Startseite Emerging trends and knowledge domain of research on urban green open spaces and wellbeing: A scientometric review
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Emerging trends and knowledge domain of research on urban green open spaces and wellbeing: A scientometric review

  • Akansha Shrivastava EMAIL logo und Surabhi Mehrotra
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 19. August 2022
Reviews on Environmental Health
Aus der Zeitschrift Reviews on Environmental Health Band 38 Heft 4

Abstract

Green Open Spaces (GOS) and its linkages to human health and wellbeing have received growing attention in the field of urban planning. In spite of increase in number of studies in this field, there is lack of scientometric perspective pertaining to this research domain. The purpose of the study is to map the research status and key research directions in the interdisciplinary domain: Green open spaces, public health and urban planning, using Citespace. Scientometric analysis (co-author, co-citation, co-word and cluster analysis) is conducted for 451 peer reviewed publications, primarily published in last two decades (2000–2021) in the web of science database. The study assessed influential authors, journals and documents to identify the intellectual structure and network of co-authorship and countries to understand research collaborations of this domain. As a result of this review, five emerging research trends in this domain are identified - Emerging data sources, Study areas at various spatial scales, Type of study, Assessment of urban GOS benefits and Urban planning contribution in the research area. In addition, critical review of these trends is conducted to understand corresponding challenges and opportunities. The critical analysis highlighted the need of generating evidence base appropriate for assessing GOS use and user perception, especially in developing nations capturing socio-demographic diversity. The use of Citespace for scientometric analysis facilitated the systematic understanding of this research area by visualizing and analyzing various patterns and trends. This study provides an intensive understanding of present research status and emerging trends of this research domain. Findings in this study are envisioned to provide practitioners, decision makers and researchers with promising future research directions.

Keywords: emerging trends; green open space; scientometrics; SDG goals; urban planning; wellbeing
Corresponding author: Akansha Shrivastava, Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, M.P., India, Phone: +91 834937753, 0755 4051128, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. Dye, C. Health and urban living health and urban living. Science 2008;319:766–9.10.1126/science.1150198Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Asha, A, Manoj Kumar, K. Urban health and wellness in Indian context – a strategic approach in urban design. Procedia Technol 2016;24:1750–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.210.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Cox, DTC, Shanahan, DF, Hudson, HL, Fuller, RA, Gaston, KJ. The impact of urbanisation on nature dose and the implications for human health. Landsc Urban Plann 2018;179:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.07.013.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Frumkin, H, Bratman, GN, Breslow, SJ, Cochran, B, Kahn, PH, Lawler, JJ, et al.. Nature contact and human health: a research agenda. Environ Health Perspect 2017;125:1–18.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Bratman, GN, Hamilton, JP, Daily, GC. The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012;1249:118–36.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Gong, Y, Gallacher, J, Palmer, S, Fone, D. Neighbourhood green space, physical function and participation in physical activities among elderly men: the caerphilly prospective study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ 2014;1–11:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-40.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Markevych, I, Schoierer, J, Hartig, T, Chudnovsky, A, Hystad, P, Dzhambov, AM, et al.. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: theoretical and methodological guidance. Environ Res 2017;158:301–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Douglas, O, Lennon, M, Scott, M. Green space benefits for health and well-being: a life-course approach for urban planning, design and management. Cities 2017;66:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.011.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Mehrotra, S, Subramanian, D, Bardhan, R, Jana, A. Effect of surface treatment and built form on thermal profile of open spaces: a case of Mumbai, India. Urban Climate 2021;35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100736.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Bikomeye, JC, Balza, J, Beyer, KM. The impact of schoolyard greening on children’s physical activity and socioemotional health: a systematic review of experimental studies. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2021;18:1–20.10.3390/ijerph18020535Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Rogers, NT, Waterlow, NR, Brindle, H, Enria, L, Eggo, RM, Lees, S, et al.. Behavioral change towards reduced intensity physical activity is disproportionately prevalent among adults with serious health issues or self-perception of high risk during the UK COVID-19 lockdown. Front Public Health 2020;8:1–12.10.3389/fpubh.2020.575091Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Ugolini, F, Massetti, L, Calaza-Martínez, P, Cariñanos, P, Dobbs, C, Ostoic, SK, et al.. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and perceptions of urban green space: an international exploratory study. Urban For Urban Green 2020;56:126888.10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126888Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Id, MB, Derom, C, Thiery, E, Id, SW. Residential green space and child intelligence and behavior across urban, suburban, and rural areas in Belgium: a longitudinal birth cohort study of twins. PLoS Med 2020;17:1–20.10.1371/journal.pmed.1003213Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Alderton, A, Villanueva, K, O’connor, M, Boulangé, C, Badland, H. Reducing inequities in early childhood mental health: how might the neighborhood built environment help close the gap? A systematic search and critical review. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019;16:1–23.10.3390/ijerph16091516Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Höglhammer, A, Muhar, A, Stokowski, P, Schauppenlehner, T, Eder, R. Factors affecting adolescents’ use of urban public spaces in their leisure time: an exploratory study from the city of Vienna. Local Environ 2018;23:814–29.10.1080/13549839.2018.1477744Suche in Google Scholar

16. Giles-Corti, B, Broomhall, MH, Knuiman, M, Collins, C, Douglas, K, Ng, K, et al.. Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? Am J Prev Med 2005;28(2 Suppl):169–76.10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Kabisch, N, Kraemer, R, Masztalerz, O, Hemmerling, J, Püffel, C, Haase, D. Impact of summer heat on urban park visitation, perceived health and ecosystem service appreciation. Urban For Urban Green 2021;60:127058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127058.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Zandieh, R, Martinez, J, Flacke, J. Older adults’ outdoor walking and inequalities in neighbourhood green spaces characteristics. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019;16:4379.10.3390/ijerph16224379Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Giles-Corti, B, Donovan, RJ. Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. Prev Med (Baltim) 2002;35:601–11.10.1006/pmed.2002.1115Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Freeman, LC. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 1977;40:35–41.10.2307/3033543Suche in Google Scholar

21. Kleinberg, J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Min Knowl Discov 2003;7:373–97.10.1145/775047.775061Suche in Google Scholar

22. Chen, C. CiteSpace: a practical guide for mapping scientific literature [Internet]. Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2016:210 p. Available from: http://cluster.cis.drexel.edu/∼cchen/citespace/books/.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Chaomei, C, Morris, S. Visualizing evolving networks: minimum spanning trees vs. pathfinder networks BT – information visualization, 2003. INFOVIS 2003. In: IEEE symposium on proceedings of the ninth annual IEEE conference information visualization [Internet]. Seattle, Washington, USA; 2003, vol. 2003:67–74 pp. Available from: http://cluster.ischool.drexel.edu/∼cchen/papers/2003/2003InfoVis.pdf.10.1109/INFVIS.2003.1249010Suche in Google Scholar

24. Hooper, P, Boruff, B, Beesley, B, Badland, H, Giles-Corti, B. Testing spatial measures of public open space planning standards with walking and physical activity health outcomes: findings from the Australian national liveability study. Landsc Urban Plann 2018;171:57–67.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

25. Giles-Corti, B, Bull, F, Knuiman, M, McCormack, G, Van Niel, K, Timperio, A, et al.. The influence of urban design on neighbourhood walking following residential relocation: longitudinal results from the RESIDE study. Soc Sci Med 2013;77:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.016.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Remme, RP, Frumkin, H, Guerry, AD, King, AC, Mandle, L, Sarabu, C, et al.. An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2021;118:1–10.10.1073/pnas.2018472118Suche in Google Scholar

27. Peschardt, KK, Schipperijn, J, Stigsdotter, UK. Use of small public urban green spaces (SPUGS). Urban For Urban Green 2012;11:235–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Schipperijn, J, Ekholm, O, Stigsdotter, UK, Toftager, M, Bentsen, P, Kamper-Jørgensen, F, et al.. Factors influencing the use of green space: results from a Danish national representative survey. Landsc Urban Plann 2010;95:130–7.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.010Suche in Google Scholar

29. Small, H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1973;24:265–9.10.1002/asi.4630240406Suche in Google Scholar

30. Chen, C, Dubin, R, Schultz, T. Science mapping. Encyclopedia of information science and technology, 3rd ed. Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global; 2014:4171–84 pp.10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch410Suche in Google Scholar

31. Carve, M, Allinson, G, Nugegoda, D, Shimeta, J. Trends in environmental and toxicity research on organic ultraviolet filters: a scientometric review. Sci Total Environ 2021;773:145628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145628.Suche in Google Scholar

32. Bayer, AE, Smart, JC, McLaughlin, GW. Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1990;41:444–52.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<444::AID-ASI12>3.0.CO;2-JSuche in Google Scholar

33. Leydesdorff, L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2007;58:1303–19.10.1002/asi.20614Suche in Google Scholar

34. Chen, C, Ibekwe-SanJuan, F, Hou, J. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: a multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 2010;61:1386–409.10.1002/asi.21309Suche in Google Scholar

35. Saelens, BE, Handy, SL. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:550–66.10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c67a4Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Hartig, T, Mitchell, R, De Vries, S, Frumkin, H. Nature and health. Annu Rev Publ Health 2014;35:207–28.10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Bowler, DE, Buyung-Ali, L, Knight, TM, Pullin, AS. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: a systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landsc Urban Plann 2010;97:147–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Maas, J, Verheij, RA, Groenewegen, PP, De Vries, S, Spreeuwenberg, P. Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:587–92.10.1136/jech.2005.043125Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Wolch, JR, Byrne, J, Newell, JP. Landscape and urban planning urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landsc Urban Plann 2014;125:234–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Mitchell, R, Popham, F. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. Lancet 2008;372:1655–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Chiesura, A. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc Urban Plann 2004;68:129–38.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.003Suche in Google Scholar

42. Kaplan, R, Kaplan, S. The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. New York, Port Chester, Melbourne, Sydney: Cambridge University Press; 1989.Suche in Google Scholar

43. Tzoulas, K, Korpela, K, Venn, S, Yli-Pelkonen, V. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plann 2007;81:167–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001.Suche in Google Scholar

44. Bowler, DE, Buyung-Ali, LM, Knight, TM, Pullin, AS. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Publ Health 2010;10:456. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-456.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

45. Model, AC. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health – a conceptual model. Am J Prev Med 2005;28:159–68.10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Gascon, M, Triguero-Mas, M, Martínez, D, Dadvand, P. Residential green spaces and mortality: a systematic review. Environ Int 2016;86:60–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.013.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Fuller, RA, Irvine, KN, Devine-Wright, P, Warren, PH, Gaston, KJ, Fuller, RA, et al.. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 2007;3:390–4. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Rock, M, Mccormack, GR, Rock, M, Toohey, AM, Hignell, D. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: a review of qualitative research. Health Place 2010;16:712–26.10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

49. Xu, H, Li, Y, Tan, Y, Deng, N. A scientometric review of urban disaster resilience research. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2021;18:3677.10.3390/ijerph18073677Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

50. Chen, C, Zhang, J, Vogeley, MS. Visual analysis of scientific discoveries and knowledge diffusion. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI 2009). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2009, vol. 2875:874–85 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

51. Zhong, B, Wu, H, Li, H, Sepasgozar, S, Luo, H, He, L. A scientometric analysis and critical review of construction related ontology research. Autom Constr 2019;101:17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.013.Suche in Google Scholar

52. Donahue, ML, Keeler, BL, Wood, SA, Fisher, DM, Hamstead, ZA, McPhearson, T. Using social media to understand drivers of urban park visitation in the Twin Cities, MN. Landsc Urban Plann 2018;175:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.006.Suche in Google Scholar

53. Dumitru, A, Frantzeskaki, N, Collier, M. Identifying principles for the design of robust impact evaluation frameworks for nature-based solutions in cities. Environ Sci Pol 2020;112:107–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.024.Suche in Google Scholar

54. Ives, CD, Oke, C, Hehir, A, Gordon, A, Wang, Y, Bekessy, SA. Capturing residents’ values for urban green space: mapping, analysis and guidance for practice. Landsc Urban Plann 2017;161:32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.010.Suche in Google Scholar

55. Delclòs-Alió, X, Vich, G, Miralles-Guasch, C. The relationship between Mediterranean built environment and outdoor physical activity: evidence from GPS and accelerometer data among young adults in Barcelona. Landsc Res 2020;45:520–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2019.1702937.Suche in Google Scholar

56. Lee, HJ, Lee, DK. Do sociodemographic factors and urban green space affect mental health outcomes among the urban elderly population? Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019;16:789.10.3390/ijerph16050789Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

57. Rey Gozalo, G, Barrigón Morillas, JM, Montes González, D, Atanasio Moraga, P. Relationships among satisfaction, noise perception, and use of urban green spaces. Sci Total Environ 2018;624:438–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.148.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

58. Lavin Fueyo, J, Totaro Garcia, LM, Mamondi, V, Pereira Alencar, G, Florindo, AA, Berra, S. Neighborhood and family perceived environments associated with children’s physical activity and body mass index. Prev Med (Baltim) 2016;82:35–41.10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

59. Lu, Y, Sarkar, C, Xiao, Y. The effect of street-level greenery on walking behavior: evidence from Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med 2018;208:41–9.10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.022Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

60. Grow, HM, Saelens, BE, Kerr, J, Durant, NH, Norman, GJ, Sallis, JF. Where are youth active? Roles of proximity, active transport, and built environment. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:2071–9.10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181817baaSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

61. Chen, T, Lang, W, Li, X. Exploring the impact of urban green space on residents’ health in Guangzhou, China. J Urban Plann Dev 2020;146:05019022.10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000541Suche in Google Scholar

62. Sallis, JF, Spoon, C, Cavill, N, Engelberg, JK, Gebel, K, Parker, M, et al.. Co-benefits of designing communities for active living: an exploration of literature. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ 2015;12:30.10.1186/s12966-015-0188-2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

63. Matsuoka, RH, Kaplan, R. People needs in the urban landscape: analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landsc Urban Plann 2008;84:7–19.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009Suche in Google Scholar

64. Binns, HJ, Forman, JA, Karr, CJ, Osterhoudt, K, Paulson, JA, Roberts, JR, et al.. The built environment: designing communities to promote physical activity in children. Pediatrics 2009;123:1591–8.10.1542/peds.2009-0750Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

65. Standish, RJ, Hobbs, RJ, Miller, JR. Improving city life: options for ecological restoration in urban landscapes and how these might influence interactions between people and nature. Landsc Ecol 2013;28:1213–21.10.1007/s10980-012-9752-1Suche in Google Scholar

66. Pett, TJ, Shwartz, A, Irvine, KN, Dallimer, M, Davies, ZG. Unpacking the people-biodiversity paradox: a conceptual framework. Bioscience 2016;66:576–83.10.1093/biosci/biw036Suche in Google Scholar

67. Poggio, L, Vrščaj, B. A GIS-based human health risk assessment for urban green space planning – an example from Grugliasco (Italy). Sci Total Environ 2009;407:5961–70.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

68. Barbosa, O, Tratalos, JA, Armsworth, PR, Davies, RG, Fuller, RA, Johnson, P, et al.. Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landsc Urban Plann 2007;83:187–95.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.004Suche in Google Scholar

69. Groenewegen, PP, Van Den Berg, AE, De Vries, S, Verheij, RA. Vitamin G: effects of green space on health, well-being, and social safety. BMC Publ Health 2006;6:149.10.1186/1471-2458-6-149Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

70. He, S, Wu, Y, Wang, L. Characterizing horizontal and vertical perspectives of spatial equity for various urban green spaces: a case study of Wuhan, China. Front Public Health 2020;8:1–11.10.3389/fpubh.2020.00010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

71. Vandermeulen, V, Verspecht, A, Vermeire, B, Van Huylenbroeck, G, Gellynck, X. The use of economic valuation to create public support for green infrastructure investments in urban areas. Landsc Urban Plann 2011;103:198–206.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.010Suche in Google Scholar

72. Li, Z, Wei, H, Wu, Y, Su, S, Wang, W, Qu, C. Impact of community deprivation on urban park access over time: understanding the relative role of contributors for urban planning. Habitat Int 2019;92:102031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102031.Suche in Google Scholar

73. Tannous, HO, Major, MD, Furlan, R. Accessibility of green spaces in a metropolitan network using space syntax to objectively evaluate the spatial locations of parks and promenades in Doha, State of Qatar. Urban For Urban Green 2021;58:126892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126892.Suche in Google Scholar

74. Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, A, Czepkiewicz, M, Kronenberg, J. Eliciting non-monetary values of formal and informal urban green spaces using public participation GIS. Landsc Urban Plann 2017;160:85–95.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.12.012Suche in Google Scholar

75. Brown, G, Rhodes, J, Dade, M. An evaluation of participatory mapping methods to assess urban park benefits. Landsc Urban Plann 2018;178:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.018.Suche in Google Scholar

76. Brown, G, Schebella, MF, Weber, D. Using participatory GIS to measure physical activity and urban park benefits. Landsc Urban Plann 2014;121:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.006.Suche in Google Scholar

77. Donahue, ML, Keeler, BL, Wood, SA, Fisher, DM, Hamstead, ZA, McPhearson, T. Using social media to understand drivers of urban park visitation in the Twin Cities, MN. Landsc Urban Plann 2018;175:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.006.Suche in Google Scholar

78. Liang, H, Zhang, Q. Temporal and spatial assessment of urban park visits from multiple social media data sets: a case study of Shanghai, China. J Clean Prod 2021;297:126682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126682.Suche in Google Scholar

79. Qin, B, Zhu, W, Wang, J, Peng, Y. Understanding the relationship between neighbourhood green space and mental wellbeing: a case study of Beijing, China. Cities 2021;109:103039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103039.Suche in Google Scholar

80. McEwan, K, Ferguson, FJ, Richardson, M, Cameron, R. The good things in urban nature: a thematic framework for optimising urban planning for nature connectedness. Landsc Urban Plann 2020;194:103687.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103687Suche in Google Scholar

81. Järv, O, Tenkanen, H, Toivonen, T. Enhancing spatial accuracy of mobile phone data using multi-temporal dasymetric interpolation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 2017;31:1630–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2017.1287369.Suche in Google Scholar

82. Wang, Z, Jin, Y, Liu, Y, Li, D, Zhang, B. Comparing social media data and survey data in assessing the attractiveness of Beijing Olympic Forest Park. Sustainability 2018;10:1–18.10.3390/su10020382Suche in Google Scholar

83. Ghermandi, A, Sinclair, M. Passive crowdsourcing of social media in environmental research: a systematic map. Global Environ Change 2019;55:36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.003.Suche in Google Scholar

84. Wang, Z, Zhu, Z, Xu, M, Qureshi, S. Fine-grained assessment of greenspace satisfaction at regional scale using content analysis of social media and machine learning. Sci Total Environ 2021;776:145908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145908.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

85. Frumkin, H, Bratman, GN, Breslow, SJ, Cochran, B, Kahn, PH, Lawler, JJ, et al.. Nature contact and human health: a research agenda. Environ Health Perspect 2017;125:075001.10.1289/EHP1663Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

86. Yu, S, Zhu, X, He, Q. An assessment of urban park access using house-level data in urban China: through the lens of social equity. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020;17:1–19.10.3390/ijerph17072349Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

87. Łaszkiewicz, E, Kronenberg, J, Marcińczak, S. Microscale socioeconomic inequalities in green space availability in relation to residential segregation: the case study of Lodz, Poland. Cities 2021;111:103085.10.1016/j.cities.2020.103085Suche in Google Scholar

88. Maurer, M, Zaval, L, Orlove, B, Moraga, V, Culligan, P. More than nature: linkages between well-being and greenspace influenced by a combination of elements of nature and non-nature in a New York City urban park. Urban For Urban Green 2021;61:127081.10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127081Suche in Google Scholar

89. Orii, L, Alonso, L, Larson, K. Methodology for establishing well-being urban indicators at the district level to be used on the cityscope platform. Sustainability 2020;12:1–25.10.3390/su12229458Suche in Google Scholar

90. Coombes, MG, Dixon, JS, Goddard, JB, Openshaw, S, Taylor, PJ. Daily urban systems in Britain: from theory to practice. Environ Plann A Econ Space 1979;11:565–74.10.1068/a110565Suche in Google Scholar

91. Koohsari, MJ, Mavoa, S, Villianueva, K, Sugiyama, T, Badland, H, Kaczynski, AT, et al.. Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: concepts, methods and research agenda. Health Place 2015;33:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.009.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

92. Weimann, H, Björk, J, Håkansson, C. Experiences of the urban green local environment as a factor for well-being among adults: an exploratory qualitative study in southern Sweden. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2019;16:2464.10.3390/ijerph16142464Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

93. Boulton, C, Dedekorkut-Howes, A, Byrne, J. Factors shaping urban greenspace provision: a systematic review of the literature. Landsc Urban Plann 2018;178:82–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.029.Suche in Google Scholar

94. Soga, M, Yamanoi, T, Tsuchiya, K, Koyanagi, TF, Kanai, T. What are the drivers of and barriers to children’s direct experiences of nature? Landsc Urban Plann 2018;180:114–20.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.015Suche in Google Scholar

95. Frantzeskaki, N. Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities. Environ Sci Pol 2019;93:101–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033.Suche in Google Scholar

96. Calogiuri, G, Chroni, S. The impact of the natural environment on the promotion of active living: an integrative systematic review. BMC Publ Health 2014;14:873.10.1186/1471-2458-14-873Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

97. Campagnaro, T, Vecchiato, D, Arnberger, A, Celegato, R, Da Re, R, Rizzetto, R, et al.. General, stress relief and perceived safety preferences for green spaces in the historic city of Padua (Italy). Urban For Urban Green 2020;52:126695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126695.Suche in Google Scholar

98. Dean, J, van Dooren, K, Weinstein, P. Does biodiversity improve mental health in urban settings? Med Hypotheses 2011;76:877–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2011.02.040.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

99. Fathi, S, Sajadzadeh, H, Sheshkal, FM, Aram, F, Pinter, G, Felde, I, et al.. The role of urban morphology design on enhancing physical activity and public health. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020;17:1–29.10.20944/preprints202003.0421.v1Suche in Google Scholar

100. Cleary, A, Fielding, KS, Bell, SL, Murray, Z, Roiko, A. Exploring potential mechanisms involved in the relationship between eudaimonic wellbeing and nature connection. Landsc Urban Plann 2017;158:119–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.003.Suche in Google Scholar

101. Kingsley, J, Foenander, E, Bailey, A. “It’s about community”: exploring social capital in community gardens across Melbourne, Australia. Urban For Urban Green 2020;49:126640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126640.Suche in Google Scholar

102. Petrovic, N, Simpson, T, Orlove, B, Dowd-Uribe, B. Environmental and social dimensions of community gardens in East Harlem. Landsc Urban Plann 2019;183:36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.009.Suche in Google Scholar

103. Lai, D, Lian, Z, Liu, W, Guo, C, Liu, W, Liu, K, et al.. A comprehensive review of thermal comfort studies in urban open spaces. Sci Total Environ 2020;742:140092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140092.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

104. Du, M, Zhang, X. Urban greening: a new paradox of economic or social sustainability? Land Use Pol 2020;92:104487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104487.Suche in Google Scholar

105. Contesse, M, Van Vliet, BJM, Lenhart, J. Is urban agriculture urban green space? A comparison of policy arrangements for urban green space and urban agriculture in Santiago de Chile. Land Use Pol 2017;71:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.006.Suche in Google Scholar

106. Žlender, V, Gemin, S. Testing urban dwellers’ sense of place towards leisure and recreational peri-urban green open spaces in two European cities. Cities 2020;98:102579.10.1016/j.cities.2019.102579Suche in Google Scholar

107. Chalmin-Pui, LS, Griffiths, A, Roe, J, Heaton, T, Cameron, R. Why garden? – attitudes and the perceived health benefits of home gardening. Cities 2021;112:103118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103118.Suche in Google Scholar

108. Säumel, I, Hogrefe, J, Battisti, L, Wachtel, T, Larcher, F. The healthy green living room at one’s doorstep? Use and perception of residential greenery in Berlin, Germany. Urban For Urban Green 2021;58:126949.10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126949Suche in Google Scholar

109. Guyot, M, Araldi, A, Fusco, G, Thomas, I. The urban form of Brussels from the street perspective: the role of vegetation in the definition of the urban fabric. Landsc Urban Plann 2021;205:103947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103947.Suche in Google Scholar

110. Chalmin-Pui, LS, Roe, J, Griffiths, A, Smyth, N, Heaton, T, Clayden, A, et al.. “It made me feel brighter in myself”- the health and well-being impacts of a residential front garden horticultural intervention. Landsc Urban Plann 2021;205:103958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103958.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

111. Zhang, Y, Mavoa, S, Zhao, J, Raphael, D, Smith, M. The association between green space and adolescents mental well-being: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2020;17:1–26.10.3390/ijerph17186640Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

112. Ugolini, F, Massetti, L, Pearlmutter, D, Sanesi, G. Usage of urban green space and related feelings of deprivation during the COVID-19 lockdown: lessons learned from an Italian case study. Land Use Pol 2021;105:105437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105437.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

113. Haaland, C, van den Bosch, CK. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: a review. Urban For Urban Green 2015;14:760–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009.Suche in Google Scholar

114. Anguluri, R, Narayanan, P. Role of green space in urban planning: outlook towards smart cities. Urban For Urban Green 2017;25:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.04.007.Suche in Google Scholar

115. Carmichael, L, Townshend, TG, Fischer, TB, Lock, K, Petrokofsky, C, Sheppard, A, et al.. Land use policy urban planning as an enabler of urban health: challenges and good practice in England following the 2012 planning and public health reforms. Land Use Pol 2019;84:154–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.043.Suche in Google Scholar

116. Yigitcanlar, T, Kamruzzaman, M, Teimouri, R, Degirmenci, K, Alanjagh, F. Association between park visits and mental health in a developing country context: the case of Tabriz, Iran. Landsc Urban Plann 2020;199:103805.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103805Suche in Google Scholar

117. Jim, CY. Sustainable urban greening strategies for compact cities in developing and developed economies. Urban Ecosyst 2013;16:741–61.10.1007/s11252-012-0268-xSuche in Google Scholar

118. Wang, Q, Lan, Z. Park green spaces, public health and social inequalities: understanding the interrelationships for policy implications. Land Use Pol 2019;83:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.026.Suche in Google Scholar

119. Coppel, G, Wüstemann, H. The impact of urban green space on health in Berlin, Germany: empirical findings and implications for urban planning. Landsc Urban Plann 2017;167:410–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.015.Suche in Google Scholar

120. Soga, M, Akasaka, M. Multiple landscape-management and social-policy approaches are essential to mitigate the extinction of experience. Landsc Urban Plann 2019;191:103634.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103634Suche in Google Scholar

Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2022-0091).

Received: 2022-06-06
Accepted: 2022-07-24
Published Online: 2022-08-19
Published in Print: 2023-12-15

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. A meta-analysis of the risk of salivary gland tumors associated with mobile phone use: the importance of correct exposure assessment
  4. An investigation into the present levels of contamination in children’s toys and jewelry in different countries: a systematic review
  5. Analysis of physiological markers and risk factors for the development of rhabdomyolysis in military personnel: a systematic review
  6. Cell proliferation assay for determination of estrogenic components in food: a systematic review
  7. Investigation ways of causes needle sticks injuries, risk factors affecting on health and ways to preventive
  8. The impact of nature-led recovery initiatives for individual and community health post disaster: a systematic literature review
  9. Acrylamide; a neurotoxin in popcorns: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  10. Havana syndrome: a scoping review of the existing literature
  11. Emerging trends and knowledge domain of research on urban green open spaces and wellbeing: A scientometric review
  12. A critical review on global CO2 emission: where do industries stand?
  13. Global systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and concentration of aflatoxins in peanuts oil and probabilistic risk assessment
  14. Noise exposure and the risk of cancer: a comprehensive systematic review
  15. An updated systematic review on the maternal exposure to environmental pesticides and involved mechanisms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) progression risk in children
  16. Exploring the links between indoor air pollutants and health outcomes in South Asian countries: a systematic review
  17. Letter to the Editor
  18. The influence of Maslow’s hammer. Response to: electromagnetic hypersensitivity close to mobile phone base stations – a case study in Stockholm, Sweden
https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2022-0091
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
emerging trends; green open space; scientometrics; SDG goals; urban planning; wellbeing

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. A meta-analysis of the risk of salivary gland tumors associated with mobile phone use: the importance of correct exposure assessment
  4. An investigation into the present levels of contamination in children’s toys and jewelry in different countries: a systematic review
  5. Analysis of physiological markers and risk factors for the development of rhabdomyolysis in military personnel: a systematic review
  6. Cell proliferation assay for determination of estrogenic components in food: a systematic review
  7. Investigation ways of causes needle sticks injuries, risk factors affecting on health and ways to preventive
  8. The impact of nature-led recovery initiatives for individual and community health post disaster: a systematic literature review
  9. Acrylamide; a neurotoxin in popcorns: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  10. Havana syndrome: a scoping review of the existing literature
  11. Emerging trends and knowledge domain of research on urban green open spaces and wellbeing: A scientometric review
  12. A critical review on global CO2 emission: where do industries stand?
  13. Global systematic review and meta-analysis on prevalence and concentration of aflatoxins in peanuts oil and probabilistic risk assessment
  14. Noise exposure and the risk of cancer: a comprehensive systematic review
  15. An updated systematic review on the maternal exposure to environmental pesticides and involved mechanisms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) progression risk in children
  16. Exploring the links between indoor air pollutants and health outcomes in South Asian countries: a systematic review
  17. Letter to the Editor
  18. The influence of Maslow’s hammer. Response to: electromagnetic hypersensitivity close to mobile phone base stations – a case study in Stockholm, Sweden
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 1.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2022-0091/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen