in wastewater treatment systems. In this review, the variable roles of MOFs in wastewater treatment applications have been discussed and highlighted as well. Herein, we are additionally reviewing the state-of-the-art research trends on the applications of metal-organic framework materials in the removal of pollutants in wastewater treatmen t systems.

1 Introduction

Water is one of the most important resources on the earth and the main base for all of the living organisms. Water represents around 72 % of the earth’s surface with only 0.5 % fresh water resources. 1 Currently, these resources became scarce as a direct result for the climate change, population growth and the most dangerous threat the pollution of water as nearly 2.2 million people die every year due to diarrheal related disease most of them caused by waterborne infections in polluted water. 2 Therefore, it is really urgent to solve the problem of water pollution to control water scarce and to solve a dangerous health problem by the treatment for the polluted water. Water treatment is a process that has more than one approach as chemical, physical and biological treatment, but these methods are limited due to its high cost or its poor efficiency in some cases so finding new approach to improve the traditional ways was necessary. 3 There are several technologies used in water treatment as for example chemical treatment, sedimentation, filtration membranes and adsorption which are the most preferable techniques in wastewater treatment due to its easy operation. 4 , 5 Furthermore, there are many adsorbents used in wastewater treatment , for example; active carbon, metal oxide nanoparticles, resins, zeolites, etc. 6 Overall examples the nano-adsorbents are the preferred material, especially the porous nanoparticles which has special adsorption properties due to its large surface area and highly porous structure. Therefore, by developing new highly porous solid phase nanomaterials, highly adsorption efficiency could be obtained besides its high selectivity property. 7 Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs), three-dimensional crystalline coordination networks that consists of connections between metal ions and organic ligands with high porosity and controllability property, and many available active sites beside its large surface area, therefore, it is widely used in several applications as for example drug delivery, gas storage, gas separation and heterogeneous catalysis. Furthermore, MOFs are widely used in adsorption of pollutants from the water. 8 , 9 , 10 The first appearance for MOFs was reported by Yaghi’s group, which was a 2D stable structure synergistic composite that synthesized by using 1,3,5 Benzene tricarboxylic acid (BTC) and Co, followed by synthesis of MOF-1 and MOF-2 and other types that based on it, working on 2D MOFs continued till 1999 when Yaghi’s group synthesized MOF-5 the first 3D structured MOFs that were synthesized from terephthalic acid (1,4-BDC) and Zn. 11 , 12 , 13 On the other hand, Ferey’s group in Institute Lavoisier in France was developing series of MOF materials known as The Materials of Institute Lavoisier (MIL) that are famous by their huge pore number and high specific area, in 2002 Ferey’s group succeeded to obtain MIL-53 that prepared by solvothermal-hydrothermal method. 14 After that the research on MOFs and developing new structures of it with new elements and new properties continued. So far MOFs materials synthesis reached 20,000 with different compositions and functions. 15 At early studies, MOFs were used in gas storage applications due to their high surface area and porosity, Through years and by evolving and modifying MOFs by metal ions and organic ligands, their applications expanded in many fields as gas storage, gas separation, catalysis, sensors, water treatment, etc. 16 , 17 The aim of this review is to spot the light on the various applications of MOFs materials in the removal of different pollutants in wastewater.

Table 1:

Summarized studies on MOFs applications in hydrocarbons removal in wastewater.

Author, year Type of MOFs Type of hydrocarbon treated Technique Surface area (m2 g−1) Summary
55 Zn-BDC

&

Cu-BDC
Naphthalene and anthracene Adsorption Zinc and copper MOFs of benzene-1,4-carboxylic acid (Zn-BDC and Cu-BDC) effectively removed naphtha and anthracene, demonstrating stability over a wide temperature range and enhancing the sorption process.
56 UiO-66(Zr)

&

NH2-UiO-66(Zr)
Anthracene (ANT) and chrysene (CRY) Adsorption 1,420

&

985

respectively
The solvothermal synthesis of UiO-66(Zr) and NH2-UiO-66(Zr) MOFs yielded materials with high BET surface areas, thermal stability, and high removal efficiency for ANT and CRY, making them excellent for repeated applications due to their ease of regeneration.
53 MIL-88(Fe)

&

NH2-MIL-88(Fe)
Pyrene (PYR) Adsorption 24.1 ± 1

&

23.0 ± 1 mg g−1 respectively
MIL-88(Fe) and NH2-MIL-88(Fe) MOFs, characterized by high BET surfaces and crystallinity, efficiently removed PYR from wastewater within 40 min, fitting the Langmuir isotherm and pseudo-second-order kinetics, with thermodynamic analysis showing the process is exothermic and spontaneous, indicating their potential as PAH adsorbents in wastewater treatment.
57 Zr based UiO-66

&

UiO-66-F4
Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) Adsorption 800

&

680 respectively
UiO-66 exhibits higher sorption capacity than UiO-66-F4 for most pollutants due to larger pore sizes, which enhance surface area, with a notable affinity for xylene adsorption.
58 MOF‐199

&

ZIF‐8
Phenol (Ph) and P-nitro phenol (PNP) Adsorption 2,271

&

2,266

respectively
MOF 199 and ZIF8 effectively removed phenol and p-nitrophenol from aqueous solutions through chemical interactions and π-π interactions, demonstrating high selectivity and spontaneous adsorption kinetics following a pseudo-second-order model.
59 M.MIL-100(Fe)@ZnO NS Phenol

& bisphenol-A
Photocatalytic degradation 654 Using an in situ self-assembly template technique, we created M.MIL-100(Fe) loaded with ZnO NS, demonstrating superior photo-Fenton activity compared to standard MIL-100(Fe) and ZnO in degrading phenol, bisphenol A, and atrazine, and removing TOC. The mesoporous structure of M.MIL-100(Fe) enhances H2O2 breakdown and OH radical production, while ZnO NS placement reduces electron-hole recombination, resulting in exceptional stability and reusability.
46 MOF/CuWO4 4-nitrophenol Photocatalytic degradation 801 Under mild conditions, a highly efficient and recoverable MOF/CuWO4 heterostructure photocatalyst was synthesized for effective photodegradation of 4-NP organic pollutants, achieving approximately 81 % removal. The MOF/CuWO4 heterostructure reduces electron-hole recombination, with its increased photocatalytic activity attributed to its light harvesting capability, adjustable porous structure, high adsorption capacity, and narrow band gap enabling visible light activation.
Table 2:

Different MOFs acting in pharmaceuticals adsorption in wastewater.

MOFs MOFs constituent PPCPs Adsorption feature Reference
MOF-PCN-222 Porous coordination network (PCN), mesoporous iron-porhpyrinic zirconium-based MOF) Chloramphenicol (CAP) H-bond interaction

electrostatic interaction special pore structure
71
ZIF-8 and Cu-ZIF-8 Zinc metal-organic framework (ZIF-8) and copper-doped ZIF-8 (Cu-ZIF-8) Tetracycline hydrochloride (TC) Pseudo-second-order

Langmuir models
72
ZIF-67 Ciprofloxacin (CIP) Fast adsorption, due to the presence of hollow Co3S4 73
UiO-66 Universitetet i Oslo (UiO), zirconium-based. MOF Oxytetracycline (OTC) Hydrophilicity 74
Ibuprofen ketoprofen

naproxen

indomethacin

furosemide
(π–π interaction). 66
Diclofenac (DCF)
  1. Pseud second-order kinetic model

  2. Langmuir isothermal model,

75
Methotrexate salt (MTX) Diffusion dependent on inner pores and channels of MOF 76
[Cu(Glu)2(H2O2)]· Ciprofloxacin (CIP) Physisorption

Chemisorption

intra-particle diffusion and follows: pseudo-second-order kinetic
77
Fe3O4/HKUST-1 Magnetic copper-based metal-organic frameworks (MOF) Norfloxacin (NOR) Electrostatic interactions

π-π interactions
78
MIL-53(Fe) Doxycycline (DOC) Pseudo-second-order equation 79
Basolite A100 Carbamazepine (CBZ) Pseudo-second-order equation 80
MOF-808 Ibuprofen ketoprofen

naproxen

indomethacin

furosemide
(π–π interaction). 66
MOF-(525 and 545) Zr-oxide groups and porphyrin Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) Surface area

π–π interaction
81
MIL-101 Naproxen and clofibric acid Large pore size of MIL-101 82

2 MOFs applications in heavy metals removal from wastewater

On the last years MOFs are frequently used in degradation and removal of heavy metals, synthetic dyes, radioactive elements, detergents and pharmaceutics from water, some MOFs materials used in water treatment are represented below. Heavy metals are defined as metals with a relatively high atomic mass high, density, and atomic number. Some heavy metals are harmless (Ag, In, Ru), while others are essential nutrients (Fe, Co, Zn), but when present in large quantities, they can be toxic. Other heavy metals, such as lead, mercury, and cadmium, are extremely toxic in nature, 18 Figure 1. In many diverse industries, including metallurgy, electroplating, heavy manufacturing, paint and ceramics, civil construction, etc., heavy metals are frequently and constantly produced and released into the environment through industrial effluent. 19 The critical issue of water contamination has been exacerbated by the rapid growth of industry and the intentional and unintentional disposal of industrial waste, such as heavy metal ions. Heavy metal ion pollution poses a major threat to human health as it perturbs protein function and enzyme activity in the body and accumulates in particular organs, leading to chronic poisoning. 20 , 21

Figure 1: 
Examples of heavy metals pollutants.
Figure 1:

Examples of heavy metals pollutants.

2.1 Mercury

Mercury is used in a wide variety of products, including batteries, fluorescent lighting, pigments, insecticides, and chemical catalysts. However, non-efficient treatment leads to significant mercury contamination. 22 Lung damage, psychological and neurological issues, restlessness, anxiety and depression are brought on by inorganic mercury. 23 Herein, nitrogen-containing Sm-MOF was prepared by Wu et al., to detect and remove Hg2+ ions. It shows that 97 % of Hg2+ ions were removed in 2 h from the solution. With maximum adsorption amount (qe) equal to 243 mg/g. The findings also demonstrate that the produced Sm-MOF, due to a low detection limit of 0.87 M and the broad linear range of 0.6–300 M, has excellent sensitivity and selectivity for the detecting of Hg2+. 24 Furthermore, Halder et al., prepared a Ni-based MOF ([Ni(3-bpd)2(NCS)2]n) for Hg2+ removal and detection, Removal can be observed as Hg atoms make coordination bonds with S atoms of the SCN group, the color of [Ni(3-bpd)2(NCS)2]n turns from green to grey, the removal efficiency was found to be 94.30 % with Hg adsorption capacity equal 713 mg/g. 25 Additionally, a zirconium-based MOF filter was prepared by Yan et al., this filter avoids the disadvantage that arises from the usage of MOF powder materials and shows a very high removal efficiency within a few minutes equal to 97.8 %, and saturated adsorption capacity similar to 427.3 mg/g at pH = 4.5. 26 Ji et al., prepared thiol-functionalized MOF-808 by grafting thioglycolic acid on MOF-808 to remove Hg(II),that show impressively ultrafast adsorption kinetics (C0 = 10 mg/L, removal > 99 % in 10 s) and high adsorption capacity equal to 977.5 mg/g, with a rate constant k equal to 36.89 g mg−1 min−1, and after six adsorption-regeneration cycles, MOF-808-SH demonstrates great recyclability with a low loss of capacity. 27 Moreover, Mon et al., prepared eco-friendly and stable MOFs ({Cu4II [(S,S)-methox]2}·5H2O) as methox is bis [(S)-methionine]oxalyl diamide, it has been discovered to be capable of lowering the [Hg2+] concentration in drinking water from unsafe levels of 10 ppm to safe ranges of below 2 ppb with a capture efficiency of 99.95 % in 15 min. 28

2.2 Copper

The human body needs copper, but too much of it can harm the brain, create gastric ulcers, or irritate the mucous membranes. Anthropogenic sources were piping for drinking water, kitchenware, pigments, roofing, alloys, and pharmaceuticals. 21 , 29 So Tan et al., prepared Zr-based metal organic framework (MOF-801) using solvothermal method, At an initial Cu2+ concentration of 10 mg/L, for 180 min, and an adsorbent dosage of 10 mg, the results of adsorption showed a removal efficiency equal 97.80 % and equilibrium adsorption capacity of Cu2+ from the process equal to 9.78 mg/g that demonstrated the efficiency of MOF-801 in removing Cu2+. 30 Similarly, a cadmium terephthalate metal-organic framework MOF-2 (Cd), Cd-TPA have been synthesized using ultrasonic synthesis method by Ghaedi et al., for the removing of copper and lead ions by adsorption and 1.0 g adsorbent dose was used to achieve removal percentage values of 99.9 for lead and 97.9 % for copper with highest monolayer adsorption capacities 434.78 for copper and 769.23 mg/g for lead. 31 Moreover, Bakhtiari et al., used direct carbonization of zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8), to synthesis Nano porous carbons (NC) and studied (MOF-NC) particles as adsorbent for copper removal which shows adsorption capacity equal to 33.44 mg/g and rate of adsorption equal 5.87 × 10−6 g mg−1 min−1. 31 In another work Bakhtiari et al., prepared nano porous metal organic framework (MOF-5), The greatest removal efficiency of copper ion by MOF-5 is at pH = 5.2, which is shown to be more than 80 %, and a high value of the adsorption capacity of MOF-5 for copper ion (290 mg/g) suggests that MOF-5 is an effective adsorbent for Cu removal. 32 Additionally, a composite ZnO-NP@Zn-MOF-74 was prepared by Guo et al., which demonstrated improved copper removal capabilities compared to the usual Zn-MOF-74 replacing the traditional zinc ions with layered porous ZnO microspheres. It has maximal sorption capacities of 106.27 mg/g at pH = 5.5, and the removal mechanism involves π-π stacking, electrostatic interaction, surface complexation and ion exchange. 33

2.3 Lead

One of the elements that is most harmful to people, animals, and plants is lead. It has an additive effect that can lead to severe hematologic, brain, and kidney issues. Additionally, it is nonbiodegradable, and eating food with excessive amounts of this element might have negative health effects on people. Therefore, it is crucial to precisely calculate the trace lead concentrations present in the environment and food. For cereals and fruit juices, the maximum acceptable concentration levels of lead are 0.05 mg kg−1 and 0.2 mg kg−1, respectively, 34 Herein, Zhennan et al., designed Cu-MOFs/Fe3O4 a magnetic metal organic frameworks (MOFs) composite by in-situ growth of Cu-MOFs with Fe3O4 doping nanoparticles which reported adsorption capacities equal to 219.00 mg/g for Pb2+ Also Fe3O4/Cu-MOFs was found to be recyclable adsorbent for Pb(II) removal from water, 35 Also Pb2+ ions was removed at PH = 5 using two metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) which is Cu-BTC and Zn-BTC, with benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid linker, which has been synthesized by Hasankola et al., maximum absorption capacity reported for these two MOFs was 333 mg g−1 for Cu-BTC and 312 mg g−1 for Zn-BTC, in <30 min. 36 Zhang et al., reported and adsorbent rate of 99.35 % of lead and it is concentration in a few tens of seconds reached the safe level for drinking standard, using MIL-100 (Fe) which was prepared by hydrothermal method and treated with ultrasonic to achieve slow polymerization of dopamine hydrochloride in the cages of it. 37 A combination between Amino-functionalized MOFs and ceramic membrane ultrafiltration (CUF) was reported by Yin et al., the process had the lowest flux fall, lowest level of membrane fouling, and the maximum removal of Pb (II) (61.4 %) at pH equal to 4.5. Additionally, the equilibrium adsorption capacity was exceptionally high (1795.3 mg/g). 38 Zhu et al., synthesized Nanotube-like Tb-based metal–organic frameworks (Tb-MOFs) through the solvothermal assembly of carboxylate-based ligands and Tb3+, shown that the Tb-MOFs had good adsorption properties, With a maximal removal capacity of 547 mg g−1 within 50 min in pH equal to 5.5. 39 And by successfully grafting natural citric acid (CA), Yang et al., reported that an eco-friendly adsorbent MOF-808-CA with abundant free carboxylic sites to synergistically trap Pb2+ was successfully prepared. It has a superior adsorption capacity of 173.3 mg/g, removal efficiency can reach 99 % in 5 min, and the concentration of Pb2+ can be decreased from 10 mg/L to 7 g/L after equilibrium. 40 Geisse et al., used thiophene functionalized metal–organic frameworks for Removal of lead ions with a maximum Pb2+ loading of 98.5 mg/g MOF,which was prepared using HCl as a modulator, DUT-67 can be recycled at least five times in flow conditions at relevant concentrations with no loss in adsorption activity. 41

2.4 Hexavalent chromium Cr6

Hexavalent chromium Cr6+ is a class of major heavy metal contaminants that has drawn a lot of attention. It mostly enters the environment via industrial wastewater and then travels through several environmental pathways to reach the human body. Their anthropogenic causes included plating, data storage, leather, tanning of textiles and Wood treatment, and the production of ferroalloys, which inflicted varying degrees of harm on human organ function. Here to our knowledge, the pathway that is relatively significant is heavy metal enrichment. A mild Cr6+ overdose may result in rashes, allergies, and stomach ache. 42 , 43 As a result Amino-functionalized MIL-101(Cr) (AFMIL) prepared by Jalayeri et al., using hydrothermal method at pH3.51 and T = 60 °C, the greatest measured adsorption capacity of Amino-functionalized MIL-101(Cr) toward Cr(VI) was 44 mg/g for a liquid phase concentration of 140 mg/L, The outcome of the experiment shows that AFMIL has some very intriguing potential uses for removing Cr(VI) from water. 44 Also Zhou et al., prepared Magnetic Zr–based metal organic framework (UiO-66) @Polypyrrole (magnetic UiO-66@Ppy) by in situ chemical oxidative polymerization method, that shows excellent adsorption capacity of 259.1 mg/g for Cr(VI) removing from water at pH equal 2. 45 It was suggested by Gao et al., to use the metal organic framework (MOF) as a template to fabricate Porous Fe0.72(0) Fe2.28(II)C which used to remove hexavalent chromium, the resulting Fe0.72(0) Fe2.28(II)C shown excellent removal performance with a maximal capacity of 354.6 mg/g. 45 In order to remove toxic chromium ions from ground water and industrial effluents, a novel nanocomposite adsorbent material was created by Samuel et al., using chitosan (CS), graphene oxide (GO), and metal organic framework (MOF [Zn(BDC) (DMF)]). At pH3, this material had an excellent potential candidate for adsorption capacity of 144.92 mg/g, which opens the door to the development of MOF/GO/CS based composite materials in the future. 3 Nguyen et al., created MOF-808, an ultra-stable Zr-MOF with a steady adsorption capability that is made up of 6-connected zirconium clusters and 1,3,5-benzene tricarboxylic acid. MOF-808’s crystal size ranges from 40 nm to about 1,000 nm. MOF-808 450 produced a maximum K2Cr2O7 trapping adsorption of 141.2 mg/g. 39

3 Heavy metal’s adsorption on MOFs

The convenience, high efficiency, scalability, and low operating and maintenance costs of adsorption make it unique method. Many different adsorbent materials have been studied for the removal of heavy metals, including zeolites, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), clays, chitosan, magnetic nanoparticles, biomaterials, carbon-based nanomaterials, and clays. Since MOFs offer several benefits when considering their application as adsorbent materials, the use of MOFs as adsorbent materials for heavy metals separation has gained enormous interest over the past 10 years. The high surface area and porosity of MOFs is meritswhich are beneficial for applications in drug delivery, gas storage, separation, and catalysis, among other things. A large surface area and porosity can help with pollutant dispersion through the framework and accessibility to adsorption sites. Due to their crystalline structure, MOF pores are extremely organized. By adjusting the linkers involved and the connectivity of the metal ions, it is possible to change the size and form of the pores. Additionally, MOFs have become a potential approach to successfully remove heavy metals from aqueous matrices in order to overcome the limits of existing nanocomposites, and the adsorption capabilities of these materials depend on particular functional groups. Depending on the nature of the interaction between the heavy metals (adsorbates) and MOFs, heavy metal remediation from the water is accomplished by MOFs by chemical and physical adsorption (adsorbents). Reactive adsorption is the common name for chemical adsorption, whereas adsorptive adsorption is the name for physical adsorption. The ability of MOFs to bind to molecules is influenced by the solidity of chemical and physical adsorption. 29 , 44 , 46 Like Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), which may be easily made utilizing imidazolate (Hmim) as the organic linker and either Zn or Co as the metal node. With a surface area of roughly 1,400 m2 g−1, ZIF-8 is a typical porous MOF that is used as a possible adsorbent for Pb and Cd from both simulated and real process effluent. 5

3.1 Mechanisms of heavy metal’s adsorption onto MOFs

One of the problems to be resolved by an adsorption mechanism is the potential interactions between adsorbents (adsorbent active sites) and those absorbed in MOFs. The evaluation of the studies’ findings in the literature has revealed that there are four common processes for MOF adsorption, including coordinative unsaturated sites. As demonstrated in Figure 2, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interactions, and acid-base interactions, Due to the highly ordered structures of pristine MOFs, ion exchange serves as the primary mechanism for the adsorption of Cr (VI) oxoanions. Additionally, the Lewis acid/base principle demonstrates a key function in the attraction of heavy metal oxyanions. As Lewis bases, heavy metal oxoanions can interact with Lewis acidic sites in MOFs throughout an overlapped orbital process, increasing the adsorption capacity, Figure 2. 29 , 47

Figure 2: 
Mechanisms of heavy metal’s adsorption onto MOFs
1
.
Figure 2:

Mechanisms of heavy metal’s adsorption onto MOFs 1 .

3.2 Removal of MOFs in hydrocarbons elimination for wastewater

Recovering water bodies, including the ocean, lakes, rivers, and aquifers, that have been contaminated by hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs) is one of the main environmental issues that must be resolved today. Aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and phenols are some of these contaminants. 48 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are organic pollutants generated by both anthropogenic and natural activities linked with industrialization and urbanization, are over 100 different types of PAHs. 49 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a class of dangerous organic compounds composed of two or more condensed benzene rings joined in linear, cluster, or angular structures, Table 1. Most of them are solids that are colorless, white, or pale yellow. 50 PAHs have been found in sediments, water, and crustaceans in mixtures, where they often coexist with other pollutants. Dry and wet deposition, road runoff, industrial wastewater, leaching from creosote-impregnated wood, petroleum spills and fossil fuel combustion are the main ways that PAHs can enter water bodies. The solubility of PAHs in water diminishes as their molecular weight increases, however their boiling and melting points rise in parallel. As known, aromatic hydrocarbons with four and five rings are practically insoluble in water. Furthermore, solubility declines with increasing ring structure, degree of substitution, vapor pressure, and molecular weight. PAHs are known to be carcinogenic and mutagenic, as well as to bioaccumulate in human and animal tissue. 51 Phenolic compounds exist in water bodies as a result of polluted wastewater discharged from industrial, agricultural, and domestic activities. These chemicals are known to be poisonous, causing severe and long-term damage to both people and animals. Even at low doses, they operate as carcinogens and cause harm to red blood cells and the liver. 52 Zakariyya Uba Zango et al. synthesized Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) of UiO-66(Zr) and NH2-UiO-66(Zr) in the removal of anthracene (ANT) and chrysene (CRY) by using adsorption technique. These MOFs showed high regeneration ability. The solvothermal method was used to successfully synthesis UiO-66(Zr) and NH2-UiO-66(Zr) MOFs. They exhibit high surface area “1,420 m2 g−1 for UiO-66(Zr) and 985 m2 g−1 for NH2-UiO-66(Zr)”, good thermal stability, with high adsorption capacity and excellent removals efficiency. For time effect, Maximum adsorption of anthracene (ANT) and chrysene (CRY) achieved at 30 min and 25 min respectively. Adsorption efficiency was higher in CRY for all adsorbents, reaching 98.6 and 96.4 % for UiO-66(Zr) and NH2-UiO-66(Zr), respectively. The percentage elimination of ANT for UiO-66(Zr) and NH2-UiO-66(Zr) was 97.9 and 95.7 %, respectively. For PH effect, it is worth noting that both MOFs removed more pollutants at all pH levels. For isotherms, the measured Qmax values were substantially higher and matched the equilibrium adsorption capacity well. 53 , 54

3.3 Role of MOFs in pharmaceutical removal from wastewater

Pharmaceutical wastewater (PWW) is arguably a rising problem that threatens health, living organisms and the environment. The actual impact of these products on human health not fully figured out but presence associated with many endocrine disruptions that may change hormonal actions. 60 Pharmaceuticals such as hormones, antibiotics, lipids-lowering agents and psychological. Pharmaceuticals possess an elevated degree of stability which makes them as a burden for wastewater treatment. 61 , 62 , 63 Sources of pollution can be categorized into two parts; pollution associated with manufacturing processes as well as the municipal use of pharmaceuticals, Table 2. Various methods have been utilized to solve (PWW) including, biological treatment, membrane technology adsorption method, advanced oxidation process, hybrid systems as well as MOFs. MOFs possess several promising features as illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3: 
Different methods for pharmaceuticals removal from wastewater.
Figure 3:

Different methods for pharmaceuticals removal from wastewater.

Pharmaceutical products can be treated via an adsorption approach by utilizing carbons, zeolites, carbon nanotubes, and mesoporous silica but with limitations such with some of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs which have miscellaneous features, thus, MOFs with enhanced constituents able to point out advantage with aid of numerous interactions with PCPPs such as polar interaction hydrogen bond formation, acid–base interfaces as well as hydrophobic interactions which subsequently promote adsorption and finally PWW treatment. 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70

3.4 Role of MOFs in wastewater depollution via catalyzed advanced oxidation process

MOFs contribute in the enhancement of advanced processes such as Fenton-based, photocatalysis as well as sulphate-centered oxidation; promoted generation of reactive species with MOFs has the key role in this process. 83 For instance, bio-MOF-11-Co has been utilized in sulfachloropyradazine and para-hydroxybenzoic acid. 84 Iron-derived MOF (MIL-88-A) was used in naproxen (NPX) elimination from wastewater. 85 Moreover, iron-grounded MOF (MIL-100(Fe)) pointed out significant role in antibiotics contaminants removal such as sulfamethoxazole, ibuprofen, theophylline and bisphenol A, Figure 4.86 87

Figure 4: 
Activation methods of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and their applications in degrading contaminants in wastewater.
Figure 4:

Activation methods of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and their applications in degrading contaminants in wastewater.

4 Metal organic frameworks (MOFs)-hybrid systems (HSs)

MOF-based hybrid frameworks are framework materials composed of one MOF and another MOF which increase porosity and adsorption capacity of MOFs. 88 Calcium alginate/MOF linked to levofloxacin adsorption from wastewater, also Al-MOF/SA (Aluminum-based MOF sodium alginate) was reported its role in bisphenol A depollution. 89 Addition of MIL-101(Cr) to graphene oxide help in ketoprofen (KTP) and naproxen (NAP) elimination from wastewater. 90 Moreover, ZIF-8 incorporated into chitosan matrix pointed out significant impact in tetracycline elimination rather than regular adsorbent 91 Further studies prepared MIL-68(In)–NH2/graphene oxide for the removal of amoxicillin through photodegradation. 40

4.1 Radioactive heavy metals

Nuclear energy is considered the main energy source beyond fossil fuels. The widespread use of nuclear power provides large convenience to mankind. However, the development of nuclear power is highly controversial, because nuclear fission generates large amounts of radioactive wastes. 92 Radioactive metal ions (128Pd, 137Cs, 89Sr, 235U, 59Fe, 57Co, 65Zn, 90Sr, 99Tc, 79Se, 133Ba, etc.), toxic heavy metal cations (Hg2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, etc.) and oxyanions (CrO42−, Cr2O72−, AsO43−, SeO32−, SeO42−, etc.) are major pollutants in nuclear reactor operations and industrial effluents, which create a serious threat to humans and ecological system. 93 , 94 While, organic pollutants and heavy metal ions such as Hg(II), Pb(II), Cr (Ⅵ), and Cd(II) are difficult to decompose into small eco-friendly molecules, and their stubborn accumulation in living organisms leads to high toxicity and potential carcinogenicity. 93 , 95 Because of the ability of heavy metals to form compounds that can be carcinogenic and mutagenic within the body even at very low levels. Therefore, people need to avoid unnecessary exposure to heavy metals. 96

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of crystalline porous materials, assembled by metal clusters or ions and organic linkers connected via coordination bonds. MOFs have been explored in many applications, such as catalysis, adsorption/separation, chemical sensing, drug delivery, gas storage, and luminescence sensing. 92 , 93 Many papers 97 , 98 reported the potential applications of MOFs and MOF-based composites for the removal of toxic and nuclear waste-related metal ions from wastewater. MOFs were considered as potential adsorbent choices for radionuclide capture and recovery that is attributed to owing high density of the active site, excellent porosity, and high stability. 92 Figure 5 illustrates some development of MOF-based materials for the adsorption of toxic and nuclear waste-related metal ions. 92 , 94 , 99 , 100

Figure 5: 
Various MOF-based materials for the adsorption of toxic and nuclear waste-related metal ions.
92
,
94
,
99
,
100
Figure 5:

Various MOF-based materials for the adsorption of toxic and nuclear waste-related metal ions. 92 , 94 , 99 , 100

4.2 Uranium

Uranium (U(VI)) and its compounds are radioactive and toxic, and they are highly polluting and harmful to the ecological environment, human survival, and development. 101 Lin’s group 102 extracted U(VI) from aquatic environments by using the stable and porous phosphorylurea-derived MOFs UiO-68-type MOFs (MOF-2 and -3) with maximum adsorption capacities of 217 mg g−1. An amidoxime-appended zirconium metal-organic framework [Zr6O4(OH)4(BDC-NHCH2CH2C(=N–OH)NH2)6](UiO-66-AO, BDC = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate) for efficiently and rapidly removing uranium from aqueous solution was fabricated through post-modifications of UiO-66 MOFs. It was found that the maximum adsorption capacity reached 232.8 mg g−1 at pH 5.0 and 328 K based on the Langmuir isotherm. The sorption experiment in a simulated nuclear industry effluent demonstrated a high adsorption efficiency (about 95.3 %) and selectivity toward uranium. 102

The combination of magnetic nanoparticles and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has demonstrated their potential for pollutant sequestration. Fe3O4@SiO2@UiO-66 core–shell as an example of magnetic microspheres were synthesized and used for the removal of U(VI) from an aqueous environment. The maximum adsorption capacity was calculated to be 616.5 mg g−1 for U(VI) by fitting the equilibrium data to the Langmuir model. Thus, the excellent adsorption capacity and sensitive response of the Fe3O4@SiO2@UiO-66 core–shell magnetic microspheres to a magnetic field make them a promising candidate for the removal of uranium (VI) from aqueous solutions. 103 A well-defined magnetic metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)/graphene oxide (Fe3O4@HKUST-1/GO) consisting of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles, HKUST-1 nanocrystal, and GO was synthesized through a simple and environmentally friendly approach. The introduction of GO enhanced the ability of particles to uptake U(VI) from an aqueous solution. The adsorption process can be better described by the Langmuir model and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The results showed that the Fe3O4@HKUST-1/GO exhibited good adsorption capacity towards U(VI) at the initial solution pH value of 4.0 and T = 318 K. 104 Zhimin Lv 99 eliminates U(VI) from radioactive wastewater by using A MgO/carbon adsorbent as a safe treatment in the nuclear power industry. A MgO/carbon adsorbent was prepared by one-step Mg-MOF-74 pyrolyzation and used for U(VI) removal from the aqueous solution. Characteristic results indicated that the as-prepared composite was a typical porous structure. It can rapidly and effectively remove U(VI) and showed an excellent adsorption capacity (777.51 mg g−1), which is much higher than other reported adsorbent materials. 99

4.3 Thorium

The release of Th (Ⅳ) into the water thereby induces a huge threat to humans and other living creatures. Thus, high-efficiency removal and further recovery of Th (Ⅳ) content from wastewater are essential. 92 MOF-303 was synthesized by the solvothermal reaction reported in the literature. 105 It is synthesized from aluminum chloride hexahydrate (AlCl3⋅6H2O) and 3,5-pyrazoledicarboxylic acid monohydrate (H2PDC H2O). A stable aluminum-based metal-organic framework (MOF 303) with high-density ion traps was used to selectively capture thorium (Th) ions from an aqueous solution. The features of the aluminum center endow this material with excellent resistance from β-ray irradiation even with a high dose of 1,000 kGy. Further, due to the special chelation interaction from the ion trap, MOF-303 exhibits a large adsorption capacity for Th(IV) ion (461.7 mg g−1) and excellent separation coefficients up to 97.6, 97.3, and 81.3 for Th(IV)/Pr(III), Th(IV)/Eu(III) and Th(IV)/Nd(III), respectively. 92 The combination of magnetic nanoparticles and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has demonstrated their perspective on pollutant sequestration. In this work, a magnetic metal-organic framework nanocomposite (Fe3O4@AMCA-MIL53(Al) was prepared and used for the removal of U(VI) and Th(IV) metal ions from an aqueous environment. The isotherm and kinetic data were accurately described by the Langmuir and pseudo-second-order models. The adsorption capacity was calculated to be 227.3 and 285.7 mg/g for U(VI) and Th(IV), respectively, by fitting the equilibrium data to the Langmuir model. 106

4.4 Barium

For the 133Ba with a long half-life (10.5 years), irreversible adsorption and long-term storage are highly required. The simultaneous high-capacity and fast removal of radioactive barium ion (Ba2+) from nuclear wastewater are necessary but still face a large challenge. Thus, strong host-guest interaction and high stability are necessary for an ideal adsorbent. 94 Efficient decontamination of radioactive Ba2+ is of great significance to human health and environmental safety. Herein, an adsorbent based on the sulfonic acid functionalized Zr-MOF has been successfully developed, which could efficiently decontaminate radioactive Ba2+ with excellent selectivity, recyclability, a high adsorption capacity up to 60.8 mg g−1 as well as a short adsorption kinetic time of less than 5 min. This outstanding adsorption performance is attributed to the strong affinity between Ba2+ and high-density –SO3H active sites in MOFs. 107 Another adsorbent containing a sulfonic group, MOF-808-SO3H, was prepared based on the oxidation of the –SH group. The adsorbent exhibits excellent capture ability for Ba2+ due to strong hard acid-base and electrostatic interactions, with the adsorption capacity of 152.0 mg g−1 and fast equilibrium adsorption time, superior to other reported materials. 94

4.5 Iodine

Radioiodine 131I, which emits beta and gamma radiation, is the most frequently used radionuclide in nuclear medicine, especially to treat hyperthyroidism and thyroid cancer 100 In the application of nuclear technology, radioiodine, a key radionuclide is released into the environment. Its danger to environmental and human health, such as hyperthyroidism, high environmental mobility, and human metabolic damage, makes its capture and safe storage very important. 108 Silver-functionalized UiO-66 MOF was prepared by an easy one-pot solvothermal reaction. The prepared functionalized MOF was tested for the removal of radioactive iodine from water, obtaining an outstanding extraction capacity of 131I (∼1 MBq g−1) due to the excellent affinity of Ag particles to iodide. The developed UiO-66-SO3H@Ag 3D device showed high efficiency for the removal of 131I, excellent reusability, and good performance for the extraction of 131I from sewage water and hospital waste samples, obtaining in all cases recoveries above 90 %. 100

4.6 Selenium

Contamination of Se has attracted worldwide attention, and the WHO has set a guideline at 40.0 μg/L for Se in drinking water. Moreover, Se(IV) and Se (VI) reveal more than 40 times higher toxicity than other forms of Se, and the acute toxicity of Se(IV) is nearly 10 times higher than Se(VI). 109 Metal-organic framework materials (MOFs) and MOFs-based composite materials have been extensively applied to adsorb heavy metals due to their high specific surface area and high porosity. Herein, the MOF-801 and its complex Fe3O4/MOF-801 were respectively prepared and employed as adsorbents to capture the Se (IV) in an aqueous solution. The experimental results showed that the maximum adsorption capacity of MOF-801 and Fe3O4/MOF-801 was 101.2 and 206.6 mg g−1 under acidic conditions, respectively 110 High-quality Al@Fe-MOF was prepared by in situ modification of Fe-MOF with Al3+ to improve the adsorption performance for selenite (Se (Ⅳ)). Compared with those of Fe-MOF, the specific surface area (SSA) and microporosity of Al@Fe-MOF decreased to 1,368 m2 g−1 and 38.5 %, respectively. the adsorption capacity and efficiency of Fe-MOF Compared with SSA for Se (Ⅳ) were increased by 77 % and 112 %, and the average free energy of adsorption was increased to 11.62  kJ/mol in Al@Fe-MOF. 109

4.7 Technetium

One extremely nuisance radionuclide is technetium-99 (99Tc), a significant portion of which exists in the form of pertechnetate, TcO4. The half-life of TcO4 is 2.13 × 105 years, which can be generated in a typical uranium fission reactor with a high fission yield (∼6 %), giving rise to a mass of stock in spent nuclear fuel and waste. Imidazolium-based ionic liquids (ILs) are a promising candidate for the efficient separation of radioactive pertechnetate (TcO4) from nuclear waste. The bisimidazolium-based ILs into porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) were incorporated via a combination of immersion grinding and in-situ polymerization. 3,3′-divinyl-1,1′(1,4-butanediyl) dimidazolium dichloride is tightly bound inside and outside the porous MOFs matrix by uniform immersion grinding, which facilitates the exposure of more adsorption sites and provides channels for the anions to travel through quickly. Solvent-free polymerization reduces environmental pollution and energy consumption. Notably, the composite P[C4(VIM)2]Cl2@MIL-101 possesses an admirable removal efficiency (673 mg g−1) compared with the pristine poly (ionic liquid)s (215 mg g−1). 111 Direct removal of TcO4 from the highly alkaline solution of nuclear fuel is a serious and challenging environmental issue. The efficient synthetic two-dimensional metal-organic framework, named Mn-MOF, is established using MnCl2·4H2O coordinating with neutral nitrogen-donor ligand, showing ultrahigh stability in alkaline aqueous even under 1 M NaOH. The Mn-MOF exhibits a high adsorption capacity (403 mg/g) and high selectivity to ReO4 even under the presence of excess competing ions. Inspired by the highly efficient adsorption ability for ReO4, the Mn-MOF was applied to remove the TcO4 from nuclear waste. 112

5 Conclusion and future perspectives

Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as highly promising materials for wastewater treatment applications due to their exceptional surface area, tunable porosity, and versatile chemical functionality. This review has highlighted the significant advancements in the synthesis and application of MOFs for the degradation and removal of various contaminants, including pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and industrial pollutants. By leveraging different activation methods such as peroxymonosulfate, peroxydisulfate, and persulfate, MOFs have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in breaking down complex pollutants into less harmful substances. The ability of MOFs to function as catalysts in advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) further underscores their potential in revolutionizing wastewater treatment technologies. That’s why we recommend the expansion of their usage and applications in pesticides removal and other contaminants in water due to the significant effect that these materials exhibited in wastewater treatment applications.


Corresponding authors: Doaa Zamel, CAS Key Laboratory of Urban Pollutant Conversion, Department of Environmental Engineering, Institute of Urban Environment, CAS, Xiamen 361021, China, E-mail: ; and Atta Ullah Khan, CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, No. 11 Zhongguancun Beiyitiao, Beijing 100190, China, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: All authors contributed equally in this manuscript writing.

  3. Competing interests: Authors declare no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: No fund received.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Musie, W.; Gonfa, G. Fresh Water Resource, Scarcity, Water Salinity Challenges and Possible Remedies: A Review. Heliyon 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18685.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Landrigan, P. J.; Fuller, R.; Fisher, S.; Suk, W. A.; Sly, P.; Chiles, T. C.; Bose-O’Reilly, S. Pollution and Children’s Health. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 650, 2389–2394; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.375.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Qian, J.; Gao, X.; Pan, B. Nanoconfinement-mediated Water Treatment: from Fundamental to Application. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (14), 8509–8526; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01065.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Ali, I.; Gupta, V. Advances in Water Treatment by Adsorption Technology. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1 (6), 2661–2667; https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.370.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. El-Baz, A. A. A.; Hendy, I. A.; Dohdoh, A. M.; Srour, M. Adsorption Technique for Pollutants Removal; Current New Trends and Future Challenges–A Review. The Egyptian Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2020, 32, 1–24; https://doi.org/10.21608/eijest.2020.45536.1015.Search in Google Scholar

6. Chai, W. S.; Cheun, J. Y.; Kumar, P. S.; Mubashir, M.; Majeed, Z.; Banat, F.; Ho, S. H.; Show, P. L. A Review on Conventional and Novel Materials towards Heavy Metal Adsorption in Wastewater Treatment Application. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 296, 126589; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126589.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kharissova, O. V.; Dias, H. R.; Kharisov, B. I. Magnetic Adsorbents Based on Micro-and Nano-Structured Materials. RSC Adv. 2015, 5 (9), 6695–6719; https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra11423j.Search in Google Scholar

8. Cai, G.; Yan, P.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, H. C.; Jiang, H. L. Metal–organic Framework-Based Hierarchically Porous Materials: Synthesis and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121 (20), 12278–12326; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00243.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Lin, Z.-J.; Lü, J.; Hong, M.; Cao, R. Metal–organic Frameworks Based on Flexible Ligands (FL-MOFs): Structures and Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43 (16), 5867–5895; https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60483g.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Liu, D.; Gu, W.; Zhou, L.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Lei, J. Recent Advances in MOF-Derived Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for Environmental Applications in Adsorption and Catalytic Degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 131503; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131503.Search in Google Scholar

11. Yaqoob, L.; Noor, T.; Iqbal, N.; Nasir, H.; Sohail, M.; Zaman, N.; Usman, M. Nanocomposites of Cobalt Benzene Tricarboxylic Acid MOF with rGO: an Efficient and Robust Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction (OER). Renew. Energy 2020, 156, 1040–1054; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.131.Search in Google Scholar

12. Khan, M. S.; Shahid, M. Synthesis of Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs): Routes to Various MOF Topologies, Morphologies, and Composites. In Electrochemical Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2022; pp 17–35.10.1016/B978-0-323-90784-2.00007-1Search in Google Scholar

13. Furukawa, H.; Cordova, K. E.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Science 2013, 341 (6149), 1230444; https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230444.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Lee, Y.-R.; Kim, J. Ahn. W.-S. Synthesis of Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Mini Review. Kor. J. Chem. Eng. 2013, 30, 1667–1680; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0140-6.Search in Google Scholar

15. Delhali, A.; Assen, A. H.; Mohammed, A.; Adil, K.; Belmabkhout, Y. Enabling Simultaneous Valorization of Tannery Effluent and Waste Plastic via Sustainable Preparation of Cr-BDC MOFs for Water Adsorption. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13 (1), 14653; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41840-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Shi, Y.; Yang, A.-F.; Cao, C.-S.; Zhao, B. Applications of MOFs: Recent Advances in Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Water. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 390, 50–75; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.03.012.Search in Google Scholar

17. Pettinari, C.; Marchetti, F.; Mosca, N.; Tosi, G.; Drozdov, A. Application of Metal− Organic Frameworks. Polym. Int. 2017, 66 (6), 731–744; https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5315.Search in Google Scholar

18. Abdollahi, N.; Moussavi, G.; Giannakis, S. A Review of Heavy Metals’ Removal from Aqueous Matrices by Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs): State-Of-The Art and Recent Advances. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10 (3), 107394; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107394.Search in Google Scholar

19. Roy, D.; Neogi, S.; De, S. Adsorptive Removal of Heavy Metals from Battery Industry Effluent Using MOF Incorporated Polymeric Beads: A Combined Experimental and Modeling Approach. J. Hazard Mater. 2021, 403, 123624; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123624.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Huang, L.; He, M.; Chen, B.; Hu, B. Magnetic Zr-MOFs Nanocomposites for Rapid Removal of Heavy Metal Ions and Dyes from Water. Chemosphere 2018, 199, 435–444; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Hu, S.-z.; Huang, T.; Zhang, N.; Lei, Y. z.; Wang, Y. Chitosan-assisted MOFs Dispersion via Covalent Bonding Interaction toward Highly Efficient Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 277, 118809; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118809.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Kobielska, P. A.; Howarth, A. J.; Farha, O. K.; Nayak, S. Metal–organic Frameworks for Heavy Metal Removal from Water. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 358, 92–107; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.12.010.Search in Google Scholar

23. Tokalıoğlu, Ş.; Yavuz, E.; Demir, S.; Patat, Ş. Zirconium-based Highly Porous Metal-Organic Framework (MOF-545) as an Efficient Adsorbent for Vortex Assisted-Solid Phase Extraction of Lead from Cereal, Beverage and Water Samples. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 707–715; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.06.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Shamim, M. A.; Zia, H.; Zeeshan, M.; Khan, M. Y.; Shahid, M. Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) as a Cutting-Edge Tool for the Selective Detection and Rapid Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water: Recent Progress. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10 (1), 106991; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106991.Search in Google Scholar

25. Chen, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhuang, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, G.; Lv, W. Selective Removal of Heavy Metals by Zr-Based MOFs in Wastewater: New Acid and Amino Functionalization Strategy. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 124, 268–280; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.10.010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Rani, L.; Kaushal, J.; Srivastav, A. L.; Mahajan, P. A Critical Review on Recent Developments in MOF Adsorbents for the Elimination of Toxic Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solutions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 44771–44796; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10738-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Ahmadijokani, F.; Tajahmadi, S.; Bahi, A.; Molavi, H.; Rezakazemi, M.; Ko, F.; Aminabhavi, T. M.; Arjmand, M. Ethylenediamine-functionalized Zr-Based MOF for Efficient Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water. Chemosphere 2021, 264, 128466; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128466.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Zhao, X.; Yu, X.; Wang, X.; Lai, S.; Sun, Y.; Yang, D. Recent Advances in Metal-Organic Frameworks for the Removal of Heavy Metal Oxoanions from Water. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 407, 127221; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127221.Search in Google Scholar

29. Tursi, A.; Beneduci, A.; Chidichimo, F.; De Vietro, N.; Chidichimo, G. Remediation of Hydrocarbons Polluted Water by Hydrophobic Functionalized Cellulose. Chemosphere 2018, 201, 530–539; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.044.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Qiao, M.; Bai, Y.; Cao, W.; Huo, Y.; Zhao, X.; Liu, D.; Li, Z. Impact of Secondary Effluent from Wastewater Treatment Plants on Urban Rivers: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Derivatives. Chemosphere 2018, 211, 185–191; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.167.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Şahin, T.; Dalğa, S.; Ölmez, M. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Their Importance in Animal Nutrition. In Animal Husbandry; IntechOpen: London, 2022.10.5772/intechopen.101816Search in Google Scholar

32. Pogorzelec, M.; Piekarska, K. Application of Semipermeable Membrane Devices for Long-Term Monitoring of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons at Various Stages of Drinking Water Treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631, 1431–1439; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Abdel-Shafy, H. I.; Mansour, M. S. A Review on Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Source, Environmental Impact, Effect on Human Health and Remediation. Egypt. J. Petrol. 2016, 25 (1), 107–123; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.03.011.Search in Google Scholar

34. Jaward, F. M.; Alegria, H. A.; Galindo Reyes, J. G.; Hoare, A. Levels of PAHs in the waters, sediments, and shrimps of Estero de Urias, an estuary in Mexico, and their toxicological effects. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/687034.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

35. Karyab, H.; Yunesian, M.; Nasseri, S.; Mahvi, A. H.; Ahmadkhaniha, R.; Rastkari, N.; Nabizadeh, R. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Drinking Water of Tehran, Iran. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2013, 11, 1–7; https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336x-11-25.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Adeniji, A. O.; Okoh, O. O.; Okoh, A. I. Analytical Methods for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Their Global Trend of Distribution in Water and Sediment: a Review. Recent Insights Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2018, 10.10.5772/intechopen.71163Search in Google Scholar

37. Mojiri, A.; Zhou, J. L.; Ohashi, A.; Ozaki, N.; Kindaichi, T. Comprehensive Review of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Water Sources, Their Effects and Treatments. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 696, 133971; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133971.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Anku, W. W.; Mamo, M. A.; Govender, P. P. Phenolic Compounds in Water: Sources, Reactivity, Toxicity and Treatment Methods. Phenolic Comp. Nat. Sources Importance Appl. 2017, 419–443.10.5772/66927Search in Google Scholar

39. Sharma, V.; Sharma, A. Nanotechnology: an Emerging Future Trend in Wastewater Treatment with its Innovative Products and Processes. Nanotechnology 2012, 1 (2), 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

40. Qi, Z.-P.; Yang, J.-M.; Kang, Y.-S.; Guo, F.; Sun, W. Y. Facile Water-Stability Evaluation of Metal–Organic Frameworks and the Property of Selective Removal of Dyes from Aqueous Solution. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45 (21), 8753–8759; https://doi.org/10.1039/c6dt00886k.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Du, F.; Qin, Q.; Deng, J.; Ruan, G.; Yang, X.; Li, L.; Li, J. Magnetic Metal–Organic Framework MIL‐100 (Fe) Microspheres for the Magnetic Solid‐phase Extraction of Trace Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons from Water Samples. J. Separ. Sci. 2016, 39 (12), 2356–2364; https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201600100.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Dias, E. M.; Petit, C. Towards the Use of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Water Reuse: a Review of the Recent Advances in the Field of Organic Pollutants Removal and Degradation and the Next Steps in the Field. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3 (45), 22484–22506; https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta05440k.Search in Google Scholar

43. Paredes, L.; Alfonsin, C.; Allegue, T.; Omil, F.; Carballa, M. Integrating Granular Activated Carbon in the Post-treatment of Membrane and Settler Effluents to Improve Organic Micropollutants Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 345, 79–86; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.120.Search in Google Scholar

44. Wang, S.; Peng, Y. Natural Zeolites as Effective Adsorbents in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156 (1), 11–24; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.10.029.Search in Google Scholar

45. Wei, X.-N.; Ou, C.-L.; Fang, S.-S.; Zheng, X. C.; Zheng, G. P.; Guan, X. X. One-pot Self-Assembly of 3D CdS-Graphene Aerogels with Superior Adsorption Capacity and Photocatalytic Activity for Water Purification. Powder Technol. 2019, 345, 213–222; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.01.012.Search in Google Scholar

46. Ramezanalizadeh, H.; Manteghi, F. Synthesis of a Novel MOF/CuWO4 Heterostructure for Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation and Removal of Water Pollutants. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 2655–2666; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.145.Search in Google Scholar

47. Chughtai, A. H.; Ahmad, N.; Younus, H. A.; Laypkov, A.; Verpoort, F. Metal–organic Frameworks: Versatile Heterogeneous Catalysts for Efficient Catalytic Organic Transformations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44 (19), 6804–6849; https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00395k.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Haritash, A.; Kaushik, C. Biodegradation Aspects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): a Review. J. Hazard Mater. 2009, 169 (1-3), 1–15; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.137.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Patel, A. B.; Shaikh, S.; Jain, K. R.; Desai, C.; Madamwar, D. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Sources, Toxicity, and Remediation Approaches. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 562813; https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.562813.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

50. Ukiwe, L. N.; Egereonu, U. U.; Njoku, P. C.; Nwoko, C. I. A.; Allinor, J. I. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Degradation Techniques. Int. J. Chem. 2013, 5 (4), 43–55; https://doi.org/10.5539/ijc.v5n4p43.Search in Google Scholar

51. Isobe, T.; Takada, H.; Kanai, M.; Tsutsumi, S.; Isobe, K. O.; Boonyatumanond, R.; Zakaria, M. P. Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Phenolic Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in South and Southeast Asian Mussels. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2007, 135, 423–440; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9661-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

52. DeChellis, D. M.; Ngule, C. M.; Genna, D. T. Removal of Hydrocarbon Contaminants from Water with Perfluorocarboxylated UiO-6 X Derivatives. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8 (12), 5848–5852; https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta11144a.Search in Google Scholar

53. Zango, Z. U.; Sambudi, N. S.; Jumbri, K.; Abu Bakar, N. H. H.; Abdullah, N. A. F.; Negim, E. S. M.; Saad, B. Experimental and Molecular Docking Model Studies for the Adsorption of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons onto UiO-66 (Zr) and NH2-UiO-66 (Zr) Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 220, 115608; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.115608.Search in Google Scholar

54. Zango, Z. U.; Ramli, A.; Jumbri, K.; Sambudi, N. S.; Isiyaka, H. A.; Abu Bakar, N. H. H.; Saad, B. Response Surface Methodology Optimization and Kinetics Study for Anthracene Adsorption onto MIL-88 (Fe) and NH2-MIL-88 (Fe) Metal-Organic Frameworks. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1092 (1), 012035.10.1088/1757-899X/1092/1/012035Search in Google Scholar

55. Okoro, H. K.; Tella, A. C.; Ajibola, O. A.; Zvinowanda, C.; C Ngila, J. Adsorptive Removal of Naphthalene and Anthracene from Aqueous Solution with Zinc and Copper-Terephthalate Metal-Organic Frameworks. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2019, 33 (2), 229–241; https://doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v33i2.4.Search in Google Scholar

56. Zango, Z. U.; Sambudi, N. S.; Jumbri, K.; Abu Bakar, N. H. H.; Saad, B. Removal of Pyrene from Aqueous Solution Using Fe-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 549 (1), 012061.10.1088/1755-1315/549/1/012061Search in Google Scholar

57. Amador, R. N.; Cirre, L.; Carboni, M.; Meyer, D. BTEX Removal from Aqueous Solution with Hydrophobic Zr Metal Organic Frameworks. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 214, 17–22; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.097.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

58. Giraldo, L.; Bastidas-Barranco, M.; Húmpola, P.; Moreno-Piraján, J. C. Design, Synthesis and Characterization of MOF-199 and ZIF-8: Applications in the Adsorption of Phenols Derivatives in Aqueous Solution. Eur. J. Chem. 2017, 8 (3), 293–304; https://doi.org/10.5155/eurjchem.8.3.293-304.1603.Search in Google Scholar

59. Ahmad, M.; Chen, S.; Ye, F.; Quan, X.; Afzal, S.; Yu, H.; Zhao, X. Efficient Photo-Fenton Activity in Mesoporous MIL-100 (Fe) Decorated with ZnO Nanosphere for Pollutants Degradation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 245, 428–438; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.057.Search in Google Scholar

60. Zhang, Y.; Ji, T.; Ma, S.; Wu, W. RETRACTED: MLL1 Promotes Migration and Invasion of Fibroblast-like Synoviocytes in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Activating the TRIF/NF-κB Signaling Pathway via H3K4me3 Enrichment in the TLR4 Promoter Region. Int. Immunopharm. 2020, 82, 106220; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106220.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Haldar, D.; Duarah, P.; Purkait, M. K. MOFs for the Treatment of Arsenic, Fluoride and Iron Contaminated Drinking Water: A Review. Chemosphere 2020, 251, 126388; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126388.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

62. Zakeritabar, S. F.; Jahanshahi, M.; Peyravi, M.; Akhtari, J. Photocatalytic Study of Nanocomposite Membrane Modified by CeF3 Catalyst for Pharmaceutical Wastewater Treatment. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2020, 18, 1151–1161; https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00534-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

63. Ahmad, S.; Abbasi, B. b. K.; Nazir, M. S.; Abdullah, M. A. Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) as Formidable Candidate for Pharmaceutical Wastewater Treatment. Inorg. Org. Compos. Water Wastewater Treat. 2022, 2, 37–63; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5928-7_2.Search in Google Scholar

64. Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Self-consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140 (4A), A1133; https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.140.a1133.Search in Google Scholar

65. Dong, R.; Zhang, Z.; Tranca, D. C.; Zhou, S.; Wang, M.; Adler, P.; Liao, Z.; Liu, F.; Sun, Y.; Shi, W.; Zschech, E.; Mannsfeld, S. C. B.; Felser, C.; Feng, X. A Coronene-Based Semiconducting Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Framework with Ferromagnetic Behavior. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 2637; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05141-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

66. Lin, S.; Zhao, Y.; Yun, Y.-S. Highly Effective Removal of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Pharmaceuticals from Water by Zr (IV)-based Metal–Organic Framework: Adsorption Performance and Mechanisms. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (33), 28076–28085; https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b08596.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

67. Bujňáková, Z.; Baláž, P.; Zorkovská, A.; Sayagués, M.; Kováč, J.; Timko, M. Arsenic Sorption by Nanocrystalline Magnetite: an Example of Environmentally Promising Interface with Geosphere. J. Hazard Mater. 2013, 262, 1204–1212; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

68. Dzhardimalieva, G. I.; Baimuratova, R. K.; Knerelman, E. I.; Davydova, G. I.; Kudaibergenov, S. E.; Kharissova, O. V.; Zhinzhilo, V. A.; Uflyand, I. E. Synthesis of Copper (II) Trimesinate Coordination Polymer and its Use as a Sorbent for Organic Dyes and a Precursor for Nanostructured Material. Polymers 2020, 12 (5), 1024; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12051024.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

69. Ge, J.; Guha, B.; Lippincott, L.; Cach, S.; Wei, J.; Su, T. L.; Meng, X. Challenges of Arsenic Removal from Municipal Wastewater by Coagulation with Ferric Chloride and Alum. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 725, 138351; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138351.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

70. Jin, E.; Lee, S.; Kang, E.; Kim, Y.; Choe, W. Metal-organic Frameworks as Advanced Adsorbents for Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 425, 213526; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213526.Search in Google Scholar

71. Zhao, X.; Zhao, H.; Dai, W.; Wei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhi, L.; Huang, H.; Gao, Z. A Metal-Organic Framework with Large 1-D Channels and Rich OH Sites for High-Efficiency Chloramphenicol Removal from Water. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 526, 28–34; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.04.095.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

72. Sun, S.; Yang, Z.; Cao, J.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, W. Copper-doped ZIF-8 with High Adsorption Performance for Removal of Tetracycline from Aqueous Solution. J. Solid State Chem. 2020, 285, 121219; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121219.Search in Google Scholar

73. Liang, C.; Zhang, X.; Feng, P.; Chai, H.; Huang, Y. ZIF-67 Derived Hollow Cobalt Sulfide as Superior Adsorbent for Effective Adsorption Removal of Ciprofloxacin Antibiotics. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 344, 95–104; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.064.Search in Google Scholar

74. Fang, S.-Y.; Zhang, P.; Gong, J.-L.; Tang, L.; Zeng, G. M.; Song, B.; Cao, W. C.; Li, J.; Ye, J. Construction of Highly Water-Stable Metal-Organic Framework UiO-66 Thin-Film Composite Membrane for Dyes and Antibiotics Separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 385, 123400; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123400.Search in Google Scholar

75. Zhuang, S.; Cheng, R.; Wang, J. Adsorption of Diclofenac from Aqueous Solution Using UiO-66-type Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 359, 354–362; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.150.Search in Google Scholar

76. Aghajanzadeh, M.; Zamani, M.; Molavi, H.; Khieri Manjili, H.; Danafar, H.; Shojaei, A. Preparation of Metal–Organic Frameworks UiO-66 for Adsorptive Removal of Methotrexate from Aqueous Solution. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2018, 28, 177–186; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-017-0709-3.Search in Google Scholar

77. Olawale, M. D.; Tella, A. C.; Obaleye, J. A.; Olatunji, J. S. Synthesis, Characterization and Crystal Structure of a Copper-Glutamate Metal Organic Framework (MOF) and its Adsorptive Removal of Ciprofloxacin Drug from Aqueous Solution. New J. Chem. 2020, 44 (10), 3961–3969; https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nj00515k.Search in Google Scholar

78. Wu, G.; Ma, J.; Li, S.; Guan, J.; Jiang, B.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, L. Magnetic Copper-Based Metal Organic Framework as an Effective and Recyclable Adsorbent for Removal of Two Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics from Aqueous Solutions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 528, 360–371; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

79. Naeimi, S.; Faghihian, H. Application of Novel Metal Organic Framework, MIL-53 (Fe) and its Magnetic Hybrid: for Removal of Pharmaceutical Pollutant, Doxycycline from Aqueous Solutions. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017, 53, 121–132; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2017.05.007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

80. Jun, B.-M.; Kim, S.; Heo, J.; Her, N.; Jang, M.; Park, C. M.; Yoon, Y. Enhanced Sonocatalytic Degradation of Carbamazepine and Salicylic Acid Using a Metal-Organic Framework. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 56, 174–182; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.04.019.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

81. Yu, K.; Ahmed, I.; Won, D.-I.; Lee, W. I.; Ahn, W. S. Highly Efficient Adsorptive Removal of Sulfamethoxazole from Aqueous Solutions by Porphyrinic MOF-525 and MOF-545. Chemosphere 2020, 250, 126133; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126133.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

82. Hasan, Z.; Jeon, J.; Jhung, S. H. Adsorptive Removal of Naproxen and Clofibric Acid from Water Using Metal-Organic Frameworks. J. Hazard Mater. 2012, 209, 151–157; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.01.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

83. Sharma, V. K.; Feng, M. Water Depollution Using Metal-Organic Frameworks-Catalyzed Advanced Oxidation Processes: A Review. J. Hazard Mater. 2019, 372, 3–16; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.043.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

84. Azhar, M. R.; Vijay, P.; Tadé, M. O.; Sun, H.; Wang, S. Submicron Sized Water-Stable Metal Organic Framework (Bio-MOF-11) for Catalytic Degradation of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products. Chemosphere 2018, 196, 105–114; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.164.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

85. El, A. R.; Baalbaki, A.; Abou Khalil, Z.; Naim, S.; Bejjani, A.; Ghauch, A. Iron-based Metal Organic Framework MIL-88-A for the Degradation of Naproxen in Water through Persulfate Activation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126701; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126701.Search in Google Scholar

86. Yin, R.; Chen, Y.; He, S.; Li, W.; Zeng, L.; Guo, W.; Zhu, M. In Situ Photoreduction of Structural Fe (III) in a Metal–Organic Framework for Peroxydisulfate Activation and Efficient Removal of Antibiotics in Real Wastewater. J. Hazard Mater. 2020, 388, 121996; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121996.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

87. Liang, R.; Luo, S.; Jing, F.; Shen, L.; Qin, N.; Wu, L. A Simple Strategy for Fabrication of Pd@ MIL-100 (Fe) Nanocomposite as a Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalyst for the Treatment of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs). Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 176, 240–248; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.009.Search in Google Scholar

88. Shan, Y.; Chen, L.; Pang, H.; Xu, Q. Metal–organic Framework‐based Hybrid Frameworks. Small Struct. 2021, 2 (2), 2000078; https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202000078.Search in Google Scholar

89. Luo, Z.; Chen, H.; Wu, S.; Yang, C.; Cheng, J. Enhanced Removal of Bisphenol A from Aqueous Solution by Aluminum-Based MOF/sodium Alginate-Chitosan Composite Beads. Chemosphere 2019, 237, 124493; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124493.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

90. Sarker, M.; Song, J. Y.; Jhung, S. H. Adsorptive Removal of Anti-inflammatory Drugs from Water Using Graphene Oxide/metal-Organic Framework Composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 335, 74–81; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.138.Search in Google Scholar

91. Zhao, R.; Ma, T.; Zhao, S.; Rong, H.; Tian, Y.; Zhu, G. Uniform and Stable Immobilization of Metal-Organic Frameworks into Chitosan Matrix for Enhanced Tetracycline Removal from Water. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122893; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122893.Search in Google Scholar

92. Chen, X.; Liu, X.; Xiao, S.; Xue, W.; Zhao, X.; Yang, Q. A β-ray Irradiation Resistant MOF-Based Trap for Efficient Capture of Th (IV) Ion. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2022, 297, 121517; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121517.Search in Google Scholar

93. Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, G.; Chen, C.; Chai, Z.; Alsaedi, A.; Hayat, T. Metal–organic Framework-Based Materials: Superior Adsorbents for the Capture of Toxic and Radioactive Metal Ions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47 (7), 2322–2356; https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00543a.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

94. Zhao, X.; Pei, L.; Zhang, Y.-N.; Huang, H.; Zheng, X.; Liu, B.; Tong, M. Effective and Irreversible Removal of Radioactive Barium Ions in MOF-808 Framework Functionalized Sulfonic Acid Groups. Green Chem. Eng. 2022, 3 (4), 405–412; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gce.2022.01.007.Search in Google Scholar

95. Chen, L.; Shen, N.; Chen, L.; Chen, L.; Wang, S. Water-stable Metal–Organic Framework–Based Nanomaterials for Removal of Heavy Metal Ions and Radionuclides. In Emerg. Nano. Rec. Tox. Rad. Met. Ions. Env. Med. 2022, 49–126.10.1016/B978-0-323-85484-9.00007-8Search in Google Scholar

96. Ezz El Arab, A.; Abbas, O. A.; Abdelrahman, M. T. Effect of Different Garlic Preparations on Testosterone, Thyroid Hormones, and Some Serum Trace Elements in Rats. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02756-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

97. Qiao, W.-Z.; Yang, G.-L.; Zhu, Z.-H.; Xu, H.; Zhao, B. Cooperation between Microporous Frameworks and Micron-Sized Channel in Crystals for Excellent Chromate Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132655; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132655.Search in Google Scholar

98. Boudias, M.; Gourgiotis, A.; Montavon, G.; Cazala, C.; Pichon, V.; Delaunay, N. 226Ra and 137Cs Determination by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry: State of the Art and Perspectives Including Sample Pretreatment and Separation Steps. J. Environ. Radioact. 2022, 244, 106812; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106812.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

99. Lv, Z.; Wang, H.; Chen, C.; Yang, S.; Chen, L.; Alsaedi, A.; Hayat, T. Enhanced Removal of Uranium (VI) from Aqueous Solution by a Novel Mg-MOF-74-Derived Porous MgO/carbon Adsorbent. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 537, A1–A10; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.11.062.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

100. del Rio, M.; Villar, M.; Quesada, S.; Turnes Palomino, G.; Ferrer, L.; Palomino Cabello, C. Silver-functionalized UiO-66 Metal-Organic Framework-Coated 3D Printed Device for the Removal of Radioactive Iodine from Wastewaters. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 24, 101130; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101130.Search in Google Scholar

101. Chen, L.; Feng, S.; Zhao, D.; Chen, S.; Li, F.; Chen, C. Efficient Sorption and Reduction of U (VI) on Zero-Valent Iron-Polyaniline-Graphene Aerogel Ternary Composite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 490, 197–206; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.11.050.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

102. Peng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wu, X.; Li, M.; Zhou, C.; Hua, Y. Synthesis of Core–Shell Magnetic Metal Organic Framework Composite for the Efficient Removal of Uranium (Vi). New J. Chem. 2022, 46 (16), 7503–7511; https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nj00132b.Search in Google Scholar

103. Carboni, M.; Abney, C. W.; Liu, S.; Lin, W. Highly Porous and Stable Metal–Organic Frameworks for Uranium Extraction. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4 (6), 2396–2402; https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sc50230a.Search in Google Scholar

104. Wang, Z.; Zhao, D.; Wu, C.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C. Magnetic Metal Organic Frameworks/graphene Oxide Adsorbent for the Removal of U(VI) from Aqueous Solution. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2020, 162, 109160; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109160.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

105. Elsaidi, S. K.; Mohamed, M. H.; Helal, A. S.; Galanek, M.; Pham, T.; Suepaul, S.; Space, B.; Hopkinson, D.; Thallapally, P. K.; Li, J. Radiation-resistant Metal-Organic Framework Enables Efficient Separation of Krypton Fission Gas from Spent Nuclear Fuel. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 3103; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16647-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

106. Alqadami, A. A.; Naushad, M.; Alothman, Z. A.; Ghfar, A. A. Novel Metal-Organic Framework (MOF) Based Composite Material for the Sequestration of U(VI) and Th(IV) Metal Ions from Aqueous Environment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (41), 36026–36037; https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b10768.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

107. Liu, P.; Yang, P.; Yang, J.; Gu, J. One-pot Synthesis of Sulfonic Acid Functionalized Zr-MOFs for Rapid and Specific Removal of Radioactive Ba 2+. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57 (47), 5822–5825; https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cc01740c.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

108. Miensah, E. D.; Gu, A.; Kokuloku, Jr L. T.; Chen, K.; Wang, P.; Gong, C.; Mao, P.; Chen, K.; Jiao, Y.; Yang, Y. Strategies for Radioiodine Capture by Metal Organic Frameworks and Their Derived Materials. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022, 341, 112041; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112041.Search in Google Scholar

109. Wu, H.; Chen, J.; Xu, L.; Guo, X.; Fang, P.; Du, K.; Shen, C.; Sheng, G. Decorating Nanoscale FeS onto Metal-Organic Framework for the Decontamination Performance and Mechanism of Cr (VI) and Se (IV). Colloids Surf.,A Physicochem. Eng. Aspect. 2021, 625, 126887; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126887.Search in Google Scholar

110. Li, K.; Zou, S.; Jin, G.; Yang, J.; Dou, M.; Qin, L.; Su, H.; Huang, F. Efficient Removal of Selenite in Aqueous Solution by MOF-801 and Fe3O4/MOF-801: Adsorptive Behavior and Mechanism Study. Separ. Purif. Technol. 2022, 296, 121384; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121384.Search in Google Scholar

111. Huang, M.; Lou, Z.; Zhao, W.; Lu, A.; Hao, X.; Wang, Y.; Feng, X.; Shan, W.; Xiong, Y. Immersion Grinding and In-Situ Polymerization Synthesis of Poly (Ionic Liquid) S Incorporation into MOF Composites as Radioactive TcO4-Scavenger. J. Hazard Mater. 2022, 422, 126871; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126871.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

112. Sun, L.; Yu, H.; Liu, Q.; Li, L.; Dong, H.; Adenutsi, C. D. Identifying the Key Driving Factors of Carbon Emissions in ‘Belt and Road Initiative’Countries. Sustainability 2022, 14 (15), 9104; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159104.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-06-07
Accepted: 2024-08-01
Published Online: 2024-10-25
Published in Print: 2025-06-26

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/revic-2024-0038/html
Scroll to top button