Home Effects of man-made electromagnetic fields on heart rate variability parameters of general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effects of man-made electromagnetic fields on heart rate variability parameters of general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies

  • Mahsa Mansourian EMAIL logo , Hamidreza Marateb , Rasool Nouri and Marjan Mansourian
Published/Copyright: May 18, 2023
Reviews on Environmental Health
From the journal Reviews on Environmental Health Volume 39 Issue 3

Abstract

Objectives

The effects of man-made electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on the cardiovascular system have been investigated in many studies. In this regard, the cardiac autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity due to EMFs exposure, assessed by heart rate variability (HRV), was targeted in some studies. The studies investigating the relationship between EMFs and HRV have yielded conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the data’s consistency and identify the association between EMFs and HRV measures.

Content

Published literature from four electronic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane, were retrieved and screened. Initially, 1601 articles were retrieved. After the screening, 15 original studies were eligible to be included in the meta-analysis. The studies evaluated the association between EMFs and SDNN (standard deviation of NN intervals), SDANN (Standard deviation of the average NN intervals for each 5 min segment of a 24 h HRV recording), and PNN50 (percentage of successive RR intervals that differ by more than 50 ms).

Summary

There was a decrease in SDNN (ES=−0.227 [−0.389, −0.065], p=0.006), SDANN (ES=−0.526 [−1.001, −0.05], p=0.03) and PNN50 (ES=−0.287 [−0.549, −0.024]). However, there was no significant difference in LF (ES=0.061 (−0.267, 0.39), p=0.714) and HF (ES=−0.134 (0.581, 0.312), p=0.556). In addition, a significant difference was not observed in LF/HF (ES=0.079 (−0.191, 0.348), p=0.566).

Outlook

Our meta-analysis suggests that exposure to the environmental artificial EMFs could significantly correlate with SDNN, SDANN, and PNN50 indices. Therefore, lifestyle modification is essential in using the devices that emit EMs, such as cell phones, to decrease some signs and symptoms due to EMFs’ effect on HRV.

Keywords: electromagnetic fields; heart rate variability; meta-analysis
Corresponding author: Mahsa Mansourian, Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran, E-mail:

Funding source: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Award Identifier / Grant number: 140130

  1. Research funding: This study was funded by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences [grant number: 140130].

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent is not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: This study was approved by Research Ethics Committee of the “Alzahra Research Centers”.

References

1. Rubin, GJ, Hahn, G, Everitt, BS, Cleare, AJ, Wessely, S. Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study. BMJ 2006;332:886–91. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38765.519850.55.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Kaszuba-Zwoińska, J, Gremba, J, Gałdzińska-Calik, B, Wójcik-Piotrowicz, K, Thor, P. Electromagnetic field induced biological effects in humans. Przegl Lek 2015;72:636–41.Search in Google Scholar

3. Mansourian, M, Firoozabadi, M, Hassan, ZM. The role of 217-Hz ELF magnetic fields emitted from GSM mobile phones on electrochemotherapy mechanisms. Electromagn Biol Med 2020;39:239–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2020.1762635.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Mansourian, M, Marateb, HR, Vaseghi, G. The effect of extremely low-frequency magnetic field (50–60 Hz) exposure on spontaneous apoptosis: the results of a meta-analysis. Adv Biomed Res 2016;5:141–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.187375.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Mansourian, M, Firoozabadi, SMP, Hassan, ZM. Effect of pulse-modulated GSM-900 MHz electromagnetic field on the electrochemotherapy efficacy of 4T-1 cells. Iran J Med Phys 2018;15:264–70.Search in Google Scholar

6. Mansourian, M, Firoozabadi, S, Hassan, ZM. The effect of 900 MHz electromagnetic fields on biological pathways induced by electrochemotherapy. Electromagn Biol Med 2021;40:158–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2020.1856681.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Mahdavi, M, Yekta, R, Tackallou, SH. Association between ELF and RF electromagnetic field and Leukemia. Arch Adv Biosci 2015;6:106–15.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kim, JH, Lee, J-K, Kim, H-G, Kim, K-B, Kim, HR. Possible effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on central nerve system. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2019;27:265–75. https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2018.152.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Taki, M, Watanabe, S. Biological and health effects of exposure to electromagnetic field from mobile communications systems. IATSS Res 2001;25:40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0386-1112(14)60069-8.Search in Google Scholar

10. Schuermann, D, Mevissen, M. Manmade electromagnetic fields and oxidative stress—biological effects and consequences for health. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:3772. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073772.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Hirata, A, Diao, Y, Onishi, T, Sasaki, K, Ahn, S, Colombi, D, et al.. Assessment of human exposure to electromagnetic fields: review and future directions. IEEE Trans Electromagn C 2021;63:1619–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/temc.2021.3109249.Search in Google Scholar

12. Deruelle, F. The different sources of electromagnetic fields: dangers are not limited to physical health. Electromagn Biol Med 2020;39:166–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2020.1737811.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. D’Angelo, C, Costantini, E, Kamal, M, Reale, M. Experimental model for ELF-EMF exposure: concern for human health. Saudi J Biol Sci 2015;22:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.07.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Savitz, DA, Liao, D, Sastre, A, Kleckner, RC, Kavet, R. Magnetic field exposure and cardiovascular disease mortality among electric utility workers. Am J Epidemiol 1999;149:135–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009779.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Zhang, Y, Li, L, Liu, X, Ding, L, Wu, X, Wang, J, et al.. Examination of the effect of a 50-Hz electromagnetic field at 500 μT on parameters related with the cardiovascular system in rats. Front Public Health 2020;8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00087.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Jeong, J, Kim, J, Lee, B, Min, Y, Kim, D, Ryu, J, et al.. Influence of exposure to electromagnetic field on the cardiovascular system. Autonom Autacoid Pharmacol 2005;25:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-8673.2004.00328.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Elmas, O. Effects of electromagnetic field exposure on the heart:a systematic review. Toxicol Ind Health 2016;32:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233713498444.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Shaffer, F, Ginsberg, JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front Public Health 2017;5:258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Nam, KC, Lee, JH, Noh, HW, Cha, EJ, Kim, NH, Kim, DW. Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: a provocation study. Bioelectromagnetics 2009;30:641–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20518.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Stephenson, MD, Thompson, AG, Merrigan, JJ, Stone, JD, Hagen, JA. Applying heart rate variability to monitor health and performance in tactical personnel: a narrative review. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2021;18:8143. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158143.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Scott, EE, LoTemplio, SB, McDonnell, AS, McNay, GD, Greenberg, K, McKinney, T, et al.. The autonomic nervous system in its natural environment: immersion in nature is associated with changes in heart rate and heart rate variability. Psychophysiology 2021;58:e13698. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13698.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Clifford, GD, Azuaje, F, McSharry, P. Advanced methods and tools for ECG data analysis. Boston: Artech house Boston; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

23. Bigger, JTJr, Kleiger, RE, Fleiss, JL, Rolnitzky, LM, Steinman, RC, Miller, JP. Components of heart rate variability measured during healing of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1988;61:208–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(88)90917-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Mahmad Khairai, K, Abdul Wahab, MN, Sutarto, AP. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) as a physiological marker of stress among electronics assembly line workers. Human-centered technology for a better tomorrow. Wiesbaden: Springer; 2022:3–14 pp.10.1007/978-981-16-4115-2_1Search in Google Scholar

25. Spada, GE, Masiero, M, Pizzoli, SFM, Pravettoni, G. Heart rate variability biofeedback in cancer patients: a scoping review. Behav Sci 2022;12:389. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12100389.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Goldberger, JJ, Challapalli, S, Tung, R, Parker, MA, Kadish, AH. Relationship of heart rate variability to parasympathetic effect. Circulation 2001;103:1977–83. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.103.15.1977.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Verrier, RL, Lown, B. Experimental studies of psychophysiological factors in sudden cardiac death. Acta Med Scand 1982;211:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1982.tb00361.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Hughes, JW, Stoney, CM. Depressed mood is related to high-frequency heart rate variability during stressors. Psychosom Med 2000;62:796–803. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200011000-00009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Shaffer, F, Ginsberg, JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front Public Health 2017;5:258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Xhyheri, B, Manfrini, O, Mazzolini, M, Pizzi, C, Bugiardini, R. Heart rate variability today. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2012;55:321–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2012.09.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Stuckey, MI, Tulppo, MP, Kiviniemi, AM, Petrella, RJ. Heart rate variability and the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Diabetes/Metabol Res Rev 2014;30:784–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.2555.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Gouin, J-P, Thayer, JF, Deschênes, SS, MacNeil, S, Booij, L. Implicit affect, heart rate variability, and the metabolic syndrome. Psychosom Med 2021;83:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000000879.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Bassett, D. A literature review of heart rate variability in depressive and bipolar disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatr 2016;50:511–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867415622689.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Stautland, A, Jakobsen, P, Fasmer, OB, Osnes, B, Torresen, J, Nordgreen, T, et al.. Heart rate variability as biomarker for bipolar disorder. medRxiv; 2022.10.1101/2022.02.14.22269413Search in Google Scholar

35. Koenig, J, Kemp, AH, Beauchaine, TP, Thayer, JF, Kaess, M. Depression and resting state heart rate variability in children and adolescents—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2016;46:136–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Aimaier, G, Qian, K, Zheng, Z, Peng, W, Zhang, Z, Ding, J, et al.. Interictal heart rate variability as a biomarker for comorbid depressive disorders among people with epilepsy. Brain Sci 2022;12:671. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050671.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Murray, AR. Examining heart rate variability and alpha-amylase levels in predicting PTSD in combat-experienced marines. Alhambra: Alliant International University, California School of Professional; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

38. Chrousos, GP, Papadopoulou-Marketou, N, Bacopoulou, F, Lucafò, M, Gallotta, A, Boschiero, D. Photoplethysmography (PPG)-determined heart rate variability (HRV) and extracellular water (ECW) in the evaluation of chronic stress and inflammation. Hormones (Basel) 2022:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-021-00341-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Broucqsault-Dédrie, C, De Jonckheere, J, Jeanne, M, Nseir, S. Measurement of heart rate variability to assess pain in sedated critically ill patients: a prospective observational study. PLoS One 2016;11: e0147720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147720.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

40. Jhang, D, Chu, Y, Cai, J, Tai, Y, Chuang, C. Pain monitoring using heart rate variability and photoplethysmograph-derived parameters by binary logistic regression. J Med Biol Eng 2021;41:669–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-021-00651-x.Search in Google Scholar

41. Catai, AM, Pastre, CM, Godoy, MF, Silva, E, Takahashi, ACM, Vanderlei, LCM. Heart rate variability: are you using it properly? Standardisation checklist of procedures. Braz J Phys Ther 2020;24:91–102. Epub 2019/02/26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.02.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Ekici, B, Tanındı, A, Ekici, G, Diker, E. The effects of the duration of mobile phone use on heart rate variability parameters in healthy subjects. Anatol J Cardiol 2016;16:833. https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.6717.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Alassiri, M, Alanazi, A, Aldera, H, Alqahtani, SA, Alraddadi, AS, Alberreet, MS, et al.. Exposure to cell phones reduces heart rate variability in both normal-weight and obese normotensive medical students. Explore 2020;16:264–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.02.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

44. Kurokawa, Y, Nitta, H, Imai, H, Kabuto, M. Can extremely low frequency alternating magnetic fields modulate heart rate or its variability in humans? Auton Neurosci 2003;105:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1566-0702(02)00296-5.Search in Google Scholar

45. Tamer, A, Gunduz, H, Oezildirm, S. The cardiac effects of a mobile phone positioned closest to the heart. Anatol J Cardiol 2009;9:380–4.Search in Google Scholar

46. Wallace, J, Andrianome, S, Ghosn, R, Blanchard, ES, Telliez, F, Selmaoui, B. Heart rate variability in healthy young adults exposed to global system for mobile communication (GSM) 900-MHz radiofrequency signal from mobile phones. Environ Res 2020;191:110097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110097.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al.. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2021;10:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

48. Higgins, JP. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org; 2008.10.1002/9780470712184Search in Google Scholar

49. Ma, L-L, Wang, Y-Y, Yang, Z-H, Huang, D, Weng, H, Zeng, X-T. Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Mil Med Res 2020;7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

50. Higgins, JP, Thompson, SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

51. Sutton, AJ, Duval, SJ, Tweedie, R, Abrams, KR, Jones, DR. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ 2000;320:1574–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7249.1574.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

52. Siwindarto, P. Poincaré plot of RR-interval differences (PORRID) a new method for assessing heart rate variability. J Basic Appl Sci Res 2014;4:308–13.Search in Google Scholar

53. Carnethon, MR, Prineas, RJ, Temprosa, M, Zhang, ZM, Uwaifo, G, Molitch, ME. The association among autonomic nervous system function, incident diabetes, and intervention arm in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Care 2006;29:914–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1729.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

54. Dalise, AM, Prestano, R, Fasano, R, Gambardella, A, Barbieri, M, Rizzo, MR. Autonomic nervous system and cognitive impairment in older patients: evidence from long-term heart rate variability in real-life setting. Front Aging Neurosci 2020;12:40. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00040.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

55. Vanderlei, LCM, Pastre, CM, Hoshi, RA, Carvalho, TD, Godoy, MF. Basic notions of heart rate variability and its clinical applicability. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2009;24:205–17. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-76382009000200018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Nantsupawat, T, Tungsuk, P, Gunaparn, S, Phrommintikul, A, Wongcharoen, W. Effects of prolonged working hours on heart rate variability in internal medicine physicians. Sci Rep 2022;12: 18563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23538-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

57. Ben Mrad, I, Ben Mrad, M, Besbes, B, Zairi, I, Ben Kahla, N, Kamoun, S, et al.. Heart rate variability as an indicator of autonomic nervous system disturbance in Behcet’s disease. Int J Gen Med 2021;14:4877–86. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s326549.Search in Google Scholar

58. Zygmunt, A, Stanczyk, J. Methods of evaluation of autonomic nervous system function. Arch Med Sci 2010;6:11–8. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2010.13500.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

59. Koizumi, K, Terui, N, Kollai, M. Effect of cardiac vagal and sympathetic nerve activity on heart rate in rhythmic fluctuations. J Auton Nerv Syst 1985;12:251–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1838(85)90065-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

60. Andrzejak, R, Poręba, R, Poreba, M, Derkacz, A, Skalik, R, Gać, P, et al.. The influence of the call with a mobile phone on heart rate variability parameters in healthy volunteers. Ind Health 2008;46:409–17. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.46.409.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Parazzini, M, Ravazzani, P, Tognola, G, Thuroczy, G, Molnar, FB, Sacchettini, A, et al.. Electromagnetic fields produced by GSM cellular phones and heart rate variability. Bioelectromagnetics 2007;28:122–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20275.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

62. Vegad, AM, Kacha, YK, Varu, MS, Mehta, HB, Shah, CJ. Effects of mobile phone radiation on heart rate variability of healthy young subjects. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;2:23–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/2348-8093.155508.Search in Google Scholar

63. Lombardi, F. Clinical implications of present physiological understanding of HRV components. Card Electrophysiol Rev 2002;6:245–9. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016329008921.10.1023/A:1016329008921Search in Google Scholar PubMed

64. Electrophysiology TFotESoCtNASoP. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 1996;93:1043–65. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.93.5.1043.Search in Google Scholar

65. Wu, W, Gil, Y, Lee, J. Combination of wearable multi-biosensor platform and resonance frequency training for stress management of the unemployed population. Sensors 2012;12:13225–48. https://doi.org/10.3390/s121013225.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

66. Kleiger, RE, Miller, JP, Bigger, JTJr, Moss, AJ. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:256–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(87)90795-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

67. Marotta, J, Piano, C, Brunetti, V, Genovese, D, Bentivoglio, AR, Calabresi, P, et al.. Heart rate variability during wake and sleep in Huntington’s disease patients: an observational, cross-sectional, cohort study. Neurodegener Dis 2021;21:79–86.10.1159/000520754Search in Google Scholar PubMed

68. Itabashi, K, Morita, J, Hirayama, T, Mase, K, Yamada, K, editors. Interactive model-based reminiscence using a cognitive model and physiological indices. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on cognitive modelling; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

69. Nonka, T, Lebedeva, E, Repin, A. Possibilities of detecting and correcting decreased heart rate variability in patients with coronary artery disease in combination with depressive disorders in a cardiology department. J Bull Siberian Med 2021;2021:65–70. https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2021-2-65-70.Search in Google Scholar

70. Corino, VD, Mainardi, L, Husser, D, Bollmann, A, editors. Autonomic modulation of ventricular response by exercise and antiarrhythmic drugs during atrial fibrillation. In: 11th Mediterranean conference on medical and biomedical engineering and computing 2007. Wiesbaden: Springer; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

71. Freitas, IMG, Miranda, JA, Mira, PAC, Lanna, CMM, Lima, JRP, Laterza, MC. Cardiac autonomic dysfunction in obese normotensive children and adolescents. Revista Paulista de Pediatria 2014;32:244–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-0582201432210213.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

72. Adeyemi, O, Akinlade, O, Ogunmodede, J, Kolo, P, Katibi, I, Omotoso, A. Heart rate variability parameters among acute heart failure patients in a tertiary center in Nigeria. World J Adv Res Rev 2020;7:178–87. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2020.7.2.0274.Search in Google Scholar

73. Thayer, JF, Lane, RD. The role of vagal function in the risk for cardiovascular disease and mortality. Biol Psychol 2007;74:224–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.11.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

74. Schubert, C, Lambertz, M, Nelesen, R, Bardwell, W, Choi, J-B, Dimsdale, J. Effects of stress on heart rate complexity—a comparison between short-term and chronic stress. Biol Psychol 2009;80:325–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.11.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

75. Friedman, BH. An autonomic flexibility–neurovisceral integration model of anxiety and cardiac vagal tone. Biol Psychol 2007;74:185–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.08.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

76. Thayer, JF, Friedman, BH. Stop that! Inhibition, sensitization, and their neurovisceral concomitants. Scand J Psychol 2002;43:123–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00277.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

77. Schneider, U, Frank, B, Fiedler, A, Kaehler, C, Hoyer, D, Liehr, M, et al.. Human fetal heart rate variability-characteristics of autonomic regulation in the third trimester of gestation. J Perinat Med 2008;36:433–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm.2008.059.Search in Google Scholar

78. Reardon, M, Malik, M. Changes in heart rate variability with age. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996;19:1863–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03241.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

79. Vegad, A, Kacha, Y, Varu, M, Mehta, H, Shah, C. Effects of mobile phone radiation on heart rate variability of healthy young subjects. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;2:23. https://doi.org/10.4103/2348-8093.155508.Search in Google Scholar

80. Barutcu, I, Esen, AM, Kaya, D, Turkmen, M, Karakaya, O, Saglam, M, et al.. Do mobile phones pose a potential risk to autonomic modulation of the heart? PACE-Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011;34:1511–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03162.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

81. Bhagyalakshmi, K, Mantur, VS, Kumar, NA, Pai, SR. A pilot study on long term effects of mobile phone usage on heart rate variability in healthy young adult males. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;6:346–9.Search in Google Scholar

82. Tabor, Z, Michalski, J, Rokita, E. Influence of 50 Hz magnetic field on human heart rate variability: linear and nonlinear analysis. Bioelectromagnetics 2004;25:474–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20039.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

83. Sait, M, Wood, A, Kirsner, R. Effects of 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on human heart rate variability with passive tilting. Physiol Meas 2006;27:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/27/1/007.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

84. Sait, ML, Wood, AW, Sadafi, HA. A study of heart rate and heart rate variability in human subjects exposed to occupational levels of 50 Hz circularly polarised magnetic fields. Med Eng Phys 1999;21:361–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-4533(99)00062-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

85. Al-Hazimi, A. Effects of the call with the mobile phone on heart rate variability parameters of healthy young people. J Chem Pharmaceut Res 2011;3:734–40.Search in Google Scholar

86. Alhusseiny, A, Al-Nimer, M, Majeed, A. Electromagnetic energy radiated from mobile phone alters electrocardiographic records of patients with ischemic heart disease. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2012;2:146–51. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.105662.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

87. Beres, S, Nemeth, A, Ajtay, Z, Kiss, I, Nemeth, B, Hejjel, L. Cellular phone irradiation of the head affects heart rate variability depending on inspiration/expiration ratio. In Vivo 2018;32:1145–53. https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11357.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

88. Ghione, S, Del Seppia, C, Mezzasalma, L, Emdin, M, Luschi, P. Human head exposure to a 37 Hz electromagnetic field: effects on blood pressure, somatosensory perception, and related parameters. Bioelectromagnetics 2004;25:167–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10180.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

89. Misek, J, Belyaev, I, Jakusova, V, Tonhajzerova, I, Barabas, J, Jakus, J. Heart rate variability affected by radiofrequency electromagnetic field in adolescent students. Bioelectromagnetics 2018;39:277–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

90. Wilen, J, Johansson, A, Kalezic, N, Lyskov, E, Sandstrom, M. Psychophysiological tests and provocation subjects with mobile phone related symptoms. Bioelectromagnetics 2006;27:204–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20195.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-09-26
Accepted: 2023-04-17
Published Online: 2023-05-18
Published in Print: 2024-09-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. E-waste in Vietnam: a narrative review of environmental contaminants and potential health risks
  4. Knowledge mapping and research trends of the social determinants of health (SDoH): a scientometric analysis
  5. Hospital wastewater treatment methods and its impact on human health and environments
  6. Associated health risk assessment due to exposure to BTEX compounds in fuel station workers
  7. Associations between fine particulate matter and colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  8. Health effects of air pollutant mixtures (volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, sulfur and nitrogen oxides) – a review of the literature
  9. Status and frontier analysis of indoor PM2.5-related health effects: a bibliometric analysis
  10. Relationship between parental exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and primarily hematopoietic neoplasms (lymphoma, leukemia) and tumors in the central nervous system in children: a systematic review
  11. Blood and hair copper levels in childhood autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies
  12. Cellular and molecular effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields
  13. Benzo (a) pyrene in infant foods: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and health risk assessment
  14. Relationship between exposure to heavy metals on the increased health risk and carcinogenicity of urinary tract (kidney and bladder)
  15. The nexus between economic growth, health expenditure, environmental quality: a comparative study for E7 countries
  16. Potentially toxic elements in the environment – a review of sources, sinks, pathways and mitigation measures
  17. Assessment of medical waste generation rate in Viet Nam
  18. A scoping review of waterborne and water-related disease in the Florida environment from 1999 to 2022
  19. Effects of man-made electromagnetic fields on heart rate variability parameters of general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
  20. Letter to the Editor
  21. Environmental perspectives of monkeypox virus: correspondence
https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2022-0191
Keywords for this article
electromagnetic fields; heart rate variability; meta-analysis

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. E-waste in Vietnam: a narrative review of environmental contaminants and potential health risks
  4. Knowledge mapping and research trends of the social determinants of health (SDoH): a scientometric analysis
  5. Hospital wastewater treatment methods and its impact on human health and environments
  6. Associated health risk assessment due to exposure to BTEX compounds in fuel station workers
  7. Associations between fine particulate matter and colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  8. Health effects of air pollutant mixtures (volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, sulfur and nitrogen oxides) – a review of the literature
  9. Status and frontier analysis of indoor PM2.5-related health effects: a bibliometric analysis
  10. Relationship between parental exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and primarily hematopoietic neoplasms (lymphoma, leukemia) and tumors in the central nervous system in children: a systematic review
  11. Blood and hair copper levels in childhood autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis based on case-control studies
  12. Cellular and molecular effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields
  13. Benzo (a) pyrene in infant foods: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and health risk assessment
  14. Relationship between exposure to heavy metals on the increased health risk and carcinogenicity of urinary tract (kidney and bladder)
  15. The nexus between economic growth, health expenditure, environmental quality: a comparative study for E7 countries
  16. Potentially toxic elements in the environment – a review of sources, sinks, pathways and mitigation measures
  17. Assessment of medical waste generation rate in Viet Nam
  18. A scoping review of waterborne and water-related disease in the Florida environment from 1999 to 2022
  19. Effects of man-made electromagnetic fields on heart rate variability parameters of general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies
  20. Letter to the Editor
  21. Environmental perspectives of monkeypox virus: correspondence
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 22.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2022-0191/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button