Home Exposure of children to phthalates and the impact of consumer practices in Slovakia
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Exposure of children to phthalates and the impact of consumer practices in Slovakia

  • Miroslava Šidlovská EMAIL logo , Ida Petrovičová , Branislav Kolena , Tomáš Pilka , Eva Šovčíková and Tomáš Trnovec
Published/Copyright: February 23, 2017

Abstract

Phthalates are environmental pollutants that can enter the human body by ingestion, inhalation and dermal absorption. Food constitutes the most important source of human exposure to these chemicals. The aim of our study was the biological monitoring of exposure to eight phthalate metabolites in children (n=107), 10–12 years of age, living in eastern Slovakia. Additionally, we analysed some associations between anthropometric measures, questionnaire data (i.e. eating and drinking habits, practice of personal care products) and concentrations of phthalate metabolites. Because of the short half-life of phthalates, within 24–48 h, we used 24-h recalls to assess dietary intakes. We used high-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry for the analysis of spot urine samples to determine concentrations of phthalate metabolites mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP), mono-n-butyl phthalate, mono-iso-butyl phthalate, mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP), mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate (5OH-MEHP), mono(2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate (5oxo-MEHP), mono-carboxy pentyl and mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP). We found statistically significant association between consumer practices and concentration of some phthalate metabolites, concretely consumption of milk and dairy products with MBzP and margarine with MEP (p<0.01 in both cases) and margarine with 5oxo-MEHP, hot beverages with 5OH-MEHP, baguettes and semifinished products with MEP (p<0.05 in all cases). Further, we found relationship between use of cosmetic products and phthalate concentrations, nail polish application and MEP and use of body lotion and MEHP (p<0.05 in both cases). We concluded that consumer practices (including eating and drinking habits and personal care) represent the substantial source of phthalate exposure in Slovak children.

  1. Author Statement

  2. Research funding: This study was supported by project APVV-0571-12 and project UGA VIII/28/2016. The authors thank Michaela Földesiova for her excellent technical assistance. Conflict of interest statement: The authors state no conflict of interest. Informed consent: Participation was voluntary and there was a possibility to withdraw participation at any time during the study. The legal representatives of all children gave written informed consent before the study to provide samples of urine, to complete questionnaires and to allow the researchers to take measurements and also to process their personal records and data. Ethical approval: The research related to human use complied with all the relevant national regulations and institutional policies and was performed in accordance to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study received an approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Slovak Medical University.

References

1. Silva MJ, Samandar E, Preau JL, Reidy JA, Needham LL, et al. Quantification of 22 phthalate metabolites in human urine. J Chrom B 2007;860:106–12.10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.10.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Meeker JD. Exposure to environmental endocrine disruptors and child development. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012;166(6):1–12.10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.241Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Calafat AM, Weuve J, Ye X, Jia LT, Hu H, et al. Exposure to bisphenol A and other phenols in neonatal intensive care unit premature infants. Environ Health Perspect 2009;117(4):639–44.10.1289/ehp.0800265Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Koch H, Calafat AM. Human body burdens of chemicals used in plastic manufacture. Phil Trans Biol Sci 2009;364:2063–78.10.1098/rstb.2008.0208Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Beko G, Weschler CH, Langer S, Callesen M, Toftum J, et al. Children’s phthalate intakes and resultant cumulative exposures estimated from urine compared with estimates from dust ingestion, inhalation and dermal absorption in their homes and daycare centers. PLoS One 2013;8(4):1–18.10.1371/journal.pone.0062442Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Bertelsen RJ, Carlsen KC, Calafat AM, Hoppin JA, Haland G, et al. Urinary biomarkers for phthalates associated with asthma in Norwegian children. Environ Health Perspect 2013;121(2):251–6.10.1289/ehp.1205256Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Meeker JD, Sathyanarayana S, Swan SH. Phthalates and other additives in plastics: human exposure and associated health outcomes. Phil Trans Biol Sci 2009;364:2097–112.10.1098/rstb.2008.0268Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Hanzalíková M. Phthalates- exposure, toxicology and occurrence in fruit and vegetables: review. Ministry of environment and regional development of Slovak Republic 2010. Available at: http://www.mpsr.sk/sk/index.php?navID=525&navID2=525&sID=111&id=4034.Search in Google Scholar

9. Adibi JJ, Whyatt RM, Williams PL, Calafat AM, Camann D, et al. Characterization of phthalate exposure among pregnant women assessed by repeat air and urine samples. Environ Health Perspect 2008;116(4):467–73.10.1289/ehp.10749Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Pilka T, Petrovicova I, Kolena B, Zatko T, Trnovec T. Relationship between variation of seasonal temperature and extent of occupational exposure to phthalates. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2015;22:434–40.10.1007/s11356-014-3385-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Shen Q, Shi H, Zhang Y, Cao Y. Dietary intake and phthalates body burden in boys and girls. Arch Publ Health 2015;73(5):1–5.10.1186/2049-3258-73-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Larsson K, Björklund KL, Palm B, Wannberg M, Kaj L, et al. Exposure determinants of phthalates, parabens, bisphenol A and triclosan in Swedish mothers and their children. Environ Int 2014;73:323–33.10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Serrano SE, Braun J, Trasande L, Dills R, Sathyanarayana S. Phthalates and diet: a review of the food monitoring and epidemiology data. Environ Health 2014;13(43):1–14.Search in Google Scholar

14. Rudel RA, Gray JM, Engel CL, Rawstorne TW, Dodson RE, et al. Food packaging and bisphenol A and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate exposure: findings from a dietary intervention. Environ Health Perspect 2011;119(7):914–20.10.1289/ehp.1003170Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Sakhi AK, Lillegaard ITL, Voorspoels S, Carlsen MH, Loken EB, et al. Concentrations of phthalates and bisphenol A in Norwegian foods and beverages and estimated dietary exposure in adults. Environ Int 2014;73:259–69.10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Moreira MA, André LC, Cardeal ZL. Analysis of phthalate migration to food simulants in plastic containers during microwave operations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11:507–26.10.3390/ijerph110100507Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Buckley JP, Palmieri RT, Matuszewski JM, Herring AH, Baird DD, et al. Consumer product exposures associated with urinary phthalate levels in pregnant women. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2012;22(5):468–75.10.1038/jes.2012.33Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Philippat C, Bennet D, Calafat AM, Picciotto IH. Exposure to select phthalates and phenols through use of personal care products among Californian adults and their children. Environ Res 2015;140:369–76.10.1016/j.envres.2015.04.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Berman T, Hochner-Celnikier D, Calafat AM, Needham LL, Amitai Y, et al. Phthalate exposure among pregnant women in Jerusalem, Israel: results of pilot study. Environ Int 2009;35:353–7.10.1016/j.envint.2008.08.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Just AC, Adibi JJ, Rundle AG, Calafat AM, Camann DE, et al. Urinary and air phthalate concentrations and self-reported use of personal care products among minority pregnant women in New York City. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2010;20(7):625–33.10.1038/jes.2010.13Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Parlett LE, Calafat AM, Swan SH. Women’s exposure to phthalates in relation to use of personal care products. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2013;23(2):197–206.10.1038/jes.2012.105Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Kopelovich L, Perez AL, Jacobs N, Mendelsohn E. Screening-level human health risk assessment of toluene and dibutyl phthalate in nail lacquers. Food Chem Toxicol 2015;81:46–53.10.1016/j.fct.2015.04.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-7-22
Accepted: 2017-1-12
Published Online: 2017-2-23
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Environmental challenges in Central and Eastern Europe
  4. Mini Reviews
  5. The CEECHE: a practical approach for reducing exposures and disease outcomes in Central and Eastern Europe
  6. Perinatal health in the Danube region – new birth cohort justified
  7. Building multi-country collaboration on watershed management: lessons on linking environment and public health from the Western Balkans
  8. An open-sourced statistical application for identifying complex toxicological interactions of environmental pollutants
  9. Air exchange rates and alternative vapor entry pathways to inform vapor intrusion exposure risk assessments
  10. Review Articles
  11. Sustainable exposure prevention through innovative detection and remediation technologies from the NIEHS Superfund Research Program
  12. Future of environmental research in the age of epigenomics and exposomics
  13. Linking childhood allergic asthma phenotypes with endotype through integrated systems biology: current evidence and research needs
  14. Impact of nutrition on pollutant toxicity: an update with new insights into epigenetic regulation
  15. Environmental PAH exposure and male idiopathic infertility: a review on early life exposures and adult diagnosis
  16. The association of peripubertal serum concentrations of organochlorine chemicals and blood lead with growth and pubertal development in a longitudinal cohort of boys: a review of published results from the Russian Children’s Study
  17. Epigenomic reprogramming in inorganic arsenic-mediated gene expression patterns during carcinogenesis
  18. Emerging roles of xenobiotic detoxification enzymes in metabolic diseases
  19. Recent advances on iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles as sorbents of organic pollutants in water and wastewater treatment
  20. Review of heavy metal accumulation on aquatic environment in Northern East Mediterrenean Sea part I: some essential metals
  21. Original Articles
  22. Sensemaking, stakeholder discord, and long-term risk communication at a US Superfund site
  23. Valuing environmental health for informed policy-making
  24. How serious are health impacts in one of the most polluted regions of Central Europe?
  25. The results of interconnection of the evidence of professional exposure to genotoxic factors (regex) and cancer registry in the Czech Republic
  26. The impact of selected environmental, behavioral and psychosocial factors on schoolchildren’s somatic and mental health
  27. Markers of lipid oxidative damage among office workers exposed intermittently to air pollutants including nanoTiO2 particles
  28. Determinants of ETS exposure in a sample of Slovak pregnant women
  29. Respiratory toxicity of Fe3O4 nanoparticles: experimental study
  30. Exposure of children to phthalates and the impact of consumer practices in Slovakia
  31. Metal contamination in environmental media in residential areas around Romanian mining sites
Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2016-0028/html
Scroll to top button