Home Radiochromic liquid dosimeter based on p-arsanilic acid for gamma radiation monitoring
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Radiochromic liquid dosimeter based on p-arsanilic acid for gamma radiation monitoring

  • El-Saeid R. El-Shawadfy , Hoda A. Farroh and Sameh M. Gafar ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 1, 2025

Abstract

Organoarsenic can be applied to feed to improve feed efficiency or as a radiation dosimeter, as presented in this study. A developed radiochromic solution and powder based on p-arsanilic acid (P-ASA) was evaluated at various concentrations. Using a UV–vis Spectrophotometer, EPR analysis were operated, the spectrophotometric characteristics of P-ASA aqueous solutions that were both unirradiated and gamma-irradiated were evaluated. For applications involving moderate dose dosimetry, two absorption peak intensities were observed at λmax 300 nm and 361 nm following gamma ray exposure within the range of up to 4.5 kGy. The results indicate that P-ASA solutions exhibit good dosimetric properties and can be considered as a dosimeter.


Corresponding author: Sameh M. Gafar, Radiation Protection and Dosimetry Department, National Center for Radiation Research and Technology, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt, E-mail:

Funding source: The National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT) of the Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA)

Acknowledgments

The National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT) of the Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA), located in Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt, provided financial assistance for this research in the field of fundamental radiation technology applications.

  1. Research ethics: All the authors have read and approved this version of the article, due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work and the work described has not been published previously. No part of this article has been published or submitted elsewhere.

  2. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  3. Author contributions: The study’s idea and design involve all of the authors. Moreover, material preparation, data collection, and analysis were done by S.R.El-Shawadfy, H. A. Farroh and S.M. Gafar. They wrote a draft of the text. Comments were made on all manuscript revisions regarding software, visualization, computations, peer review, and editing. All authors have read and approved the final draft.

  4. Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.

  5. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

  6. Research funding: This work was supported by The National Center for Radiation Research and Technology (NCRRT) of the Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority (EAEA).

  7. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. ISO/ASTM 51707. Standard Guide for Estimating of Measurement Uncertainties in Dosimetry for Radiation Processing. In Annual Book of ASTM Standards; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

2. IAEA. “Gamma Irradiators for Radiation Processing, A Booklet of International Atomic Energy Agency” Printed by the Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology; Warazawa: Polanda, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

3. IMRAP, Transactions of the 10th International Meeting on Radiation Processing. Amhein, California. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1994, 52, 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

4. Sudha, A.; Maity, T. K.; Sharma, S. L.; Gupta, A. N. Gamma Irradiation Effect on the Optical Properties of Tellurium Dioxide Films. Nuclear Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. B 2019, 461, 171–174; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2019.09.050.Search in Google Scholar

5. Gafar, S. M.; El-Ahdal, M. A. A New Developed Radiochromic Film for High-Dose Dosimetry Applications. Dye. Pigment. 2015, 114, 273–277; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.11.021.Search in Google Scholar

6. El-Kelany, M. A.; Gafar, S. M.; El-Ahdal, M. A. Development of Ion Exchange Membrane for Possible Use in Radiation Processing Dosimetry. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 303 (3), 2345–2351.10.1007/s10967-014-3804-8Search in Google Scholar

7. El-Kelany, M.; Gafar, S. M. Preparation of Radiation Monitoring Labels to γ Ray. Optik. 2016, 127, 6746–6753; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.05.001.Search in Google Scholar

8. Gafar, S. M.; El-Kelany, M. A.; El-Shawadfy, S. R. Spectrophotometric Properties of Azo Dye Metal Complex and its Possible Use as Radiation Dosimeter. J. Radiat. Res. Appli. Sci. 2018, 11, 190–194; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2018.01.004.Search in Google Scholar

9. Sobhy, A.; Faheem, E.; Gafar, S.M. Dosimetric Studies and Chemical Kinetics of Resazurin Dye and its Possible Use as Radiation Dosimeter. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2019, 319, 101–107; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6294-2.E.Search in Google Scholar

10. Gafar, S. M.; El-Ahdal, M. A. Radiochromic Fuchsine-Gel and its Possible Use for Low Dosimetry Applications. Polym. Technol. 2016, 35, 146–151; https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.21538.Search in Google Scholar

11. Gafar, S. M.; El-Kelany, M. A.; El-Ahdal, M. A.; El-Shawadfy, S. R. Toluidine Blue O-Gelatin Gel Dosimeter for Radiation Processing. J. Polym. Chem. 2014, 4, 56–61; https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpchem.2014.43007.Search in Google Scholar

12. Gafar, S. M.; El-Kelany, M. A. Radiation Induced Free-Radicals for EPR Dosimetry Applications. Silic 2018, 10, 2671–2675; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-018-9804-5.Search in Google Scholar

13. Karakirova, Y.; Yordanova, V. Optimizing the Size of Cylindrical Sucrose Solid State/EPR Dosimeters for Ionizing Radiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 184, 109469; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109469.Search in Google Scholar

14. Bekhit, M.; Sobhy, A.; Ali, Z.; Gafar, S.M. Efficient Monitoring of Dosimetric Behaviour for Copper Nanoparticles through Studying its Optical Properties. Radiochim. Acta 2019, 107 (6), 523–529; https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2018-3010.Search in Google Scholar

15. Rabaeh, Kh. A.; Aljammal, S. A.; Eyadeh, M. M.; Abumurad, Kh. M. Methyl Thymol Blue Solution and Film Dosimeter for High Dose Measurements. Result. Phys. 2021, 23, 103980; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2021.103980.Search in Google Scholar

16. Li, Y. Y.; Dong, X.; Gao, J. S.; Hei, D. Q.; Zhou, X. C.; Zhang, H. Q. A Highly Sensitive G-Radiation Dosimeter Based on the CeO2 Nanowires. Physica E 2009, 41, 1550–1553; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2009.04.036.Search in Google Scholar

17. Beshir, W. B.; Eid, S.; Gafar, S. M.; Ebraheem, S. Application of Solutions of Rhodamine B in Dosimetry. Appl. Radiat. Isotop. 2014, 89, 13–17; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.11.030.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Chu, L.; Yu, S.; Wang, J. Gamma Radiolytic Degradation of Naphthalene in Aqueous Solution. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2016, 123, 97–102; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.02.029.Search in Google Scholar

19. Baccaro, S.; Bal, O.; Cemmi, A.; Sarcina, I. D. The Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Rice Protein Aqueous Solution. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 146, 1–4; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

20. Yao, T.; Luthjens, L. H.; Gasparini, A.; Warman, J. M. A Study of Four Radiochromic Films Currently Used for (2D) Radiation Dosimetry. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2017, 133, 37–44; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.12.006.Search in Google Scholar

21. Basfar, A. A.; Rabaeh, Kh. A.; Moussa, A. A.; Msalam, R. I. Dosimetry Characterization of 1,2,3 Nitro-Blue Tetrazolium Polyvinyl Butyral Films for Radiation Processing. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2011, 80, 763–766; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

22. Shengnan, C.; Jing, D.; Cheng, Ye.; Chengcheng, Xu.; Lingyi, H.; Xiao, L.; Jun, Li.; Xueyan, Li Degradation of P-Arsanilic Acid by Pre-magnetized Fe0/persulfate System: Kinetics, Mechanism, Degradation Pathways and DBPs Formation during Subsequent Chlorination. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 410, 128435–128442; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.128435.Search in Google Scholar

23. Biming, L.; Zhenxue, L.; Haixia, Wu.; Shunlong, P.; Xing, C.; Yongjun, S.; Yanhua, Xu Effective and Simultaneous Removal of Organic/inorganic Arsenic Using Polymer-Based Hydrated Iron Oxide Adsorbent: Capacity Evaluation and Mechanism. Sci. Total. Env. 2020, 742, 140508–1405014; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140508.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Suqi, Li.; Jing, Xu.; Wei, C.; Yingtan, Yu.; Zizheng, L.; Jinjun, Li.; Feng, Wu Multiple Ransformation Pathways of P-Arsanilic Acid to Inorganic Arsenic Species in Water during UV Disinfection. J. Env. Sci. 2016, 47, 39–48.10.1016/j.jes.2016.01.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Zhu, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Qin, W. X.; Zhou, D. M. Kinetics, Intermediates and Acute Toxicity of Arsanilic Acid Photolysis. Chemosph 2014, 107, 274–281; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.060.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Xu, J.; Zhang, H.; Luo, T.; Liu, Z.; Xia, J.; Zhang, X. Photo-transformation of Parsanilic Acid in Aqueous Media Containing Nitrogen Species. Chemosph 2018, 212, 777–783; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.104.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Xu, J.; Shen, X.; Wang, D.; Zhao, C.; Liu, Z.; Pozdnyakov, I.P.; Wu, F.; Xi, J. Kineticsand Mechanisms of pH-dependent Direct Photolysis of P-Arsanilic Acid under UV-C Light. Chem. Eng. 2018, 336, 334–341; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.037.Search in Google Scholar

28. Yuliya, E.; Tyutereva, P. S.; Sherin, M. V.; Parkhats, Z. L.; Feng, Wu.; Victor, F.; Plyusnin, I. P. P.; Pozdnyakov, I. P. New Insights into Mechanism of Direct UV Photolysis of P-Arsanilic Acid. Chemosph 2019, 220, 574–581; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.179.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Jing, Xu.; Yi, Wu.; Mengling, Ma.; Tao, L.; Jun, X.; Xiang, Z. A Novel Transformation Pathway of P-Arsanilic Acid in Water by Colloid Ferric Hydroxide under UVA Light. Enviro. Sci. Polut. Reas. 2022, 29, 5043–5051; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15975-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Gafar, S. M.; El-Ahdal, M. A.; El-Shawadfy, S. R. Variation in Dose Response of Three Dosimetry Systems Based on Diphenyl Thiocarbazone. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2022, 331, 3391–3399; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-022-08392-0.Search in Google Scholar

31. El-Kader, N. M.; Gafar, S. M. Effect of Gamma Radiation on a Natural Pigment and its Possible Use as a Label Dosimeter. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2022, 331 (1), 461–467; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-08120-0.Search in Google Scholar

32. Joana, K. B.; Daniel, U.; Elizabeth, V. H.; Tobias, T.; Marleen, D.; Ulla, K.; Simone, S. Novel Liquid Dosimeters for Low-Energyelectron Beamirradiation Inlowand Mediumdose Ranges. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2024, 222, 111781; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111781.Search in Google Scholar

33. McLaughlin, W. L.; Desrosiers, M. F. Dosimetry Systems for Radiation Processing. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1995, 46 (4/6), 163–174; https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-806x(95)00349-3.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-10-07
Accepted: 2024-12-09
Published Online: 2025-01-01
Published in Print: 2025-03-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ract-2024-0359/html
Scroll to top button