Home The influence of geology on the quality of groundwater for domestic use: a Kenyan review
Article Publicly Available

The influence of geology on the quality of groundwater for domestic use: a Kenyan review

  • Patrick Kirita Gevera ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Ednah Kwamboka Onyari
Published/Copyright: June 7, 2024

Abstract

Kenya’s population, akin to other Sub-Saharan countries, is rapidly growing. With the increasing unreliability of surface water, groundwater resources are becoming highly relied on for domestic and industrial use. Despite several known contaminants reported in different parts of the country, no study has attempted to correlate groundwater quality in the different geological provinces. This review critically synthesizes the influence of Kenya’s diverse geology on groundwater quality for human consumption. This was achieved through a review of published journal articles and other research material through research and government databases. Groundwater was categorised based on the major geological provinces including the Archaean volcanic Nyanzian Craton, the Proterozoic metamorphic Mozambique Mobile Belt (MMB) and volcanic Kisii Group, the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic sediments, and Tertiary volcanic Rift Valley. Groundwater quality in these regions showed a characteristic high concentration of fluoride (F) in volcanic aquifers of the Rift Valley and Nyazian Craton and metamorphic aquifers of the MMB, where mineral dissolution was the main process of F release. High salinity was common in metamorphic aquifers in the MMB and the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary aquifers where mineral dissolution and seawater intrusion were the common contributors to salinity. Other contaminants such as lead and iron were reported in localised areas in the sedimentary and metamorphic aquifers, respectively. Anthropogenic contaminants such as Escherichia coli (E. coli), NO3 , and NO2 were common in shallow groundwater resources in most informal settlements in urban areas. Due to the presence of health implications, of the highlighted contaminants, such as fluorosis, high blood pressure and diarrhoea (due to high F and salinity) in affected regions, this review highlights the need for an active water resource management program in any country relying on groundwater resources to determine the presence of all region-specific potentially harmful chemical elements and mitigation measures in all its water resources.

Introduction

Most Sub-Saharan African countries are experiencing high population growth, with the urban regions having a higher annual population growth rate (4 %) than the global value of 1.84 % projected to exceed 1.2 billion [1], [2], [3], [4]. This high population growth will tighten the constraints of the provision of resources such as safe domestic water and sanitation. Due to the intimate connection between us and our immediate environments for food and water sources, our health is directly dictated by it [5], 6]. There is evidence from environmental geochemistry and public health studies from different parts of the world reporting endemic health complications that result from nutritional and element toxicity or deficiency from groundwater [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].

Access to safe water is estimated to be 50 and 45 % in urban and rural regions in Kenya respectively [12], 13]. Kenya is a water-stressed country due to the annual water availability per capita being below the global value of 1,700 m3 [14]. Urban cities in Kenya such as Nairobi, Mombasa, Kisumu, and Nakuru have high population densities most of whom live in informal settlements with a limited supply of piped water and proper waste and sewage disposal systems. Similarly, population growth, increased demand for agricultural products, unplanned land developments, and climate change are putting constraints on water availability for domestic and agricultural use in both rural and urban communities in a country where 85 % of the land is arid to semi-arid (ASAL) which receives rainfall ranging between 250 and 750 mm [12], 15].

However, developing a reliable and sustainable groundwater supply is expensive leading most people in Kenya to rely on shallow, often unprotected, wells, rivers, and water pans for their domestic and agricultural use. Despite shallow wells being cheaper to develop and maintain [16], most of these wells built in informal urban settlements are not properly cased and have unprotected well heads. This brings several potential health challenges such as contamination of shallow groundwater through ingress of surface runoff [16], 17], pit latrines waste [12], 17], and pharmaceutical waste [18] in urban regions most of which have between 30 and 70 % low-income household [2], 12]. Additionally, geological contamination from aquifer chemistry, and farm effluent in rural regions. This is alarming because it takes a shorter time for surface contaminants to get onto shallow wells [16] compared to deep boreholes [17], therefore shallow wells in urban areas pose a greater health hazard to humans [16].

The country has a diverse geology which ranges from the Archaean Greenstone Belt in the western region of the country, the Neo-Preoterozoic Mozambique Mobile Belt in the eastern region, the Caenozoic sedimentary beds in the extreme eastern and southern region, as well as Tertiary volcanic rocks associated with the formation of the Rift Valley which spans in a north–south across the central region of the country [19]. These geological provinces have unique geochemical signatures that influence groundwater quality, which consequently influences the nutritional intake and health status of local populations in these regions [20], [21], [22].

The need to document groundwater quality was suggested as early as 2006 when the Kenya Ministry of Water and Irrigation [23] reported that only 15 % of 9,462 borehole data in Kenya had been stored in the database, creating the challenge of assessing groundwater quality by region or drainage basin. Poor water quality has been identified in the coastal, northeastern, western, and eastern regions due to mostly anthropogenic (poor salinity and animal dropping) and geogenic sources [23]. For example, dental and skeletal fluorosis are common across the East African Rift Valley including Kenya, as well as high salinity in drinking water from the eastern region of the country. Studies as early as 1950s identified high F in groundwater from Nairobi, North Eastern, and Rift Valley provinces and identified the problem as one of the main groundwater quality issues but solutions such as defluoridation face challenges of non-economical feasibility, especially in small rural communities [23], 24]. However, most of these studies do not correlate these health implications to the geochemistry of the different geological provinces in the country.

There is a need to characterise these geological provinces and determine and correlate their influence on groundwater quality and human nutritional requirements. The geological characteristics of rocks and groundwater will be reviewed to determine the nutritional characteristics of these different geological provinces. The significance of this review comes at a time when there is a need to establish the global geochemical baseline database for the betterment of human health. This review will also highlight the gaps and challenges present not only in Kenya but most countries globally in achieving this universal geochemical baseline and coming up with recommendations for achieving the same that can also be applied in other regions.

The criteria to select literature for this review included all academic books, journal papers, conference proceedings, Masters and PhD thesis, geological reports and government and non-government reports available in public domains. These materials had to cover research within the topics of ‘geology and hydrogeology of Kenya’, ‘groundwater quality and related health implications in Kenya’, and ‘drinking water challenges in Kenya’ which were the prompts used to search in databases such as Google scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science.

The influence of geology and hydrogeology on groundwater quality

The lithological and structural properties of a rock can influence groundwater quality due to the mineralogical composition of aquifer material and structures that act as conduits or barriers to groundwater movements [25], 26]. Different rock types have different mineral assemblages dictated by their chemical composition. As water slowly percolates underground into aquifers, the water–rock interactions enable the leaching of chemicals from aquifer materials into groundwater [27]. Depending on factors such as the chemical composition of the aquifer material, contact time, pH-Eh, and redox conditions [28], 29], [27], 30] that control leaching, groundwater can be enriched with elements that can potentially have health impacts on people who consume the groundwater.

The main process through which minerals are released into groundwater is through dissolution, hydration, oxidation, and hydrolysis [27]. These processes affect different aquifers based on their mineralogical composition. For example, feldspars react with water (through hydrolysis) to form clay minerals, as shown in Equation 1 below, and the continuous formation of the clay minerals increases the aquifer’s adsorption and desorption capacity [31]. The presence of high clay content in aquifers can build up the concentrations of elements to contamination levels through adsorption and desorption [31].

(1) 2 KAl Si 3 O 8 + 3 H 2 O Al 2 Si 2 O 5 OH 4 + 4 SiO 2 + 2 K + + 2 OH

K-Feldspar Water Kaolinite (clay) Quartz ions

Dissolution is the main process of limestone weathering caused by dissolving minerals such as calcite (CaCO2), gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O) and anhydrite (CaSO4) by an acidic surface or groundwater [32]. This can lead to groundwater with high concentrations of elements such as calcium, sulphates, and chlorides which can have health and organoleptic implications [30]. Organic matter in aquifers consumes oxygen (oxidation) leading to anoxic conditions under which the dissolution of minerals such as arsenic increases thus enriching them in groundwater [31]. Examples of such weathering are when aquifer materials with olivine, rich in iron, react with groundwater with carbonic acid, as shown in Equation 2 to release iron into groundwater [31] which can build up the concentrations to deleterious levels for human consumption.

(2) Fe 2 SiO 4 + 4 H 2 CO 3 2 Fe 2 + 4 HCO 3 + H 4 SiO 4

Olivine Carbonic acid Iron Bicarbonate silicic acid

Hydrological properties of an aquifer system not only control groundwater availability but also quality. Shallow aquifers are more susceptible to both anthropogenic sources such as infiltration of agrochemicals, leaking septic tanks, and landfills [33], [34], [35], and geogenic [35] contamination due to the ease of infiltration of surface runoff. Therefore, deep aquifers are considered to have clean and less contaminated water, while shallow ones are easily contaminated by sources. Seawater intrusion, a phenomenon of seawater mixing with freshwater due to a water table depression caused by over-abstraction, is a common problem in many coastal regions causing salinization of groundwater [36].

Distance to recharge zones can also influence the concentration of dissolved constituents in an aquifer. Recently infiltrated water in recharge zones has little dissolved chemicals due to the less water–rock interaction time. Several studies show the concentrations of chemicals increase along the groundwater flow path as mineral dissolution increases [37], [38], [39], [40]. Therefore, structures such as deep joints and faults that act as groundwater conduits enable groundwater to flow deep and for distances that can contribute to high dissolution of chemicals as seen in aquifers in the East African Rift Valley [40].

Fluoride is a good example of a groundwater contaminant, affecting about 200 million people globally [7], whose concentration is highly influenced by geological and hydrological controls. It is an essential element required for the growth and development of calcified tissues in the body at an optimum concentration of 0.5–1.5 mg/L, which is the WHO-recommended amount in drinking water [41]. However, at concentrations below or above the optimum limits, it can be detrimental to health causing dental caries and fluorosis.

Fluoride crystalises in late-forming minerals in igneous rocks and is also common in hydrothermal solutions [40]. High F concentrations are, therefore, found in localised regions with acidic igneous rocks and veins and their sedimentary and metamorphic derivatives [42]. Minerals with high F concentrations include apatite (Ca5(PO4)3F), biotite (K2(Mg,Fe)4(Fe,Al)2[Si6Al2O20](OH)2(F,Cl)2), fluorite (CaF2), while others such as olivines can have trace amounts of it.

Fluoride is released in groundwater during water–rock interactions through mineral solubility. Bicarbonate alkaline conditions in groundwater favour the precipitation of calcite reducing Ca concentration in water, which in turn increases the solubility of F from Ca-minerals such as fluorite shown in Equation 3 [43].

(3) CaF 2 + HCO 3 CaCO 3 + 2 F + H +

Fluoride dissolution is favoured by geo-hydrochemical conditions such as lower Ca concentrations in solution, high temperatures, and long-term groundwater residency [7], 42], 43]. Aquifers in alkaline volcanic regions such as the Rift Valley region, have a Na-HCO3 water type with low Ca in solution, and deep faults that allow deep seepage which favour the dissolution of F into groundwater [40], 42], 44].

Geology and hydrogeology of Kenya

The geology of Kenya can be grouped into five main geological successions: The Archaean which is composed of the Nyanzian and Kavirondian forming the Nyanzian Craton in the western region, the Proterozoic Mozambique Mobile Belt and Bukoban in the central and western regions, the Palaeozoic/Mesozoic sediments in the eastern and coastal region, and the Tertiary/Quarternary volcanics and sediments associated with the Rift Valley cutting the country in a north–south direction in the central region as shown in Figure 1 [19]. About 26 % of the country is covered by volcanic rocks associated with the formation of the Rift Valley, 17 % by Proterozoic metamorphic rocks of the Mozambique Belt, and 55 % by Palaeozoic–Caenozoic sedimentary rocks [19].

Figure 1: 
The geological map of Kenya. From https://ngdckenya.bgs.ac.uk/geology/.
Figure 1:

The geological map of Kenya. From https://ngdckenya.bgs.ac.uk/geology/.

The geology of Kenya highly influences the hydrologic properties of groundwater. The diverse characteristics of groundwater and aquifer systems in Kenya have been documented by several researchers including Kuria [45] (Figure 2) and Barasa et al. [46]. Lithology and structures highly influence aquifer geometry and storage capacity (transmissivity, recharge and discharge, and specific capacity) [45]. Aquifer systems have been categorised based on the lithological controls which include those in coastal sedimentary, the Mozambique Mobile Belt’s metamorphic, Rift Valley associated volcanic and volcano-sedimentary, Nyanzian Craton and Kisii igneous and sedimentary rocks. Groundwater resources form 14 % (619 million m3) of Kenya’s national water resources [12]. This important resource is vulnerable to both natural and anthropogenic pollution since 69 % of it is found in shallow aquifers [12] which are easily contaminated by human activities [13].

Figure 2: 
Groundwater distribution map of Kenya showing aquifer transmissivity. From Kuria (2013).
Figure 2:

Groundwater distribution map of Kenya showing aquifer transmissivity. From Kuria (2013).

Geology and hydrogeology of Kenya

Geology and hydrogeology of the Nyanzian Craton

The Archaean Nyanzian Craton, comprising of the Nyanzian and Kavirondian Systems are the oldest rocks in the country found in the western region and extend onto northern Tanzania and south–east Uganda forming part of the Tanzania Craton. The Nyanzian System is predominantly felsic volcanics and has less appearance of lavas and sediments (banded iron formations and chert) while the Kavirondian, which lies unconformably over the Nyazian is sedimentary dominant (rudites, arenites, and argillites) [19], 46], 47]. The dominant rocks in the region include granites, syenites, basalts, dacites, andesites, rhyolites, agglomerates and tuffs, chert, banded iron formations (Nyanzian) and conglomerates, greywackes and grits, and sandstones (Kavirodian) [19], 47]. Aquifers are located in Pleistocene sediments of sand and gravel and fractured and weathered layers of volcanics and borehole depths have a mean of 90 m and an average yield of 10 m3/h [13], 16].

Geology and hydrogeology of the Proterozoic Bukoban system (Kisii Series)

These rocks unconformably overly the Nyanzian System and cover the Kisii and Nyamira Counties in Western Kenya. The group is composed of andesitic basalts overlain by lapilli tuffs and lahar and sediments composed of siltites, conglomerates, chert, cinerite, and rhyolitic ignimbrite [19], 47]. There are no studies available on public domains characterising aquifer characteristics in the Kisii group.

Geology and hydrogeology of the Proterozoic Mozambique Mobile Belt

This region is found east of the Kenyan Rift Valley and covers most of the north–south of the central region of Kenya [19], 48]. Nyamai et al. [48] categorised the Kenyan Segment of the MMB into four segments which include the eastern segment, the southwestern segment, the northwestern, and northeastern according to where they appear in Kenya. These regions comprise various high-grade meta-sedimentary and meta-igneous rocks with a predominantly north–south structural trend covering the north-eastern to south-eastern region of Kenya and overlain by younger Tertiary volcanic rocks and recent sandy and loamy soils in some areas [49]. Dominant rocks include metasediments such as gneisses, schists, quartzites, migmatites, marble, granulites, and amphibolites as well as intrusives and meta-intrusives such as diorites, gabbros, and anorthosites [48].

Due to rock compactness and lack of primary porosity, aquifers in the metamorphic regions of Kenya have the least groundwater potential and are only localised in weathered and fractured zones within or in the boundaries of the rocks (secondary porosity) or in alluvial deposits along existing and old buried drainage channels [45], 50], 51]. Aquifer yield, static water level, and depth to water table vary within rock type, however, a general borehole yield of 4.5 m3/h and borehole depth of 55 m [45]. Due to the low productivity, low yield and seasonal boreholes, some of which dry up after some time, are common in regions such as Makueni, Machakos, and Taita-Taveta Counties [48], 51], 52].

Geology and hydrogeology of the Palaeozoic and Mesozoic sediments of northern and the coastal regions

These sediments are mostly found in the north-eastern and south-eastern regions of Kenya. They have been attributed to an intra-cratonic basin associated with the Gondwana land breakup during the Palaeozoic period [19]. Dominant sedimentary rocks include sandstones, grits, shales, limestones, conglomerates, and quartzites which are fluvio-deltaic and aeolian origin [19]. Shallow to deep marine environments in the Mesozoic favoured the deposition of limestones and shales.

Sedimentary aquifers make the largest aquifer system in the country by size, extending from the northeast region (Marsabit and Moyale) to the coastal region (Lamu) with an estimated maximum stretch of 740 km in length and 250 km in width [45]. In the northern region, the aquifer is relatively thin and shallow with reported thickness between 2 and 15 m and well depths of 6 m composed mainly of limestone overlaying sandy beds and silts and underlain by clay. Well yields are highly variable with most of the pump test producing a yield of 2 m3/h and a few 5 m3/h. Local direct recharge by rainfall feeds these aquifers which are drained by shallow wells by mostly pastoralists in the region.

The coastal region is covered by three major aquifers Msambweni, Tiwi and Sabaki which share a similar geology. These aquifers have a maximum stretch of about 80 km wide and reach up to a similar distance far inland from the coastline. The aquifer is composed mainly of sands intercalated with clays, coral, and limestone with a thickness range of 16–100 m and storativity of 20.1–92 Mm3 where most of them (above 65 % of the aquifer) are located above sea level (0–25 m asl) reducing the susceptibility of mixing with salt water [45], 53]. Groundwater heads from shallow wells and boreholes have been shown to vary between −3 and 30 m above sea level and increase inland from the sea level [53].

Geology and hydrogeology of tertiary volcanics and sediments of the Kenyan Rift Valley

The volcanic rocks are predominantly distributed along the Rift Valley region and the Kenyan highlands. The oldest of the rocks are found in the northern Kenya and South Nyanza regions and the youngest are towards the south. The rocks include basalts, trachytes, rhyolites, nephelinites, basanites, tuffs, basanites and ignimbrites [19]. In some areas of the Rift Valley, especially in toughs and volcanic succession bases, lacustrine and fluviatile Tertiary sediments are deposited.

The Rift Valley is a Caenozoic rift system onstage of separating the Somali subplate from the rest of the African plate. The rift runs in an N–S trend from Turkana in the North through to Magadi in the South and has varying volcanic and igneous suites with periodic lacustrine sedimentation in the lake basins on its floor. Aquifers are found in the fractured and weathered zone in rocks, lacustrine and other sediments intercalated between rocks while recharge is along the escarpments [19].

Several large aquifers in the rift include the Turkana aquifer in the northernmost part which extends for about 220 and 135 km in the N–S and E–W directions respectively and has a maximum transmissivity of 404 m2/day [45]. In the central rift, the Bogoria-Baringo aquifer stretches in a predominantly N–S trend of about 200 km and varies widely in the E–W direction with a transmissivity range of 100–1,600 m2/day [45]. Adjacent south, the Nakuru aquifer stretches around Lake Nakuru at about 100 km and stretches further south towards Lake Elementaita with a transmissivity range between 50 and 100 m2/day [45]. At the southern end of the Kenyan Rift Valley is the Magadi aquifer. the aquifer stretches from the south of Lake Naivasha in the north to the south of Lake Magadi in the south. The larger part of the aquifer has a width of about 80 km aquifer transmissivity ranges between 400 and 1,000 m2/day [45].

Groundwater quality and human health implications in Kenya

Several studies have been conducted in Kenya to determine the quality of different groundwater resources such as shallow wells, boreholes, and springs. The reported physico-chemical characteristics of these different groundwater resources were compiled in this review and grouped based on the geological provinces, as discussed above, where the study was conducted. The compilation is presented in Tables 14 and the chemical characteristics of the groundwater are discussed in this section.

Table 1:

Physico-chemical characteristics of borehole water and their WHO and KEBS recommended values based on the counties within the Nyanzian Craton.

Physico-chemical parameter Concentration range County Reference WHO/KEBS standards
Physical parameters

Ph 5.51–10.1 Kisumu Kanoti et al. [17], Nyilitya et al. [4]
Turbidity (N.T.U) 0–456 Kisumu Kanoti et al. [17] 5
Conductivity, µs/cm 143–3,525 Kisumu Kanoti et al. [17], Okotto-Okotto et al. [16], Nyilitya et al. [4] 2,500
Salinity, mg/L 0.01–63 Kisumu Kanoti et al. [17]
TDS, mg/L 66–950 Kisumu Kanoti et al. [17] 1,500/1,000

Cations, mg/L

Fe 0–4.3 Kisumu Kanoti et al. [17] 0.3
Mn 0–1 Kisumu Kanoti et al. [17]
Ca 1.11–74.7 Kisumu Nyilitya et al. [4], Kanoti et al. [17]
Mg 0.04–44 Kisumu Nyilitya et al. [4], Kanoti et al. [17] 100
Na 29.8–461 Kisumu Nyilitya et al. [4], Kanoti et al. [17]
K 1–67.9 Kisumu Nyilitya et al. [4], Kanoti et al. [17]

Anions, mg/L

Cl 0–225 Kisumu Okotto-Okotto et al. [16], Nyilitya et al. [4], Kanoti et al. [17] 250
F 0.2–10.9 Kisumu Nyilitya et al. [4], Kanoti et al. [17] 1.5
PO 0.4–17.5 Kisumu Okotto-Okotto et al. [16]
HCO3 56–622 Kisumu Kanoti et al. [17]
NO3 0.04–90.6 Kisumu Okotto-Okotto et al. [16], Nyilitya et al. [4], Kanoti et al. [17]
NO2 <0.04–3.2 Kisumu Nyilitya et al. [4]
SO4 0.9–212 Kisumu Okotto-Okotto et al. [16], Nyilitya et al. [4], Kanoti et al. [17]
Table 2:

Physico-chemical characteristics of borehole water and their WHO and KEBS recommended values based on the Counties within the metamorphic Mozambique Mobile Belt.

Physico-chemical parameter Concentration range County Reference WHO/KEBS standards
Physical parameters

Ph 6.94–8.53 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] N.E.
5.7–8.02 Kitui Muthangya and Samoei [65], Abila et al. [66]
7.1–7.92 Machakos Nzeve and Mbate [84]
6.4 Taita-Taveta Leiter et al. [61]
Colour, mgPt/L 5–100 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 15
Turbidity (N.T.U) 0.85–84 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 5
0.65–4.87 Machakos Nzeve and Mbate [84]
Conductivity, µs/cm 2,310–9,520 Makueni Ng’ang’a et al. [72], Gevera et al. [52] 2,500
184–3,700 Kitui Mwamati [60], Muthangya and Samoei [65], Abila et al. [66]
573.89–784.67 Machakos Nzeve and Mbate [84]
0.27–4.93 Taita-Taveta Leiter et al. [61]
Hardness, mgCaCO3/L 64–1,880 Makueni Ng’ang’a et al. [72], Mbithi [20], Gevera et al. [52] 500/300
Alkalinity, mgCaCO3/L 100–851 mg/L Makueni Mbithi [20], Gevera et al. [52] 500
Salinity, mg/L 336–4,424 Makueni Gevera et al. [52]
TDS, mg/L 64–6,025 Makueni Ng’ang’a et al. [72], Mailu [50], Gevera et al. [52] 1,500/1,000
114–2,637 Kitui Mwamati [60], Muthangya and Samoei [65]

Cations, mg/L

Fe 1.72–7.60 mg/L Makueni Ng’ang’a et al. [72], Gevera et al. [52] 0.3
0.01–1.63 mg/L Kitui Mwamati [60]
Mn 0.01–0.18 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 0.08/0.5
Ca 8–432 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 100/150
44.14–56.94 Machakos Nzeve and Mbate [84]
13.7–629 Taita-Taveta Leiter et al. [61]
Mg 7.78–199 Makueni Mbithi [20], Gevera et al. [52] 100/100
4.14–50.18 Kitui Muthangya and Samoei [65]
21.22–27.41 Machakos Nzeve and Mbate [84]
4.01–113 Taita-Taveta Leiter et al. [61]
Na 20–980 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 200
24.1–342 Taita-Taveta Leiter et al. [61]
K 1.7–6.5 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 50/–
20.2–24.7 Taita-Taveta Leiter et al. [61]
5.01–6.31 Machakos Nzeve and Mbate [84]
Cr 0.00–2.43 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 50
Co 0.00–0.54 Makueni Gevera et al. [52]
Ni 0.15–11.27 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 70/–
Cu 0.74–13.22 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 2,000/100
Zn 0.31–426 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 3,000/5,000
As 0.02–2.78 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 10
Se 0.36–14 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 10/10
Cd 0.01–0.27 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 3/5
Pb 0.05–0.23 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 50/10

Anions, mg/L

Cl 6–960 Makueni Mbithi [20], Gevera et al. [52] 250
92.89–174.67 Machakos Nzeve and Mbate [84]
9.92–127.74 Kitui Abila et al. [66]
27–969 Taita-Taveta Leiter et al. [61]
F 0.6–8.20 Makueni Ng’ang’a et al. [72], Mailu [50], Mbithi [20], Gevera et al. [52] 1.5
0.21–9.30 Machakos James [83], Nzeve and Mbate [84]
0.30–2.47 Kitui Mwamati [60]
0.28–1.24 Taita-Taveta Leiter et al. [61]
HCO3 122–734 Makueni Gevera et al. [52]
NO3 0.2–43 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 50/–
0.03–0.67 Kitui Abila et al. [66]
0.67–1.05 Taita-Taveta Leiter et al. [61]
NO2 0.01–0.04 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 3/3
SO4 14–1,580 Makueni Gevera et al. [52] 450/400
0–53.27 Kitui Abila et al. [66]
4.24–16.94 Machakos Nzeve and Mbate [84]
34.7–1,299 Taita-Taveta Leiter et al. [61]
Table 3:

Physico-chemical characteristics of borehole water and their WHO and KEBS recommended values based on the counties within the volcanic rocks associated with the Rift Valley.

Physico-chemical parameter Concentration range County Reference WHO/KEBS standards
Physical parameters

Ph 5.8–9.5 Nakuru Mwiathi et al. [21], Gevera and Mouri [40]
7–8.63 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77], Mbugua et al. [78]
5.06–8.01 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
Turbidity (N.T.U) 0.09–1.83 Turkana Mbugua et al. [78] 5
3.63–14.03 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
Conductivity, µs/cm 0.24–25.3 Nakuru Mwiathi et al. [21] 2,500
495–3,960 Turkana Mbugua et al. [78]
0.28–47 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77]
497.04–718.24 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
Hardness, mgCaCO3/L 4.1–300 Nakuru Gevera and Mouri [40] 500/300
66.48–197.72 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
Alkalinity, mgCaCO3/L 121.18–203.16 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82] 500
TDS, mg/L 122–7,800 Nakuru Mwiathi et al. [21], Gevera and Mouri [40] 1,500/1,000
306.9–2,455.2 Turkana Mbugua et al. [78]
308.16–457.3 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]

Cations, mg/L

Fe 0.19–0.58 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82] 0.3
Mn 0.05–0.5 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
Ca 0.8–1,808 Nakuru Mwiathi et al. [21], Gevera and Mouri [40]
0.8–656 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77], Mbugua et al. [78]
17.78–37.93 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
Mg 0–613 Nakuru Mwiathi et al. [21], Gevera and Mouri [40] 100
2–880 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77], Mbugua et al. [78]
5.41–31.25 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
Na 13–995 Nakuru Gevera and Mouri [40]
4.77–8,264 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77]
68.08–79.08 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
K 0.79–82.4 Nakuru Mwiathi et al. [21], Gevera and Mouri [40]
0.2–362 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77], Mbugua et al. [78]
13.04–15.54 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
Zn 0.06–2.27 Turkana Mbugua et al. [78]
Pb 0.8–2.64 Turkana Mbugua et al. [78]

Anions, mg/L

Cl 0.05–8,400 Nakuru Mwiathi et al. [21], Gevera and Mouri [40] 250
5–15,670 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77], Mbugua et al. [78]
15.2–55.54 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
F 0.29–10.5 Nairobi Coetsiers et al. [81] 1.5
1.10–2.27 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
0.01–75 Nakuru Moturi et al. [76], Olaka et al. [42], Mwiathi et al. [21], Gevera and Mouri [40]
0.15–5.87 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77], Mbugua et al. [78]
0.8–15 mg/L Kajiado Induswe et al. [79]
HCO3 100–4,170 Nakuru Mwiathi et al. [21], Gevera and Mouri [40]
97.6–11,468 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77]
NO3 0–606 Nakuru Mwiathi et al. [21], Gevera and Mouri [40]
0–371.85 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77], Mbugua et al. [78]
2.37–12.87 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
NO2 0–0.88 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77]
SO4 0.1–2,710 Nakuru Mwiathi et al. [21], Gevera and Mouri [40]
0.3–982.86 Turkana Rusiniak et al. [77], Mbugua et al. [78]
3.28–18.39 Kiambu Olonga et al. [82]
Table 4:

Physico-chemical characteristics of borehole water and their WHO and KEBS recommended values based on the Counties within the sedimentary rocks of the coastal and northern Kenyan.

Physico-chemical parameter Concentration range County Reference WHO/KEBS standards
Physical parameters

Ph 7.13–7.82 Mombasa Temitope [53] 7.5–8.5
5.8–10.4 Kwale Chege et al. [86], Wanjala et al. [87]
Turbidity (N.T.U) 0.5–4.2 Kwale Wanjala et al. [87] 5
Conductivity, µs/cm 993–10,585 Mombasa Temitope [53] 2,500
85.3–6,060 Kwale Chege et al. [86], Wanjala et al. [87]
600–19,568 Kilifi Makhoha [85]
Hardness, mgCaCO3/L 0–560 Kwale Wanjala et al. [87] 500/300
Alkalinity, mgCaCO3/L 80–630 Kwale Wanjala et al. [87] 500
Salinity, mg/L 982–10,569 Mombasa Temitope [53]
TDS, mg/L 438–5,281 Mombasa Temitope [53] 1,500/1,000
90–907 Kwale Wanjala et al. [87]

Cations, mg/L

Ca 6.93–32.95 Mombasa Temitope [53]
0–162.81 Kwale Wanjala et al. [87]
Mg 0.83–13.30 Mombasa Temitope [53] 100
0–48.8 Kwale Wanjala et al. [87]
Na 65.69–735.55 Mombasa Temitope [53]
Pb B.D.L–1.397 Kwale Chege et al. [86] 0.01

Anions, mg/L

Cl 140.30–379.60 Mombasa Temitope [53] 250
30–1,635 Kwale Wanjala et al. [87]
HCO3 87.84–173.24 Mombasa Temitope [53]

Drinking water quality in the Nyanzian Craton

The physicochemical characteristics of drinking water sources in the Nyanzian Craton are presented in Table 1. F concentrations in Kisumu County ranged between 0.3 and 11 mg/L with an average of 4.1 mg/L, where 50–81 % of boreholes and 30 % of shallow wells had higher values than the WHO recommended values [4], 17].

Groundwater facies characterising using Gibbs plot in the Kisumu region showed highly mineralised saline waters (Na+–Cl type) in the Awasi town [4], indicating high salinity in drinking water. In addition to the discussed geogenic groundwater quality issues, industrial contamination of surface water has been reported, where raw industrial effluent and municipal and agricultural wastewater have been reported to cause the death of aquatic life in Lake Victoria [15].

Only half of the population of Kisumu City has a piped water supply and even less (8 %) have proper sewerage [13]. Shallow groundwater abstraction in informal settlements in Kisumu City puts the local population at health risk due to the mixing of shallow groundwater with faecal matter from pit latrines, soak pits and septic tanks [2], 13]. Despite deeper boreholes showing safer drinking water in the area, this route to safe drinking water isn’t explored as these deep boreholes are not functional [2]. A comparative study on nitrate concentrations in shallow and deep wells (less than 10 m and more than 15 m, respectively) in Kano plan and Kisumu City showed higher NO3 (ranging between <0.04–90.6 mg/L) and NO2 (ranging between <0.04–3.2 mg/L) values than the WHO recommended values of 50 mg/L and 0.2 mg/L, respectively, in 63–75 % of boreholes and shallow wells in the region [4]. The study showed water sources (especially shallow wells) in highly populated sums to have higher NO3 values than less populated regions of the area while farm manure and fertilizer were associated with the elevated NO3 in deep boreholes in some parts of Kano and planned estates in Kisumu. Additionally [17], reported Thermal Tolerant Coliform (TTC) higher than the WHO recommended value (0 TTC/100 mL) in 95 % (n=22) of shallow groundwater sources in Kisumu City indicating contamination of shallow groundwater by faecal coliform.

Turbidity values in the Kisumu area range between 0 and 456 NTU [17] and these values higher than the recommended limit are noticed in boreholes, shallow wells and springs, with higher values noticed during the rainy season. The high turbidity was associated with geogenic sources including suspended soil and dissolved iron from laterites, as well as anthropogenic activities such as farming fields [17].

Drinking water quality in the Kisii Group volcanic and sedimentary aquifers

There are no groundwater geochemistry studies from the Kisii volcanic and sedimentary group region. However, several studies have highlighted the influence anthropogenic effects of water in the area and are highlighted here. In Kisii town, 95 % (n=41) of analysed spring water and 100 % (n=34) of shallow wells had faecal coliform which was attributed to contamination from pit latrines and septic tanks [54]. The contamination was also attributed to the high presence (50 %) of unprotected wells, which were categorised as high to very high risk of the frequency of sanitary hazards [54]. In the Manga region of Nyamira county, the water quality index showed good to excellent status (21.32–29.66) in the water, from three springs, which was deemed fit for domestic, industrial and agricultural use [55]. Other anthropogenic activities in Nyamira County such as sand harvesting along rivers, household wastewater and raw sewage disposal into the rivers as well as agricultural activities in Masaba North sub-county made the water turbid, murky and polluted rendering it undesirable and unhealthy to the local population [56].

Drinking water quality in the metamorphic Mozambique Mobile Belt

Most of the groundwater quality studies in the MMB are conducted in the eastern segment of the metamorphic rocks between Machakos, Makueni, and Kitui Counties with a Ca-Mg-HCO3 water type [48]. There are several groundwater quality issues reported in areas covered by these metamorphic rocks such as F, salinity, and iron.

Varying F concentrations have between reported in shallow wells and boreholes (0.3–8.2 mg/L) and a spring in Makueni, Machakos, and Kitui Counties [20], [50], [51], [52] as shown in Table 2. Concentrations higher than the WHO [57] and KEBS [58] recommended value of 1.5 mg/L in drinking water account for up to 50 % of analysed boreholes in these areas [52]. The high F concentrations in groundwater in these regions were reported as early as the 1980s [24], however, early studies, such as that of JICA [59], have been observed to categorise water sources with F higher than the recommended value of 1.5 mg/L as safe for human consumption, indicating that locals were allowed to use high F drinking water which caused health implications especially in Counties like Kitui County with groundwater dependence is as high as 90 % [60]. However, despite the limited number of studies, the metamorphic aquifers further south in Taita-Taveta have reportedly acceptable F concentrations of 0.28–1.24 mg/L [61].

The high F in groundwater in these metamorphic regions is reflected in its high values in food crops grown in the area. These include 288–700 mg/kg in vegetables (kale and cowpeas leaves) and 29–71.2 mg/kg in maize and legumes (cowpeas and green grams) [22].

Salinity is the concentration of inorganic salts, mostly Na, Ca, Mg, K, Cl, SO4 , and HCO3 , in water, and can be expressed as the concentration of these parameters, their sum (cation + anion) or represented by physical parameters such as electrical conductance (due to dissolved salts), TDS, hardness, and alkalinity [11], 62], 63]. High salinity is a common issue in groundwater in crystalline basement aquifers [46]. In eastern Kenya, groundwater in metamorphic aquifers has been reported to have saline water of varying composition. In Makueni, Kitui and Machakos Counties, salinity and conductivity values ranging between 336 and 4,424 mg/L and 184–9,520 μS/cm, respectively were reported (as shown in Table 1), where, 50–100 % of the water sources have either higher conductivity and TDS than recommended values or poor-unacceptable salinity values [52], [64], [65], [66]. The other salinity-indicator parameters are also presented in Table 2. In Taita-Taveta, groundwater SO4 was reported as high as 1,299 mg/L in the Kasigau area [61] which is higher than the recommended value of 450 indicating high saline groundwater.

High salinity in crystalline aquifers found in arid to semi-arid regions such as eastern Kenya is contributed by the hot and dry weather causing evaporative concentration of salts in soils and shallow water, as well as long-term rock-water interaction causing mineral dissolution in deep aquifers [52], 67]. The high salinity in these regions has been linked to undesirable taste and gastrointestinal complications, which has resulted in the abandonment of some boreholes [52]. Other health implications such as high blood pressure, diarrhoea, and skin diseases have been shown to result from drinking high saline water [63], [68], [69], [70] need to be investigated in these high saline regions of Kenya. The lack of such research is evident by a report which showed that a significant number (61 %) of Kenyans living in rural regions have not been screened for high blood pressure [71]. In addition, research is needed to map groundwater salinity distribution in other regions known with salinity issues such as Taita-Taveta and parts of Nairobi and north-eastern Counties that draw water from metamorphic aquifers.

In the south-eastern Kenya region, iron concentrations ranging between 0.01 and 7.6 mg/L were reported in Makueni and Kitui Counties [51], 52], 60], 72] as shown in Table 1. this shows that some groundwater sources in the region have iron concentrations higher than the WHO and KEBS [57], 58] recommended value of 2 mg/L for drinking water. The only health implication reported from high Fe in drinking water was a ‘metallic’ undesirable taste of drinking water reported in Kitui County [60]. However, stains in clothes washed with high Fe water were also reported in Makueni County [51], 72]. There is a need for more studies on the health implications of high Fe drinking water use in the other regions covered by these metamorphic rocks, as high concentration in drinking water has been linked to cases of gastrointestinal upset, suppressed zinc and calcium absorption and constipation [73].

There is only one study [52] that reports the concentrations of potentially harmful trace metals (such as Cr, Co, Ni, As, Se, Cd and Pb) in groundwater in the metamorphic regions of Kenya. The study reported the values of these metals to be below the recommended values in drinking water in Makueni County. There are, therefore, more studies needed to know the concentrations of these metals in other areas of the metamorphic region due to their potential deleterious health effects even at very low concentrations [57]. Besides physicochemical parameters, bacterial contaminants such as E. coli have been identified in shallow wells dug close to pit latrines and septic tanks (as close as 5–7 m) in Kitui town [66], as well as in piped water from streams and springs in Kasigau hills of Taita-Taveta [61].

Drinking water quality in the volcanic rocks associated with the Rift Valley

The physicochemical characteristics of drinking water sources in the aquifers associated with the Rift Valley are presented in Table 3. The Kenyan Rift Valley, with a Na-HCO3 water-type, has been identified as a high-F province for quite some time [21], 24], 40], [74], [75], [76] both in surface and groundwater. In groundwater, F values ranging between 0.15 and 5.87 mg/L [77], 78] have been reported in the northern section of the Rift Valley around Turkana. The high F in the Turkana area was associated with the dissolution of the high-F minerals [77]. In the central region covering the Baringo-Naivasha area, F concentrations ranging between 0.01 and 75 mg/L have been reported both in shallow wells as well as boreholes [21], 40], 42], 76]. In the southern section covering Kajiado County, F concentrations between 0.8 and 15 mg/L have been reported in groundwater sources [79]. F concentrations in all the Kenyan Rift Valley lakes range between 2 and 140 mg/L [42], 80].

Since the volcanic rocks of the Rift Valley extend beyond the area, high F concentrations have been reported in groundwaters beyond the rift; such as 0.29–10.5 mg/L in Nairobi [81], 1.10–2.27 mg/L in Kiambu [82], and 0.21–9.30 mg/L in Machakos [83], 84].

Other potential groundwater contaminants reported in the Kenyan Rift Valley include heavy metals including Pb (0.8–2.64 mg/L), Zn (0.06–2.27 mg/L) and Mg (0–613 mg/L) as well as salts including Cl (5–15,670 mg/L), NO3 (0–371.85 mg/L) and SO4 (0.3–982.86 mg/L) which exceeded their recommended values in drinking water as shown in Table 2 [77], 78]. In Turkana, these high values of metals and salts were associated with oil drilling and hydraulic fracturing which contaminate nearby groundwater [78].

Drinking water quality in the sedimentary rocks of the coastal and northern Kenyan

Like other global coastal regions, groundwater contamination in the Kenyan coast is mainly associated with the vulnerability to seawater intrusion as well as aquifer mineral dissolution. Additionally, due to the rapid population growth in the Kenyan coastal region due to its industrialization, anthropogenic input to groundwater contamination cannot be ignored. In the northern drier parts of the coastal region, up to 50 % of the population relies on groundwater resources [85] and therefore monitoring its quality is important in the region.

The physicochemical characteristics of drinking water sources in the sedimentary aquifers of Kenya are presented in Table 4. Shallow groundwater (static water level of up to 8 m in some areas) makes aquifers on the Kenyan coast susceptible to surface contamination [53]. In the Mombasa area, the average concentrations of EC (993–10,585 mg/L) and TDS (438–5,281 mg/L) in boreholes (n=15) were higher than the WHO-recommended values (750 and 500 mg/L respectively) in 94 % of the sampled water sources by [53]. However, these values were slightly lower in Kwale County, south of Mombasa (EC=85.3–6,060 mg/L, TDS=90–907) [86], 87]. Sodium concentrations (average 254 g/L) in Mombasa were higher than the WHO-recommended value of 200 mg/L in 50 % of the samples [53]. Chloride concentrations (average of 161 mg/L) in Mombasa exceeded the WHO recommended value of 200 mg/L in 75 % of the water sources during the dry season where the maximum value of 369 mg/L was recorded. High Cl values (range between 30 and 1,635 mg/L) are also seen in Kwale County where 43 % (n=14) of the boreholes exceeded the recommended values [87]. The high EC, TDS Na and Cl concentrations in the groundwater indicate a salinity issue in the area, especially during the dry seasons. Temitope [53] reported a moderate vulnerability of the Mombasa aquifer to seawater intrusion.

This phenomenon is also observed in Kilifi County, located in the northern part of the Kenyan coast. Seawater intrusion has been reported in some areas which has led to the abandonment of some wells due to increased salinity of water over time [85]. Groundwater in the county was characterised by salinity which increased with depth and time, and cases of ‘iron taste’ from a borehole in Kituu [85], 88]. Higher EC values than recommended values were reported in 75 % (n=20) of both shallow wells and boreholes in Kilifi County by Makokha [85]. The study associated salt mining in the northern part of the county (Magarini) with the significantly high EC in groundwater in the area. Similarly, the study reported high TDS values, especially during the dry seasons, Cl and salinity in boreholes closer to the ocean and slightly hard to hard water. Most of the water sources had an E. coli count of more than 100 cfu/100 mL which is higher than the recommended value of 0 cfu/100 mL as was attributed to the disposal of untreated solid and liquid waste in the region [85].

Other potential contaminants reported in the Kenyan coastal region include lead in groundwater in Kwale County whose values ranged below the detection limit to 1.397 mg/L (mean value of 0.33 mg/L) where 62 % (n=37) of the sampled boreholes were above the WHO-recommended value of 0.01 mg/L [86].

Discussion

The Nyanzian Craton

The geology of the Nyanzian Craton is composed of the oldest rocks in the country comprising both igneous and sedimentary rocks. The aquifers in the area are predominantly in the Pleistocene sediments (sand and gravel) and fractured and weathered volcanics with borehole depths of around 90 m. Shallow groundwater (less than 10 m) in Kisumu City, especially in highly populated settlements, and near farms in Kano Plain was associated with high NO3 (<0.04–90.6 mg/)and NO2 (<0.04–3.2 mg/L) which were higher than the WHO-recommended values, which was attributed to mixing of groundwater with sewage from put latrines, soak pits and septic tanks (in Kisumu) and farm manure and fertilizer in Kano Plain. The presence of high concentrations of Thermal Tolerant Coliform (TTC) in shallow waters in Kisumu indicates the presence of faecal coliform in the water. Deeper boreholes (>15 m) did not indicate sewerage or farm effluent contamination. High turbidity (up to 456 NTU) in both shallow and deep wells in Kisumu was associated with the dissolution of iron from laterites as well as farming effluent. High F (0.3–11 mg/L) was also reported in both boreholes and shallow wells in the Kisumu area. Highly mineralized saline water (Na+-Cl type), and conductivity (143–3,525 μs/cm), were also reported in Kisumu County [4], [13] which might affect drinking water palatability in the area.

From the geology of the area, high F can be associated with the presence of igneous rocks such as granites, basalts, and rhyolites, which have been shown to have high F concentrations in the Kenyan Rift Valley [42]. High turbidity can be attributed to high iron in the banded iron formations found in the area [19], 47]. Anthropogenic contamination is seen in the area by the presence of NO3 and NO2 in shallow wells in both urban settlement and farming areas indicating sewerage and farming effluent contamination. There is a need for a health study to determine the prevalence of health effects of high F, NO3 , and NO2 , faecal matter reported in the area. Additionally, there is a lack of information on the concentration of potentially harmful trace metals such as Cr, Cu, As, Se, and Cd in the Nyazian Shield.

The Kisii Group

In the Kisii Group comprise basalts and tuffs as well as conglomerates, chert, and rhyolitic ignimbrites. However, there are no studies in the public domain reporting on aquifer characteristics in the Kisii and Nyamira Counties where these rocks cover. Shallow wells in Kisii town were categorized as high-risk health hazards due to the presence of faecal coliform contamination from pit latrines and septic tanks [54]. In Nyamira County, spring water showed a good-excellent water quality index [55], However, human activities including sand harvesting and disposal of untreated wastewater have been reported to pollute rivers in the County [56]. There is a lack of studies on groundwater quality analysing all the chemical elements in the Kisii Group that can potentially come from geogenic sources, which is wanted in the area. Additionally, the health effects of the faecal coliform contamination reported in shallow groundwater need to be established in the area.

The Mozambique Mobile Belt

The Mozambique Mobile Belt is dominated by various meta-sediments and meta-igneous rocks, such as gneisses, schists, and migmatites, and covers the north–south of the central region of Kenya [19], 48]. Aquifers are located in fractured, weathered and contact zones of these rocks with average borehole depths of 55 m [45]. Groundwater quality in the eastern segment of the belt has been extensively studied.

Among the commonly reported contaminants, F concentrations above recommended values have been reported in Makueni (0.6–8.2 mg/L), Kitui (0.30–2.47 mg/L), Machakos (0.21–9.3), while Taita Taveta County has concentrations within recommended limits (0.28–1.24 mg/L) as shown in Table 3. Fluoride concentrations range between 0 and 3.47 mg/kg in farm soils in Makueni County and were associated with the leaching of apatite, muscovite and biotite metamorphic rocks in the area [22]. Cases of dental fluorosis have been reported in Makueni and Machakos Counties indicating the health implications of the high F in the region [83], 89]. There is a need to establish a F hazard map in aquifers of the Mozambique Belt as well as a F-related disease prevalence map to determine the most affected regions where defluoridation programs can be encouraged.

High salinity (336–4,424 mg/L) has been reported being a common issue in the Makueni, Machakos, Taita-Taveta and Kitui Counties (Table 3). This has been known to be a common issue in most basement aquifers due to the dissolution of the crystalline rocks [46]. The high salinity has caused undesirable water taste and gastrointestinal complications causing some boreholes to be abandoned [52]. There is, however, a need for further studies in the region on health implications such as high blood pressure, diarrhoea, and skin diseases that have been shown to result from drinking high-saline water [63], [68], [69], [70]. Desalination programs are also recommended in most public water systems in the region.

High iron concentrations (0.01–7.6 mg/L) than recommended values (Table 3) were reported in Makueni and Kitui Counties which caused a ‘metallic’ taste in drinking water [60]. The high iron can be attributed to the metamorphic rocks in the area. There is a need for further studies on the health effects of high iron in drinking water in the area. Potentially harmful trace metal concentrations (such as Cr, Co, Ni, As, Se, Cd and Pb) were lower than recommended values in Makueni County [52].

Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary regions of Kenya

These are sedimentary rocks including sandstones, grits, shales and limestones found in the north–eastern and south–eastern regions of Kenya. Aquifers in these regions are the largest in Kenya [45] and occur in sands, corals and limestones. Concentrations of Sodium (average 254 g/L), chloride (average of 161 mg/L), EC (993–10,585 mg/L) and TDS (438–5,281 mg/L) higher than the recommended values in drinking water were reported in Mombasa, Kilifi and Kwale indicating high salinity in groundwater in the three counties, which had led to the abandonment of some wells in Kilifi County [85]. The high salinity in the coastal aquifers was linked to seawater intrusion and salt mining activities in Kilifi County [85]. Lead concentrations (up to 1.4 mg/L) above recommended limits were reported in groundwater in Kwale County but there was no indication whether the source was geogenic or anthropogenic. The presence of E. coli counts higher than recommended values in drinking water was reported in Kilifi County indicating anthropogenic contamination of shallow groundwater resources. There is a need for a health study to determine the health effects of the high salinity as well as E. coli presence in drinking water in the area. The extent of seawater intrusion also needs to be established in the Kenyan Coastal aquifers to know the affected aquifers and mitigate the issue. Alternative water sources such as piped water should be encouraged to reduce the stress on fresh water aquifers in the coastal region.

Tertiary volcanics and sediments

Tertiary volcanic rocks in Kenya, including basalts, trachytes, rhyolites, nephelinites, basanites and tuffs are associated with the formation of the Rift Valley, and they cover the Rift region, north–south in central Kenya and the areas next to the Rift Valley. Aquifers are found in fractured and weathered zones in rocks as well as lacustrine sediments in the Rift floor. Most studies on groundwater quality in the Rift Valley report high F concentrations in most of the areas covered by these volcanic rocks such as Turkana, Baringo, Nakuru, Nairobi, Kiambu, and Kajiado Counties (Table 3). These studies are similar to those in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda which report high F in the groundwaters of the Rift Valley [90], 91]. High F concentrations of up to 140 mg/L have similarly been reported in the Rift Valley lakes [42], 80]. The dissolution of F from the volcanic rocks through water-rock interaction and evaporative concentration has been attributed as the main processes contributing to the high F in aquifers in the Rift Valley aquifers [40], 42].

Food crops grown in these volcanic regions have also reported elevated F concentrations such as 7–53 mg/kg in vegetables (kale and pumpkin leaves) from Muranga, Meru, Kirinyaga and Kericho Counties, and 10–88 mg/kg from cowpeas from Kisii, Kericho and Nakuru Counties [92], 93]. Apart from F, high concentrations of lead, zinc, magnesium, chlorides, nitrates and sulphates were also reported in groundwater in Turkana County [78]. Other potentially harmful contaminants in drinking water have not been reported in the region. Due to the extremely high F concentrations reported across the Kenyan Rift Valley and its environs, there is a need for establishing a F hazard map to know contaminated aquifers and food crops. Defluoridation programs should be established in the Rift Valley region to reduce the effects of the high F. Due to the wide extent of the Tertiary volcanic aquifers, there is a need to establish their interactions and interconnections with other aquifers for possible contamination. This is especially true in the eastern region, with cases of dental fluorosis, where volcanic and metamorphic rocks overly each other [52].

Water quality management is an important aspect of every country to ensure the provision of safe, reliable, and adequate water to its citizens. This can be achieved through systematic data collection, processing, analysis and cataloguing of the results of water quality status which can be accessible for decision-making in all the industries using the different water resources in the country [8], 94]. Kenya is still lacking proper data management of the quality of its water resources mainly because of a lack of adequate and reliable data as well as poor handling, processing, achieving and distribution [12].

The Kenyan Ministry of Water and Irrigation created a drinking water quality surveillance programme in 1992. Challenges including inadequate equipment, funding allocation, and proper management have stalled their operations which are handled by several organizations such as (the Water Resources Management Authority) (WRMA) [12]. For example, the national water quality management team at the ministry was at 40 % capacity in a ministry report of 2016 [12]. In addition, the report also indicated that different institutions under the ministry do not have clear specifications on the roles shared amongst them, which might lead to neglecting some tasks.

Conclusions

Kenya has a very diverse geology which has a very strong influence on groundwater quality for human consumption. This review aimed to highlight the status of the influence of Kenya’s geology on groundwater quality for human consumption. This is due to the lack of studies highlighting the geological composition and how they influence the different groundwater resources across the county. Different potential groundwater contaminants have been identified in specific geological provinces. The commonly reported geogenic contaminants include high F concentrations common in groundwaters in volcanic regions of the Rift Valley and Nyanzian Shield as well as metamorphic rocks of the Mozambique Mobile Belt, where mineral dissolution is the main process of F release into groundwater. High salinity has been reported in the sedimentary aquifers in the coastal and northeastern regions as well as metamorphic aquifers of the Mozambique Mobile Belt. Mineral dissolution as well as seawater intrusion, in the coastal aquifers are the main contributors to the high salinity. Other contaminants reported in selected regions include high iron in some metamorphic aquifers of the Mozambique Mobile Belt and lead in some sedimentary aquifers of the coastal region. Several health implications of these contaminants such as dental and skeletal fluorosis caused by high F consumption and gastrointestinal complications caused by highly saline water are common in affected regions.

Anthropogenic contaminants are the major groundwater contaminants in urban areas. As cities are rapidly growing in the country, it becomes more difficult for local governments to provide piped water to all its residents. This leads to a lot of shallow groundwater abstraction, especially in informal settlements in major cities and towns including Nairobi, Kisumu, Mombasa, and Kilifi. However, shallow groundwaters in these cities and towns are contaminated NO3 , NO2 and E. coli from shallow groundwater contamination by pit latrines, and septic tanks.

Recommendations

Several knowledge gaps highlighted in this review include the very limited studies reporting the concentrations of potentially harmful trace elements such as Pb, Cd, and As, especially in aquifers in urban areas which are susceptible to both geogenic and industrial contamination.

Due to the inefficiency of water quality monitoring and management in the country, there is a need for all the water management stakeholders such as the government, universities, and private research institutes with the expertise and technical capacity to carry out water quality assessment, and data analysis to work together in achieving the provision of quality drinking water to the citizens of Kenya. In addition, sensitising the community on safe sanitary practices such as proper refuse and sewerage disposal is required in Kenya, both in rural and urban areas where shallow groundwater resources are susceptible to contamination by such practices. Local governments are also encouraged to develop proper public sanitation programs within low-income communities and discourage practices of open defecation and the use of shallow pit latrines in regions with shallow aquifers.


Corresponding author: Patrick Kirita Gevera, Department of Civil Engineering, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, Cnr Christian de Wet Road and Pioneer Avenue, Johannesburg, South Africa, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: Postdoctoral Research Fellowship

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the University of South Africa for granting the Postdoctoral research fellowship to Patrick Kirita Gevera and the Department of Civil Engineering for providing a research environment that enabled him to undertake the research. We also acknowledge the valuable comments by the reviewers that improved the quality of the manuscript.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: Patrick Gevera and Edna Onyari contributed to the conceptualization and data curation of the project. Patrick Gevera wrote the first draft. Both authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and the revised draft to the final submission version. The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest

  5. Research funding: This study was funded by the University of South Africa’s Postdoctoral research fellowship grant to Patrick Kirita Gevera.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. United Nations. World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, CD-ROM Ed. New York: United Nations; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

2. Okotto, L, Okotto-Okotto, J, Price, H, Pedley, S, Wright, J. Socio-economic aspects of domestic groundwater consumption, vending and use in Kisumu, Kenya. Appl Geogr 2015;58:189–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.02.009.Search in Google Scholar

3. White, R, Turpie, J, Letley, GL. Greening Africa’s cities: enhancing the relationship between urbanization, environmental assets, and ecosystem services. World Bank; 2017.10.1596/26730Search in Google Scholar

4. Nyilitya, B, Mureithi, S, Boeckx, P. Tracking sources and fate of groundwater nitrate in Kisumu city and Kano plains, Kenya. Water 2020;12:401. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020401.Search in Google Scholar

5. Abrahams, PW. Soils: their implications to human health. Sci Total Environ 2002;291:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01102-0.Search in Google Scholar

6. Oliver, MA, Gregory, PJ. Soil, food security and human health: a review: soil, food security and human health. Eur J Soil Sci 2015;66:257–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12216.Search in Google Scholar

7. Edmunds, WM, Smedley, PL. Fluoride in natural waters. In: Selinus, O, editor. Essentials of medical geology: revised edition. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2013:311–36 pp.10.1007/978-94-007-4375-5_13Search in Google Scholar

8. Griffin, N, Palmer, C, Scherman, P. Critical analysis of environmental water quality in South Africa: historic and current trends. Water Res Comm 2014;1:13–24.Search in Google Scholar

9. Yadav, N, Rani, K, Yadav, SS, Yadav, DK, Yadav, VK, Yadav, N. Soil and water pollution with fluoride, geochemistry, food safety issues and reclamation–a review. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 2018;7:1147–62. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.140.Search in Google Scholar

10. Kumar, V, Bharti, PK, Talwar, M, Tyagi, AK, Kumar, P. Studies on high iron content in water resources of Moradabad district (UP), India. Water Sci 2017;31:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsj.2017.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

11. Talukder, MRR, Rutherford, S, Phung, D, Islam, MZ, Chu, C. The effect of drinking water salinity on blood pressure in young adults of coastal Bangladesh. Environ Pollut 2016;214:248–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.074.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Kenya Ministry of Water and Irrigation. National Water Quality Management Strategy (NWQMS) (2012–2016). Kenya Ministry of Water and Irrigation. Nairobi; 2017. Available from: https://www.iwa-network.org/filemanager-.uploads/WQ_Compendium/Database/Future_analysis/066.pdf [Accessed 01 Aug 2023].Search in Google Scholar

13. Kanoti, JR, Olago, D, Opiyo, N, Nyamai, C. An overview of groundwater and sanitation challenges in Kisumu City, Kenya. Int J Innovat Res Dev 2019;8:1–10. https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i4/143592-347932-1-SM.Search in Google Scholar

14. Mulwa, F, Li, Z, Fangninou, FF. Water scarcity in Kenya: current status, challenges and future solutions. Open Access Libr J 2021;08:1–15. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107096.Search in Google Scholar

15. USAID. Water resources profile series: Kenya water resources profile review. USAID Sustainable Water Partnership Activity. Nairobi; 2021. Available from: https://winrock.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Kenya_Country_Profile-Final.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

16. Okotto-Okotto, J, Okotto, L, Price, H, Pedley, S, Wright, J. A longitudinal study of long-term change in contamination hazards and shallow well quality in two neighbourhoods of Kisumu, Kenya. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2015;12:4275–91. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120404275.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Kanoti, JR, Olago, D, Opiyo, N, Nyamai, C, Dulo, S, Ayah, R. Microbial and physical chemical indicators of groundwater contamination in Kenya: a case study of Kisumu aquifer system, Kenya. J Water Resour Protect 2019;11:404–18. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2019.114024.Search in Google Scholar

18. K’oreje, KO, Vergeynst, L, Ombaka, D, De Wispelaere, P, Okoth, M, Van Langenhove, H, et al.. Occurrence patterns of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater, surface water and groundwater of Nairobi and Kisumu city, Kenya. Chemosphere 2016;149:238–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.095.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Akech, NO, Omuombo, CA, Masibo, M. General geology of Kenya. In: Developments in earth surface processes. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013, 16:3–10 pp.10.1016/B978-0-444-59559-1.00001-3Search in Google Scholar

20. Mbithi, FM. Assessment of the impact of groundwater fluoride on human health in Makindu district, Makueni county, Kenya Masters Thesis, Kenya: South Eastern Kenya University; 2017. Available from: http://repository.seku.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/3535/Mbithi_Assessment%20of%20the%20Impact%20of%20Groundwater%20Fluoride%20on%20Human%20Health….pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Search in Google Scholar

21. Mwiathi, NF, Gao, X, Li, C, Rashid, A. The occurrence of geogenic fluoride in shallow aquifers of Kenya Rift Valley and its implications in groundwater management. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2022;229:113046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113046.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Gevera, PK, Cave, M, Dowling, K, Gikuma-Njuru, P, Mouri, H. Potential fluoride exposure from selected food crops grown in high fluoride soils in the Makueni County, south-eastern Kenya. Environ Geochem Health 2022;44:4703–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-022-01240-w.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Kenya Ministry of Water and Irrigation. Kenya national water development report: case study. UNESCO. Nairobi; 2006. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000148866.Search in Google Scholar

24. Nair, KR, Manji, F, Gitonga, JN. The occurrence and distribution of fluoride in groundwaters of Kenya. East Afr Med J 1984;61:503–12.Search in Google Scholar

25. Ligavha-Mbelengwa, L, Gomo, M. Investigation of factors influencing groundwater quality in a typical Karoo aquifer in Beaufort West town of South Africa. Environ Earth Sci 2020;79:196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08936-1.Search in Google Scholar

26. Abanyie, SK, Apea, OB, Abagale, SA, Amuah, EEY, Sunkari, ED. Sources and factors influencing groundwater quality and associated health implications: a review. Emerging Contam 2023;9:100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2023.100207.Search in Google Scholar

27. Yu, Z, Zhang, L, Jiang, P, Papelis, C, Li, Y. Study on water‐rock interactions of trace elements in groundwater with leaching experiments. Groundwater 2015;53:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12182.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Gaskova, O, Bessonova, E, Bortnikova, S. Leaching experiments on trace element release from the arsenic-bearing tailings of Khovu–Aksy (Tuva Republic, Russia). Appl Geochem 2003;18:1361–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-2927(03)00056-8.Search in Google Scholar

29. Al-Masri, M, Amin, Y, Ibrahim, S, Al-Bich, F. Distribution of some trace metals in Syrian phosphogypsum. Appl Geochem 2004;19:747–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2003.09.014.Search in Google Scholar

30. Dar, FA, Ganai, JA, Ahmed, S, Satyanarayanan, M. Groundwater trace element chemistry of the karstified limestone of Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Earth Sci 2017;76:673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6972-3.Search in Google Scholar

31. Earle, S. Groundwater quality. In: Physical geology, 1st ed. British Columbia: BCcampus; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

32. Hussein, MT, Al Yousif, MM, Awad, HS. Potentiality of secondary aquifers in Saudi Arabia: evaluation of groundwater quality in Jubaila limestone. Int J Geosci 2012;03:71–80. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2012.31009.Search in Google Scholar

33. Gassiat, C, Gleeson, T, Lefebvre, R, McKenzie, J. Hydraulic fracturing in faulted sedimentary basins: numerical simulation of potential contamination of shallow aquifers over long time scales. Water Resour Res 2013;49:8310–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014287.Search in Google Scholar

34. Nemčić-Jurec, J, Jazbec, A. Point source pollution and variability of nitrate concentrations in water from shallow aquifers. Appl Water Sci 2017;7:1337–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0369-9.Search in Google Scholar

35. Rajmohan, N. Groundwater contamination issues in the shallow aquifer, Ramganga sub-basin, India. In: Emerging issues in the water environment during anthropocene 2020:337–54 pp.10.1007/978-981-32-9771-5_18Search in Google Scholar

36. Alfarrah, N, Walraevens, K. Groundwater overexploitation and seawater intrusion in coastal areas of arid and semi-arid regions. Water 2018;10:143. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020143.Search in Google Scholar

37. Salama, RB, Otto, CJ, Fitzpatrick, RW. Contributions of groundwater conditions to soil and water salinization. Hydrogeol J 1999;7:46–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050179.Search in Google Scholar

38. Santoni, S, Huneau, F, Garel, E, Vergnaud-Ayraud, V, Labasque, T, Aquilina, L, et al.. Residence time, mineralization processes and groundwater origin within a carbonate coastal aquifer with a thick unsaturated zone. J Hydrol 2016;540:50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.001.Search in Google Scholar

39. Ma, B, Jin, M, Liang, X, Li, J. Groundwater mixing and mineralization processes in a mountain–oasis–desert basin, northwest China: hydrogeochemistry and environmental tracer indicators. Hydrogeol J 2018;26:233–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1659-0.Search in Google Scholar

40. Gevera, P, Mouri, H. Natural occurrence of potentially harmful fluoride contamination in groundwater: an example from Nakuru County, the Kenyan Rift Valley. Environ Earth Sci 2018;77:365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7466-7.Search in Google Scholar

41. WHO. Chemical aspects. In: Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum. World Health Organization. Geneva; 2017:155–201 pp. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254637 [Accessed 21 Jan 2019].Search in Google Scholar

42. Olaka, LA, Wilke, FDH, Olago, DO, Odada, EO, Mulch, A, Musolff, A. Groundwater fluoride enrichment in an active rift setting: Central Kenya Rift case study. Sci Total Environ 2016;545–546:641–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.161.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Nordstrom, DK. Fluoride in thermal and non-thermal groundwater: insights from geochemical modeling. Sci Total Environ 2022;824:153606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153606.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Adimalla, N, Li, P. Occurrence, health risks, and geochemical mechanisms of fluoride and nitrate in groundwater of the rock-dominant semi-arid region, Telangana State, India. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2018;25(1–2):81–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1480353.Search in Google Scholar

45. Kuria, Z. Groundwater distribution and aquifer characteristics in Kenya. In: Developments in earth surface processes. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2013, 16:83–107 pp.10.1016/B978-0-444-59559-1.00008-6Search in Google Scholar

46. Barasa, M, Crane, E, Upton, K, Dochartaigh, B, Bellwood-Howard, I. Africa groundwater Atlas: hydrogeology of Kenya, 2018. Available from: http://earthwise.bgs.ac.uk/index.php/Hydrogeology_of_Kenya [Accessed 22 Jan 2019].Search in Google Scholar

47. Nyakinye, M. A summary of the geology and mineral resource potential of Kenya. 2021. Available from: https://ngdckenya.bgs.ac.uk/geology/ [Accessed 30 May 2023].Search in Google Scholar

48. Nyamai, CM, Mathu, EM, Opiyo-Akech, N, Wallbrecher, E. A reappraaisal of the geology, geochemistry, structures and tectonics of the Mozambique belt in Kenya, east of the rift system. Afr J Sci Technol 2003;4:51–71. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajst.v4i2.15306.Search in Google Scholar

49. Saggerson, EP. Geology of the Simba-Kibwezi area: degree sheet 59, NE quarter (with coloured geological map). Nairobi: Geological Survey of Kenya; 1963.Search in Google Scholar

50. Mailu, GM. The influence of Precambrian metamorphic rocks on groundwater in the Chyulu Area, Kenya. Appl Hydrogeol 1994;2:26–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100400050038.Search in Google Scholar

51. Ng’ang’a, SK, Thumbi, GM, Nyadawa, MO, Okwadha, GO, Kibetu, PM. Groundwater mapping of Makueni county, eastern Kenya using remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) technologies. J Int Acad Res Multidiscip 2015;3:271–85.Search in Google Scholar

52. Gevera, PK, Cave, M, Dowling, K, Gikuma-Njuru, P, Mouri, H. Naturally occurring potentially harmful elements in groundwater in Makueni county, South-Eastern Kenya: effects on drinking water quality and agriculture. Geosciences 2020;10:62. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10020062.Search in Google Scholar

53. Temitope, I. Groundwater flow and quality of coastal aquifers: case study of Mombasa North Coast, Kenya. Kenya: Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology; 2018. Available from: http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.2.15426.68806 [Accessed 31 May 2023].Search in Google Scholar

54. Misati, AG. Assessment of water quality and the use of sanitary surveys in identifying water source risk factors in Kisii County. Kenya: Egerton University; 2017. Available from: http://41.89.96.81:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1306.Search in Google Scholar

55. Wekesa, AM, Otieno, C. Assessment of groundwater quality using water quality index from selected springs in Manga Subcounty, Nyamira county, Kenya. Sci World J 2022;2022:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3498394.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

56. Bosire, AS, Nyantika, D, Mamboleo, D. Evaluation of the effects of human activities on water resources in Masaba North, Nyamira County. Int J Res Sch Commun 2021;4:85–98.Search in Google Scholar

57. WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. In: WHO guidelines approved by the guidelines review committee. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442376/ [Accessed 29 Jan 2019].Search in Google Scholar

58. KEBS. Drinking water – specification, part 1: the requirements for drinking water, 3rd ed. KEBS (KS 459-1:2007). Nairobi; 2007. Available from: https://webstore.kebs.org/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=1749.Search in Google Scholar

59. JICA. Basic design study report on the project for groundwater development in rural districts (Machakos, Kitui, Makueni and Mwingi) in the Republic of Kenya. 2004. Available from: http://open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/618/618/618_407_11775582.html [Accessed 23 Jan 2019].Search in Google Scholar

60. Mwamati, FT, Kitheka, JU, Njuru, PG. An assessment of the spatial and temporal variations of groundwater quality in Yatta plateau in Kitui county, Kenya. J Environ Earth Sci 2017;7:90–104.Search in Google Scholar

61. Leiter, M, Levy, J, Mutiti, S, Boardman, M, Wojnar, A, Deka, H. Drinking water quality in the Mount Kasigau region of Kenya: a source to point-of-use assessment. Environ Earth Sci 2013;68:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1698-8.Search in Google Scholar

62. Rhoades, JD, Kandiah, A, Mashali, AM. Saline waters as resources. In: The use of saline waters for crop production. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Pap. Rome: FAO, Rome; 1992, vol 48:5–10 pp. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/t0667e/t0667e00.htm#Contents.Search in Google Scholar

63. Chakraborty, R, Khan, KM, Dibaba, DT, Khan, MA, Ahmed, A, Islam, MZ. Health implications of drinking water salinity in coastal areas of Bangladesh. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019;16:3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193746.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

64. Krhoda, GO. Groundwater assessment in sedimentary basins of eastern Kenya, Africa. In: Regional characterization of water quality: Baltimore Symposium. IAHS. Baltimore; 1989. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237577698_Groundwater_assessment_in_sedimentary_basins_of_eastern_Kenya_Africa [Accessed 20 Jan 2019].Search in Google Scholar

65. Muthangya, M, Samoei, D. Status of water quality in the coal rich Mui Basin on Kitui county, Kenya. ARPN J Earth Sci 2012;1:48–51.Search in Google Scholar

66. Abila, R, Mutemi, M, Mutuku, E, Mutati, K, Mutinda, M, Musyoka, C. Physico-chemical and bacteriological quality assessment of shallow wells in Kitui town, Kenya. J Environ Sci Water Res 2012;1:27–33.Search in Google Scholar

67. Kumar, M, Sharma, B, Ramanathan, A, Someshwar Rao, M, Kumar, B. Nutrient chemistry and salinity mapping of the Delhi aquifer, India: source identification perspective. Environ Geol 2009;56:1171–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1217-0.Search in Google Scholar

68. Khan, AE, Ireson, A, Kovats, S, Mojumder, SK, Khusru, A, Rahman, A, et al.. Drinking water salinity and maternal health in coastal Bangladesh: implications of climate change. Environ Health Perspect 2011;119:1328–32. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002804.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

69. Vineis, P, Chan, Q, Khan, A. Climate change impacts on water salinity and health. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2011;1:5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2011.09.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

70. Nahian, MA, Ahmed, A, Lázár, AN, Hutton, CW, Salehin, M, Streatfield, PK. Drinking water salinity associated health crisis in coastal Bangladesh. Elem Sci Anth 2018;6:2. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.143.Search in Google Scholar

71. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. Kenya stepwise survey for non communicable diseases risk factors 2015 report. 2016. Available from: https://www.google.com/search?q=kenya+stepwise+survey+for+non+communicable+diseases+risk+factors+2015+report&rlz=1C1GGRV_enZA751ZA752&oq=KENYA+STEPwise+SURVEY+FOR+NON+COMMUNICABLE+DISEASES+RISK+FACTORS+2015+REPORT&aqs=chrome.0.0.422j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 [Accessed 22 Jan 2019].Search in Google Scholar

72. Ng’ang’a, S, Kibetu, P, Thumbi, G, Okwadha, G, Nyadawa, M. Reduction of iron and manganese in groundwater through non-mechanical aeration and filtration method: case study of Makueni County, Eastern Kenya. J Int Acad Res Multidiscip 2017;5:25–37.Search in Google Scholar

73. Raju, NJ. Iron contamination in groundwater: a case from Tirumala-Tirupati environs, India. Researcher 2006;1:28–31.Search in Google Scholar

74. Williamson, M. Endemic dental fluorosis in Kenya. A preliminary report. East Afr Med J 1953;30:217–33.Search in Google Scholar

75. Gaciri, S, Davies, T. The occurrence and geochemistry of fluoride in some natural waters of Kenya. J Hydrol 1993;143:395–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(93)90201-j.Search in Google Scholar

76. Moturi, WK, Tole, MP, Davies, TC. The contribution of drinking water towards dental fluorosis: a case study of Njoro Division, Nakuru District, Kenya. Environ Geochem Health 2002;24:123–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014204700612.10.1023/A:1014204700612Search in Google Scholar

77. Rusiniak, P, Sekuła, K, Sracek, O, Stopa, P. Fluoride ions in groundwater of the Turkana county, Kenya, east Africa. Acta Geochim 2021;40:945–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-021-00481-3.Search in Google Scholar

78. Mbugua, D, Makokha, MK, Shisanya, CA. Assessment of physicochemical properties of groundwater near oil well pads in Lokichar basin, Turkana county, Kenya. Open Access Libr 2022;09:1–17. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1108487.Search in Google Scholar

79. Induswe, B, Opinya, G, Khasakhala, LI, Owino, R. The intellectual efficiency of adolescents aged 13–15-years-old using drinking water with varying fluoride concentrations in Kajiado North sub county, Kajiado county. Am J Med Med Sci 2018;8:295–311. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ajmms.20180811.02.Search in Google Scholar

80. Gikunju, JK, Maitho, TE, Birkeland, JM, Lökken, P. Fluoride levels in water and fish from Lake Magadi (Kenya). Hydrobiologia 1992;234:123–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00010867.Search in Google Scholar

81. Coetsiers, M, Kilonzo, F, Walraevens, K. Hydrochemistry and source of high fluoride in groundwater of the Nairobi area, Kenya/Hydrochimie et origine des fortes concentrations en fluorure dans l’eau souterraine de la région de Nairobi, au Kenya. Hydrol Sci J 2008;53:1230–40. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.6.1230.Search in Google Scholar

82. Olonga, R, Nduda, E, Makokha, M. Seasonal variations of physico-chemical and microbiological characteristics of groundwater quality in Ruiru, Kiambu county, Kenya. Int J Sci Res Publ 2015;5:411–23.Search in Google Scholar

83. James, RM. Dental fluorosis and parental knowledge of risk factors for dental fluorosis Masters Thesis. South Africa: University of the Western Cape; 2016. Available from: http://etd.uwc.ac.za/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11394/5027/James_rm_msc_dent_2015.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.Search in Google Scholar

84. Nzeve, JK, Mbate, GN. Assessment of ground water quality in Mumbuni estate, Machakos town, Kenya. J Health Environ Res 2021;7:7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jher.20210701.12.Search in Google Scholar

85. Makokha, M. Groundwater quality analyses along Kenyan coastal region, case study of Kilifi county. Int J Environ Geoinf 2019;6:1–14. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.466933.Search in Google Scholar

86. Chege, MW, Hashim, NO, Marenga, AS, Tschiersch, J. Lead contamination of traditional hand-dug wells in parts of Kwale County, Kenya. Int J Phys Sci 2013;8:835–9. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS12.571.Search in Google Scholar

87. Wanjala, K, Mwakio, T, Musundi, S. Assessment of water quality in boreholes and wells in Waa location, Kwale county–Kenya. J Sci Eng Res 2017;4:261–77.Search in Google Scholar

88. Onyancha, C, Khaemba, A, Sabuni, B. Aquifer storage and recovery and surface basins for a greener Kilifi District. Nile Water Sci Eng J 2010;3:26–33.Search in Google Scholar

89. Gevera, PK, Dowling, K, Gikuma-Njuru, P, Mouri, H. Public knowledge and perception of drinking water quality and its health implications: an example from the Makueni county, South-Eastern Kenya. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2022;19:4530. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084530.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

90. Bosshard-Stadlin, SA, Mattsson, HB, Stewart, C, Reusser, E. Leaching of lava and tephra from the Oldoinyo Lengai volcano (Tanzania): remobilization of fluorine and other potentially toxic elements into surface waters of the Gregory Rift. J Volcanol Geoth Res 2017;332:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2017.01.009.Search in Google Scholar

91. Dagnaw, LA, Chandravanshi, BS, Zewge, F. Fluoride content of leafy vegetables, irrigation water, and farmland soil in the rift valley and in non-rift valley areas of Ethiopia. Fluoride 2017;50:409–29.Search in Google Scholar

92. Owuor, PO. Fluoride content of common vegetables from different parts of Kenya. Food Chem 1985;18:283–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(85)90109-8.Search in Google Scholar

93. Nelima, D, Wambu, EW, Kituyi, JL. Fluoride distribution in selected foodstuffs from Nakuru County, Kenya, and the risk factors for its human overexposure. Sci Rep 2023;13:15295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41601-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

94. Huang, GH, Xia, J. Barriers to sustainable water-quality management. J Environ Manag 2001;61:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0394.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2024-02-15
Accepted: 2024-05-20
Published Online: 2024-06-07
Published in Print: 2025-03-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Mercury and cadmium-induced inflammatory cytokines activation and its effect on the risk of preeclampsia: a review
  4. Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Indian nonsmokers: a systematic review & meta-analysis
  5. Beyond the outdoors: indoor air quality guidelines and standards – challenges, inequalities, and the path forward
  6. Cadmium exposure and thyroid hormone disruption: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  7. New generation sequencing: molecular approaches for the detection and monitoring of bioaerosols in an indoor environment: a systematic review
  8. Concentration of Tetrabromobisphenol-A in fish: systematic review and meta-analysis and probabilistic health risk assessment
  9. The association between indoor air pollution from solid fuels and cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  10. Phthalates and uterine disorders
  11. Effectiveness of educational interventions for the prevention of lead poisoning in children: a systematic review
  12. Association between exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and levels of lipid profile based on human studies
  13. Summary of seven Swedish case reports on the microwave syndrome associated with 5G radiofrequency radiation
  14. Expanding the focus of the One Health concept: links between the Earth-system processes of the planetary boundaries framework and antibiotic resistance
  15. Exploring the link between ambient PM2.5 concentrations and respiratory diseases in the elderly: a study in the Muang district of Khon Kaen, Thailand
  16. Standards for levels of lead in soil and dust around the world
  17. Tributyltin induces apoptosis in mammalian cells in vivo: a scoping review
  18. The influence of geology on the quality of groundwater for domestic use: a Kenyan review
  19. Biological concentrations of DDT metabolites and breast cancer risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
  20. Letter to the Editor
  21. Ancient medicine and famous iranian physicians
Downloaded on 11.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2024-0022/html?recommended=sidebar
Scroll to top button