Home Investigating the field effectiveness of respirators against metal particle exposure in various workplaces: a systematic review
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Investigating the field effectiveness of respirators against metal particle exposure in various workplaces: a systematic review

  • Ata Rafiee ORCID logo , Imranul Laskar ORCID logo and Bernadette Quémerais ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 17, 2021

Abstract

Welders are exposed to high levels of metal fumes, which could be resulting in various health impairments. Respirators became a practical protective option in workplaces, as they are lightweight and easy to use. This systematic review attempts to explore the field effectiveness of using respirators to reduce metal particle exposure in workplaces. We reviewed papers published from 1900 to April 2019 in five major bibliographic databases, including Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL, along with organizational websites to cover gray literature. In total, 983 references were identified from the databases, out of which, 520 duplicates were removed from the EndNote database. The remaining 463 references were screened for their title and abstract. Out of 463, 70 references went through the full-text screening. Finally, eight papers, including 19 workplace respirator studies, satisfied all the inclusion criteria and were reviewed in this report. The geometric means for metal levels in workers’ breathing zone with and without respirators were 9.4 and 1,777 µg/m3 for iron, 1.1 and 139 µg/m3 for lead, 2.1 and 242 µg/m3 for zinc, and 27 and 1,398 µg/m3 for manganese oxide, respectively. Most reviewed studies reported significant differences between measured metal particle levels among workers who worn respirators and who did not. In addition, results showed that N95 provided significantly less protection than elastomeric half facepieces, full-face respirators, and powered air-purifying respirators (p<0.001). More field studies are recommended to investigate Workplace Protection Factor (WPF) and fit factor (FF) of different respirators to understand the actual protection levels that they could be provided to control welding fume exposure among welders in various workplaces.


Corresponding author: Bernadette Quémerais, Associate Professor, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, Phone: +1 780 492 3240, E-mail:

Funding source: Alberta Innovates

Award Identifier / Grant number: 201800031

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dan Curts from 3M company for his constructive comments on the manuscript.

  1. Research funding: This study was financially supported by 3M and Alberta Economic, Development, Trade and Tourism through Alberta Innovates with grant no. 201800031.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Hoffmeyer, F, Raulf-Heimsoth, M, Lehnert, M, Kendzia, B, Bernard, S, Berresheim, H, et al.. Impact of different welding techniques on biological effect markers in exhaled breath condensate of 58 mild steel welders. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 2012;75:525–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2012.675303.Search in Google Scholar

2. Zhang, M, Jian, L, Bin, P, Xing, M, Lou, J, Cong, L, et al.. Workplace exposure to nanoparticles from gas metal arc welding process. J Nanopart Res 2013;15:2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-2016-4.Search in Google Scholar

3. Cate, DM, Nanthasurasak, P, Riwkulkajorn, P, L’Orange, C, Henry, CS, Volckens, J. Rapid detection of transition metals in welding fumes using paper-based analytical devices. Ann Occup Hyg 2014;58:413–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/met078.Search in Google Scholar

4. Flynn, MR, Susi, P. Local exhaust ventilation for the control of welding fumes in the construction industry—a literature review. Ann Occup Hyg 2012;56:764–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes018.Search in Google Scholar

5. Liu, H, Wu, Y, Chen, H-L. Production of ozone and reactive oxygen species after welding. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2007;53:513–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-007-0030-1.Search in Google Scholar

6. Buonanno, G, Morawska, L, Stabile, L. Exposure to welding particles in automotive plants. J Aerosol Sci 2011;42:295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

7. Zimmer, AT, Baron, PA, Biswas, P. The influence of operating parameters on number-weighted aerosol size distribution generated from a gas metal arc welding process. J Aerosol Sci 2002;33:519–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-8502(01)00189-6.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kendzia, B, Koppisch, D, Van Gelder, R, Gabriel, S, Zschiesche, W, Behrens, T, et al.. Modelling of exposure to respirable and inhalable welding fumes at German workplaces. J Occup Environ Hyg 2019;16:400–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2019.1566734.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Mino, J, Landon, D, Quemerais, B, editors. Characterization of similar exposure groups in a structural steel fabrication shop. Glasgow, Scotland; 2016. OH2016.Search in Google Scholar

10. Honaryar, MK, Lunn, RM, Luce, D, Ahrens, W, Hansen, J, Bouaoun, L, et al.. Welding fumes and lung cancer: a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Occup Environ Med 2019;76:422–31. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2018-105447.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Mahmood, Q, Wang, J, Pervez, A, Meryem, SS, Waseem, M, Ullah, Z. Health risk assessment and oxidative stress in workers exposed to welding fumes. Toxicol Environ Chem 2015;97:634–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2015.1059639.Search in Google Scholar

12. Chung, K, Scott, R. Particle-size analysis of welding fume. J Aerosol Sci 1997;2:339. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-8502(97)86855-3.Search in Google Scholar

13. Chen, H-L, Chung, S-H, Jhuo, M-L. Efficiency of different respiratory protective devices for removal of particulate and gaseous reactive oxygen species from welding fumes. Arch Environ Occup Health 2013;68:101–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2011.650799.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Cena, LG, Chisholm, WP, Keane, MJ, Cumpston, A, Chen, BT. Size distribution and estimated respiratory deposition of total chromium, hexavalent chromium, manganese, and nickel in gas metal arc welding fume aerosols. Aerosol Sci Technol 2014;48:1254–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.980883.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Chuang, K-J, Pan, C-H, Su, C-L, Lai, C-H, Lin, W-Y, Ma, C-M, et al.. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is associated with heavy metal exposure in welding workers. Sci Rep 2015;5:18048. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18048.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Becker, N, Claude, J, Frentzel-Beyme, R. Cancer risk of arc welders exposed to fumes containing chromium and nickel. Scand J Work Environ Health 1985:75–82. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2242.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Hobson, A, Seixas, N, Sterling, D, Racette, BA. Estimation of particulate mass and manganese exposure levels among welders. Ann Occup Hyg 2011;55:113–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meq069.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Ntlailane, MGL, Wichmann, J. Effectiveness of N95 respirators for nanoparticle exposure control (2000–2016): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nanopart Res 2019;21:170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4596-0.Search in Google Scholar

19. Hedmer, M, Karlsson, J-E, Andersson, U, Jacobsson, H, Nielsen, J, Tinnerberg, H. Exposure to respirable dust and manganese and prevalence of airways symptoms, among Swedish mild steel welders in the manufacturing industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2014;87:623–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0896-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Cetintepe, S, Iritas, S, Gunduzoz, M, Alaguney, M, Wilson, D, Bal, C, et al.. Relation between lung dysfunction and blood cadmium and lead levels among welders. Expos Health 2019;11:13–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-017-0262-x.Search in Google Scholar

21. Beach, JR, Dennis, JH, Avery, AJ, Bromly, CL, Ward, RJ, Walters, EH, et al.. An epidemiologic investigation of asthma in welders. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:1394–400. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.154.5.8912754.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Korczynski, R. Occupational health concerns in the welding industry. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2000;15:936–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/104732200750051175.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Gordon, T, Fine, J. Metal fume fever. Occup Med (Philadelphia, Pa) 1993;8:504–17.Search in Google Scholar

24. Baker, MG, Criswell, SR, Racette, BA, Simpson, CD, Sheppard, L, Checkoway, H, et al.. Neurological outcomes associated with low-level manganese exposure in an inception cohort of asymptomatic welding trainees. Scand J Work Environ Health 2015;41:94. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3466.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Wastensson, G, Sallsten, G, Bast-Pettersen, R, Barregard, L. Neuromotor function in ship welders after cessation of manganese exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2012;85:703–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0716-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Clinger, JC, O’Shaughnessy, PT. Breakthrough analysis for filtering facepiece respirators impregnated with activated carbon. J Occup Environ Hyg 2019;16:423–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2019.1594838.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Sivapirakasam, S, Mohan, S, Kumar, MS, Surianarayanan, M. Welding fume reduction by nano-alumina coating on electrodes–towards green welding process. J Clean Prod 2015;108:131–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.132.Search in Google Scholar

28. Pires, I, Quintino, L, Miranda, R. Analysis of the influence of shielding gas mixtures on the gas metal arc welding metal transfer modes and fume formation rate. Mater Des 2007;28:1623–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.02.012.Search in Google Scholar

29. Han, D-H, Willeke, K, Colton, CE. Quantitative fit testing techniques and regulations for tight-fitting respirators: current methods measuring aerosol or air leakage, and new developments. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1997;58:219–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119791012874.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Assigned protection factors for the revised respiratory protection standard. U.S. Department of Labor; 2009:1–51 pp.Search in Google Scholar

31. Gobba, F, Ghittori, S, Imbriani, M, Cavalleri, A. Evaluation of half-mask respirator protection in styrene-exposed workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2000;73:56–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00007938.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Coffey, CC, Lawrence, RB, Zhuang, Z, Campbell, DL, Jensen, PA, Myers, WR. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2002;17:723–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473220290107002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Tanaka, S, Tanaka, M, Kimura, K, Nozaki, K, Seki, Y. Fitness of a gas mask for the face of a worker handling organic solvents. Ind Health 1997;35:294–7. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.35.294.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Faridi, S, Nodehi, RN, Sadeghian, S, Tajdini, M, Hoseini, M, Yunesian, M, et al.. Can respirator face masks in a developing country reduce exposure to ambient particulate matter? J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2020:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0222-6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Morgan, RL, Thayer, KA, Bero, L, Bruce, N, Falck-Ytter, Y, Ghersi, D, et al.. GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health. Environ Int 2016;92:611–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Myers, WR, Zhuang, Z, Nelson, T. Field performance measurements of half-facepiece respirators—foundry operations. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1996;57:166–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119691015106.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Han, DH. Correlations between workplace protection factors and fit factors for filtering facepieces in the welding workplace. Ind Health 2002;40:328–34. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.40.328.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Han, BC, Liu, IJ, Chuang, HC, Pan, CH, Chuang, KJ. Effect of welding fume on heart rate variability among workers with respirators in a shipyard. Sci Rep 2016;6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34158.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

39. Lehnert, M, Weiss, T, Pesch, B, Lotz, A, Zilch-Schöneweis, S, Heinze, E, et al.. Reduction in welding fume and metal exposure of stainless steel welders: an example from the WELDOX study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2014;87:483–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0884-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Zhuang, ZQ, Coffey, CC, Jensen, PA, Campbell, DL, Lawrence, RB, Myers, WR. Correlation between quantitative fit factors and workplace protection factors measured in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry. AIHA J 2003;64:730–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428110308984867.Search in Google Scholar

41. Lenhart, SW, Campbell, DL. Assigned protection factors for two respirator types based upon workplace performance testing. Ann Occup Hyg 1984;28:173–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/28.2.173.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Myers, WR, Zhuang, ZQ. Field performance measurements of half-facepiece respirators: steel mill operations. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1998;59:789–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119891010974.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Wallis, G, Menke, R, Chelton, C. Workplace filed testing of a disposable negative-pressure half-mask dust respirators (3M-8710). Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1993;54:576–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298669391355080.Search in Google Scholar

44. Lehnert, M, Hoffmeyer, F, Gawrych, K, Lotz, A, Heinze, E, Berresheim, H, et al.. Effects of exposure to welding fume on lung function: results from the German WELDOX study. Berlin: Springer; 2014:1–13 pp.10.1007/5584_2014_65Search in Google Scholar PubMed

45. Lehnert, M, Pesch, B, Lotz, A, Pelzer, J, Kendzia, B, Gawrych, K, et al.. Exposure to inhalable, respirable, and ultrafine particles in welding fume. Ann Occup Hyg 2012;56:557–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

46. Hinds, WC, Kraske, G. Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: I. Experimental. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1987;48:836–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668791385679.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

47. Foereland, S, Robertsen, O, Hegseth, MN. Do various respirator models fit the workers in the Norwegian smelting industry?. Saf Health Work 2019;10:370–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.06.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

48. Stobbe, TJ, daRoza, RA, Watkins, MA. Facial hair and respirator fit: a review of the literature. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1988;49:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668891379594.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2021-01-11
Accepted: 2021-04-21
Published Online: 2021-05-17
Published in Print: 2022-06-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Mini Reviews
  3. Unani medicinal herbs as potential air disinfectants: an evidence-based review
  4. Safety assessment of natural products in Malaysia: current practices, challenges, and new strategies
  5. Environmental and occupational health on the Navajo Nation: a scoping review
  6. Review Articles
  7. Understanding Holism in the light of principle underlying practice of Unani Medicine
  8. Investigating the field effectiveness of respirators against metal particle exposure in various workplaces: a systematic review
  9. To which extent are per-and poly-fluorinated substances associated to metabolic syndrome?
  10. Reactive nitrogen compounds and their influence on human health: an overview
  11. Millimeter (MM) wave and microwave frequency radiation produce deeply penetrating effects: the biology and the physics
  12. Air pollution increases the risk of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis
  13. Housing and health in vulnerable social groups: an overview and bibliometric analysis
  14. Environmental arsenic exposure and its toxicological effect on thyroid function: a systematic review
  15. Letters to the Editor
  16. Comments on Martin Pall, “Millimeter (MM) wave and microwave frequency radiation produce deeply penetrating effects: the biology and the physics”, Rev Environ Health 2021;37:247–58.
  17. Comments on Pall’s “Millimeter (MM) wave and microwave frequency radiation produce deeply penetrating effects: the biology and the physics”
  18. ‘Proof of EHS beyond all reasonable doubt’. Comment on: Leszczynski D. Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS). Rev Environ Health 2021; https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2021-0038. Online ahead of print
  19. Why scientifically unfounded and misleading claim should be dismissed to make true research progress in the acknowledgment of electrohypersensibility as a new worldwide emerging pathology
  20. Comments on the article by Dariusz Leszczynski: Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS). Rev Environ Health 2021
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2020-0174/html
Scroll to top button